/v/ - Video Games

Its not enough to point at a group of niggers and say this is 100% nigger. We need 200% nigger.

>>15520465

Tired feminist bigotry is what counts as "new ideas" now?

>>15520487

No he just knows nothing about video games.

>>15520498

We just need well written characters whether they are male or female within well made games.

>>15520513

We just need thicklipped nigger characters whether they are likeable or not shoved everywhere in games

>>15520498

>>15520519

>muh huwite sharia

He's right, that a great female character generally needs to be written in a way that dovetails with their femininity. Simply swapping around checkboxes in your cast, rather than making it more "diverse", only further highlights the blandness of your story.

Was this worth a thread?

these generic articles all sound the same now. 4 years and nothing has changed

>>15520522

I'm sorry your elaborate tuba honking simulator general thread had to die for this.

>Point at Bayonetta

>Job Done

What? They were ready to ban Bayonetta if they would have had the leverage to at the time, and she's been a constant exemplar throw up by feminists for all the things "wrong" with depictions of women in gaming. They can't just forget all the shit they talked for the last 10 fucking years and then try to claim her as their own.

Who the fuck cares what a cultural marxist windbag has to say about videogames. Why don't marxists give the same cry treatment over the fact that there is not enough straight male representation in the fashion industry, or white representation in basketball? Protip: It's because they seek the destruction of white men, not "representation" which is a retarded ideal to begin with

>>15520498

Judging from the character rename he mentioned, it's probably some jewtuber. I know one guy's used the same name for videos of another game in the series before.

>>15520507

I'm reminded of the story behind Animal Crossing (N64). The producer Takashi Tezuka wanted the game to appeal to a broad demographic including women. So nearly all the women who worked in EAD group (about 7) were put to work on the game, one designed characters, some did interior design, textbox design, wallpaper/carpets/clothing, etc.

Somehow that paid off and AC has a massive fanbase of both men and women. With New Leaf having 56% of pre-orders by women and even buying 3DS's just for the game.

>>15520582

>they can't even run a studio like Telltale Games (How the fuck you can screw a studio that make point and click games? That's beyond me.)

I think there is an Einstein quote of doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity (or is it stupidity?) would apply well to TTG post TWD formula.

>>15520662

>if we ignore it it will go away

your kind of faggotry is how this shit was allowed to fester and grow for decades

>>15520687

Ignoring and outcompeting it is the only way to make it go away. Unless you're not all that confident about the quality of the games competing with the poz, anyway…

>>15520693

Ignoring it never helped, you fucking idiot.

Kill yourself.

>>15520693

>ignoring it and outcompeting it is the only way to make it go away

No it isn't and you are retarded if you think that will work. Ignoring it is how they were able to slip in, and you are not representative of the market so you aren't going to out compete a monopoly.

>>15520696

Very few have actually ignored it. The big guys knuckled under and sacrificed principles for money.

>>15520699

>a monopoly

Which monopoly is that, which forbids others from making and selling better games?

>>15520582

Can you post more sexy Vivian?

>>15520700

The big guys have wanted this all along, they just needed the culture shifted far enough to make it work. This shit didn't start in the past decade. It just got unbearable in the past decade.

>>15520702

Advertising. You will always be a drop in the bucket and so will anyone else who isn't towing the line. At best you get a slightly less pozzed game, which no doubt to faggots like you is good enough because you don't care unless the poz is dialed up to 15.

>>15520682

AC is a game that's just right, and achieves peak comfy somehow. I guess being comfy, relaxed, and cute is what attracts women, but thing is that's exactly what makes AC good and why men like it as well.

There is nothing wrong with genders liking different things. It is extremely comfy when both sexes can agree on something, like how good AC is, but these people don't seem to understand that many women don't play most "mainstream" games because they are not their cup of tea, not because a girl is showing too much skin, but because maybe they don't want to play like cocaine-ridden APM monkeys. Fire Emblem is another game a lot of women like, and it has its fair deal of skimpy clothes.

These people don't understand that if they want more girls in gaming, they have to start pandering to them, not making other games pander less to men.

>>15520710

the big guys want big numbers, that attracts stock holders that demand bigger numbers. marketing or advertisability is exactly whats dragging everything down since numbers are the only priority. when youre vouching for advertising, youre just confirming that keeping a cool head is the right path.

>>15520732

>the big guys want big numbers

Ignoring how they have shoved increasing poz into every new game regardless of whether it hurts sales or not. They have an agenda and control enough of the market to weather losses until it sticks.

And they still pretend there is no political agenda behind it.

>>15520744

we are not in total disagreement, they were never our friends since we are just numbers. and there are surely such schemes in place nowadays as there are successful infiltrators and in many cases theres nothing left to them but a name. but marketing is the gatekeeper to all this. thats how they got in, thats how they were opened up to this kind of thing and thats where we end back up at with what i believe is their end goal, security/longevity.

in the quest for coverage/advertising or for public image they sell their soul. that public image is for some reason very important, they must play along or the too busy to think will turn their backs on them.

unless theyre under the radar enough to not really care too much either way about some propaganda piece since at that stage any coverage is good coverage.

>>15520582

This. Just laugh at them or kill them. Anything else is a waste of effort.

I remember not what, 10 years ago that things were so different. Nobody cared about Trannies. Feminism was mostly kept to the occational GURL POWAH episode in a cartoon. People felt like they had thicker skins and those that were properly laughed at, not coddled by companies. What changed?

>>15520997

(((They))) start by having you laugh at it.

>>15521010

They're basically doubling down on the old classic of shouting everyone else down and claiming their silence is acceptance to your ideals.

>>15521010

It's like they want the illusion of change. The feeling of making a difference within what would seem like an insignificant position they're in (which they are). They are the Don Quixote's that are chasing windmills. It's like a Don Quixote Syndrome outbreak with nobody giving them proper medication.

>all there is for this game is a twatter and faceberg page

I call shenanigans.

>>15521359

Show me your collection of commie scalps and I'll take you seriously, TORpedo

Oh hey a chance to post this again.

>>15520487

>N-no gaming is totally representative of women and feminism. See? Look at all of these examples. Now please stop politicizing my hobby!

I thought we cleaned you cucks out years ago.

>>15520465

>UK Editor

James needs to wake up. His country is under invasion, and all he's doing is writing an article about some stupid feminist in gaming.

>>15521028

refugees say the darnedest things

>>15521474

Samus

Jill Valentine

Chun Li

Nina Williams

Sophitia

Sheik/Tetra (non-princess forms of Zelda basically)

Aloy

Bloodrayne

SNK's Athena

Off the top of my head. There are plenty of female leads, and that's only in the genres I actually play. Girly shit like VNs and P&C adventures have fucking way more than the usual action/adventure quota.

If anything women are over-represented in gaming given how few women actually play the hardcore games. Survey after survey shows 50% of women play games, but of those women, 80%+ are playing mobile shit almost exclusively. The remaining 20% get plenty of proportional representation in their games.

And now you are starting to realize that it's long gone the times when women fought for EQUAL rights you know, what they call egalitarianism.

What happens when that is the case?

>Push for female inclusion

>People bow before you because it is just to be more inclusive

>Industry becomes more inclusive

>Job well done, let's live on

This is not what's happening.

And it's far from the truth that this is a bunch of feminists just sperging out because they can. This is a systematic oppression of everyone who doesn't conform to their "beliefs" Belief is the wrong word. Maybe doctrine?

Why is it that behind every feminist there's a big bunch of money?

Why is it that that money almost always comes from left-leaning rich assholes and/or globalists?

>I first started expressing an interest in making games when I was at senior school, and I mentioned games alongside film and TV;

>I just wanted to tell stories and those are the three mediums I think are interesting.

>"[Careers advisors] completely ignored my game-making aspirations and just pushed me more in the TV/film direction

Damn, those advisors tried to save us from another shitty art "game" maker.

>With aspirations of becoming a narrative designer or game director, Fernandez hopes to contribute to changing perceptions of video games and the career opportunities they offer women in her own way - starting with Deserter.

>The game takes about 10 minutes to play through

>10 minutes

Just another retard wannabe filmmaker who doesn't care about games and doesn't know shit about them. That's not even getting to her dumb ass remarks on female game characters, which there are fucking mountains of but she wouldn't know since she doesn't fucking play games.

>>15521474

One "badass" female character is too much really.

>>15520465

>everybody needs to be a woman

lol this faggot

>>15521753

They want females in a leading position, with males explicitly depicted as either useless or admirative of their assertiveness and leadership. Keep in mind they don't see the game in video games, only the narrative (that they mostly make up from their ideology). So it doesn't matter what the characters actually do or what the story actually is, what matters to them is the trivial details of how they are shown.

>>15521630

>There are plenty of female leads

too many, feminists are never satisfied because they can't get any, devs should cut down female leads

So what about all of those other female characters? Don't make me get the list. Jill Valentine? Who?

>>15521766

> It's all white noise meant to fool gullible fence shitters in siding with them

Good work then, because I was neatly on the left early 00s and these psychos dragged the Left so far back like a fucking treadmill belt that i had to jump over the fence just to stay where I was.

>>15521010

Every time someone posts this gif I think it's Dracula from the thumbnail.

>>15521895

We talk about left and right, but it's beyond that at this point. A few decades ago, no one would be in favour of encouraging kids to have sexual reassignment surgeries, left or right. It's purely a battle between fantasy and reality, sanity and insanity at this point.

I bet if you added up all of the games where you only play a man, vs all of the games where a woman is at least an option, the second catagory would win, though sports games might offset the balance.

>>15521956

Okay, but that wasn't "the left" was it? That was (((the left))).

>>15521966

>the useful idiot is the problem

>>15521972

The useful idiots are just the masses. They want to be told what to think and how to behave. These people can be a burden, but they're also a necessity, as you can't have a society made up entirely of leaders and free thinkers. These people are only a problem when destructive ideas are planted in their minds.

>>15520592

>>15520582

This. They aren't trying to get more female representation. They're trying to be what determines what is enough female representation. By saying "what about Samus, are we progressive enough now mommy?" you give them exactly what they want. They don't care about video games, hell, they don't even care about women. They care about power and influence. Stop humoring them.

>>15522013

The point is to sway bystanders who might actually be dumb enough to believe there are only two female characters in all of video games, and all they're asking for is a bit of variety.

>>15521720

Because it's the same as these dried up cunts asking for muh wymynz representation. Go make it yourself if you want something to reinforce your identity.

>>15520592

Of course it isn't. Give an inch get taken for a mile. Then again, these cunts can only impotently wail on about wanting others to do things for them. It's the fools in gamedev who actually listen to them thinking there's a player base to be satisfied there.

>>15522014

>sway bystanders

you tell bystander normal homos to eat shit and die

>>15522033

More like the kikes in managerial and institutional positions who put developers in a bind forcing them to comply or be left living in a $50k plus a year rent city with no job opportunities. Of course the Stockholm syndrome already set in years before this ever became an issue so resistance was never even considered an option.

>>15522014

They do not care about the bystanders. They already have a mass of idiots who will do whatever they say. It's called tumblr. They are trying to gain more power by getting into positions in the industry itself. That's why they push agendas and virtue signal. It's noise to make them look bigger than they are, make them look like a fighter of oppression and make them look like the only answer to this "issue" they created.

>>15522047

These people have cared about the bystanders for a long time. That's how they operate. Slowly slipping their ideas into people's minds until they no longer question them.

>>15521454

im mocking the author for rewriting history and saying there's no female video game characters in video games.

>>15520737

Almost like these faggots have never played a single video game ever.

>when things like Gamergate

There's something magical about being the big, bad boogeyman when the entire thing has effectively been on life support for just about years by now.

>>15522555

Nice digits

>>15520513

A well-written female character is a loving mother and wife. A woman pretending to be a man is not well-written UNLESS the fact that she was emotionally abused to become that way is the characterization and her arc.

>>15522791

Counterpoint: crone and seductress.

>>15522805

It’s a shame that Five Guys got (negatively subconsciously) associated with that shit. It’s the only chain I find worth eating.

>>15522795

Oh, sure; those styles are fairly traditional and work as well.

>>15522835

5 guys is really expensive for not an amazing burger imo. I get better from a local diner.

>>15520718

>There is nothing wrong with genders liking different things.

Men and women are different sexes, not genders. Don't let them control language.

Didn't Bioware say only less than 20 percent of players even used FemShep?

>>15520465

>>15521010

It's just a marketing tactic for them to market shitty games, BUT WOKE. That's pretty much it.

>>15523164

>Estelle is second fiddle to Joshua. wew.

Which only proves my point that they never played these games.

>>15523231

You're a faggot for liking Bioware games period.

>>15523292

Yeah and it's terrible.

<WE NEED MORE WYMYN IN VIDEOGAMES

>ok this is my idea we have an attractive

<OBJECTIFYING

>White

<RACIST

>Woman with boobs

<SEXIST RAPE MONSTER YOU SHOULD BE KILLED FOR YOUR IDEAS

>With no severe mental disorders

<RRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGHHHHHHHH

>And is actually capable and not a pathetic child like Samus in Other M

<STOP FUCKING RAPING ME YOU SHITLORD

More WYMYN in Vidya could be cool, but we all know they just want more obese mulatto half nigger tranny blobs with purple hair and no boobs to get raped by digital niggers.

>>15523416

>Piercing the condom

How retarded is Shadman?

>With aspirations of becoming a narrative designer or game director,

>Narrative designer

>The opposite of sellable skillset

Stopped reading right here.

>>15521956

>And let's not forget how the German Green Party used to put children in a room, encourage them to simulate sex with each other while their observed them through a one-way glass for "research".

A-Anon, s-source?

>>15521474

How about 50% of all fightan characters?

>>15520507

>shonen - tween/teen

>seinen - young adult/adult

>this is what weebs actually believe

Shonen is for boys and seinen is for teens. While adults do read manga, they usually go back to more lighthearted stuff like sports manga.

>>15526132

I prefer strong people as opposed to strong women; when the sex of the character becomes the focus, the creator is doing something wrong.

>>15526141

What makes a strong woman are virtues completely different from what makes a strong man. Equality is really just masculinizing females and feminizing males.

>>15526054

>(1)

You're full of shit, by the way.

Don't talk about shit you don't understand, goon.

>>15520515

>Then he should quit his job because he's already failed at very fundamental level.

His job is to oppose masculinity, and anything else that's a threat to jewish control.

>>15522835

>>15522880

>>15526164

I'd post a webm but youtube-dl is a gay piece of shit that doesn't create valid webms anymore.

>>15526260

Then use invidious, faggot

>>15526335

>the ability to make sound rational decisions

Obviously a male virtue and why females up until feminism were guided by their fathers/husbands.

>the ability to control's one's emotions

See above

>interests or hobbies

Irrelevant to the point.

Female virtues are entirely around caring for and supporting their families. Holding them to a male standard is playing by feminist logic, except feminists use said logic hypocritically with applying male virtues to females without holding them to actually fulfilling said virtues. You are holding females to male virtues and pointing out how they don't meet them as an argument for why females are just shit, which again is just assuming they have to be like males to be of any value. They are different for a reason and that difference should be recognized for why and what it is. Females should never have been expected to live up to male virtues because they are not male. A female isn't shit because she is emotionally driven and incapable of competent leadership, she isn't meant to be a logic driven leader. She is meant to nurture her man's children and provide respect, love, and validation for the struggles he goes through to provide for her and said children. This not being the case with modern women is because they are damaged goods.

>>15526579

>tomboys are gay because

>WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS

Hello, Mr. Buckley.

>>15526691

>tomboys

Acting boyish and being bad at it does what to disprove anything that I said?

>y-you're a faggot c-confirmed

Says the faggot who wants boyish females.

>>15526703

>samefagging this hard

>>15526703

Tomboys are not gay

>WORDS WORDS WORDS

Does this part

>This not being the case with modern women is because they are damaged goods.

Hit too close to home? I know it's harsh, not only it's something damaged women cannot fix, it's also something they brought on to themselves on their own volition. It's one thing to be a subhuman, it's even more painful to have become one through one's own fault.

>>15526691

>>15526703

>i love men with tits

>i love women who don’t act like women

>i love emotionally abused girls who think they’re not girls

<totally not gay bro

>>>/reddit/

>>15526260

Isn’t he a queer furry?

>>15520487

<Yeah but most of them are white and thin so it doesn't count.

>tomboy fetish

Or as I call it, gay-lite.

>>15526787

She won't turn if you claim her

>>15526864

>posting a direct embed of The Bald Coalburner

>>15527105

It is better even thought it wasn't finished, but he was saying KOTOR wasn't good at all.

>>15527000

>the same anon ID hopping both spout some bullshit about tomboys out of the blue within minutes of each other

>i-i'm not samefagging

>>15526864

>Direct link to youtube

>Direct link to WigOnHead

wtf are you doing anon?

>>15526194

That's a pretty fair summary. Men and women evolved for different roles. Fighting your nature just leads to people becoming more and more unhappy as this feminist shit is pushed on people. Women in the west are getting more and more unhappy/unsatisfied, and male suicide rates are growing from what I've heard. Everyone suffers for this cancer.

>>15526864

>direct linking to nigger lover

>>>/reddit/

>>15527222

>The reason tomboys were brought up by more than one person is because you're the kind of stupid shit that believes that women being uninteresting eyecandy is a good thing.

I said nothing about tomboys. I spoke about male and female nature. That you or some other faggots have a tomboy fetish is completely irrelevant. That supposedly two different anons, within 2 and a half minutes of "eachother", both jump to defending tomboys when they weren't even brought up is more than a little coincidental. Maybe try not to be so defensive about your degenerate fetishes in the future?

>>15527279

>she plays sports

60+% chance she will end up fucking her knees or legs in general up

>>15527305

>implying they know anything about video games or their communities

Even Peach could be considered a strong character.

>But anon, she gets kidnapped!

She's also the fucking sole ruler of an entire kingdom. A lynchpin of her government. Literally every man around her except Mario and Luigi are goddamned incompetent. Her father was so inept and useless he simply ceased to exist as a government entity, or at least as someone worthy of note, before the SNES era. Peach is shown to have excellent skills in diplomacy and general government management, outside of military tactics or strategy. She manages herself quite well even when taken captive, most minions of Bowser and even Bowser himself finding it hard to actually do her harm outside of imposing that captivity. And this is due to her overwhelming charisma. Literally, she is just too likable to even consider causing her harm.

I admit that I'm probably injecting too much narrative into the Mario games here, but in the ones that have a story, this is consistent. Peach is likable, runs her government so well that no one seems to ever consider takeover (And in fact, Muchroom Kingdom is quite a nice-looking place, without poverty or disrepair) and is beloved by her people. In cases where she is allowed by the medium, she's even considerably capable as a fighter. I simply assume her sense of decorum prevents her from beating her captors senseless with her crown, most of the time.

I'm only taking the piss a little.

>>15527301

At least its something.

I barely played any sports at all for half my life, and now that I finally started getting into more "athletic" stuff, I found out that my knees are horribly fucked up and pretty much will cripple me by the time I'm 50 unless I get it fixed.

>>15527305

Its kind of funny how literally only landwhales and soiboys want this tumblr-tier shit that is infecting all these games.

Regular guys tend to sexualize attractive female characters, whether they are strong (Samus, Lara Croft, etc.) or not (Peach, most other princesses).

It would make sense that most girls into vidya would be into sexualizing attractive male characters (Link, Dante, etc.).

It has nothing to do with whatever bullshit progressive pet issue is at stake.

>>15527301

That's only if you abuse them a lot, like a professional player does. Other than that the benefits far outweigh the risk.

>>15526864

>Terra

>Jade

>Maya

>White

only samus and heather are white the rest are 1/2 magical esper with a satyr father, black, and Japanese

>>15520465

>what is goalpost shifting for $200, Alex.

>>15527320

She only gets kidnapped at this point because she likes it. She could beat Bowser singled handedly if she wanted to. Peach is fucked up.

>>15527376

Look, the only reason Peach doesn't beat the everloving shit out of her captors is because it would escalate the conflicts with the Koopa Kingdom to the point of open, actual warfare. Far better to simply sit in relatively cushy captivity and let Mario handle the matter than expose the Mushroom Kingdom to a war it clearly can't handle for the sake of personal dignity. I mean, would you trust Toads to be able to hold their own against flying fucking turtles with predatory beaks?

>>15522077

sauce on on pics?

>>15520582

I have to wonder why 3D women find this sort of style appealing, and why men with bad taste like >>15520705 (and the aforementioned women, no doubt) call it "sexy" when it's just whorish. Disgustingly ugly, the style started with hoochies and West Indian women (frequently those who wanted to show off their emaciatedly skinny legs, this especially in the early 00s) somewhere around the 90s, if not slightly before. White women already had a fine look down, and then somehow, for some reason, latched onto this–and strongly, right at about 2007-8. Truly a symbol of dissipation: the pants are themselves a symbol of sex obsession, women wearing them appearing to wear nothing at all below the waist at times; the flats are a symbol of regression to primitivity, having been initially popular with people from backwater/relatively uncivilized countries. And yet no one notices. Women call it "cute", men stare at asses slack-jawedly to the oblivion of everything else and call it "sexy".

Sage for offtopic.

>>15527501

>human parasite

Anon your take on this is misguided. The issue is not parasitism because all human society is symbiotic by nature (and in this regard even at times parasitic). The issue is that the Class stratification has broken down and these people are no longer subjugated thus their nature's been unleashed becomes perverted and grows like a cancer cell.

>>15527335

>At least its something.

It's a lot of physical stress since most sports girls play are activities their bodies aren't really meant to handle including lots quick direction changing.

>>15527349

The problem is female hips are not conducive toward running and changing directions while running. Basketball in particular is bad on female knee's and leg tendons.

>>15527374

>boyish females isn't degenerate!

Would you say the same thing about effeminate males?

>>15521474

Enough for what and why do you want them, exactly?

I think just pointing out female characters like >>15520487 is falling into their trap because feminists can just say those are not enough, and then they'll say they're not diverse enough because they're not gay or trans, etc. I'm not even giving you that because your reasons for wanting female characters don't make sense in the first place.

If you mean they're not enough because you want to play as a woman in more games, then the reason is that it's just how the market works. You'll get more female characters when people want to buy them.

If you want more females for equal representation for a feminist political point, then same as above. Companies that make games are not political parties, they're there to sell and make money. That means responding to market trends and doing whatever sells. You're basically bitching about the statistically proven fact that women buy less PC and console games than men, or that only a small portion of those women actually want female main character.

If female main characters sold more, you would have already seen more of them.

>poison

person*

>>15527501

>All problems in any country come down to a lack of education and communication.

A country without naturally stupid or violent people maybe. You can lead a horse to water.

>>15527609

When it's both stupidity and malice, stupidity is enabling malice. the fact that you can identify and stereotype malicious action is indicitive of stupidity and ignorance of such problems in regards to maliciousness being the problem. The degree of stereotypes and the prevalence of them being the deciding factor.

The problem is not easily diagnosed in this situation either. The problem is ultimately extreme polarization of two sides of a political argument, but the causes can be found.

My hypothesis is that the cause is due to a rapid shift in information confusion, not caused by individuals since this sort of problem requires willing group participation, but rather that the internet has allowed mass contact and the novelty hasn't worn off yet, even now. And it's compounded by the housing bubble crises, people are worried for income and with it came a shift in employment practices, job to job instead of employment stasis at one job for a start.

So, with the internet, everyone is in view. This massive influx of information has overloaded some people. News media capitalized on this by doubling down on their "Blood, Sex, Fear" story strats to keep people watching, but the rise of alternative news sources due to the internet made their once effective strategy seem less effective since people are now getting their news from elsewhere so stats are down, so they double down, go too far, and get mocked heavily.

You see where this is going? There's too many factors to play around here. My argument is that the diagnosis is as useful as as diagnosing someone with an obvious cold with a cough.

The diagnosis will not matter here. This isn't something that can be solved, this isn't a problem with a solution, only treatments. We can diagnose all day, but the only thing we can do, what ANYONE can do, is to calm people down, de-politicize, and wait for everyone else to do the same.

This isn't going to get solved by caring about the problem, this is going to be solved by desensitizing people, giving them confidence and soothing nerves. Treating people as people instead of animals, encouraging others to do the same.

The only thing that can solve this is to be a better person yourself, to be an example of a put-together human being, and to call out bullshit where it stands. Not trying to blow away a hurricane.

>As for this faggot >>15521474 look at >>15527697 to find the games right for you.

>>15527737

That's obvious bait. No one here is ignorant enough to think there are only three women in all of video games.

>>15527742

People who've been told as such and accepted it do. You would be surprised.

>"HARRY POTTER IS WITCHCRAFT", "D&D IS THE DEVIL'S GAME!".

It doesn't have to be religious, i've personally seen some pretty ignorant people in my life. You see them more often on the internet and yes some of those aren't real, but they do exist.

>>15527748

None of those people are posting on /v/.

>>15523625

>He doesn't know sluts do this so they can get impregnated

Are you that mentally incapable?

>>15527697

Did you mean to reply to somebody else?

>>15527771

yeah sorry i meant to reply to the person you were replying to.

freedom of information *

>>15527611

>This is true, but you can easily create a female character that exemplifies masculine virtue without it undermining her femininity at all.

Such a character is not truly female. Sure she may not be offensively mannish, and in fact may appear completely feminine aside from some aberrations, but it isn't representative of female virtue and it isn't really a good thing in general. Such characters have been used as the grease for the slippery slope for decades.

>>15527969

Also as an addendum to my second paragraph, yes it is possible to control a populace by keeping them so weak and infirm that they literally cannot resist the government, but I was under the impression that a "nationalist" government of this type wants the exact opposite of this.

>>15527978

And this kind of retarded shit is why the West will never be able to create any worthwhile female characters. Too busy going through various political fever dreams.

>>15528024

If you have a "good feminine character" who just so happens to be courageous and fight in battles then it isn't much of a step for the next iteration to be a bit more badass, a bit more courageous, a bit more assertive, a bit more of a leader, a bit more aggressive, a bit more the focus, a bit more better compared to the male characters. The article quoted in the OP illustrates this effect perfectly "It's not enough."

Also you are blind if you think Japan is free of this same slippery slope. It just is harder to shift Japan toward feminist bullshit because of cultural differences and less of a jew infestation. Nip companies aren't caving to localization because of ignorance, they are going in the same direction, but are just on a different part of the curve.

>>15527969

>happy mediums are impossible

You're retarded. Anarcho-capitalist minarchism and communist totalitarian oligarchy are not the only options, nor are they regressive situations. A government that has hard control over an explicit list of things and which will explicitly be removed/executed for treason if it goes outside this list can easily stand for long periods, and can easily allow necessary freedoms to its citizens.

If you want your personal vision of your ideal female character go write your own because harassing existing writers will hopefully fucking backfire eventually. I'm waiting for the devs to just get tired of being hounded on by fucking secondaries every other week, how can this be viewed as acceptable anymore

>>15528111

>masculine girls have nothing in common with effeminate boys

Both are degenerate. Just like you, fag.

>>15527483

Stop being a faggot, scantily clad women are sexy.

>>15520465

Ah yes, lets destroy the only hobby that contains the violent tendencies of boys and young men.

I can't wait till this fucks them over in a generation.

>>15528136

They plan to contain it in the future with large doses of estrogen.

because they can obfuscate their duties by hiding behind the pretenses that the accountability

>>15527978

>>15528054

You're not paying attention. The problem with the "strong female character" stereotype is not that she possesses masculine virtue (she doesn't, in fact–the thing the SFC is designed to have is agency without responsibility), it's that she lacks feminine virtue.

>>15528156

>implying I said just like

Both are shifted from their natural sexual characteristics to varying degrees. Keep on defending your faggotry though. You want boyish girls and are trying to act like this doesn't make you a faggot.

>>15528176

Having some masculine virtue requires losing some feminine virtue.

>>15528200

I contend that it does not. Read "The Necessity of Chivalry" by C.S. Lewis for an exploration of this from the male perspective.

>>15528196

Okay, whatever. Last (you) that you are getting from me. Go bother someone else with your faggoty non-arguments.

>>15528188

Men and women are polar opposites. And we both agree that men having features similar to the opposite gender is bad. Now what does this say about women?

>>15528203

I do not think I will be doing that. Why don't you put an argument forward on this subject yourself? If I venture a guess about the direction you are going regarding "chivalry" I would contend that none of that is at all feminine. I would contend that some of it is natural inclinations of men toward women and some of it was taken to the extreme by proto-feminists.

>>15528207

>Men and women are polar opposites

No. Virtue and vice are opposites, men and women are complements.

Masculine virtue (courage, for instance) is opposed by feminine vice (cowardice) and complemented by feminine virtue (devotion), while feminine virtue is opposed by masculine vice and complemented by masculine virtue.

>effeminate girl

you know what I met

>>15526194

>>15526579

>>15527978

Yeah, ok, women in real life are neurotic baby makers who have the mental capacity of a male retard, it's wired in our brains and probably necessary to keep society running, but why should that be an ideal to strive towards in fiction? If men in fiction can slay dragons and lift boulders, you can give women a few brain cells and have them do things other than their nails.

>>15528217

So in your opinion is getting pegged by a plastic dick not gay because a woman is wearing it? Sorry, but it's gay for a male to want male elements involved with himself sexually. The addition of feminine elements or a female with masculine elements doesn't negate that fact. You don't cancel out the faggotry with the addition of a female like you are tipping some invisible scales.

>>15528234

Not particularly into pegging, myself, but yes, the fact that there's no man involved makes it inherently not-gay. Weird, maybe, but not gay.

>>15528234

>So your opinion is a strawman that I made up just to uncharitably mischaracterize your position?

that isn't even a well constructed reductio ad absurdum.

>>15528232

Women being feminine isn't the same as being retarded and "just doing their nails." Also, why do you specifically want women to be more than what they are in fiction? The things men do in fiction like fighting dragons or lifting boulders are based around things men do in real life, fighting dangerous things and lifting heavy objects. You aren't creating some fantastical improvement to what women already can do. You are creating some fantastical thing that they never do. Again, what is the reason? Is it because you can't value them unless they are doing male things?

>>15528242

>taking a plastic dick up my ass isn't gay

>i'm not into that though, heh heh

>>15528245

>it doesn't apply because it shows how gay it is!

>>15528234

Ah, that's where you're wrong. Pegging is in fact dominant for a male. Think about it. The man's the only one getting physical pleasure from it. That piece of plastic isn't doing anything for the woman.

>>15528246

>Is it because you can't value them unless they are doing male things?

Well, being a man it's only natural for me to value male things and not understand what's going on in a woman's head, so maybe?

>>15528266

>Ah, that's where you're wrong. Pegging is in fact dominant for a male. Think about it. The man's the only one getting physical pleasure from it. That piece of plastic isn't doing anything for the woman.

<implying she isn't getting off on dominating a man sexually

Hmm

>Well, being a man it's only natural for me to value male things and not understand what's going on in a woman's head, so maybe?

That is wrong. There are things that are natural for a woman that should attract you as a male and give her value. I'm not just talking about having tits and a pussy either. Having things that you value in men shouldn't be the only things you value in people period otherwise you really are a faggot.

>>15528257

No it doesn't apply because its not even remotely relevant to my position. I oppose all sodomy and sodomy is essentially all sex acts not for reproduction. Moreover, a "Masculine woman" does not imply dildos, but rather a Woman with masculine secondary characteristics. The primary characteristics of the person are Female by the nature of the fact that they are unquestionably categorically a woman. Likewise, I would argue that women are not gay for being attracted to "Effeminate" women. The fact that you need to resort to dildos just reflects how twisted your mind is.

>>15528281

> I would argue that women are not gay for being attracted to "Effeminate" women

what the fuck!

I meant to type:

"I would argue that women are not gay for being attracted to "Effeminate: men"

>>15528225

You're defeating your own point here by reclassifying the argument as being about virtues and vices. Virtues are unilaterally beneficial, vices unilaterally negative. A man can be devoted to his family (by your own definition a female virtue) without being a faggot. You can add virtues of either gender to the other gender in certain measures without detracting from them. A man who cooks is universally seen as a benefit by women, a tomboy is universally seen as a benefit by men. Provided they aren't faggots.

>>15528281

You have either lost track of where this conversation began or are purposely doing so. I'm sorry but if you want a female that dresses and acts like a man then you are a bit of a fag. You may not be a flaming faggot who's okay with admitting it to himself, but you are attracted sexually to male characteristics.

>>15528292

>You can add virtues of either gender to the other gender in certain measures without detracting from them. A man who cooks is universally seen as a benefit by women, a tomboy is universally seen as a benefit by men.

Yes, that's been my point this whole time. Masculine virtue and feminine virtue do not oppose each other and can exist within the same person.

>>15528292

Being devoted to your family isn't a female virtue. It is a human virtue.

>>15528301

You yourself assigned it as a female virtue, so you admit you were wrong?

And having hobbies, going out in nature, and the like are human virtues as well. Guess being a tomboy is a human virtue.

>>15528316

I never said or even implied that a masculine woman ceases to be a woman. I said that being attracted to a masculine woman is gay. In particular gayer than being attracted to a feminine woman.

>>15528318

>You yourself assigned it as a female virtue, so you admit you were wrong?

No I did not implicitly say in broad terms that being devoted to your family is a female virtue. I said specifically in what way female virtues are applied to family devotion. A male virtue regarding family is to provide for them and protect them. A female virtue regarding family is to nurture and care. A male virtue regarding family is to lead his family. A female virtue regarding family is to trust and respect her husband.

>>15528321

I can agree with that. I didn't even bring up tomboys. Some sensitive anons did so.

>>15528360

<I did not say exactly what I said above

<also traps are less gay than tomboys

<and I'm going to ignore the fact that tomboy traits are just general virtues, such as doing sports and being an active outdoorsy type, because that doesn't fit my arguments

Whelp, it's a good thing you gave up trying to argue at all since I'm off to bed. Anyone who still takes anything you say seriously after this atrocious display of argumentation needs to reconsider their life choices.

>>15528397

>you said what I want you to say! no I won't bother with a quote!

>male traits are general virtues! equality is real damn it!

Yeah, whatever you want to believe faggot.

All right, allow me to be a bit more serious and go back to my previous point now that I've had time to think. not the pegging though, that's a whole other can of worms

>why do you specifically want women to be more than what they are in fiction?

>You are creating some fantastical thing that they never do. Again, what is the reason?

Why are fighting women in fiction a thing? Now that I think about it, it's very simple. The things women do don't make for entertaining fiction. The most important thing in fiction is the conflict. In real life, combatants are all men, of course, and there's not always a good reason to give their wives at home screen time. Telling a story only about men and exploring themes thereof is fine, but when you add women you can have gender dynamics and more perspectives between the characters, so you put women on the front lines, realism be damned. For what it's worth, in the vast majority of fantasy settings, gender roles still exist, just not 1 to 1 with real life: men are still portrayed as beefier and women with unwomanly physiques are special cases; Kings are still the most important, women aren't in positions of power unless their gimmick is that they're a dominatrix type; fighting women usually fight in ways that are agreed upon as more feminine such as magic, bows (which is funny because archers are actually extremely strong to be able to handle their bowstrings), or "graceful" melee weapons like whips and daggers.

>>15527000

>strawman, because he can't justify his faggotry

>reducto ad absurdum fallacy because he can't justify his faggotry

>false dichotomy because he can't justify his faggotry

Totally gay, bro.

>>>/reddit/

>>15528434

Understandable. I meant all the bickering about tomboys is worthless. The last thing you should be complaining about is tomboys during this time and age.

Considering tomboys are really great tbh.

>>15528466

>The last thing you should be complaining about is tomboys during this time and age.

I only complain about the lack of tomboys, which is actually a little less about them being my preferred kind of girl and more about how girls were never promoted to have hobbies or skills at all. There's a lotta women, and hell men too out there who really just fill the NPC stereotype but women are worse for it because even a complete normalfag man might go watch a sports game with his friends but the idea of a hobby to a lot of women was "netflix and food"

>>15528502

must we keep fucking posting this

>>15528509

Every day until /leftypol/ is dead, and this website is a nigger-free land.

>>15528440

If it simply made for entertaining fiction there would be a lot of examples of it prior to feminism.

>>15528474

>girls were never promoted to have hobbies or skills at all

Girls have hobbies. You don't find them interesting because you aren't a girl. So why exactly do you need girls to engage in male hobbies/skills? So you can pretend that they are your bro or what?

>>15528475

Being attracted to women is not gay. Being attracted to women with masculine traits is gay. Otherwise you are attracted to them inspite of the masculine traits and would prefer them not to have said traits, but then you wouldn't be defending them having it and how totally not gay it is to want masculine women.

>>15528492

>we just brought it up at the same time out of nowhere!

Okay maybe you didn't samefag. Maybe you are just really sensitive about your fetish.

>>15528537

>Girls have hobbies.

netflix reruns of the office isn't a hobby

>>15528550

>>15528521

oh shit how could i forget scathach

Anyway there's actually a ton of examples of exactly that. They're typically either bad guys or get redeemed by the power of the D.

>>15528513

to my understanding, /leftypol/ loves shit like this so I don't see how posting the gross shit they like will make them leave

>>15528550

>I can apply it if I stretch the criteria to the limit and pretend a couple examples are "many"

>>15528565

>if i insist any number of examples of evidence counter to my argument are just 'a couple' then i'll never have to address these counterexamples!

And sure, go ahead, feel free to try to explain how a murderous violent bitch that the sagas felt the need to point out repeatedly was weirdly masculine, or a chick called the fucking warrior maid who trained the hero in spearfighting, or a chick who mocked her husband for being less manly than her aren't examples of women acting manly or being warriors.

>>15528585

>any number

>named 3

>stretched the qualification of "made for entertaining fiction"

>>15528585

Accidentally posted too soon, but the point is you have hundreds or thousands post feminism and maybe a handful pre feminism. Apparently the overwhelming majority didn't find it entertaining until mass jewish media started forcing it out.

>>15528521

Women in fiction is more common after feminism because people in antiquity just wouldn't have considered the possibility. People write about what they know, and for the last 100+ years, for better or worse we live in a world where women live and work alongside men, and in the economy we're in women can't just stop working. People now actually expect women to be in fiction because that's what they see in real life. Moreover, feminism itself is a symptom, not a cause. During WW1, some women had to take jobs because they're husbands were overseas, and that was a bit launching point for feminism. In VIDEO GAMES specifically, unless it's a puzzle game or walking simulator, the goal is to fight the bad guys. If you want a female character to play a role in the main party she has to participate in combat, even if as a healer or some such.

>>15528601

>Women in fiction is more common after feminism because people in antiquity just wouldn't have considered the possibility

Fighting women still isn't a possibility. It is a comically disastrous idea. You are also arguing against the other anon who is saying that it's been part of all human history or some shit to write about warrior womyn.

>for better or worse we live in a world where women live and work alongside men

This was artificially enduced by feminism

>we're in women can't just stop working

Due to devaluing the labor market by their presence.

>>15528610

>Shakespeare has to entertain you

>Mythology(tm) has to entertain you

Sorry that I am not you. This is also irrelevant and quasi goalpost moving.

>Alright, fine, I'll play the same logical fallacy you're playing.

You have your own problems. Like claiming a logical fallacy without pointing it out.

>If feminism actually existed, there'd be hundreds of thousands of examples of strong warrior women in media. But there aren't, so clearly, feminism doesn't exist.

Now you are being disingenuous. I never set the bar anywhere fucking close to hundreds of thousands. You also highlight how laughable your argument is since post feminism is where the vastly overwhelming majority of warrior women in entertainment appear.

>>15528613

>You are also arguing against the other anon who is saying that it's been part of all human history or some shit to write about warrior womyn.

Good thing I'm neither him nor making that argument.

>This was artificially enduced by feminism

>Due to devaluing the labor market by their presence.

Fiat currency was also artificially induced by central banks but we can't just stop using it overnight, unless you want to put your whole net worth in crypto. Market forces are a bitch.

>>15528622

>Shakespeare has to entertain you

Well, certainly not has to, but that was its purpose. Just because it's damn good art doesn't mean Shakespeare's plays weren't entertainment for the common man.

>>15528638

>Fiat currency was also artificially induced by central banks but we can't just stop using it overnight, unless you want to put your whole net worth in crypto. Market forces are a bitch.

You are right that there is no easy fix. That doesn't change what started the problem though.

>Well, certainly not has to, but that was its purpose. Just because it's damn good art doesn't mean Shakespeare's plays weren't entertainment for the common man.

I never said it wasn't entertaining for anyone. It has absolutely nothing to do with the argument whether I find it entertaining or not. It was nothing more than twisting what I said and trying to use my supposed lack of culture for appreciating such entertainment as a detriment against my argument.

>>15528622

So, suddenly, is the definition of entertaining fiction "fiction that has to entertain" rather that fiction intended to entertain? Are the dick jokes in Shakespeare too high-brow for it to qualify as 'entertaining fiction?' The entire character of Macbeth's wife was invented by Shakespeare and based on nothing but what would attract audiences. There's similarly zero to no evidence that Scathach, Aife, or the Gae Bolg ever actually existed, and were simply created for entertaining myths, as myths and legends WERE the entertaining fiction of that time.

> I never set the bar anywhere fucking close to hundreds of thousands

You said 'hundreds or thousands.' Those were your exact words. So, then, let's hear those hundreds or thousands of examples as proof feminism exists, else I can simply dismiss any examples you cite as 'only a couple.' Oh, or does that logical fallacy only count as valid when you're using it? Is that how it works? If it is, then you lack the basic ability to reason and there's no point in speaking with you.

>>15528651

>my supposed lack of culture

Now this is an interesting admission. Never once did I bring up your lack of culture. I simply whipped out three chicks off the top of my head related to media I recently consumed. I take it, then, that you were completely unaware of the mythological trope of a warrior woman getting beaten in a fight and dicked by the hero and that's why you're trying to force me to come up with a long and tedious itemized list of names?

Ah, there's another good example whose name popped into my head! Amazons! They were completely fictitious and thought to have been invented by potters as a means of selling pots with tits on them. Oh, and there's also Elli from the Prose Edda who humiliated Thor in a wrestling match.

>>15528692

>amazons

Allow me to play doubles advocate. The amazons were considered rare, exotic, an anomaly. In today's world, women in active roles (not just warriors, and role that's not a homemaker) isn't considered nearly as rare as a tribe isolated from civilization, quite the opposite.

>>15528720

>The amazons were considered rare, exotic, an anomaly.

No. No they were fucking not. They were considered a FUCKING FICTION because THEY NEVER GODDAMN EXISTED YOU FUCKING RETARD.

WOMEN DO NOT MAKE GOOD WARRIORS

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A FUCKING TRIBE OF WOMEN WARRIORS

THE ENTIRE FUCKING POINT OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM K-TYPE SELECTED SPECIES IS TO HAVE ONE GENDER FIGHT AND CLEAR THE LAND SO THAT THE OTHER GENDER CAN BE A BABY FACTORY

NOT ONLY DID THEY NEVER EXIST, THEY WERE NEVER THOUGHT TO EXIST WHEN THEY WERE CONTEMPORARY FICTION

THEY WERE INVENTED SO THAT POTTERS COULD SELL PORN

>>15528738

Woah dude, all I'm trying to say is that in that time strong women in fiction wasn't something people were actively looking for nearly as much as today. No one was asking "What if the protagonist of [novel] was an empowered womyn instead of a problematic man?" like people do about movies today.

>>15528133

So, what you're saying is that you can't find a woman appealing without her clothes off? The more clothing she has on, the less detail you see of a comely woman? A woman has no beauty unless she's wearing nothing? A woman is only appealing when she's "sexy", right?

You're certainly an example of the mindless sex obsession gripping the West. Either that or you're still wrapped in immaturity. There's a time and place for everything–including sex and sexual appeal. It's not all the time and everywhere for those two, as leftists would have you believe. Even worse, you play into their hands by being drawn only to women exhibiting "sexiness" (read: salaciousness)–who, themselves, do so because of the same Western popular culture that encourages that in all they do, including their choice of attire; it also encourages their next move: to gripe about the "sexism" of men, about the men that see them only as the sex objects they parade themselves as.

Elegant ladies, adorable girls with irresistible cuteness, wholesome women with a down-to-earth, girl-next-door vibe–all that's unpopular, largely vanished in favor of the world-traveling could-be tart who believes she's more empowered the more she gets plowed, who dresses the part. And guys like you enable this sort of thing.

Sage for off-topic.

Shoot the gays, burn the niggers.

If there's nothing for these freaks and cat ladies to cry over, maybe they'll stop.

>>15528475

>I really don't understand why you are trying to blur lines and shift the goal post.

Deep down you know why he's doing it.

And he needs to go back to cuckchan.

The absolute state of these people. If anything gaming has become feminized and there are many females out there playing games and games with female protagonist or pro female. Most male protagonist are cucked fools that are obviously designed with a post-modern definition of what a man should be. In otherwords:

-A man never has the point of view that women should be in the kitchen or that they are inferior to them

-His priori is locked and it's always about the female

-Save the princess

-Some girl gives the main character life/hope and sets him off in an adventure

-Male protagonist is never pro-active, I think the only game where I felt the main character was doing his shit was Grandia II

Japanese games are notorious for this shit. There are only a handful of games where the protagonist is an actual adult not design by post-modern thought.

>>15528610

Alright, how about this logical fallacy ponyfag

>>15521443

I fucking LOVE this video.

I showed it to a radical feminist and she's given up on it now and her favorite character so far is Rydia.

>>15528898

>How is that postmodern? That's just perfectly normal storytelling having some kind of mother/waifu figure. And aren't the es jay dubyas the ones who have a problem with saving the damsel in distress and how it objectifies womyn?

Because it's synonymous with the white knight syndrome.

>If it's in a "I need to protect my sister/girlfirend" way that's not postmodern either, that's what a man does. I can't name a game where it's in a "male feminist womyn empowering" way.

It might as well be just an extension of the damsel in distress. It still prioritices females, while in this particular case it is regarding family, it will be done with the intention or prop up of the female character.

>That's due to JRPGs mostly being coming-of-age stories. The protagonist acts like a kid because he is a kid, or at least starts as one. Older men who get shit done from still exist if you look for them, pic related.

No small boy unless they are already indoctrinated cucks from a small young age in first world countries acts the way those young kids act in Japanese games. Never did we act that fucking goofy and dumb and never were we afraid of females, it was the opposite, it was mostly young boys who pushed themselves towards the girls and it was the girls that were shy. The reason it is mostly done is because Japan is infatuated with infantilism since those are supposedly the best years of their lives before they turn into corporate drones. They already have a weak mentality placed in them after WW2. And ever since Romanticism and the Victorian age, the West hasn't yet broken out of it's cucked state.

I'll look up your boy and see what he's all about. I already see the same nonsense trope with female in the party, etc.

>>15528982

lets not forget that new lara has been "becoming the legendary lara croft" for three games now with no signs of development

>>15529002

Well, thats different. Thats them trying to make an origin story that doesnt suck

>>15528321

How could anybody actually defend NTR, maybe netori but not NTR.

>>15529018

>trying

I don't know if that work can even be used now since this is reaching next-level incompetence. That or they just don't know how to make her "the legendary lara croft" without just making her back into the original Lara.

>Here

her*

>>15529070

>3dpd

you need to go back

>>15529037

Maybe they forgot what made Lara so legendary to begin with

>>15528297

Male g-spot is actually in the anus.

>>15529115

That's pretty hot

>>15527762

None of the religious ones, no, but stupid comes in all categories.

>>15529128

g-spot is a jewish conspiracy to sell toys

>>15529115

ok jew

>>15529906

*only 6 jews with souls died in the holocaust

>>15529986

In jewish lore, only jews have souls. So the picture implies 6 jews died.

>>15529986

So 0?

>>15529885

>>15529906

Or maybe it takes one million souls to make a regular jewish soul.

Feminists unironically deserve the rope.

>>15523658

>that picture

I guess gay bowsah finally snapped after odyssey

>>15521443

>down with kotaku

Every time

its all so fucking tiring

i cant spend another five years discussion this shit to mentally ill people. let them run vidya in the ground i dont give a fuck anymore

>>15527305

Males fucking adore strong female characters in games, they love to see actually interesting women put on spotlight. They also love male characters just as well. A male doesn't care if he's playing as a man or a woman in a game as long as the character is interesting.

Females only care because they see the female characters in there as rivals that keep them from getting dick, and male hobbies wastes of time that make males not give them attention. which is ironic because often those characters are far more interesting than they are

>>15527305

The goal was never to improve things for the women who actually play vidya.

>>15520662

Reported for paid shilling.

>>15530440

Yes, you can and will. Because you refuse to actually fight back at all, much less against the people who are ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS. "THAT'S RACIST THAT'S SEXIST THAT'S BIGOTED WE CAN'T CALL THEM OUT FOR WHAT THEY'RE DOING MUH OPTICS" – gamergate

And so the industry has collapsed into white genocidal propaganda because you refused to do the one fucking thing that would save it.

>>15528492

<Reductio ad absurdum is not a fallacy

This is how mentally defective you actually are. This is what you actually think we will believe.

>How is this a false dichotomy?

Because you've invented a two-sided argument out of thin air. Kill yourself.

>>15526132

women would buy more games if they catered to them though

>>15540972

This assumes women and men are the same. Equality delusions are a terrible thing.

>>15540941

A bit funny considering the GG thread conatantly rails on the jews due to /pol/acks camping out in it. Not to mention governments are on the verge of turning away from the left and the usual suspects are trying to connect Mark Judge with GG since he defended them. By the end of the year we'll see how much rope they'll have to hang themselves with after the supreme court and general elections are over. Another issue is that those in power musn't cuck out otherwise it'll take longer to do anything substantial without engaging in armed rebellion.

>>15541065

>america says "we're closed"

>this policy was put in place by trumps senior jewish adviser

oy vey are you saying we should have immigrants? american is a pure jewish nation goy