cc32ae No.15412297
>go to join a server
>pic related
great final build i-i mean beta
no wonder they delayed this stuttering shit till november
cfed5d No.15412300
cc32ae No.15412325
bfv, aus servers are fucked
c40b7c No.15412337
>>15412325
>BFV
where do you fucking niggers come from, fuck off
fbd854 No.15412344
this is why i play single playa games cuz no one givs a fuk about australians
c2833a No.15412412
WEW
>Niggers
>Wymyn
>Face shields
>Fucking modern HEAT/Sabot rounds for a Tiger
>Those fucking atrocious low-res muddy textures on ULTRA
Also, you only get two magazines of ammo.
fb392d No.15412419
>BF5
why do you you even have it on your hard drive
fbc738 No.15412424
>>15412412
If they didn't explicitly say it, I'd have no idea this is supposed to be a WWII game.
c2833a No.15412434
>Tiger tank that throws anti-infantry mines around
The absolute state of WWII games
>>15412419
It's open beta, I don't know about OP but I personally wanted to see first-hand the quality of the game which surprise - surprise, it is absolute irredeemable garbage. It is actually worse than any of you ever imagined. If you thought Battlefield 1 was bad, you're about to be disappointed even more.
>>15412424
It doesn't look or feel like one. It has to be the most generic, shallow and boring shooter I've ever played in my entire life. Even CoD WWII did a better job than this. Shit, even chink free 2 play shooters are more fun than this.
1666de No.15412446
>>15412434
>The absolute state of WWII games
You`re a fucking faggot, anon. It was an actual thing in early versions of the tiger. BF is still shit tho. >>15412434
c2833a No.15412455
>>15412446
> It was an actual thing in early versions of the tiger
Studying tanks is my hobby and you're either a lying faggot or it only ever existed as a concept that never found itself in actual combat
1666de No.15412480
>>15412455
One fucking google search. Even the Bovington tiger used to have these (which makes sense given it's an early model.
84afe5 No.15412497
I'm downloading this shit (see I called it shit) to go glitch exploring.
9c4f15 No.15412500
>>15412434
As the other anons said, that part is historical, actually, and deployed as both a field modification and straight from the factory. S-mine launchers were these little skeletal mount electrically triggered one-shot airburst grenade launchers- loaded with Bouncing Betty S-mines, as the name suggests- mounted at the corners of the hull to defend against rabid infantry attackers with molotovs. It ended up getting replaced with the Nahverteidigungswaffe, an internal turret roof mounted bomb launcher that acted as both a close defense system, smoke launcher, and a handy flare pistol port all in one. The Nahverteidigungswaffe got mounted on just about every late-war tank iteration (when production wasn't short) from the humble Panzer IV H/J to the big dick Tiger II, while the S-mines were more or less only an early Tiger I thing.
Fin-stabilized, probed HEAT is on the other hand complete ludicrous bullshit that has no place outside of dieselpunk fantasy or a really, really extended war where all sides are running on all cylinders and the war is stalling (even if the conflict levels out in intensity) into 1948 or something with resulting technical acceleration. The blocky sort of pseudo-digital camo is probably the most offensive thing to me, because I'm acclimated to the diversity garbage and hate it by default, but the obnoxious ahistoricity combined with their choices not being aesthetic anger me in a fresh new way. Also, what the hell is the rifle in image 5 >>15412412 here? It doesn't look like any production gun I know and doesn't quite look like any prototypes either. There are shades of the Walther A115, but the barrel & furnishings, the charging handle and the blocky hump on the side are totally wrong.
84afe5 No.15412501
>>15412344
Oi you abo cunt, is that PS4 servers you're talking about?
8c63a2 No.15412513
>>15412412
>Face shields
Looks a bit like they saw these pics and decided to get it wrong.
Like they did with the ANZAC uniforms in BF1.
c2833a No.15412520
>>15412500
It's a literally who SIG KE7 that was used by the chinks apparently.
84afe5 No.15412521
>>15412513
Didn't only the werewolf units wear them
9c4f15 No.15412527
>>15412520
Do they even have a single Pacific front let alone mainland Chinese map to semi-justify this? Are the devs just being lazy cunts and paying interns to watch some Forgotten Weapons videos and just throw whatever in there to spice up the weapons roster, because they can't think of meaningful gameplay shakeups to better the game?
1ef3c1 No.15412535
>>15412527
>Are the devs just being lazy cunts and paying interns to watch some Forgotten Weapons videos and just throw whatever in there to spice up the weapons roster
Isn't that what they did with BF1?
8c63a2 No.15412539
>>15412521
Think the pics are of the Dirlewanger Brigade.
Could be wrong.
ece477 No.15412551
>>15412521
>werewolf units
Thanks for posting this, I had some fun reading on that shit.
It's great to read up on WW2 since everyone makes Nazis sound and look like these badass psycho killers when in reality their greatest strength was fashion sense.
That whole idea was one major fuckup and pretty much them just giving up at that point. Even more funny that it was turned into a "Railroad" but for Nazis. Imagine that, Nazis having a movement to escape slavery (that's what they thought the West would do to them apparently) before niggers in america.
ece477 No.15412568
>>15412412
I swear I don't get this "minimalist HUD" trend. Used to be that you'd get all kinds of neat backgrounds and frames for your HUD to really get you into the spirit of whatever epoch or situation that was being portrayed, the HUD itself part of the characterization.
You could even tell games apart strictly from looking at the HUD they were using.
And yet now it's flat boxes with icons being strictly white silhouettes for whatever reason.
I mean, look at pic related. Is that the Russian army crossing some rocky mountains on their way to Berlin or the Imperial Army in Hoth?
d6339f No.15412600
>>15412500
>but the obnoxious ahistoricity combined with their choices not being aesthetic anger me in a fresh new way
Boy, would Battlefield 1 obliterate your asshole.
Every faction has three tanks. A light, heavy and landship. Except, every single nation, be it the turkozoids or the Burgers, gets an FT-17 for the light, an A7V for heavy, and a Mark IV for the landship. Oh, but it doesn't end there, all of the vehicles are the exact same for all of the factions.
66bbc5 No.15412606
>>15412568
I'm with you, man. There's just no effort or love put into it any more.
Hell, the old Spiderman 2 on Xbox/PS2 had a lovely HUD, full verticality display and everything, this new one, as you say is just a white semen smear over the edge of the screen, flat map and all.
9c4f15 No.15412623
>>15412535
Yes. My surprise is that they'd do it a second time and so flagrantly.
>>15412600
Please don't remind me. I couldn't forget the nonfactional weapons and scads of prototypes at the same time as they pretended to be 'historical,' but I managed to forget the factionless tanks/planes. The extra obnoxious part is they could have at least had a Central Powers light tank in the form of the Sturmpanzerwagen and made some kind of fantasy invention mini K-Wagen for the landship if the historical captured Mark IV wasn't good enough, and the Entente could've had the St. Chaumond for a heavy tank, which they even added anyways as DLC.
But they didn't do that, in spite of having enough art people for all manner of dumb bullshit, they couldn't be assed to make vehicle remodels with the same or almost the same stats and mildly different hitboxes for two factions. Two to three extra vehicle models, that's it. And they couldn't be assed to do it, in spite of making four armored cars, three scout cars, two motorcycles, four attack planes, so on. And they couldn't make two or three two-pounder gun carriers either.
The fact they can't be consistently lazy is almost more infuriating than if they never tried at all, because people might have taken notice if there was zero vehicle variety and gotten mad. Instead, they'll shrug at the 'small' things and care nothing for the fact the game they're playing is both shit and substandard shit compared to what could've easily been accomplished, which still would have been shit.
d6339f No.15412629
>>15412623
Well, the St. Chaumond is in the game, as an all faction assault tank/tank destroyer. Even Battlefield fucking 3 and 4 had almost entirely different vehicle models for the different factions, and you had to max out the class to unlock the weapon of the opposing faction.
cc32ae No.15412642
>>15412497
lemme know if ya find anything
ece477 No.15412649
>>15412623
It's funny that these games only get any attention out of pretending to be historially accurate when that's likely a small niche in the market. The amount of people that care more about the authenticity of their arsenal is easily overshadowed by those that just want to shoot cool guns at cool dudes, regardless of faction or time period.
But at the same time, were they to make it an alternate universe or a fictional world with their own tanks and weapons, it wouldn't garner as much attention from the largest chunk of their playerbase, despite solving most of their consistency problems and even letting them do much more cool stuff with it.
It's actually quite perverted, how they use historical realism to build up familiarity with the player base that doesn't really care about historical realism, they just don't like fake\fantasy weapons.
a9f6d7 No.15412660
>>15412412
Anyone find the fucking red dot sight attachment?
cc32ae No.15412678
lol my fucking tank randomly despawned
90a3d5 No.15412701
>A fucking BFV thread
Where's the loli and gore dumps to scare away these faggots?
ed1b3e No.15412716
>>15412660
There are many different ones. The game is cancer.
>>15412649
>by those that just want to shoot cool guns at cool dudes
Neither the guns neither the dudes are cool. The gunplay is shallow is boring.
cc32ae No.15412760
i wasnt able to spawn then i just got into a tank twice and it dissapeared then i hitched a anti tank gun upto a tank track truck and it flew around
4f2cbd No.15412859
>>15412412
>3rd pic
The support class looked like shit in Battleshiet 1 but now with character customization every class gets to look ridiculous too in BFV.
>5th pic
That's a good player name
>>15412568
Once you add post effects, smoke, dust and shit flying around, it's a pain in the ass to see what's going on.
I remember playing the EA Battlefront 2 demo and I kept dying on that Coruscant map because of all that nonsense (dust, leaves, doves flying around) that was blinding me.
The UI in their first Battlefront game was quite bad too, there was no indicator that you couldn't hit a target. You could have the crosshair on an enemy's head and you would fire at a rock in front of you instead. The game never acknowledged the cover system so if you do a quick strafe to throw a grenade, it falls right on your feet.
30686e No.15412863
>>15412701
>implying that has ever worked since the mid-late 00's
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but people aren't scared away by loli and gore anymore. Maybe they were back when the internet was innocent and un-politicized, but these days there is no such wonder and amazement of the internet. You can thank 2007 for that, opening the floodgates of the interwebs, allowing for retards and shitskins alike to immigrate to our once favorite websites like it's the United Kingdom or Spain.
d6339f No.15412871
>>15412859
The one thing Battlefield 1 got right was class outlines. The assault, for example always had a stahlhelm or similar helm without a wide brim, had grenades on his belt and had a scarf or balaclava covering his face. The medic always had a small backpack and stilts on his back. The support always had a huge backpack and big pouches on his chest. And the sniper class had a hat instead of helmet and a long coat or cape. Now if only they weren't niggers.
fd3468 No.15412874
>>15412412
Just looking at this game makes me think I need new glasses.
2bf7a9 No.15412884
>>15412871
>The one thing Battlefield 1 got right was class outlines
class shooters are the worst cancer
4f2cbd No.15412899
>>15412871
>The one thing Battlefield 1 got right was class outlines.
I agree.
84afe5 No.15412913
>>15412701
Did someone say loli?
84afe5 No.15412919
>>15412871
BF1942 already got that nailed down, they deserve no praise.
37dad2 No.15412949
fb4c6f No.15412956
>>15412913
Your going to cause that guy to kill himself you know that right?
Keep up the good work
f685ff No.15412960
>>15412568
Minimalism is just an excuse for laziness. That being said, how long does everyone think this game will retain its population?
9f0da1 No.15412983
>>15412960
Apple did it and now every faggot in tech has been conditioned to use it.
2007 was a fucking mistake
66489e No.15412992
>>15412412
You forgot that they use the Imperial German flag too which is even more confusing since Germany is actually letting people use the actual Nazi Germany flag in media now.
84afe5 No.15412998
>>15412956
He broke the golden rule: Headpats only motherfucker
4f2cbd No.15413010
>>15412960
BF1 lost a major part of its playerbase within the first six months on the 3 platforms. Given the bad PR surrounding BFV and the low pre-order numbers, I doubt that they will have a lot of people. That said, there are rumors that they might make the
4f2cbd No.15413015
>>15413010
shit I clicked on new reply by mistake
they might make the battle royale mode F2P but it doesn't really make sense.
5cbbcd No.15413020
make sure to update those nvdia drivers before we let you play goyim!
inb4 W10
ed1b3e No.15413036
>>15413015
>the battle royale mode
>think you're being ironic
>but it's real
DICE needs to be put down.
66489e No.15413053
>>15413036
It's crazy how all these people think they are going to steal players from these other super popular games when their own games are fucking dying because they keep pissing everyone off.
4f2cbd No.15413118
>>15413036
You didn't know? Even the new CoD will have that shit mode.
c6eb29 No.15413145
Even the redpilled anons fail to realize that these games are not made for the progressive crowd. BFV doesn't seek to humiliate masculinity because of feminism, even if that's a nice bonus to them.
No, their real goal is to present your invaders with a comfortable story where they've always been boss in your country. Any muslim and nigger playing this in Europe will get 100% convinced that his kind has always been there. This makes them less likely to leave, and gives them ammo to claim that the country is theirs alone.
9f0da1 No.15413161
>>15413145
It's called Swedish and American propaganda.
0fd890 No.15413268
>>15412297
>Paying to consume propaganda
5cbbcd No.15413312
this game couldn't get me more angrier if it could the fucking english are all english and every faction could whatever weapon they feel like if i see another eternal nigger anglo with an stg 44 i'm gonna fucking
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
a1bc72 No.15413399
>>15413161
I know it's propaganda, what I'm saying is that it's directed to the occupier.
9f0da1 No.15413444
>>15413312
My country wasn't even in WW2 and I'm mad
1783b1 No.15413529
>>15413036
>64 player battle Royale
>When even fucking Mall Cops 4 and some shitty EA indie BR games can get up to 100
Wee
05920f No.15413541
>>15412297
>>15412325
>le reeee my babyfield game doesn't work
Kill yourself faggot
05920f No.15413552
>>15413020
I'm glad it's the dumb niggers who try to "inb4" on their own posts that are getting raped by NSA/Win10
d6339f No.15413559
>>15413552
I'm glad that you're doubleposting like a fag.
05920f No.15413840
>>15413559
And I'm glad your epic dog picture amuses you
fb8757 No.15413846
>>15413840
>I'm glad
Is that why your post exudes anger?
6b6ac8 No.15413902
>>15412649
Most people care about historical accuracy, it's just to varying degrees. It's why bfV is selling so shit on the preorder scene for EA to delay the release of the game and lose 10% of their stocks.
4f2cbd No.15414281
>>15412412
Have you seen the Axis forces? They seem to be all white.
cc32ae No.15415452
>>15413020
thankfully my 1080 is fine on these
934b7c No.15416527
>>15412455
>or it only ever existed as a concept that never found itself in actual combat
>bringing concepts that never saw the light of day to life in video games isnt the dopest shit
51cae3 No.15416537
>Aus
Someone nuke them already
e864c9 No.15416632
>>15412701
>>15412863
just post mlp ponies, you get the same effect with those
4f2cbd No.15417007
>>15412701
…or you could just ignore these threads and start posting about your favorite Nintendo games.
ece477 No.15417392
>>15417373
I could see something like "putting some oil on the barrel of your gun reduces resistance and lets your bullets go faster" or some other dumb excuse for an upgrade like this.
Like brazilian slum thugs keeping their guns and bullets behind the refrigerator so they are warm and the gunpowder never goes bad.
But having something that generic, basic and stupid instead is incredibly lazy and I'm sure it doesn't sit well with "historically realistic" guys who would rather have different calibers with different effects on range, speed and damage instead of dumb shit like this.
4f2cbd No.15417552
>>15417373
It looks like they've switched to the CoD progression system.
c5d21b No.15417628
>>15412297
We already have a two Banalfield threads, fuck off you cuckchan refugee.
d8c40f No.15418534
>>15412297
>reeee
>BFV
it all makes sense now
checkem