/x/ - Paranormal★

>Anonymecca xd

Fuck of they can't hack shit, they couldn't hack a windows 98 machine right in front of them if they tried.

>>33232

Yeah, they are just a bunch of CIA niggers. but why even say this is going to happen? And has anonymous ever been wrong?

>>33233

>has anonymous ever been wrong?

Holy fucking shit do you have to ask this?

Get out.

>>33234

No examples to give huh? Problem is anyone can claim to be a part of them anyways. Plenty of times they have been been right though. More times than I can remember being outright wrong. Lynch, Podesta and others are going to congress next week. Could be misinformation tactic. Would be a fucking bold move though for a distraction.

>>33235

>No examples to give

If you can't remember any off the top of your head you're a normal fag.

This is a fishy story, considering the distance from earth and the limitations of the tools used.

If NASA is going to announce alien life, it'll be some boring micro-organism or bacteria on Mars. They're not going to tell you about the alien bases on the Moon (or here on Earth for that matter). NASA doesn't even have the authority to make that announcement, we're talking about stuff that not even the President or the CIA director are allowed to know about. The people who know about UFOs are basically a super-secret society that answer to no-one, and they probably take orders directly from the aliens themselves. The idea that a public agency like NASA could make such an announcement is extremely silly.

>>33260

This.

Even if anonymouse was right, it won't be the big reveal that people would think it would be.

And the only time there would be a big reveal, the pieces would already be in place to control the populace. It would, from their perspective, already be too late to do anything about the aliens if their intentions are malevolent.

>>33231 (OP)

go away and never post here again

>>33260

>>33266

I agree and furthermore what do these secret societies get out of their deal with the aliens (Reptilians)? Control? Power? A place in the Reptilian Parliament?

Honestly, the heads of the secret societies think themselves above the rest of us humans and their kings, but the irony is that these "leaders" are the king of slaves.

Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

>>33388

They have a false belief that they will be able to overcome those beings (who are mostly malevolent) by being trickier or just because humans are a very powerful psychic species.

The thing is humans are the most powerful psychic beings while aligned with the will of the universe. If a human were aligned with negative and destructive principles then they're nothing more than low man on the totem pole. Especially these weak fools sitting on the tippy top of observable society. They can't even fight their urges to diddle little kids. They're misguided and power hungry weaklings.

>>33405

Spiritual feats require faith, in the same way science requires abandonment of faith. I don't need to prove anything to you, the documents and methods exist, and have existed for a hell of a lot longer than 8ch or even the internet. You can choose to investigate those methods and come to your own conclusions, or you can disregard an opportunity to earnestly study the world around and within you.

Also I never claimed any superhuman feats. Psychic and etheric manipulation exist and aren't super anything. (Ex. Random number generators set to run all over the world all spike hours before natural disasters and world stage events)

Orr in a more relative example. There's a skeptic professor dedicated to disproving paranormal phenomena. If he is on campus even unbeknownst to the other researchers…the tests invariably fail. If he's not on campus the tests do not fail. Doubt (a state of mind) can and will effect a mental or mentally linked phenomena.

Any sufficiently advanced piece of technology would be indistinguishable from magic. Also they've no reason to hide the information. I didn't even bring up any actual claims or processes and you lit me up. The people will handle censorship on their own. They've programmed us to disregard an entire field of study bc "das faaaake"

But continue your study into the material world, its just as endless and amazing as the non material one.

>>33396

If aliens were malevolent, they'd have killed us all thousands of years ago. The fact that they let us live, neither helping us or destroying us, means that they're neutral.

>The thing is humans are the most powerful psychic beings while aligned with the will of the universe. If a human were aligned with negative and destructive principles then they're nothing more than low man on the totem pole.

I'm not sure where you got this information. How is the universe supposed to have a will, exactly? And destruction is just the other side of creation, you can't have one without the other.

>>33406

Actually I have investigated psychic abilities and from what I've read, faith has nothing to do with them. They're skills like any other. The Indian texts make it clear that one can obtain supernatural powers without being very advanced spiritually, but just as a result of doing certain exercises for a long period of time. If things like levitation, invisibility, etc are real, there's probably a physical explanation for them, which has nothing to do with spirituality.

>>33406

I've looked for existing methods but the only documented one was the remote viewing CIA document. Otherwise I assume such documents would be hard to find, since 8ch to me appears to be one of the only places sensitive information (I.E. Jews) can exist without removal. Even then it's rough.

>>33409

This. Plus, common folk confuse spirituality with energy work.

>>33416

>>33410

>>33409

You confuse faith with spirituality.

Faith happens literally every single day all the time. You have faith that the sun will rise. Faith that water will quench your thirst. Faith that your legs will continue to carry you as you walk. Faith that the rules of nature will apply exactly as yesterday.

Someone can follow those practices all they want but if they do not have faith the practice will work then it won't. Our faith in various principles is what makes our experience of them possible.

If anyone can do it that simply why arent rich yoga practicing soccer moms all activating and having profound visions…why aren't fit chads all shooting fireballs? Faith. That's why. They believe those principles will give them health and vitality (which they do) but they're usually not interested or aware of the other potential uses and effects. unless they directly experience something unexplainable and have to search within they won't ever delve into that part because they don't know it exists or they simply do not have faith in the possibility.

Pyschic phenomena doesn't require you to be "spiritually" advanced but you do have to have the ability to place faith in yourself.

>>33424

Faith is belief in something that can't be proven rationally. Expecting the sun to rise again isn't a matter of faith.

>Someone can follow those practices all they want but if they do not have faith the practice will work then it won't. Our faith in various principles is what makes our experience of them possible.

The world doesn't work like that. If you lift weights, you'll grow muscles, whether you believe you will or not. If you practice meditation, you'll experience a number of health benefits, even if you are a sceptic. The placebo effect helps but it doesn't produce miracles.

>If anyone can do it that simply why arent rich yoga practicing soccer moms all activating and having profound visions…why aren't fit chads all shooting fireballs?

There are differents kinds of yoga, some of which are only good for improving physical health, while others are supposed to help with spiritual advancement. Soccer moms probably practice a dumbed down version of the former. I'm not sure what being fit has to do with shooting fireballs. I've never seen or heard a magician or guru claiming that he can do that.

>>33431

Faith- n. Complete confidence or trust in someone or something.

Got nothin' to do with rational or irrational. Scientifically supported or not. You either trust the details you are aware of or you trust another person who trusted those details in the first place. (You are not the sun you cannot know with 100% certainty that it will rise tomorrow…unless you are the sun. In which case, pleasure to share discourse)

You're right yoga practices vary immensely with different schools and levels of study. However all roads lead to the same place eventually when you're slowing your mind to near zero. And where all yoga roads lead is the dissolution of false self (or negation of ways you present yourself that are not true in this moment) .

If it were simply "just do it" with absolutely no conviction that it'll do anything then a lot more people practicing would discover the truth of their study and wouldn't just stop at a taste.

Being fit is absolutely something that increases your psychic faculties. Test it if you don't believe me. Superior respiration, blood flow, and endurance all help a system that relies on oxygen, blood, and sustained burning of energy.

You've never seen or experienced anything like fireballs or tk because you're here arguing the definition of faith instead of suspending your disbelief and trusting in the possibility.

I'm saying this.

You are the only reliable antenna you know of in this universe. Period. Unless you experience it personally, its all conjecture and "maybe" or "probably" or "this person had this to say" I've witnessed tk. I've actively effected my reality solely on my faith alone. I know this to be a principle that exists at least in the realities of myself and seven other people.

I'm not saying that assuming previous frameworks is wrong or incorrect (its v useful a lot of times so society can exist) …but to use that thought form all the time doesn't lead you to understanding anything. Only regurgitating what happened in the past. Test your doubt. Be open to the possibility and have faith that the outcome is possible, follow it through and if you fail then that doesn't mean your neighbor will.

But you'll choose what you want to believe anyway and that's the beauty of material existence, its just illusory enough that you can…in fact your encouraged to do so.

>>33444

Faith implies that you believe something based on someone's authority or your personal beliefs instead of objective evidence. I won't even respond to any of your other points until you admit that you're wrong about this.

>>33447

No. It doesn't. It may…however I've clearly defined which definition I'm using. (being the first listed by most references it's the most common and accepted use)

Use a dictionary. I did. Word for word transcription.

Or maybe trusting a book is too much faith for you.

Who or what told you what faith meant? Did you invent the word? What all knowing source do you obtain your "facts" about language from if not yourself or a compilation of minds putting their knowledge to paper?

Maybe faith >>>implies<<< that to you but that's not universal and I've already cleared and explained in detail my use of the word.

If you can't wrap your mind around that and move onto more important >>>implications<<< about our discussion then I've no reason to concede shit guy. Way to ignore the forest for a tree.

most of anonymous is paid shills or feds, to me they're controlled opposition. they used to have cred but they're digging their own graves. hope they like the taste of worms.

>>33449

I guess you're just playing dumb now. I'll just ignore you.

>>33701

They never had 'cred', Anonymous was a joke from the start and many people blamed them for ruining 4chan. And yeah, some of them are probably undercover feds.