[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ][Options][ watchlist ]

/x/ - Paranormal

Oh shit! What was that?
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Email
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): 6b04e1f1d485302⋯.jpg (27.32 KB, 300x260, 15:13, s69_34875.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.35114>>35120 >>35132 >>35155 >>35321 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

was the moon landing faked?

I was listening to a podcast with one person who thinks it was fake and one person who thinks it was real.

what was interesting to me was they agreed that:

* there was training photos edited into fake moon landing photos

* there was a faked transit photo where you could see out the window and it was hawaii

* the video or maybe just pics of yuri gagarin's journey into space were faked

do you know anything about these? was this much really faked

 No.35120

>>35114 (OP)

Link to the podcast? Sounds interesting.


 No.35121

There is a lot of evidence that we got to the moon at some point. Landing sites have been photographed by different parties. That doesn't mean apollo 11 necessarily landed on the moon. They had the technology, had the rocket, but couldn't afford failure. Especially after such a huge expenditure in the midst of vietnam and massive civil unrest. It would have made more sense to fake it. Even if they launched a real mission simultaneously so long as it didn't blow up on the launchpad they could claim success.

As for pics being faked. Most everything nasa puts out is faked in some way. It is how they communicate with the public. Whether staged shots, digitally manipulated images, false color, rendered images sewn together from countless other pictures. Ostensibly because a real image would be hard to get, wouldn't illustrate the point, or would be boring. Maybe they are hiding things maybe not. There are a lot of arguments either way, about the moon landings as well as just about everything since then, but no one seriously disputes that nasa fakes a lot of what they release publicly.


 No.35132

>>35114 (OP)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56rCyrrdhFE

If you don't wanna watch this full video start at 53 mins.

Its about glass structures hanging in the atmosphere on the moon…


 No.35153

We should be able to have vacations on the moon, if we were actually there. It's been so long.


 No.35155>>35158

>>35114 (OP)

The whole moon mission was first and foremost propaganda. Did they go there? Yes, you can test it yourself (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment). Did they have a plan B in case everything went up in flames? You bet. Otherwise the propaganda would have backfired. Plan B was faking everything beforehand so they can damage control.

Btw, there is solid evidence that Gagarin wasn't the first man in space. Some other dude went but came back dead because of insufficient radiation shielding. Ofc this was swept under the rug because it was all propaganda and you can't have your hero die.


 No.35158>>35159

>>35155

Are you stupid or what? Do you believe everything you read? It's impossible to bounce a laser beam off the moon, it's too far away for the beam to remain focused.


 No.35159

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.35321

>>35114 (OP)

We went to the moon but the footage is fake.


 No.35322

The moon is a spaceship. The real question is, who built it and who placed it where it is now?


 No.35360

It was most likely faked, but we have been on the moon without footage.


 No.37198>>37199

Can anyone here explain this?

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-11.html

http://apollo.sese.asu.edu/

im actually a skeptic, but i don't really know a good way to debunk things like this to normal people. i mean, i dont trust nasa and evidence is only as good as those who produce it, and even though this was technically not found by nasa, the fact that they picked it up so fast (and were unable to do it on their own) says alot about them.

even if this was legit, this still doesn't prove people landed there.


 No.37199

>>37198

I'm sorry but I don't understand what you're trying to say. Explain what? What did NASA find?


 No.37215

Moon landings are happening all the time, it's a busy place. But if you're asking whether or not the Cold War Era moon landing footage was faked, then yes it is.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
13 replies | 2 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ][ watchlist ]