/vore/ - Vore Board★

Can we force all comic and video requests into a single thread?

>>17485

this. no limits unless it's IRL vore, cp, beastiality or crushing.

anything else vore related should be allowed. that includes hard vore, cooking, tit, cock, anal, unbirth, hair, absorbtion, soft vore, endo, digestion, scat, macro/micro, food prep, food play, etc.

no sub genera gets left out.

>>17487

if it's a lone thread asking for a specific comic/video when there's already a dedicated "looking for comics/videos" thread the lone thread should be merged with the already existing thread that way it doesn't clutter up the board with hundreds of request threads.

>>17492

IRL should be back to being in a single thread, there are two or three now, one that keeps getting bumped is just trolling. Or tell them to move onto /vor/, doesn't matter to me.

>>17493

There are FIFTY EIGHT threads that are "looking for" or "requesting source", it'd be nice to have all of them deleted or moved.

>>17497

>There are FIFTY EIGHT threads that are "looking for" or "requesting source", it'd be nice to have all of them deleted or moved.

that's what I'm saying, merge them into the main "looking for" threads for their respective topics. if it's requesting vids merge it with the current main vore videos thread. if it's requesting comics merge it with the main vore comics thread and so on.

>IRL should be back to being in a single thread, there are two or three now, one that keeps getting bumped is just trolling. Or tell them to move onto /vor/, doesn't matter to me.

easy solution. merge all the IRL vore threads into one mega thread and then send that whole thing over to /vor/.

IRL vore should be kept to a single thread.

Cooking and hard "vore" aren't vore at all, don't know why they count as a sub category.

>>17517

i agree, same with crush. cooking/gore/crush don't belong on this board.

Thing with IRL vore is there are 2 main categories: Acting/3dps/pov, and actually swallowing real animals/insects. the 3dpsfags like to have those 2 seperated.

if people here are so triggered by 3dpd and don't know how to use the hide button, i guess that's their own fault, but maybe moving the 3dpd to another board would make more sense.

Just delete shit like cooking and hard vore and direct them to /vor/

>>17546

youre the one that sounds salty and triggered.

>>17561

considering endofag and his buddies are being complete retards who have done nothing in here but say "hard vore isn't vore! stop liking what I don't like! reeeeee!" to anyone who will listen for the past four days I'm just sick of hearing it.

>>17564

But that's the point of the thread. you can you argue in favor of hard vore/cooking instead of getting upset.

people are hating IRL vore too, but also crush/cooking prep/hardvore, and other stuff the majority doesn't like. that's the point of this thread is to discuss what should/shouldn't be allowed.

when you let too many different communities near each other, they require extra policing so they don't troll the shit out of each other.

>>17546

lol cunt, I'm not that endofag you are talking about, I enjoy fatal more than non-fatal. Just straight up eating or cooking isn't vore, I'm not saying you can't like it it's just not vore and shouldn't be categorized under it.

>>17579

That's your opinion man. Though I think what >>17572 suggested is a reasonable way to solve this. Auto-Spoiler gory hard vore shit and not allow guro-style cooking but at the same time allow tame cooking like his example. Honestly that sounds like the best solution here to make everyone happy.

>>17589

what is even tame cooking, its essentially still execution without any actual vore

>>17590

I mean, it's pretty much implied the prey is gonna get eaten in the end. as for whether or not they die from the cooking process is up to the viewer in most cases since most tame cooking pics leave the outcome open ended. personally I like to fantasize that the prey survives the actual cooking process thinking they've made it out alive only to get eaten alive by the pred that cooked them.

>>17572

CP is almost universally agreed to be the worst of the worst shit on the net, and it's illegal virtually everywhere.

Swallowing goldfish and feeder mice? Nah, only in some places. also feeder mice/fish aren't remotely comparable to child abuse unless you're a hippy vegan

>>17602

fair enough, I'll give you that, if you're doing it in your own time for personal reasons and purely for your own nourishment I can understand that. I may not agree with it personally, but I can see the reasoning behind it.

however making videos or taking pics of doing that purely for profit or to get other people off to is where I'm not okay with it. I don't want to see IRL animals get hurt or killed on here. you could probably show me the most fucked up gory guro illustrations, the dirtiest scat drawings, and the most fucked up shit from horror movies and I'd be perfectly fine, but something about seeing real animals getting harmed or killed just makes me wanna puke my goddamn guts out.

>>17589

Prey in food is not necessarily cooking, so it's just implied vore. I don't think anyone has problems with those kinds of pictures.

Cookfags need to go, their thread lacks a single image of a person being swallowed but they're firmly state and believe it's vore, though a few do imply but they involve no cooking. There is a place for them it's called the /cannibal/ board, they post exactly the same kind of shit.

RL fags are just pure cancer, every community should be shunning these disgusting fucks. I don't wanna know what kind of person gets off to killing small animal but I rather not have anything to do with them and each one tries to justify their over-fed fetish with the poorest of excuses imaginable. I believe your average vorefag sees this shit and runs for the fucking hills.

>>17605

well the fetish overlaps with sadism, it's a murderfetish. so yeah, a lot of people that like RL vore will get off on some pain and suffering. It's supposed to be hot and sickening at the same time, that's why it's so exhilarating. unfortunately real vore isn't possible. I've never seen RL vore as drastically different from 2d vore at all. I think media depicting human suffering is much creepier and disturbing than some dumb goldfish/feeder mice being eaten, so I don't think they need to be separated.

The issue is vegans go apeshit and start trolling RLfags, so they probably do need to be separated so a mod that will actually police the RL thread can take over. Not to say RLfags don't cause just as many problems, but they get attacked a lot by PETA and angry vegans, moralfags etc.

>>17614

RL vore is a fucking funny joke compared to stuff I've seen on the chans over the past 10 years. it's hilarious seeing moralfags (especially other murderfags trying to take the high ground) lose their shit whenever they see it. keep the comments coming!

>>17614

keep moralfagging moralfag. we're all into a fetish that involves people getting eaten by someone/something so you're no better than the rest of us on here and since someone is implied to get eaten at the end of a cooking scene, it has it's place here. think of it as foreplay, a lead up to the main event of someone getting eaten.

>>17622

I get what your saying, I do, I get why some people are into that shit. it's just not my thing because of my personal issues I have with it (real people eating real animals). I'd prefer that shit be limited to one thread that I can just hide and ignore.

>>17606

vanilla bondage like in >>10799 in the cooking thread and anthropomorphic food items like a pre-roasted turkey moving around like in >>17227 over in the cooking thread, I agree don't belong here. but stuff like >>9915 and >>10156 and that 4th pic in >>9985 in the cooking thread should be allowed because it's implied someone is gonna get eaten and therefore it is vore related. though it's more vore foreplay (voreplay?) than the actual act itself but it's still vore related as it's a lead-up to the act itself.

>>17627

Honestly she's a perfect pred for cooking and food prep related scenarios, I dunno why she hasn't been used more often.

>>17632

There's only a handful of images where I seen a person is cooked and swallowed in the next scene and I say a handful because I can them on one hand. The problem is the vast majority artists drawing cooking images don't have a vore fetish rather a cannibalism fetish.

It shows in the art but you ignore this also I don't see why I and anyone else gotta put up with you're horribly warped mind.

If there was actually vore content inside the thread I wouldn't be here but its the same as all cooking threads not a single person being swallowed.

Now fuck off to /cannibal/

My only question is when we're removing the "does anyone have a snake that can eat me" guy and his thread that he won't let die

>>17641

even F-LIST, which has the most compehensive list of fetishes on the internet, categorizes cooking as a vore kink and canibalism as a separate fetish entirely! why do you keep insisting it's not when every source we've provided you clearly says it is?

>>17641

You keep shilling this /cannibal/ board like you own it. Now, you wouldn't happen to be the owner of that board trying to get new members would you? Because if that's the case that just makes you look like a fucking hypocrit. Also I checked it out and that board is fucking dead. There's only been 16 posts there TOTAL since it was first established back in 2015. So no thanks, I'll stick around here.

>>17645

Sources? Definitions on two websites means shit. I've suggested evidence which proves that cooking is more related to cannibalism kink but you're defensive of that claim because it's a tad too far your liking.

Answer me this, why do cannibalfags jack it to the same images as cookfags? I tell you why because they're the same fucking fetish.

>>17646

I'm glad it's dead.

>>17653

Cannibalism

noun

the practice of eating the flesh of one's own species.

here's the thing you don't seem to understand, cannibalism as a fetish in and of itself SPECIFICALLY refers to a very VERY specific set of circumstances where one sapient creature of a species butchers, cooks, and eats a member of it's own species. (ex: a wolf anthro butchering, cooking, and eating another wolf anthro.)

if the two involved are different species (Ex: Wolf anthro cooking and eating a human) then it's not cannibalism.

is there overlap? yes but unless both the pred and the prey belong to the same species IT'S NOT CANNIBALISM.

>>17655

I know the definition of cannibalism idiot. Cookfags and Cannibalshits share fetishes like bondage/BDSM, food prep, oily skin, snuff, guro, food insertion, impalement, cannibal fetishism, torture, beheaded, roasting, netted, shaving etc.

If this shit was a vore-based fetish it would have stuff like melting, absorption, micro/macro, shrink, mouth play, licking, body-part tf, all types of vores, mawshot, bulges, endo, insertion, saliva, belly etc.

They only cross over at their extremes caused by those with 1k fetishes.

>>17662

Last 3 are fine, there is no biting or anything.

>>17666

okay Satan, what about the first two?

>>17670

Artist with too many fetishes

>>17681

>it's not vore related because there's too much context surrounding the vore

This is literal not-internet-meme autism. Like these are the actual symptoms.

The only thing that 100% needs to be banned is the saucefags/begging, everything else is really just a matter of taste and can be argued endlessly.

Stupid people who don't know how to image search shouldn't be tolerated.