[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]

/x/ - Paranormal

Oh shit! What was that?
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 2573ad5ca26992a⋯.jpg (74.16 KB, 669x749, 669:749, 1495648307766.jpg)

 No.32591

>Earth spins perfectly to the gravitational force

>a faster rotation would be counterproductive to gravity

>Moon influence the rotation of earth, slowing it down to a perfect spin

>the moon also has almost the perfect size to the sun with consideration of the distance

>moon has no spinn at all even so the earth body is five times bigger than moon itself, approximately 27% the size of the Earth.

>earth curvature appears at 10,600 metres, lets be fair and say 11,000 metres

>divided through 5: moons curvature: ca. 2200 metres

>look up any moon landing videos or satelite images, no easy to spot curvature at all.

 No.32629

File: d4c42854698ef46⋯.png (475.99 KB, 669x377, 669:377, normal camera field of vie….png)

the curvature is math based, the earth is an infinitesimal plane. Go-pros have a fish eye lense because normal camera lenses only see this


 No.32651

>>32629

are you raterded? How fucked up must one be to not see the distortion of the boat because of the fish eye?

go kill yourself


 No.32658

If earth is spinning and the moon isn't then why isn't it "spinning" from our perspective?


 No.32660

If the Earth is flat then why do ships go down over the horizon?

>>32658

>I either am not aware that the Moon orbits the Earth or have no understanding of such concepts


 No.32678

Kill yourself tbqh


 No.32679

test


 No.32697

>>32660

It's an optical illusion. The same reason cars "disappear" over the horizon, even though they're nowhere near the 12 miles that it supposedly takes to make something go down. It's a mirage.


 No.32698

>>32591

the earth would be incredibly small if it curved that much in the first pic. nobody is claiming that. in order to see the curvature of the earth, you have to be higher than that. The earth is big.

why are the seasons opposite in the southern hemisphere?

why dont you have to travel in a big circle to stay on the same line of lattitude if the earth is flat?

why can you track the ISS with a telescope as it travels around the earth?

whats on the other side of the earth?

how big is the sun and how far away is it so that is doesnt melt the "ice wall"? This would be impossible even by flat earth models.

do other planets not have gravity either?

Part of my job in the navy is to use a computer to track satalites in space. Is it just a big expensive lying toy worth millions of dollars or am I just a shill and im lying myself? Ive crossed the equator and it was another season down there. Am I just lying?

>muh fish eye lens muthafucka

its profoundly sad this is a thing people believe.


 No.32706

File: c1f0e533a3d0d64⋯.webm (1.55 MB, 720x576, 5:4, FE - ISS shower.webm)

>>32591

all the NASA shits can be easily debunked.

When you are done with it, all you are left with is the flat earth, the Truth.


 No.32711

>>32706

Or just that NASA is fake and the earth is still a globe.


 No.32715

>>32697

No. Cars disappear over a hill in the exact same way they disappear over the horizon. If you don't believe me, get out your telescope and make some measurements. This leads us to believe the horizon is a hill, which it most certainly is. And as you get higher up, you can see further beyond the hill. The horizon is exactly eye level for us. And if the horizon in every direction and at every location is a hill, there is no shape other than a sphere that the Earth could be. You can also go outside at the right time and watch the ISS pass over you in space, and see it again in 90 minutes. Have you ever traveled? You can travel from any location on the Earth, in any direction, for any distance. If that's the case then the "Flat Earth" must be connected to itself at every end to its respective opposite, and if that's the case, IT'S A FUCKING SPHERE!


 No.32722

File: 1c98eb83da3d1d3⋯.webm (747.84 KB, 720x576, 5:4, FE - Oman Sun setting.webm)

>>32711

Once you debunked all their shit and realize they have been faking all their space missions for decades, your next move will be to find and see the curvature to prove to yourself that indeed you have been living on a space ball since your birthday.

That's when you will learn about atmospheric lensing.

That's when your illusions will forever get destroyed.


 No.32723

File: 6277492b4759fbd⋯.webm (1.46 MB, 720x576, 5:4, fakespacewalks.webm)

>>32715

> If that's the case then the "Flat Earth" must be connected to itself

Lookup a "disc", it's round and you can circumnavigate it!

Good luck, genius.


 No.32728

>>32723

You can only circumnavigate a disc in one direction. On Earth you can circumnavigate no matter what direction. And what is an infinite number of discs in an infinite number of orientations, all the same size and all sharing the same center? A FUCKING SPHERE YOU RETARD!


 No.32730

File: 0ab2ffb63cc2ca7⋯.webm (1.16 MB, 720x576, 5:4, FE - scubatank in space.webm)

All spacewalks are made in a pool.


 No.32737

>>32722

>that video

So I'm supposed to believe all NASA does is smoke and mirror while this incredibly easy to reproduce phenomenon has never been observed by me or anyone else? Any person who ever visited a desert and watched the sunset would tell the tale of a shrinking sun.

>atmospheric lensing

Sure, atmospheric lensing causes seasons too I guess.


 No.32809

>>32728

have you ever flown across antartica then, smart guy?

do you know anyone who has?

so where is your circumnavigation now?


 No.32810

File: a679d45a4a9379f⋯.png (339.79 KB, 565x326, 565:326, What the fuck.png)

Flat Earth bullshit is just part of a government psy-op in order to make the common man associate retarded outlandish bullshit with legit government conspiracies.

>>32723

>>32730

>He doesn't know it is common knowledge that astronauts train in pools


 No.32863

>>32810

Basic bitch baby's first opinion


 No.32874

>>32863

>a fact's truthfulness is linearly proportional to its obscurity and edginess

/x/ in a nutshell


 No.32894

>>32863

Flat earth itself is basic bitch shitty conspiracy crap, much like denying the moon landing. It doesn't change the fact what is really happening here.


 No.32897

>>32809

So are you implying that the Earth is round everywhere except the poles, since you didn't refute the logic of my statement? Just because nobody has flown across one of the poles even though there have been many ventures to them, you are going to assume that there's some big secret there?


 No.32988

File: 118d842fad24847⋯.jpg (84.3 KB, 612x612, 1:1, 532369.jpg)

>>32894

>Flat earth itself is much like denying the moon landing

Whoa there.. da heck you get that conclusion retard..?


 No.33020

File: ab3a6809a40d9ce⋯.jpg (14.71 KB, 550x309, 550:309, 1497326472190.jpg)

File: dc3b32de4db5658⋯.jpg (36.78 KB, 503x275, 503:275, 1497325708236.jpg)

Can Flatheads explain these two images?

Probably not they'll most likely just say it's Photoshop.


 No.33021

File: a832590bb8c0b01⋯.webm (2.14 MB, 720x576, 5:4, atmosphericlensing.webm)

>>33020

air is filled with water particles which make it act like a lens. When you look at things in a distance they will appear magnified and light will bend downward.

The so called "city behind the curvature" is just a weak attempt at proving the globe lie and can be easily debunked for just a few dollars. There is no curvature here, move along.


 No.33022

>>32810

governments are under globalists' control like sorros to name just one and globalists like their name implies are behind the globe lie which you have been trained to believe in government (globalists) schools.


 No.33027

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


 No.33028

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


 No.33029

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


 No.33031

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


 No.33033

File: b9e5d4d337054c3⋯.jpg (309.37 KB, 799x1651, 799:1651, 1497324428375.jpg)

>>33021

Now what about the fact that gaseous water does not act as a lens, only liquid water, which is fill the role of the table in your example, is capable of that.

And the fact that the river in the second picture does not go to a perfect point, which any long flat lines naturally would.


 No.33034

>>33031

>Cucked Skeptic

Fuck off Armored Skeptic no one wants to see your video's.


 No.33035

>>33034

Fuck off, /pol/tard. No-one wants to see your posts.


 No.33038

>>33035

No one wants to see your shitty videos either.


 No.33122

>>32591

Does anybody have the picture of the research ship anchored right next to the Ice Wall that purportedly encircles our world?

In my opinion, that picture is the most interesting–and thought provoking– thing I have seen related to this theory. I cannot find the pic anywhere online, but I have seen it on here before.


 No.33124

>>33122

I don't think I've ever seen it. What's so interesting about it? It's just a ship next to a wall of ice.


 No.33129

>>33033

> the fact that gaseous water does not act as a lens

wrong, it does. gaseous water is just water vapor which acts exactly as liquid water.

>And the fact that the river in the second picture does not go to a perfect point

I was wondering what the point with that other pic was. You simply forgot that air has a density of its own and as such you can't see through it to infinity. Said otherwise You can't see far enough to see both sides of the river melting up into the vanishing point (perspective) because of the particles inside the air, mostly water.

rule 2: keep politics and political memes out of /x/

Post last edited at

 No.33130

>>32591

>a faster rotation would be counterproductive to gravity

Do you even know how fucking fast the earth would have to be spinning?

You're retarded, the earth is concave you dumb nigger.


 No.33204

File: 4dc1d84777ca5ff⋯.png (120.23 KB, 500x522, 250:261, flat earth.png)


 No.33208

File: 11d07ec6798404c⋯.png (448.44 KB, 455x395, 91:79, 1428717365799.png)


 No.33227

>>33129

When atmospheric conditions (ie air or water) are responsible for creating an artificial horizon there is highly visible shimmer or ripple effect, which while seen over the river, is noticeably absent from the picture of the city disappearing over the curve, and the land in the picture of the river.


 No.33228

File: db909aeaf43718f⋯.jpg (51.12 KB, 600x600, 1:1, 1498207313016.jpg)

Such a smart thread really

I'm amazed that everyone here is so smart

I bet NASA is shitting themselves over you guys


 No.33240

File: 84858236ac56722⋯.jpg (18.57 KB, 330x330, 1:1, pacificocean.jpg)

File: 0ef2fc46f47eb34⋯.jpg (244.18 KB, 720x425, 144:85, surface_current_map.jpg)

>>33228

>what are wind patterns

Its the same reason it takes longer to fly from New York to Seattle than vice versa. Planes generally try to ride the currents of wind, when they have to go against those currents it takes longer.


 No.33249

>>33240

Anon lets think this through real quick

The average commercial plane flies at 500-600mph

Let's assume the shorter distance is slower than hell, maybe 400mph

That means you are suggesting that the long distance trip is happening at at least 800mph, but perhaps even up to 1200mph, because of turbulence.

You legitimately think wind speed is putting a commercial plane, which can't survive the sonic boom, well past the speed of sound.


 No.33250

>>33240

>>33249

Not to mention the fact that when the wind is in their favour commercial airlines tend to run their engines less, to save fuel, and this basically averages out the speed to as slow as a plane flying against the wind, or even slower than one flying without any.


 No.33602

>>32658

The moon does spin. It's orbit is synced with it's rotation, so it always has the same side towards us.

Walk all the way around a table and always face the center of the table. You have turned around once even though you have always faced the table.

Christ, this is second grade material.


 No.33603

Yes, the Earth is flat and carried through a universe only 6,000 years old on the back of a giant turtle, held up by four giant elephants as the sun and everything else revolves around it.

Here's a great way to prove the flat earth theory guys.

Build a LONG brick wall, 4 ft high, and use a six foot mason's level to keep it perfectly flat and true. Make it about 2,000 miles long. Then step WAY back from the half-way mark.

You'll see that although the level tells you the wall is flat straight, the wall is indeed curved.

This will take a long time to make the wall, but at least this way, the rest of the sane world can get on with reality while you're busy making that wall.

Now get to it!


 No.33610


 No.33808

>>33129

>water vapor acts just the same as liquid water

Tell me how high school physics goes when you get to it.


 No.33969

>>33808

depends how much fluoride he drinks before getting to the chapter on universal gravitation


 No.34067

File: 4144aa85ae6ca7d⋯.png (701.65 KB, 2126x1088, 1063:544, Map-projections-net-compar….png)

If the Earth is flat, why are there so many different versions of the 2d earth map?

There's no Mercator- or Lambert-projection globes, last time I checked.


 No.34070

Why are all the commercial airline pilots lying to us?


 No.34071

>>34070

>Money

>Threats

>Brainwashing


 No.34072

>>34070

>>34071

What's more likely:

>all airline pilots in the world are part of a grand conspiracy to hide the true nature of the world to us

Or:

>christians are fucking stupid and still don't understand science in 2017

Tough choice.


 No.34073

>>32651

>raterded

ahhahahahaha

flat earthing idiots that can't spout anything constructive but criticism of things they poorly understand and then end up looking like complete retards are always getting a really real laugh out of me, as real as the globe earth


 No.34308

Flat Earth is literal nigger-tier, "we was kangs"-level retard shit, perpetuated by people who have never been in an airplane.

If you believe in flat earth, then literally kill yourself now, as nothing with an IQ as low as yours should be allowed to live.


 No.34310

File: f687caecaa48ec9⋯.jpg (37.74 KB, 250x266, 125:133, lives in mem.jpg)

How Can Flat Earth Be Real When The Earth Is Hollow???????


 No.34313

File: 0b68730a8752002⋯.jpg (24.9 KB, 480x360, 4:3, enlightened.jpg)

>>34310

You see, we are on a plane of existence known as "flat earth" that resides WITHIN the hollow earth. In reality, the reptilian ayylmaos are actually the inhabitants of the global earth while we ascended humans live within the hollow earth on the flat earth.


 No.34314

>>34310

The Earth IS hollow, though.


 No.34323

>>32722

Getting a charity drive going so we can get a really big rocket, pack all of the flat earth Neanderthals into it, and shoot them out into space so they can see that the Earth is round with their own eyes and stfu once and for all.

Due to costs, it will be a one way trip. Who's with me?


 No.34328

>>34323

They'd just say that the devil is testing their faith by making them hallucinate, or that it's just an optical effect. Remember, these are the same people who don't believe dinosaurs existed.


 No.34420

>>34328

but at least they'll all be gone


 No.34421

>>34328

okay, let's try to put this to rest once and for all.

IF, the Earth is flat, the Foucault pendulum would NOT behave the way it does. (Look it up. Read a book!)

IF, the Earth is flat, it must follow that the universe is one-dimensional, therefore, we are flat as well. (I am not. I am a 3D person. You, on the other hand…)

IF, the Earth is flat, then it stands to reason that all other planets must be flat as well, and they are all conveniently orbiting us at 90 degree angles to our line of site. (We can observe EVERY planet spinning on its axis and ROUND moons orbiting them, or is every astronomer dropping acid?)

IF, the Earth is flat, a ship would still be entirely visible as it sails away from shore, since water ALWAYS seeks its level. (There are NO hills in the ocean, only waves, and they are NOT standing waves. A ship sinks below the horizon because at every point, the water of the ocean is level with the gravity from the center of a ROUND world.)

Now, get your mind OUT of the dark ages and wake up already. Remove the leeches and see a doctor. Stop trying to turn lead into gold (Unless you have a nuclear reactor in your backyard)

The Earth is round, just like every other planet. We are NOT at the center of anything. We are NOT the epitome of creation. The universe is billions of years old. The Earth is just slightly younger than the universe (4.5ish billion years).

If you don't believe in scientific proofs, then what the Hell are you doing on the Internet!!!??? Blasphemer! It's the Devil's greatest tool, so stop using it and go back to your holy man/shaman/conman etc.


 No.34424

>>34421

I watched a flat earth video once. They claimed that the Foucault pendulum is some kind of hoax (yes, every pendulum everywhere is a hoax).


 No.34453

>>34424

I forgot one:

Put a pin straight into a baseball. Now observe the shadow of the pin in regards to a light source with the pin pointed directly at the light, and then lower and higher. Note how the length of the shadow changes from zero right to the edge of the ball.

Now, get yourself a two meter rod (You do believe in the metric system, right? Or is that a conspiracy, too?) and a level. Go way up North, Siberia or Victoria island would be nice for you I'm thinking, on the Spring or Autumn equinox. set the rod 10 centimeters into the ground, ice, whatever, and measure the angle and length of the shadow at mid-day (Not noon, mid-day. There is a difference.) Write it down so you don't conveniently forget.

Now, get to the equator, preferably the amazon, but anywhere with cannibals and headhunters will be good for you, for the next equinox, set the rod 10 centimeters into the ground. Measure the angle and length of the shadow. When you have proved that the Earth is round, you will know what to do with the rod at this point.

Someone did an experiment very much like this a couple of thousand years ago and was able to not only PROVE that the Earth is round, but also calculated its circumference to within a few hundred miles. (Earth is not a perfect sphere, therefore his slight error.)

Oh yeah, in a way, you are right, technically. The Earth isn't round. That's a one-dimensional term. It is spherical. Big difference.

Enjoy your trip, send postcards, try not to freeze to death or get eaten by natives, or get your head shrunk to fit your brain.


 No.36498

It's simple to prove Earth has a curve. Watch a sunrise. Notice how the clouds are lit from underneath. How does that work if the Earth is flat?


 No.36499

Earth is hollow though. ;)


 No.36500

>>32706

because that drop couldn't possibly have been from the bag she was using with water in it, and it totally wasn't going about 1:10000 of the speed it should have been going if on earth


 No.36502

File: 63ae894b0d73124⋯.gif (3.58 MB, 340x300, 17:15, ct.gif)


 No.36513

>>36499

It really is though…


 No.36693

File: 5674160c75c77ce⋯.png (2.33 MB, 1242x2208, 9:16, 1519140724778.png)

>>32698

>how big is the sun and how far away is it so that is doesnt melt the "ice wall"? This would be impossible even by flat earth models.


 No.36695

>>33602

What a convenient coincidence


 No.36712

>>32591

be honest: you don't really believe this. does anyone here actually believe this?

flat earth has to be an IC "agree & amplify" plot to make "conspiracy theorists" look stupid


 No.37026

Eh


 No.37155

File: a36fc676543bfd7⋯.png (679.11 KB, 1514x947, 1514:947, iridium5=1.png)

File: 980f2c469c2f446⋯.png (435.77 KB, 1215x954, 135:106, iridium5=2.png)

Here are 2 crops of caps I took during the recent Iridium 5 mission. I always thought the flat earth was jokes, but How can you seeing these? Why isn't the Earth round in both the shots?


 No.37158

File: cca2fc3813fcf38⋯.png (5.23 KB, 704x513, 704:513, 546465987852631.png)

>>37155

There's a slight concave curve in the second shot.


 No.37160

>>36695

it's not, one side of the moon is actually heavier than the other from its formation of molten material settling in orbit around the planet


 No.37197

File: 8c156e4af201a4b⋯.jpg (93.07 KB, 670x670, 1:1, 628457main1_Apollo_11-670.jpg)




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]