/x/ - Paranormal

Lack of books and oral tradition. War and shit disrupts the chain

>>16546

>Lack of books

something that lags on /x/

There is no pdf section with good stuff to read.

can i have sauce on that gif OP?

>>16553

Other boards may have what you're looking for. /x/ is more like paranormal general, specialized in nothing.

After careful scientific thought I've deduced that we are a culmination of one of the following two circumstances:

1.) We were placed upon this earth by aliens, but they're not aliens from another planet, instead we ARE the aliens, and they live among us, monitoring us, watching us.

Or

2.) We're a part of the computer simulation, and God is in fact an autistic child holding a snow globe.

>>16535

war mostly

>>16560

what if aliens or gods gave the knowledge? is /x/ related now yeah?

>>16561

I'd rather imagine God as some kind of giant Richard Stallman

>>16571

>if aliens

would rly like to read soemthing about aliens, /fringe/ doesn't have pdfs about it and /pdfs/ also.

i see /fringe/ more like a spiritual board,not rly as paranormal.

>>16561

>careful scientific thought

Horny ayy lmaos banged sexy apes.

Therefore, humans.

>>16828

That's why they abadon us and never came back.

>>16830

I wouldn't come back either if I created the embarrassment to life known as niggers

>>16554

http://www.pornjam.com/video/gianna-michaels-first-anal-scene/

>>16535 Sauce for that image?

A group of people belives that knowledge only belongs to the chosen and everybody else should live an animalistic life, serving them.

first deluge

but also

the religious nutcases used to burn the books when they invaded dutchland/pagan lands

the oldest book known to mankind is BeoWulf (BioWolf) a story about a dutch kings fight versus a dragon

>>16961

aka the jews

>>16961

>>16991

>>16992

>Being this historically illiterate

pay >>>/his/ a visit once in a while

>>16992

I bet you think people in the middle ages all thought the earth was flat and the dark ages were actually dark too, ledditor

>>16992

Being this oblivious to the old world

Shit.

>>16575

/x/ allows PDF's

The Jews hide it from the public

>>16535

I don't know but what I want to know is where I can find more of that gif fuk man

>>18518

Sometimes I like to think that civilization today is just a redone version of civilizations long gone, like the human race has always reached a certain point, killed mostly everyone, and then millions of years later we come back full circle

>>16553

Actually, didnt someone at one point have a HUGE archive on mega of basically every pdf you could think of on a shit ton of different subjects /x/ related?

I remember downloading promethius rising off of it, then losing the link

>>18367

In this time, yes.

>>20906

Like https://mega.nz/#F!AE5yjIqB!y7Vdxdb5pbNsi2O3zyq9KQ ?

I think I got that one from plebbit

>>16958

>>18514

Loosh farmed

>>20975

>being this angry

calm down jerry, you'll give yourself an asthma attack

>>21076

>>21077

Top kek

>>21077

>>21076

Back to your containment board: >>>/christian/

>>20975

>They burned ancient libaries

That's a myth, anon. Prove it.

>>16553

Ask /fringe/… they have been under low server response tho, really wonder why only them and the equivalent in masterchan.

>>16553

Well, it's really just adding to the problem then right?

>Save up what we know on PDFs and digital mediums

>Lack of print books and oral tradition

>War and shit disrupts the chain

>Fucks up technology and access to it

>Humans lose access to the pdfs and digital media

>The generation after the next great cataclysm use hard drives and building material, with no idea wtf inside or how to possibly access it

>>22405

>what is "a printer" for $500, Alex?

>>21098

Ah thank you, I love collecting fedoras; they're my trophies that tell me how often a burthurt chantard couldn't handle the truth because I'm a badass motherfuckerswho makes you pissants cry by being the hardest, edgiest troll on the Internet, all cuz you wouldn't handle the truth. :^)

Mods: prove me right with a delete and ban like you always do cuz even you can't handle my power!!

>>16969

>implying that the reason why we have any books that predates the middle ages isn't because the monks took care to recover, preserve, & restore what little history they could find.

>>22678

Mankind history is the history of wasted potential.

From what I understand, we use to all be spiritually connected, even had good technology. Then some sort of blackout happened, we were disconnected from our spiritual minds, so humans had to start from scratch and adapt to using their carnal minds. With the rise of meme magic, humanity is most likely going to have a new spiritual awakening.

>>22678

You'd probably like Michael Cremo's books, "Forbidden Archeology" and the one about human devolution. Humans have been on this planet for a lot longer than what we've been told in school. There's actually evidence that humans came before the dinosaurs, it's crazy.

>>16535

>so how did we lost ancient knowledge?

The Flood destroyed most of our cities. How well do you think WE would fare?

>>20975

>>>/reddit/

>>>/atheism/

>>>/suicide/

>>16535

> how did we lost ancient knowledge

>lost

We lost it because idiots like you never learned proper tenses.

>>16835

Why do porn gifs always look better than the actual porn film itself?

>>23012

Deepest quandary in the thread

>>20966

>Loosh

I remember the concept but I don't think I really understand it. Could you please clarify a bit more, it's real isn't it?

>>16535

The reptiles burned it

>>23012

It is the concentration of loosh from everyone that see's it. Because it's posted on a popular forum, and it's a small clip you can imagine the sexual strength that single loop holds while it's there.

It's like you go to a website where other people like you are, and they've already put energy that it is like yours, but also holds deeper more perverted energy from all the deep recesses of humankind. Enlightening so, yet addictive?

>>23070

To expand it's also your narcissism that draws you to the picture because of the similarity of the energy to you that you feel from the picture (from the niche of this communitty), though that's my negativity brewing, trying to seep its way into you

>>23012

Because porn films are 2/10 level garbage.

Of course a gif would be better.

Porn destroys eroticism and mystery and all the hot things about sex due to how it's produced/shot. A gif is naturally hotter.

>>16828

Familiar with McKenna at all?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnEKoFrx1rI

>>23012

With a gif your brain does most of the work. An explicit video does not allow your fantasies to flourish.

>>16535

Like >>18518

explained, and rasicm! destroying and conquer other cultures who has folklores and writings from the "golden age" (Atlantis)

Nobody listened to Julius Evola.

>>16535

well we used to be

#wokeasfuck

but now we

#asleepasfuck

so we need to

#wakeup

but we

#cantwakeup

>>22417

about $300 too much :^)

>>16535

>so how did we lost ancient knowledge?

We didn't, you're just retarded.

>why are we disconnected from our origins?

Because you stopped calling your mom after you went off to college and you're afraid to tell her that you're a C student.

how did she rip those panties off

>>24932

Yep, this guy does a pretty good job at stating the point, but I'll say it simpler.

People are fucking stupid.

Here is a short documentary about it.

>>16535

We didn't. Maybe you weren't told.

>>16571

What if some took knowledge away so that a physical system would be able to run instead of putting evolution at a stand still? I'd say that singularity for example is not mean't for humans to use at all until we've successfully become androids with part artificial intelligence.

>>>>>twitter.com/KolNop

>>18518

Werent the stones in the last pic exposed as fakes being sold to naive tourists?

I take it that you are unaware of what ISIS is doing in the cities they occupy.

They are systematically destroying any connection to the past in the name of their religion.

This is also what happened to the library of Alexandria. Religious nuts decided that knowledge was bad/evil.

A Chinese emperor had all the books in china destroyed to wipe out all of the past historical documents. Why? Religious reasons. (Luckily, some books were found safely hidden in a wall about 100 years later.)

We've had book burnings in the last couple of centuries, esp the 20th, and I'm sure that there were countless others way back in the day. (The Spanish missionaries systematically burned every Mayan book they could find to celebrate Christian holidays.)

So any trace of ancient knowledge and history was lost when we lobotomized ourselves

>>21077

>held accountable for the actions of humans

>denied authorship of the bible because humans

inb4 atheist bsod

>>33552

As far as I know, nobody has been able to prove that they're fake, but they look fake to me. The art style doesn't look ancient and the stones themselves don't show any sign of passage of time.

>>33559

True. I've read a book that chronicles the history of book burnings through the centuries and it's even worse than you say. And it's still going on, for example many ancient books were destroyed or stolen during the war in Iraq. There are rumours that the Egyptian government has hidden or destroyed evidence that the great pyramid of Giza is older than we think. There are similar rumours about mummies in Australia, giant skeletons in North America, and underwater ruins in Norway. Religion has been the main factor until now, but I think nowadays politics and scientific dogmas are at least as important.

>A Chinese emperor had all the books in china destroyed to wipe out all of the past historical documents. Why? Religious reasons. (Luckily, some books were found safely hidden in a wall about 100 years later.)

If I remember correctly, that was actually because of political reasons. He wanted to unite all of China under his rule and in order to do that, he tried to erase all previous history and traditions. Something similar happened again in the 60s with the communist 'cultural revolution'.

>>33626

forgot the political aspect of the Chinese book massacre, one rule and one religion. Since he was in control of the 'church' so to speak, he could also control peoples' behaviors. That is what religion is really for anyways.

I believe in God, I don't believe in religion.

God made man. Man made religion.

Who ya gonna trust?

>>16535

Imperial eradication. Look at what colonialism did to the native Americans. They came and disease destroyed them. This was not intended but it happened. Then they were conquered militarily. Those which remain were assimilated by force in reeducation programs to convert them to christianity. These cultures always resist and are usually very attractive. There are endless stories of European settlers FOing out of western society to go live like a filthy indian hippie.

The same thing was done to my ancestors by Rome. They conquered Germanic Europe by force. Many cultures willingly became christian post-Justinian to avoid being conquered militarily. The culture fought back but you just cannot win when the purpose is to enforce a religion who's purpose is to act as a control mechanism. Their culture was not just conquered, it was erased. This pattern repeats all throughout history where Abrahamic violence religions show up. Judaism, Islam and Christianity are venerable religions in their homeland which were perverted and used as mechanisms for control.

Paganism is stirring again, trying to rouse form its sleep. But westerners don't understand that they cannot swap out Abrahamic religious names for Pagan religious names. These are not personal gods like Yahweh. It is not an individualist religious order that teaches a strong separation between soul and body, between spirt realm and Earth, between men. One has to understand animism before one can understand what pagan religions actually are. Sadly very few ever recognize this because the educational foundations for these religions were mostly part of an oral tradition that died when the ancestors where murdered or assimilated.

>>33665

It's not the Romans' or the Christians' fault that your ancestors were savages. Unlike the Sumerians, the Egyptians or the Greeks, the Germanic tribes had no literature and still relied on oral traditions like cavemen. They refused to write books or have cultural exchanges with other people because all they could think about was war, and what little knowledge they had, they kept it a secret. Same with the Gauls. Even when it was obvious that Caesar was going to genocide them, they did nothing to make sure that their culture would survive.

>>33665

>>33667

Both your empires were shit that had no knowledge and both never got good until the 1400's.

>>33667

>savages

You're an historical illiterate.

>>33668

>the 1400s

Right around when the Renaissance happened, thanks to the translation of ancient Pagan texts held in Moorish universities and thus spared the illiterate degeneracy of the first thousand years of Christian rule.

>>33670

GTFO, idiot.

Most likely, all of their ancient knowledge had been uploaded to the cloud and lost when the power went out. A lot like we're doing now. In 12,000 years we have yet to come up with a more durable data storage device than clay tablets or chiseled stone.

>>33915

Are you serious?

>>33916

yep. no digital information will survive the next cataclysm, not on tape, disk, cd, dvd, or flash drives, nor hard drives. all kaput.

Paper won't last. Only things written in stone and some metals will survive for millennia. everything else will be lost and forgotten.

>>33950

Is there any evidence at all that the antediluvians had access to that kind of technology? Plato describes Atlantis like a bronze age civilisation.

Everyone seems to forget that before the Renaissance knowledge was to be hoarded as it usually translated more directly to power, thus it was much easier to stamp out knowledge by killing a few key people or burning a few books.

All old knowledge was probably observational as they didn't have the tools to acquire more technical knowledge, stuff like precise astronomy, developed mathematics, specialized engineering techniques for particular climates using particular resources, the existence of aliens all of which save the last one we can safely say are now more developed than ever.

>>33665

>Imperial eradication. Look at what colonialism did to the native Americans.

The diseases that wiped out the Indians came on seals from Europe

>>33665

>They came and disease destroyed them. This was not intended but it happened. Then they were conquered militarily.

The natives were attacking colonies, and the colonists decided to fight back. Had the natives not thrown every single man in their tribes at the "demons" who "cursed" them with plagues they wouldn't have been "conquered militarily".

>Many cultures willingly became christian post-Justinian to avoid being conquered militarily.

These cultures were stuck between a rock and a hard place. Either they obey their gods, slaughter the travelling monks, and invade the land they came from, or tolerate the monks and face the wrath of their old pagan gods. For a good example of what happens when one of these pagan cultures takes the pacifist option look at the Gaelic Irish and the origins of Halloween. On another note, Christian Europe was so intent on turtling during conflicts that the pope had to tell soldiers that retaliatory strikes in a defensive war isn't a sin in order to stop the Muslim conquests.

>a religion who's purpose is to act as a control mechanism.

Islam, maybe, but Christianity? There are only two ways any of its tenets could be oppressive or controlling in any way. The first is all the thou-shalt-nots. Many of which have been secularized into American/European common law and the general consensus on what is right and wrong. The second is blind faith, but here we are on an online message board where we openly discuss the supernatural. And it's rather hypocritical to call Christianity a control mechanism when the pagan gods practically had their followers on puppet strings.

>Their culture was not just conquered, it was erased.

Considering what medieval monks and colonial missionaries had to deal with every time they try to preach and what the Catholic church had to deal with after converting the Irish you can put two and two together.

>This pattern repeats all throughout history where Abrahamic violence religions show up.

As I said before, medieval Christians failed at war early on because soldiers thought counter-invasions were murder until the pope said it's okay to fight back. A lot of the violence was instigated by the people they tried to preach to. As for Islam, they were as bad if not worse than you make Christianity out to be, and they steamrolled the Christians until the papal statement on war turned the conflict around.

(cont.)

>>33665

>Paganism is stirring again, trying to rouse form its sleep. But westerners don't understand that they cannot swap out Abrahamic religious names for Pagan religious names. These are not personal gods like Yahweh. It is not an individualist religious order that teaches a strong separation between soul and body, between spirt realm and Earth, between men. One has to understand animism before one can understand what pagan religions actually are. Sadly very few ever recognize this because the educational foundations for these religions were mostly part of an oral tradition that died when the ancestors where murdered or assimilated.

Take everything ``you`` believe about the Abrahamic God. Not my perspective, ``yours.`` Imagine entities a thousand times worse, playing nice for their worshipers until any other religion shows up, including other pagan religions. They will then show their true colors and send their followers to war. Those who won't kill for their hateful gods are cursed in ways worse than anything you'll find in the Old Testament. They eventually encounter Christianity, who won't recklessly throw armies at nonbelievers like a bunch of savages, and lose to defensive and counter-offensive tactics. The hateful beings then move on to the next bunch of humans and start over.

Take every case of mythological spirits being demonized by Christians, and imagine the monks, missionaries, priests, and converted pagans being attacked in all the ways that Christians portrayed these entities. It was all true. Wouldn't you wonder how the locals would accept that the spirits, which had been benevolent for years, suddenly attacked innocent foreign travelers (ie. the monks) for no reason without experiencing it themselves? In fact, you can find some historical paranormal accounts of such attacks if you know what archives to dig in.

Fast forward to the modern day. Science has advanced society so much that belief in the supernatural dwindled. Yet nearly all paranormal encounters today, aside from ghosts or angels, are entirely malevolent. I personally have seen a number of paranormal encounters, all backing this up. If Christianity was so evil, and the pagan gods the good ones, at least ``one`` of them would try converting people through acts of goodwill rather than acting like demons.

>>33667

This. Though they were spurred on by their own pagan religion they were the warmongers, not the Christians. Something of note is that wars started by religious zealotry always end with the zealots losing due to their lack of self-preservation. A modern example being the "Hawaiian snackbar" variety.

On another note the captcha said tuaTHA when I tried to post, as I was posting about the pagan religions and brought up the Gaelic Irish a few times. /x/ worthy enough to share.

(Repost, fixed formatting.)

>>35257

>>35254

Anon, while I largely agree with you, the Catholics were all too happy to rape and pillage their Christian brothers while turning a blind eye to Islam. If the pope's army hadn't ransacked Christian cities that were under Muslim rule, those Christians would have joined them in the fight against Islam instead of turning to the Muslims in subservience because the Muslim rulers were more tolerant of their Christian sects than the Catholics were.