/v/ - Video Games

Harry Potter was always cucked and in a big way it's popularity is what lead to where we're at now.

>>15793742

Look who wrote it

Dumb bitch needs to read her own book lmao

Trump is dumbledore and the daily prohphet and the ministry of magic are her and the liberals

>Naruto with wands

>>15793756

>while the rest turned into a teen soap drama in apparence

i didnt like when they started focusing on that so much in adventure time

>>15793742

This >>15793747

It was always cultural marxism. The good thing is that even normalfags are realizing that now.

>>15793742

Dunno mang, Tanya Grotter seemed cooler, she had a flying Bass and eleven books, but its all in russian so who cares

>>15793756

Third book was pretty cool, because it started branching into things like the magical beasts of the world, the parents generation, and other factors a lot more. It also had a tone that matched the age of the characters it was representing - 3rd Year was pretty much spot on for the chuuni-age, so it was fitting to be a little 'darker'. 4th wasn't an improvement, it was just longer. 5th and after was when it starts being less interesting.

>>15793742

Harry Potter aged like spilled milk. All of the books are pure filler pretending to have a plot. Each novel is padded out just to make it look like they are much longer than they really are. I only reason why I ever liked it was because I was a kid when I read it. Harry Potter is jewish cuckservative trash that has now become the face of liberalism. Every time a liberal shouts out Voldemort towards some conservative I cringe since it shows that these liberal hacks only read Harry Potter, a book series that isn't even written for their age group or even comparable to far superior works that actually have meaning or depth.

http://vectorpress.blogspot.com/2013/01/harry-potter-sucks-dissertation.html

This shit has been in our media for a while, especially towards the end of the Bush administration. It just kicked into full gear when king Obango's reign began.

>>15793747

/thread

>>15793763

Harry Potter is an poorly made allegory for the Bush Administration. I know because the author was a huge supporter of George Bush when she wrote it. What I am telling me that the relationship between Harry Potter and Dumbledore is similar to the relationship between George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Harry Potter was written for Jews in mind and that is the main reason why Harry Potter is a shit fucking book.

>>15795399

Cuckservative? More like leftist shonen trash. The series is about an edgy schoolboy with dead parents, sekrit powers, and a mysterious scar. LMAO

Can't believe I read that shit entirely when I was younger.

>>15795436

If you look into the books you can find Judo-Christian roots similar to that in the bible and the Torah. Before the author converted into a leftist, she was a huge supporter of George Bush. In the 7th book, Harry Potter dies and resurrects in a way that is similar to our lord and savior Jesus Christ.

>>15795436

Harry Potter wears glasses like a nu male faggot because Harry Potter is about glorifying and normalizing the soy face.

>>15795452

Are you sure that she's conservative? She claimed that Dumbledore was gay to score brownie points, and it was before Obama got elected in the US.

I think she was just trying to shill her books to the Christian majority at the time. Critics also marketed the Matrix by claiming that it's "inspired by Christianity" since it had a resurrected protagonist. The directors eventually revealed themselves as atheist leftist trannies who created subversive anti-Christian trash for Netflix.

If I knew what was gong to happen in the future, then I would have never given them money in the first place.

I remember getting poisoned by that faggot ghost and kept dying a lot. The fuckall of no clues on where to go to heal yourself is what really pissed me off.

>>15795547

>fuckall of no clues on where to go to heal yourself

They literally say "check the library", then when they don't have it Peeves corners you to hint at "a muggle studying it". They force hints on you left and right, you're just boned if you turn off the game and forget any of them.

>>15795547

You must have been a completely retarded mongoloid of a kid to not beat that part, I was fucking 7 when I beat the game

>>15793756

They turned from stories about kids, to stories about teens though.

>>15806839

>see pic

>hope for Hermione porn

>get exactly that

Not bad.

>>15806839

>No, it really wasn't.

It's a book about a worthless shitstain getting everything handed on a platter to him and fighting against Wizard Hitler to pozz up the magical world. About the only justice is that he ended up marrying the coal burning school bicycle.

>>15806839

Fudge is shown to be incompetent in the face of danger; IIRC he was called to be a good peacetime minister and a bad wartime minister.

He seemed like an analogue of Neville Chamberlain vs. Winston Churchill, or at least the version how most people seem to think of them (Chamberlain as not preparing the country properly for war and Churchill as a leader to get rid off as soon as the war is over). There is at least one interview where Rowling names him as an inspiration for Fudge:

>My model of the world after Voldemort's return was, directly, the government of Neville Chamberlain in Great Britain during the Second World War, when he tried to minimize the menace of the Nazi regime for political convenience.

~Rowling

It wasn't about class, it was about blood, which is inherently about race. Though even in Potter's world, power trumped those, as it was being led by voldemort, a half-blood. It even has it's own "racist" term like mudblood (with people being offended by it being used.)

The fact that this is only offensive in one direction shows the inherent truth of the statement (like how most racist insults have an inherent truth inside them). Otherwise it wouldn't sting so much.

When Harry wants to hurt Draco, he can't insult him by saying "pureblood" any more than any american negro can insult with "cracker", since the inherent root and truth of the word isn't an insult.

So while many of the markers of marxist or cultural marxist propaganda aren't there (anti-fertility, anti-logic, anti-family), it does have markers of the american cultural marxist race rhetoric. You seem to want to gloss over it, but the theme of blood-origins is a central one of the harry potter saga.

A lot of the "less-sjw" things are only there because the books were written in a "less-sjw" age. Time has moved on and the books look conservative by comparison.

The most notable counter-example might be the house-elves who are insulted by Granger's attempts to emancipate them, wishing instead to be eternal servants.

>>15795500

>If I knew what was gong to happen in the future, then I would have never given them money in the first place.

You must always assume that any western entertainment is made by leftists and other mentally ill. And thus, never give money to any of it at all. And also never consume it. And especially, make normalfags avoid it, by convincing groups little by little, and making them go after non-leftist entertainment.

>>15806839

>"Harry Potter was always cucked"

It was. It was always marxist propaganda. And it was never good. There are many examples, such as >>15806938 and >>15806988

and others.

>>15793742

>Pioneer of Goblin Rights.

>>15793742

The GBC era was wild. It was like there was always an equal chance that you'd either get a forgettable piece of generic shovelware… or a completely mindblowing excellent game, regardless of the subject matter.

>>15807066

(((Goblins)))

>>15807097

>In many countries being "low-born" is tantamount to being a nigger.

Yet the Weasleys are still considered pureblooded despite being poor, so it's obviously about genetics.

>the books do not reflect the cucked-to-death wokeness that anons keep claiming they do

The books keep hammering the audiences over the head about how evil Voldermort is because he wants all the muggleborn raus, despite clearly showing in Hermione how disruptive they are to the native culture.

>When you say Harry Potter is marxist propaganda because Harry's girlfriend briefly dated two guys before him (neither of which was a nigger) you sound pretty retarded.

It's nice how you ignore the fact Harry is busy fighting Wizard Hitler and his SS buddies to open up the magical world to mass immigration.

Shit that JK Retard has said

Wizards just shat on the floor because bathrooms were a muggle invention

The only wizards in the world come from britain, France and eastern europe, somehow Indians wizards exist.

Harry potter is actually a pakistani

>>15807126

>Yet the Weasleys are still considered pureblooded despite being poor, so it's obviously about genetics.

They are poor, sure, but they have power that rich muggles do not. Like I said before, I don't buy this explanation personally but I could see the logic behind it. Rowling has likely always been an ideological coward and prone to mirror whatever the public opinion of the day was. ie: Hitler and white supremacists bad!

Voldemort clearly has some parallels to a bluepill's idea of Hitler, but is not a 'direct metaphor' in a lot of ways I've already mentioned above.

>>15807185

>there are no bad wizards or witches from non-slytherin houses

Wormtail. It's the whole point of his character

>>15807148

It's shown Hogwarts had complex plumbing since it was built a gorillion years ago. I'm not really sure what point you're trying to make here.

>>15807172

> Rowling has likely always been an ideological coward and prone to mirror whatever the public opinion of the day was

I mean, so are you when you write:

> Like I said before, I don't buy this explanation personally but I could see the logic behind it.

Either it fits or it doesn't. Why defend it if you don't buy it yourself?

>>15806839

>Rowling did go far off the deep-end into SJW retard-land but the books were already finished by that time

By a group of ghostwriters, yes

>>15807195

> I cannot consider ideas I do not believe to be absolute fact

Because it's obvious from the context of when and where the books were written that a bluepill wrote them. Of course taken out of the context of 1990s Inglun it's not an obvious.

>>15807191

She started making shit up on twitter claiming the toilets were added in the 1800s and wizards just shit on the floor despite medieval castles having Garderobes for a thousand years.

>>15793742

What am I looking at?

>>15807211

It's not that I can not. I choose not to. Seems profoundly impractical way to approach things, to be honest, which is why I asked why you half-defended it.

>>15807215

Hahaha what. The Chamber of Secrets' entrance was in the girl's toilet, and the chamber had been there since day one. Of course it wouldn't be the first time Rowling didn't know what she herself wrote.

>>15807223

It's either sorceror's stone or chamber of secrets for the GBC. pretty fun games actually.

>>15807215

Had she started to date a poo-in-the-loo or something?

>>15807228

I always consider ideas I do not believe in and am constantly doubting my beliefs. "Am I right? Is this sensible? Does my opponent have a point? Am I wrong?" And yet this logic has led me to a far right view of the world. If you don't question your own beliefs but take them on faith you may as well admit they're worthless if you can't put them to the test.

>>15807255

I don't think logic and testing of ideas can lead anywhere else than a far-right view of the world. It seems to surprise you somehow? I guess that surprises me.

Whether you've tested them or not; it seems profoundly contraproductive to not act decisively on them. Also, if you've gone to such lengths to attain them, it also make sense to allow yourself to get a deeper conviction in them.

Not just allow yourself now that I think about it; it is a goal worth striving for.

Why offer wiggle-room to others when you're convinced it's less likely? You're certainly not doing them any favors by indulging them. And if you are indeed wrong, they'll challenge you more vigourously when you don't allow them quarter, so it even helps offload some of the self-questioning.

>>15807322

>You're certainly not doing them any favors by indulging them.

It's for my own goal of being honest to myself. To even be able to dissect an idea and refute it you need to first understand it as your opponent does.

>>15793742

This is all fairly inconsequential shit to begin with, so it's no wonder you wouldn't remember any of it.

>>15793742

You don't like the negritos?

>>15793742

i do, it was the shit, I then remember goblet of fire for gba being shit

>>15807322

>I don't think logic and testing of ideas can lead anywhere else than a far-right view of the world

Then why oh why do so many people refuse to acknowledge that, in many cases, they're using exactly the same shitty logic that I see coming out of the mouths of SJWs? I like to consider myself someone who gives all ideas a fair shake, but the joke about "stormfront or SJW" only seems to apply more and more as time goes on. Both sides use thought-terminating cliches to avoid having to argue points, both sides have a distressing habit of treating points they are satisfied with as immutable axioms instead of conclusions that might have to change with the introduction of evidence, both sides claim that all evidence contrary to their beliefs is a fabrication of their omnipresent and omnipotent enemy while simultaneously touting supportive evidence from similar sources as unfailingly correct and beyond reproach, and above all, both sides adamantly refuse to argue in good faith, instead choosing to lob about accusations about the opponent's intentions, misrepresent their opposition's points, resort to pathos instead of logical evidence to support their points, and overall seek to frustrate any attempt to earnestly discuss the matters in question.

Sorry for the rant, it's something I've been needing to get off my chest. I might be getting a bit blackpilled.

>>15807185

futa is less gay that lesbianism and therefore less cucked

>>15814275

Mate you do know right it's not the NatSocs that are the ones acting as if any idea other than their own is 100% since National Socialism is so easy to have differening opinions on what it actually is, as in what I think is NatSoc is a lot different than you

It's the fucking boomer q fags who swear to gay shit like liberty or "Freedom"

wish i was a kid

>>15806839

What you just outlined can be just interpreted the other way.

>Government propaganda to paint telling the truth as a wrong thinker

<Those darn fascists telling you that we are wrong

>He uses Umbridge to stop students from learning to defend themselves

<Conservatives are appointing "spies" to stir up the movement

>Goblins are kikes

^ As funny as this is, it probably is just because goblins are known for liking money.

>Voldemort is half-blood mutt

Back-pedaling and covering her tracks so that people don't accuse her of spreading said Marxist propaganda.

Sure, she created a world that *might* seem like its playing a session of hyper-dimensional putt-putt, but considering her background, tweets, and the fact that she is a woman only says otherwise.

But who knows, maybe she looked at the abyss too long, and it started starring back

>>15815276

>^ As funny as this is, it probably is just because goblins are known for liking money.

Which the archetype for goblins is jews. The reason goblins love money is because they're jewish caricatures in folklore. Much like how Medusa in actuality was worshipped as a goddess that the Greeks had a terrible fight with and she's recorded as a monster in Greek mythology due to being of the enemy camp.

>>15806839

the only red pill shit in HP came becos lefty writters are shit at selling their own propaganda, becos right wing rethoric tends to be the truth so writters can't escape from it when wrtting a realistic scenario and becos the books were not written entierly as propaganda, say what you will about JK Rowling, it's clear that she wrote the book for thinking of the reader's entretainament first and any social comentary second