/v/ - Video Games

>>16711467

>Why does everybody shit on this game?

>the game is the censored swears

When is OP ever not a faggot?

M rated games have no reason to censor their swears. NO reason.

Where do you think we are?

Also the fur looks like shit and it doesn't have the appeal of being an M-rated Nintendo 64 game that looks like Banjo-Kazooie.

>make a N64 game

>get it heavily censored because Nintendo of America are a bunch of shitty prudes that refuse to use certain curse words

>censor one scene that showed the Tediz performing surgery on a live squirrel, replaced with a scene of the doctors chatting and smoking in the operating room while breaking the fourth wall

>get picked up by Microsoft

>remake the game because it didn't get enough love on the N64

>tell everyone you want to make it uncensored and raunchier than ever

<instead censor even more of the game than before

<add in some new, shitty class-based shooter multiplayer instead of simply remaking the old multiplayer

<don't even get to revamp the surgery scene, just keep the old one

<pretty the whole thing up with terrible textures, contextual costumes, even more retarded fourth wall breaks

<give him a different weapon because fucking le funny fourth wall breaks omg XDDDDD

I shit on this game because it's a fucking remake that they broke their goddamn promises on. They could have done a lot more with it, and they fucked it all up.

>>16711521

To be fair, what did that surgery scene add to the game? It wasn't funny, we already knew the Tediz were horrible abominations, it doesn't set with the tone. We have scenes in the game just as gruesome, but it's as if that was there purely for shock or disgust value without having any solid purpose. I couldn't care less if that scene was in the game or not.

Because it censored the original, period. I heard you can uncensor it through a hidden option in game, but I don't know if it's true.

>>16711552

[quote=16711552]f*cking[/quote]

[quote=16711552](ableist slur)[/quote]

Yucky yucky yucky the only joke here is your post

>>16711545

I do because it shows the level of quality and care the developers were willing to put into the game (Do not misinterpret or read this as a defense for the devs).

>>16711557

Ignoring the remake, why should this have been in the game? I like that the developers know what does and doesn't stick and are willing to part with what doesn't work in order to make a more cohesive and better experience. People talk as if the creator's vision is everything and should be implemented in it's entirety with no compromises, but then fail to realize the sorts of things we get out of that are things like George Lucas's Star Wars prequels.

>>16711568

There is absolutely nothing wrong with cockholdry, you fuck off

>>16711575

>-oomer

>>>/cuckchan/

>>16711570

>People talk as if the creator's vision is everything and should be implemented in it's entirety with no compromises, but then fail to realize the sorts of things we get out of that are things like George Lucas's Star Wars prequels.

Yes, the sequel trilogy has been worthy of complete and utter praise. The prequels are some of the dryest films that I have ever seen, but I still take greater interest in them than the "superior original trilogy".

>>16711575

>zoomer

When will you fags fuck off?

>>16711589

When did I mention the sequel trilogy? Those I am not defending. My only point is that sometimes the creator themselves can ruin their own product or make it contrived without experiencing input on how to make it better.

They improved everything but now you don't get to hear the big stinky doo doo cuss so lets play the far inferior version in every way instead. Conker's humor aged horrendously, but the game play on L&R is fantastic.

>>16711521

>add in some new, shitty class-based shooter multiplayer

You never played the multiplayer did you? It was pretty good online.

The direction of the cutscenes is worse in a lot of places. They manage to mess up the mood lighting, and take a lot of the personality out of the character animations.

>>16711608

It was comepetely fucking broken, not mention you could get broken stuffed unlocked if you had help, also ninja just killed everyone in one hit.

>>16711521

><add in some new, shitty class-based shooter multiplayer instead of simply remaking the old multiplayer

This was the greatest offense for me. The original multiplayer was amazing and perfect. We just needed that but online. They had 1 fucking job. 1 job. They ruined it with dog shit.

They completely ruined the gag where Gregg enters. Don't know how that got past.

original

>>16711588

Behead all those who insult conker.

<<16711576

>There is absolutely nothing wrong with cockholdry

>losing the fruits of your labor for someone else to get a free ride

>normal healthy evolutionary behavior that absolutely nothing is wrong with

>>16711616

>DOF

>shitty fur textures

>scrolling text bubbles

>somehow fucking up the animations so hard they now look stiff and lifeless

>shitty rain and fog overlays

>FUCKING UP THE DYNAMIC RANGE OF LIGHTING THAT HARD

how did they manage to fuck everything up that badly

Was the sunflower a tranny? This line always bugged me.

>king: i feel like a new man

>sunflower: so do i

>>16711618

What unlocks? I don't remember any unlocks.

And the ninja could only one shot people from behind.

>>16711655

It was a trope of 80's/90's for dumb blonde bimbo bitches and/or horn dogs to say stupid shit accidentally like that. Happened a lot on shows like three's company. Fucking faggot.

>>16711655

>>16711744

It's a double entendre.

The redesign of the Tediz for the new multiplayer fucking sucked.

Ugly and stupid shit replaced perfection basically.

Conker made children feel mature because it had shit jokes in it on a console for babies. They thought they were playing GTA not yet another shitty 3D platformer with a sonic knock off which is all children cared about bad then. They have no idea about the creative process or why the original game was not as intended due to the realities of life. When devs got a second chance to do it better the toddlers cried and whined because it wasn't an identical game to the n64 one.

>>16711594

Lucas always wanted to make space battle movies He was a special effects director who pushed the boundaries of film making to make those things come to life. The entire Star wars franchise has poor awkward writing and people look past it because it's a special effects series. If you pay attention to the prequels and know you're shit there's very few movies with as much depth. It's buttery smooth with a layer of EU references and original trilogy references all over it. Even the CGI still holds up in quite a few places today, Lucas put a bounty on people being able to tell CGI from real things in the movie and still today no one has been able to claim it.

Shit on the story as much as you want, but the facts remain the prequels achieved their goals with glowing success. Without them none of what we consider normal movie making would be possible.

>>16712163

Most movies are shit so that's not saying much /tv/, I'd rather watch kaiju/toku shit or lotr for special effects instead of SW.

>>16711654

Oddly enough I remember having a lot of fun with the multiplayer/party games with a bunch of mates. Come back from a party, everyone is nicely pissed and we play things like nazi teddies vs french squirrel refugees. Was a good time along side goldeneye.

>>16712163

LOTR's couldn't exist without Jar Jar.

>New Conker never ever

>No new good platformer rare games

>Chris Seavor wants to do a horror parody game in the vein of Conker

Hell I'd even settle for Gettin' Medieval.

Dong Cunt was the only good series that Rare ever produced and it was all downhill from there.

>>16711545

>EVERYTHING HAS TO BE FUNNY

where do you faggots come from? not everything has to be some joke or satire or funny walk, something can be interesting without being a walking parody of itself

>HURR DURR I DONT CARE ABOUT REMOVED CONTENT BECAUSE I DONT LIKE IT ANYWAY

How about mark Removes you from the thread? to be fair, what does your posting add to the board? it isnt funny, we already know your a faggot, you dont fit in. we have other posters just as gay, but its as if you where here purely for contrarianism without having any solid argument. I couldnt care less if mark banned you or not

>>16711594

The new trilogy is a terrible example for your point. It did receive criticism from the actors and staff. Director did absolutely nothing about it because they wanted to ruin the images of certain characters.

>>16712954

For fuck's sake, I'm not talking about the sequel trilogy, I never brought that up, someone else did. I am talking about the prequels.

Bad Fur Day looks and sound incredibly charming, but that shitty ending kills all my interest.

>>16711616

>no white gloves

What the fuck?

Because it was an overall downgrade.

The multiplayer was still fun though, fuck you

I just wish it had more modes than what they gave us

>>16712609

But the whole point of Conker is that it's a parody?

>>16711521

/thread

L&R wasn't terrible, but it's an inferior remake to the original in much the same way MGS The Twin Snakes was.