>>15795998
>Show me where I downplayed anything nigger.
Reread your second post and go from there.
>Everything you've said is vague as fuck, and you're using these sweeping, broad statements and attacks to mask your lack of substance.
That's funny. Because you cannot even address a full post.
>In that post you replied to, I explicitly did not say that. I said it won't achieve the goals you would want it to in the timeframe you would want, not that it wouldn't work in that they would become more cancerous as a result of it.
The only person mentioning timeframe is you. The reason why you're saying so is to invent a faux-goalpost and insist it has to meet it or it's a failure. Meanwhile you're the one advocating for them, saying give them a second chance to clean up their act, contradicting that with a reminder that they will continue to fuck up games.
>Yes, that's my personal opinion, but I also outlined a far more practical approach for people to destroy NISA if they wanted to, by informing other customers and contacting advertisers.
People have and should already be doing that. It's not new or original. That also doesn't excuse you from wanting people to give NISA a fresh chance.
>Attacking my language means nothing you sperg, and you know it.
The first part of your reply did that. A good display of your hypocrisy must be you warming up for your political career, eh? Anyone can call as they see it, but you'll cry foul if they do.
>Ah yes, I clearly stated I wanted to be fucked by NISA. I'll let you live out your pipe dream by letting NISA know to their faces that you want them to become more cancerous, and somehow that will end up destroying them in the process. That's not totally ridiculous and useless.
You left out the part of which I originally mentioned why it's important for them to stay the bad guy.
>Yes, you letting them know through their feedback form to keep doing what they're doing will obviously accomplish this.
I'll leave it up to you to see if you can reread that part and own up to your deliberate mistake of misrepresenting it. You won't, but like NISA I can't let this opportunity go by without allowing you to make a mistake.
>Them knowing and them doing something about it are two different things. They haven't experienced a true backlash like they did until Ys VIII, which happened with an emailing campaign directly to Falcom.
What part of, "Never prevent your enemy from making a mistake," do you not understand? If they start cleaning up their act, it will diffuse the resentment people have for them and when NISA fucks up all over again, deliberately, it will restart the tension back from square 1, because faggots like you will defend them. Faggots like you will say, "Hey, they did something right one time, let's give them another chance." The Ys VIII backlash is not enough evem though it's a start from the consumer.
>Yes, me telling you that they aren't dead yet and won't be for a while because they have an established fucking fanbase and company is me saying I want them to grow. And I'm the one speaking like a politician, right?
That's you trying to recontextualize what you said. You keep getting caught praising them and telling people to give them a second chance. You were the first responder in this thread.
>You're ridiculous. Me telling you objective fucking facts about NISA is me defending them?
While insisting others give them a second chance. You covered for them before reluctantly agreeing they're cancer. Keep trying to pretend otherwise and misrepresent the issue and what you're getting called out on. Exactly no one will fall for it.
>Do you even know their history? How NIS lost 97% of their income in 08-09 and they're still fucking alive? How they've been growing for years until the last few months where they've had what is likely a temporary lull/drop as a result of low amount of games being released?
Conveniently you began by praising them.
>Calling me a shill because you can't handle flat criticism of your shitty, roundabout idea and I told you the objective fucking truth about them is childish.
You stating things about NISA does not equate to you criticizing a way to make sure they repeat their garbage reputation. This is yet again another example of you conflating things and misrepresenting the issue, and what's said.
Also I will point out how you're evading how I've pointed out you being the first responder to this thread and your second post is filled with you trying to clean up NISA's image. You were here to do damage control and insist everyone give NISA a second chance at fucking everything up. Just admit it. You've done it across several posts now. You're not as slippery as you think. Listing tidbits about NISA doesn't make your posts gain substance. You blew it a long time ago.