/v/ - Video Games

>wymyn

>In a milsim

Dropped

>>14978701

Don't buy from pozzed devs, use that money to buy premium tutorials and make your own games. I'm not saying it because of the female soldier in the thumbnail, it's because of these:

https://archive.fo/09EGx

https://archive.fo/w2W93

If they add dykes and trannies, keep in mind that you've been warned.

>Hargh!

<huh!

>haaa!

<Y fuckin'noo!

Ebin

fuck me, insurgency gets womyn'd too?

>CEO is a jew

I'm not even an anti-semite but why is it always the jews

>tacticool

daily reminder that there is no difference in mechanics between call of duty and insurgency

its the same twitch shooter shit, just given lots more lens flare, fancy visual and sound effects and given a braindead community that latches onto LE SO HARDCORE SO TACTICAL OMFG

Honestly amazed how many people are upset that a modern day game has a woman in it? The new battlefield is based in WWII with a female protagonist and that is harder to bring facts behind than this. Science has proven time and time again men are stronger, but what is stronger than the strongest man? A couple fair sized bullets. Children fight civil wars and we whine about a woman with a gun in a video game. I’m buying this game because I support the developers and their game regardless.

Why couldn't they just show a multiplayer match?

I have no fucking idea why you people like this. The ironsights take half the fucking screen.

Also

>woman marine

>>14982392

>>14982392

This looks bad. What a shame. Insurgency is good.

looks like the same slow paced hitscan iron sight garbage the first game was, the mod was, only now with added diversity.

>>14978701

Looks EXACTLY like the current insurgency with slightly better graphics. That's fine but… MEH. Didn't they move to a whole new engine? All that and the gameplay is the same?

Also, *nods respectfully at female soldier*

>>14982445

Things added:

>more motion blur

>female characters

>ability to throw grenades back

ebin.

>>14982425

I think they confirmed that the only factions in the game are PMCs, Insurgents and IDF.

>>14982468

>ability to throw grenades back

the funny thing is despite it being a good feature the implementation makes it practically a randomized mechanic making it a joke pretty much. No tactics involved just "hey maybe this will make it not kill me"

>>14982491

It's a horrible feature. Grenades are great in Insurgency for forcing shitters to stop camping on a broken position for the entirety of the map. If they give them the ability to just press one key to throw the grenades back then the game's fucked and cleaning rooms will be difficult just for that sole reason.

>>14982525

That's why you cook the grenade so there's not enough time to pick it up and throw it back

>game have advanced reloading mechanic

<but that's it what is interesting

<adding some "plot"

<game being made by jewtsu

They may fuck off.

>>14982540

Yeah that's easier said than done when the fucker is camping while his entire team covers his crucial for them position so it is a challenge by itself to actually get close enough for a grenade throw only to die a second after you throw it. Most of the time you don't have enough time for a nade throw before you get shot, so cooking isn't doable unless you're in an urban map and can cook the grenade behind a wall and pop up for a second to throw it.

>>14982525

I've always wanted to be able to throw grenades back but they better make the hitbox you have to hover over to pick it up tiny and they have to make more delay between picking it up and throwing it.

>>14982519

AND there seems to be some destruction (i.e. the door breaking at the end) so hopefully they're will be some better CQB, breach&clear type stuff? If not and that door break was just a scripted event (or it's just like the pottery breaking in original), then I'm not even going to bother buying the new one.

t. 706 hours played

Reminder that the campaign portion where you play as a Kurd woman is on hiatus so they can focus on multiplayer

<https://archive.fo/wIumq

>>14982609

>CQB, breach&clear type stuff?

>In INS multiplayer

>The same INS multiplayer where people can spam explosives and rush entire buildings with a hipfired AKS or an M249 and kick tactical roleplayfags in the teeth

Sorry mate, INS multiplayer is really just a clunkier CoD. It's really easy to pop a smoke nade and go guns blazing because of the precision of the guns and low TTK.

>>14982687

I would prefer playing CQB in insurgency rather than rainbow six: siege. There are plenty of times where people could spam explosives indoors in push and don't. If you make well-designed maps then you could easily have some awesome fun simply by having a large building, like a multi-story office with lots of doors. It may actually make strike decent.

>>14982680

Why the FUCK would they make a campaign? WHAT THE FUCK. Who was waiting for the insurgency campaign?

>>14982767

Eh, it might work better on Coop vs. AI missions. Those are the best modes in the game anyway.

>>14982795

Even better. Great idea.

A much better idea than doing nothing with your game except changing the engine and failing to put in a campaign.

>>14982838

Honestly though fighting the AI in INS is pretty exciting. You never know when they're gonna either miss their shots entirely or flick their Terminator mode on and shove an RPG between your eyes from 30 miles away. If they change that, their new rehash is done and fucked.

>>14978701

Jesus christ what the fuck are they doing. Was really looking forward to this game but it barely looks like an improvement to the first game

$30 on Steam is a bit too much when the first Insurgency's launch price was half of that.

>>14982795

Who the fuck played the coop in the first Insurgency? Literal retards too bad at the game for PvP?

>sand nigger/ZOGbot warfighting game #185792751892512985712985.exe

Just join the fucking military already if you're seriously still playing this shit.

>>14983103

>Joining the military when you can become a Mercenary who get's paid $15,000 for every month of service instead

>>14983045

PvE was really fun. I've been playing on the Lua modded servers and it's nice, casual fun.

I hate the overused term "cringe" but I literally cringe when I see the groups that hardcore roleplay in fucking insurgency. It's SO BAD when these faggots are trying to LARP in this game and playing it inefficiently. It's embarrassing. This game is not a milsim.

>>14983103

>bing bing yahoo letsa go!

>>14983045

Why would you play Insurgency PvP? It's a literal clusterfuck of explosives and run and gun. It does absolutely nothing different.

And please, spare me the "but it's tactical! Not for casuals!" drivel. One guy equipped with absolutely nothing but an IED can run across the map at the start of the round and blast most of your team before you can slice your first pie.

>>14983121

I'm sure Blackwater will give you top hiring priority if you list your Insurgency experience on your resume.

yo niggas, anybody's got some /k/ material about womanly ineptitude in military?

>>14983144

You just run around and shoot people, that's the fun in most multiplayer shooters.

True tactical realism can never exist in a videogame PvP environment, turns out that war isn't actually that enjoyable in real life.

>One guy equipped with absolutely nothing but an IED can run across the map at the start of the round and blast most of your team before you can slice your first pie.

If you said RPG or AT4 that would be true, but someone running across the map into your spawn with an IED is your own fuckup

>womyn

dropped

>>14983354

>You just run around and shoot people, that's the fun in most multiplayer shooters.

You might as well play BFBC2 for that matter. Less clunky and way more fun than any other modern shooter so far.

>someone running across the map into your spawn with an IED is your own fuckup

You haven't played it enough then. The maps have plenty of routes to sneak up on people.

It's even worse with RPGs and nade launchers.

>>14983466

Insurgency is fun because of the gunplay and its low TTK. Not all "run around and shoot people" games are the same.

Yes, RPGs and launchers are issues like I said. There's barely any flanking routes on most maps, at most there's 3-4 different lanes you can run down. You'll have to specify which map you can run across to nuke spawn in.

>>14983354

>turns out that war isn't actually that enjoyable in real life.

Aside from marching it is.

>>14982392

Looks amazing cant wait to play it with you guys!

>>14983622

>Insurgency is fun because of the gunplay and its low TTK.

Quote by man killed by sprayer.

>You'll have to specify which map you can run across to nuke spawn in.

Sinjar, Peak, Verticality, Contact, Embassy, fucking DISTRICT

>>14982604

Can you mortar grenades like in the COD 4?

>>14983768

No

>>14983301

thanks

>>14978842

only for the sandniggers which makes it especially ironic

>>14983121

>he thinks becoming a mercenary is that easy

>>14983354

People's vision is very complex. We have a wide field of view and ability to focus. This is very difficult to accurately portray in a video game and the current best way to do this is to zoom with a slight radial blur. The zoom when you shoulder your weapon is perfectly valid and is even similar enough to shouldering a weapon in real life.

You dumb fucking little child.

>>14983354

>True tactical realism can never exist in a videogame PvP environment

Fuck I hoped siege would do just that and instead sucked ELS cock and became a run&gun game with destroyable environment….fuck even ghost recon with no aids active is more tacticool

>>14984198

Siege sucks dick. Spit in the face of rainbow six fans.

>>14983622

>Insurgency is fun because of the gunplay and its low TTK. Not all "run around and shoot people" games are the same.

yeah unlike call of duty it has fixed spawn positions and free aim which isn't really useful. totally better than call of duty which is also a hitscan shooter with low ttk.

>>14982767

>Why the FUCK would they make a campaign?

To push (((propaganda))). They can't control the message if it's multiplayer.

>>14982975

Co-op was fun but the bots could use some tweaking to be based more around player's strategy and not random headshots.

>>14984162

What are you talking about? Did you reply to the wrong person?

>>14983720

I've never had issues on any of those maps with people running across map to throw an IED into your spawn. Maybe I have and have seen it happen to other players or done it myself a few times but RPG/launching nades into spawn at the start of rounds is larger issue.

Insurgency is a hapless game where you run around and shoot people. It's fun PvP, who cares if you die when you respawn in 30 seconds at most.

You are playing the Push modes with respawn, right?

>>14984198

Siege tried doing that in Alpha/Beta/Launch, it doesn't work in videogames. Squad wanted to do it but it doesn't work in videogames. Tarkov is trying to do it and it's a cesspit of dogshit balancing and technical issues. Anyone arguing for realism in PvP gamemodes is an idiot trying to push balancing changes that favour his imaginary way to play the game.

They're videogames. You cannot distill real life combat into mouse and keyboard input and have it be balanced or even fun for PvP. ARMA exists for a reason, people who are dogshit at multiplayer shooters need to stop giving input on how multiplayer shooters should be.

>>14984507

>Did you reply to the wrong person?

Yes…

>>14984162 at >>14984073

>>14978701

>Women being shoehorned into another fucking game

annnnnddd dropped, although I already knew they were doing this like 3 years ago

>>14983045

>Who the fuck played the coop in the first Insurgency?

What, you never played the Sernix 16 player co-op servers? You missed out, pretty fun

>Insurgency still unusable on Linux because of BattlEye botnet, even after most of the userbase demanded it's removal

If I could physically break a window of this company I would.

HAhAAHHAHAHAHAHA

Just realized you can hold on the shotgun pump cycle by shooting and holding mouse button. NOT EVEN THAT WAS A NEW FEATURE.

>>14982445

They annouced previously that they're using hitscan at close range and ballistics at medium(?) to long range.

>>14982486

>IDF

Why?

Why not Russians? They've done far more in the middle east than that festering pile of shit and flesh known as Israel.

>>14981218

>I’m buying this game because I support the developers and their game regardless.

Oh, fuck off. How fucking pathetic are you?

Some of the devs are cool guys. I'll give you that.

They'll help you with mods, give you info about something if you ask them, even working along with you.

Some devs are involved in the development of total conversion mods, providing content, like animations, models, textures.

They're involved in the modding community.

There was a point in Insurgency where they asked modders what they could do to help out their mods.

I had alot of faith in NWI. I thought they were just about the game… But no. They've fallen into the fold. They've virtue signaled inclusivity. It's now about something more than just the game.

And anon, you fucking dullard. It's not that they put women in their game… It's why they put women in their game.

>>14983121

The masketta man?

>>14984507

>You are playing the Push modes with respawn, right?

Nah I spent most of my time on Coop vs. AI, which is infinitely more fun.

>>14978701

lookin okay I guess, but I am not going to give these assholes money again.

>>14990646

I don't care they added women. It's perfectly valid to have some females soldiers in a modern middle east fps.

I was just making fun of how they're releasing a new game where they've changed 3 things, one of them being the addition of a female character.

>>14990685

>It's perfectly valid to have some females soldiers in a modern middle east fps

Except it isn't, women make up less then 0.0000001% of the fighting force, despite what propaganda gets shoved in your face. Stop being a faggot cuck that just takes this shit up the ass everything someone ruins something

>>14990756

That's real ironic coming from a cuckchanner

>>14990646

>>14990685

>The fuck is wrong with you faggots?

Here we go again with that "you're overreacting" talking point. You know how the "cuhraaaaazy fundie" Christians accurately predicted that gay marriage was a slippery slope to transgenderism? Where mentally ill kids think it's acceptable to chop their dick off because some blog told them to? Same principle applies here. You and I are aware that that they're not going to stop at that point, they're going to keep pushing for ridiculous shit both in gaming and in the real world. Women shouldn't be fighting in wars to begin with as they can't handle the traumatic shit that occurs in there. If women are complaining about trivial shit like online harassment now, then how the fuck can anyone else think that they can also cope with torture, rape, or the loss of a comrade? Everyone should draw the line this point.

>>14990712

>Demographics

You know I'm sick of of stronk wymin shit in every game nowadays too, but women soldiers do exist in the middle east. Citing a demographic that shows how minor their participation is is not that much of an argument if you consider that the game is portraying that exact minor demographic. On one hand, DICE is absolutely cucked for putting disabled british women in the frontlines of WWII because they factually weren't there in real life, but hey there's some women fighting in Syria. Just because their participation is ridiculously small, doesn't mean they effectively don't exist. A better argument would be why the everloving fuck is the game portraying women when the crushing majority of people who play shooters are men. This isn't a japanese game.

That said this game is just a mediocre rehash that doesn't do anything new and doesn't deserve any money.

Have they removed the ability to shoot from the forehead yet?

I'm pretty sure even Battlefield has height-over-bore.

>>14990756

3D might be PD, but that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good pair of tits when you see 'em.

>>14991988

>Have they removed the ability to shoot from the forehead yet?

Nothing wrong with that, it's a game. They are not supposed to be 100% realistic.

>>14992030

Having height-over-bore is kind of important when you're talking about a game that markets itself on being realistic. But really, it's not the realism that makes it a problem, it's the engagement distances. I'm okay with people being able to shoot from the forehead if the distances are short like in Call of Duty 4 or Modern Warfare 2 or something but if its going to have the medium-range engagement distances that Insurgency and Day of Infamy have had in the past it's already hard enough to see the small dots on a 1080p monitor but then you have to look for small dots that represent just the top part of someone's head.

>>14992030

It is important when you can die from 3 bullets of any gun.

>>14983301

This shit reminds me of the BF Vag controversy over woman in the front lines during WW2, suddenly confirms it as a fact but never appoint how many went compared to men.

Same as nigs as part of European troops, during WW1.

>>14993332

women kurds are the sacred cows of SJWs, since kurds are fighting ebil fascists and IS when in reality they are literal apes living in dirt huts in the mountains.

Kurds cant even fight without their zogbot air support.

>>14993370

>one woman was enlisted so we're justified in depicting it

it's the same shit everywhere, like the grandma in ghost of hiroshima throwing swords around

>>14990789

>but women soldiers do exist in the middle east

There's maybe 1 woman fighter for every 50,000 men fighting in the middle-east right now. Throwing women into these games is just retarded and probably just a meme to get a larger audience to buy this shit, but it's going to keep away more then it's going to attract

>>14978701

>SJW propaganda

>>>/reddit/

>>15011276

>Video cut in to a sniper had a perfect zero on her head for a good few seconds

>He wasn't moving, lining up the shot, or even shaking, just straight up pointing the rifle at her head, ready to fire

>Instead he just stares at her and waits for the other guy to shoot at him

This shit pisses me off.

I pity those who do not know the joys of Australian Insurgency servers

>>14990646

>She's meant to be a member of the YPJ

What is your point ? You could easily add a female to all factions eventually even to the terrorist one.

Eventually half the teams could be female.

Why would any sane man encourage women in his games, games that are not sexual in nature ? Are you one of those *muh inclusion* morons ?

>>14978706

>>14978718

>hooknosetube

Same servers faggots.