/v/ - Video Games

>>14890627

Still looks like shitty unity game.

Wait they're listening this time?

Someone tell them they should have a 60fps "mode" like Nsane trilogy has.

>>14890649

The gems need that nice proper "ding" noise but it seems like they're taking some sort of feedback if this got across to them.

>>14890627

>touching up

You mean making it look good before releasing? You know, their fucking job? Also I don't think making objects destroyed make physics debris is a good thing, but given how short it lasts It looks like they're still fine tuning it.

>>14890647

Looks better than any game you've made.

>>14890627

I still can't believe Activision somehow got their heads out their asses and actually developed some decent remakes with some flaws that don't totally suck.

>>14890649

>Nsanse trilogy

>60FPS

What?

I guarantee it'll play like shit compared to the original. Wonky hitboxes, floaty ass jumping and messed up momentum just to name a few.

Is that horrible motion blur, or just the low webm quality? Sure looks like motion blur to me. Fucking incompetent hacks.

>>14890663

both. get less butthurt over motion blur.

>>14890672

Motion blur is fucking cancer and so are you for defending it.

>>14890672

>they shit all over the game with eye cancer

>lol you're just butthurt if you complain

Fucking hell, am I talking to a five year old? I should just ignore you now because it's very clear that you cannot communicate or reason like an actual human being.

>>14890684

>OP is a cocksucker

This shouldn't come as a surprise honestly.

whats with all these low effort cuckchan shills that are popping up here?

first that life in tumblr twilight edition and now this

Why is everything so blobby? Spyro looks like he has no bones when he moves. And why in the fuck do all the walls and buildings look like they're made out of cement? The original had everything be made out of stones and made sense. This shit just looks like a mini-golf course or something.

>>14890694

He seems like an actual, genuine shill, with how he's defending objectively bad design decisions.

>>14890661

It's in 1080p 60fps on the ps4 pro isn't it? or 4k 30?

>>14890707

I'm not defending motion blur, I'm just saying it's not an utter tragedy that makes me want to "diarrhea doodoo all over this shitty fucking game, what were they thinking?"

>>14890655

>Looks better than any game you've made

This. If you have not made something better than the thing you're criticizing, you have zero right to criticize it.

>>14890702

Summer vacation and the continuous degration of this boards userbase.

>>14890709

No

Wait, do you actually own of one of those?

>>14890707

Wouldn't surprise me by the way he posts.

I'm pretty excited. Is this coming out for PC?

>>14890721

Nope, only bone and ps4

>>14890706

>looks like a mini-golf course

we need more minigolf games tbh

>>14890712

>Anon calls a shitty trend shit

<STOP MAKING IT OUT AS A TRAGEDY!

Confirmed as a shill trying to double down, tell your PR department to hire better people.

>>14890721

Yes, and the Switch too

They just haven't confirmed it yet much like NSane.

>>14890655

>>14890715

I can't believe human beings have such an infantile mentality.

You do realise that you're now no longer allowed to ever complain about a meal at a restaurant ever? if a chef cums in your food you're not allowed to complain because "you have not made something better than the thing you're criticising"

>you have zero right

>Right

>implying anybody has any rights

>>14890755

Checked!

>>14890715

The entirety of civilization is founded on expecting others to do their jobs better than you can do their jobs. You have every right to criticize if they do badly.

That said, this game's looking much improved.

>>14890627

>what was just a sunset in a cut scene all along

told you

>>14890754

>>14890775

Anons…

>>14890715

>>14890655

>b-better than your game!

I don't have a large studio at my disposal to make games. Get Activision's dick out of your mouths.

>>14890861

>>14890754

Just pointing out how hollow your criticism is when its about something so tertiary as the engine. I like how you're more invested about criticizing something another anon posted rather than about the game the thread is about, really makes you think, talk about infantile mentality. And if you don't have a studio or money that's your problem.

>>14890896

>criticizing something another anon posted

Don't complain about criticism. Do better or stop.

>>14890627

Still bad, but still a lot better than the last preview. The brown-red tone of the stones and dirt roads conflicts with the cool tone of the grass and sky.

Somehow, they did not taught colour theory and design principles at "game design" majors?

>>14890908

No. And you don't deserve anything better.

Help, I can't tell who's baiting and who's being retarded

>>14891002

The answers are everyone and everyone, respectively.

>>14890672

>defending motion blur

It's shit, especially when you can't turn it off.

>>14890627

Holy shit, did /v/ actually help collectively make enough noise about that excruciating "sunset" vomited everywhere?

>>14891002

Panic and call everyone faggots.

>>14890627

Why do devs put motion blur in their games?

>>14891218

They think it makes it look "realistic". Or they're trying to cover something up.

>>14891218

Because somewhere along the line the industry forgot that videogames are not movies.

>>14891218

Because it's meant to look smoother.

>>14891218

Motion blur can help convey fast motions that would not be sufficiently conveyed with frame rates that are too low. When developers are unable to increase the frame rate, they will often compensate with motion blur.

My guess is that, just like with Crash Bandicoot, they managed to make another remaster of a PS1 game that fails to run at 60 frames per second.

>>14891218

Shake your head from side to side. Get it? Not defending it, but I get it.

>>14891131

sometimes real clouds have defined edges

>>14891218

Because developers are paid based on overly robotic checklists of "features" and as far as a producer is concerned a graphical artist who doesn't implement motion blur is like a smartphone that can't send text messages.

>>14891342

I checked out OP's video. While it is encoded at 60fps, every frame is doubled, strengthening my suspicion that the game runs at 30fps once again and they are compensating with heavy motion blur.

>>14891362

>>14891372

Motion blur compensating for sub 60 frame rates looks disgusting most of the time. There is still a place for motion blur in 60fps games because it would not need to be so aggressive in order to properly convey the motion.

>>14891600

I don't think there is any reason to try to be fair. The PS4 is quite a bit more powerful than the PS1. From a game design standpoint, there is no excuse for those games not to target 60fps.

>>14891664

The PS4 is equivalent to a mid-range pc from 2012. There would need to be a lot of fucking sacrifices to hit a locked 60fps. I'd bet they aren't even maintaining a locked 30 as-is.

>>14891700

No, but it's hard to say whether or not the tech side of things will make that easy. These games (Crash and Spyro) Weren't exactly rich in detal in their remasters, and the levels were already built in such a way to optimize framerates with Spyro's aggressive LOD management and Crash's dolly camera. What is seen in the existing footage would definitely be something that could hit 60fps, but I don't know enough about the technology its on or the dev targets.

I didn't even know there was ever an outrage about motion blur until I've started seeing it on /v/. It never bothered me and I think it can improve visuals. From where I stand it's just another bitchy complaint by PCcucks and muh competitive esports where everything has to have a response time of 0.00001ms and anything but the bare bone essentials is cancer.

>>14891700

Super Mario Odyssey runs at 60fps. That is on the Switch, which is somewhere between the Xbox 360 and the Xbox One in terms of power. I think Super Mario Odyssey looks really good.

Of course any game that runs at 30fps has a lot more leeway with other visual fidelity than one that runs at 60fps, but to say that it would not be possible to create a visually pleasing remaster of a PS1 game on the PS4 that runs at a smooth 60fps is absolutely idiotic. Choosing 30fps over 60fps always is to the detriment of gameplay in action games.

>>14891733

Please read some posts in this thread to see why people actually dislike motion blur in games.

>>14890991

much better

>>14891733

object motion blur is fine, it doesn't distort your view and it provides an appealing effect which does help clean up lower frame rates. Full screen is harsh and unappealing. There's not much else more to say. It's a secondary visual effect and in most games it doesn't really hurt much. First person games it does, but Spyro isn't a first person game and it's definitely not a fast paced one.

Almost hyped enough to consider pirating it when it comes out. Nice!

>>14891711

The visuals seem about right for 30FPS without resorting to ugly LOD fuckery when you consider there's a quite a few wide open areas in a certain hubs and levels.

>>14891735

SMO doesn't maintain 60fps though, and the relative detail and lighting in particular is far lower than what we see in Spyro.

>>14891742

I read the thread, and in my 26 years of playing games I've ever had even the faintest issue with motion blur, so it's obviously not a set-in-stone objective bad thing like most people make it out to be.

Spyro is so cute I wish he'd cum inside of me do any anons have pics of this?

>>14891818

There are many people who say the same thing about <24fps.

>>14890655

>>14890715

>>14890896

By your fucktarded mentality, fucking Phil Fish's bitching is more valid than 99% of people who want to fix the gaming industry here JUST because he made a game.

>>>/suicide/

>>14891860

For all we know that could fishface himself.

>>14891768

>SMO doesn't maintain 60fps though, and the relative detail and lighting in particular is far lower than what we see in Spyro.

Super Mario Odyssey maintains 60fps pretty consistently. Furthermore, again, the PS4 is much more powerful than the Switch. I know about most of the concessions they had to make for Super Mario Odyssey. I was just giving you an example of a pretty good-looking 3d-platformer on a much weaker console that mostly maintains its 60fps target.

>>14891873

I wouldn't be surprised at the least, that's the beauty of being anonymous, you never know if cancerous developers are here trying to defend their steaming hunk of rancid dogshit that is the status quo in gaming.

>>14891860

It's arguable that Fish didn't make a game though, since you can't lose in Fez, you just teleport back to the last platform you were on.

>>14891854

I still fail to see the issue. Muh graphics is never a good argument for anything.

>>14891947

>I still fail to see the issue.

Decades of looking at garbage tends to do that to your eyes.

>>14891860

Phil Fish wasn't bitching about videogames though. You fail at basic logic and its why your life is so bad that you project onto others your desire to kill yourself.

>>14892036

How'd that DJ gig work out for you?

>>14891900

>I was just giving you an example of a pretty good-looking 3d-platformer on a much weaker console that mostly maintains its 60fps target

Of course, but since Gen 7, Sony has primarily been going for the cinematic look and feel in both visuals and game design. That means framerate be damned, squeeze all the visuals you can out of it and slap 200lbs of post-processing on while you're at it. The spyro remake is consistent with that.

Nintendo, on the other hand, clearly has gameplay as their first and foremost concern.

>>14891947

>framerate = muh graphics

Imagine actually typing this. Yikes.

>>14891996

It's not a meme though. Take your hand and wave it back and forth in front of your face as fast as you can. You are now aware that your eyes already have motion blur built in when registering sufficiently fast movements. So why would you add ugly artificial motion blur on top of that? Depth of field is another retarded one, because my eyes already have that effect built in, and at best it does nothing if the DoF cone is where I'm focusing, and at worst it's blurring something that I'm focusing on which is not how DoF is supposed to fucking work.

Remasters are always shit.

>>14892049

You're right of course. Given the rough look of PS1 era polygons it isn't hard to give spyro a modern look without tacking on too many filters and post-processing effects. Nintendo has been sitting on basically the same level of graphical fidelity for the last decade and they haven't fared any worse for it.

>>14892086

Bad for everyone but the investors.

>>14892086

This is a remake, not a remaster. Learn the difference.

>>14892069

It is absolutely a meme, blown way out of proportion. DoF does have its place, and it's great for concealing low quality LoD meshes at a distance.

>>14892106

Okay, Remakes and remasters are always shit.

>>14892086

That it has been 25 years and not a single one stands up next to Mario All Stars is a shame.

>>14892133

mario all stars was bad. shadow of the colossus was good however, unlike all stars it improved the physics instead of ruining them.

>>14892106

But you didn't answer my question. What purpose does slapping shitty artificial motion blur on top of something serve, when if it's moving fast enough to warrant a blur it is already being blurred by your eyes?

>and it's great for concealing low quality LoD meshes at a distance

I disagree, the only purpose it serves is to try and force players to focus on the part of the screen that the developers want them to focus on, as if they're retarded children with brain problems.

>>14892150

>What purpose does slapping shitty artificial motion blur on top of something serve

makes low framerate movement look better, provides an aesthetic detail that may be desired.

Dark souls makes great use of depth of field to obscure distant objects so they don't look terrible.

>>14892133

Super Mario All Stars messed up by resetting the player's speed in SMB and SMB:TLL when you hit a block while running, if I remember correctly.

>>14892150

Your eyes can only "create the motion blur" if the frame rate is sufficiently high.

>>14892165

Choppy is choppy whether or not you add some post-processing to it. As for Dark Souls, look at how much better the game looks when you increase the internal resolution and blow the DoF pyramid wide open.

>>14892036

None of what you said is true. You're reaching so desperately to come to an objective conclusion that you fall on your and face and instead look like a pathetic unstable maggotshit that spits shallow pseudo-vitriol.

I'm not projecting, I'm giving you a command, and you WILL do it.

Nobody here likes you, nobody here gives half a shit about you, the only reason you exist is to spite people who know better. You aren't making a positive, nor pragmatic difference, you just want conflict and feed off indifference, placid ignorance, anger and negative energy.

Now either say something of worth, come up with a proper rebuttal with a solid conclusion or permanently shut your fucking mouth before people here shut it for you.

>>14892187

>Choppy is choppy whether or not you add some post-processing to it

it's obscured how choppy it is, as the system is always pushing out 60 frames, when you add in effects like motion blur that choppiness becomes obscured and the image looks better. Look up comparisons on your own then get back to me.

>look at how much better the game looks when you increase the internal resolution and blow the DoF pyramid wide open.

It actually hurts the image more than improving it, the draw distance is constant, so you'll see worse objects at a distance despite them looking normal when up close. You need a better argument beyond "our eyes do it already." These techniques do not work like they do in games as they do for our eyes. Many of them were created due to changes in display technology create less visible artifacts.

Hello, OP. I just wanted to tell you, that you are failure at your job. Virtually nobody from here is going to buy the upcoming Spyro remake. If Mark ever commands us to spam your threads with porn, it will be much easier, because there is a lot of gay Spyro porn. Also check out the Buylander figurines you can get from at least 1 benis up to 3 benis each. This bygone fad is what most people Remember Spyro for. This is also why there is a remake in the works in the first place, because the toy to life fad is over and Buylander doesn't sell anymore.

>>14892221

hello faggot, I'm here to tell you I don't care

>>14892224

Thanks for reporting people for dubs. Too bad you can't do that with a normal reply. Hopefully people get the heads from this post and don't check'em since you are such a petty loser that you hit report as soon as you see Bateman's face.

>>14890627

>They unfucked the lighting

Have you been outside in the evening before, OP?

>>14892069

Your eyes apply the motion effect on their own already. Adding a second layer via computer only makes it worse.

>>14892268

Post proof. Your eyes do not work the same way displays do.

>>14892209

I've put 9 hours into bloodborne, and the blur did not help the choppy framerate one iota. Get better eyes and then get back to me.

>>14890627

motion blur sucks and there's no reason NOT to make it optional on consoles. hope I can turn it off tbh

>>14892330

You will let the developers smack you across the face with their vaseline covered dick and you'll like it you dirty, entitled slut.

>>14892303

Post some sources, studies, comparisons, etc. Your eyes naturally blurring things works differently from every kind of blur in video games. Until then I'll assume the view that it's not a big deal and it's just something whiners are crying about as if it's the end of the world.

>>14892268

>Your eyes apply the motion effect on their own already

No, the screen is static. Your eyes only "blur" objects that are moving fast (and even then, it's not really a blur, it's just that the visual processing part of your brain is limit). I still hate motion blur though, at least when it can't be turned off.

>>14892374

>anon you need to post some peer reviewed studies about motion blur, chromatic aberration, and depth of field in vidya if you want me to take you seriously!

Heh.

>>14892407

You're gonna need more than "your eyes already do it!" when it's been demonstrated they work differently on a fundamental level. So far you have no argument. I don't even like or care for motion blur, but this is some weak shit.

>>14892415

>when it's been demonstrated they work differently on a fundamental level

Where are the papers on this?

>>14890627

Wow, that actually looks pretty good. It would be great gift for the small child in your life.

>>14892440

>arguing that it's not a big deal is arguing in favor of it

jewish tactics

>>14892454

>i don't like X

>let me spend hours telling you about how X is fine and disliking X is "a meme"

jewish tactics indeed.

>>14892458

You've got no argument. Now talk about Spyro or go away.

>>14892069

What you just described is object motion blur. What we are complaining about is camera motion blur. Although darting your eyes or moving your head rapidly does give you a bit of blur in your vision, you only perceive a portion of it because the optic nerve actually goes through a temporary disruption, preventing you from seeing too much of this rapid motion. This is your brain trying to prevent motion sickness. It is one of the leading reasons why VR makes people motion sick, and why they try to prevent the sickness by blacking out the screen during heavy movement. This is simulating your natural tendency to block out most of the blurred motion you would be seeing.

Blur on objects doesn't matter much, but screen blur is awful.

>>14892459

We were talking about spyro until you decided to derail things by claiming motion blur was fine, that disliking motion blur is, and I quote, "a meme", despite later admitting you don't like motion blur.

Are you just shitposting for the hell of it at this point?

>>14892470

What's your favorite music from the trilogy? I really like Magma Cone from Spyro 2. It's got a very nice bass line.

>>14892479

>>14890627

I sure am glad the sound effects have like, no punch to them. Exactly what I wanted. I'll be sure to still not buy this.

>>14892487

I'm trying to find a two decade old pdf proving you wrong but I can't so I'll concede.

>>14890647

t. Faggot who's never seen a shitty Unity game

>>14890757

>he said, backpedaling this hard

Nice try goy

>>14891735

the higher resolution demands lower fps, its not like its even necessary to run it at anything higher.

some movies are shot at 24fps.

>>14890719

>Summer vacation and the continuous degration of this boards userbase.

Such is the fate of anything considered edgy.

>>14891768

>SMO doesn't maintain 60fps though, and the relative detail and lighting in particular is far lower than what we see in Spyro.

It doesn't, but it generally only lags in very specific areas, like say, if you take the express route to the city, and the switch has to load the entire area instantly.

>>14895132

>its not like its even necessary to run it at anything higher.

>some movies are shot at 24fps.

Are you really that dumb? Should I explain to you why movies can get away with way lower frame rates than video games?

>>14892459

>>14892470

holy fuck shut up

>>14890715

>implying I haven't had actual bowel movements more entertaining than many AAA games

>>14891600

Motion Blur is never fine in any context.

>>14897407

You are going way too far. Motion blur, depending on the implementation of course, can be totally fine in 60+fps games.

>>14897469

No it can't.

>>14897488

Yes it can. Do you know how the eye perceives motion?

>>14897503

>Do you know how the eye perceives motion

Not as a blurry slideshow.

>>14897513

60fps is not a slideshow. I am pretty sure you are retarded.

>>14897503

This is the third thread you've defended motion blur in faggot. And nobodies bought your shit in either of them.

>>14897553

No it's not, you fucking retard. This is the only thread I posted in on /v/ in the past year. Additionally, read my other posts to find out what I think about motion blur.

>>14891333

>>14891419

>>14891664

>>14891735

>>14891742

>>14891900

>>14892183

>>14895456

>>14897469

Kill yourself, you stupid fucking nigger.

Reminder that soyro was and will always be a shitty Mario 64 knockoff for the weird friendless children who didn't get a N64.

>>14897595

>This is the only thread I posted in on /v/ in the past year

Nice try faggot. >>14883027

And I have read your arguments. Motion Blur is a cheap fucking gimmick of an "enhancement" that doesn't serve vidya in any way. I've had this argument with you in more than 1 thread and I'm not giving your autism more attention outside of calling you a retarded faggot at this point.

>>14897611

That post is not me. How fucking retarded are you?

>>14897623

>I-it's not me! I swear!

Yea. Just like he's not ID changing just like you are. Again, Motion blurs cancer faggot. Now fuck off.

>>14897629

The ID changed because of the maintenance yesterday, you fucking retarded mongoloid.

>>14897634

Sure faggot. Just like the multiple ID's in this thread that support it. I can match shit here word for word. Again, fuck off.

>>14897637

I have exactly two IDs in this thread.

>I can match shit here word for word.

Go ahead, do it, you stupid motherfucker.

>>14897674

k

>>14892467

>object motion blur is fine

>>14891600

>object motion blur can be fine

>>14891759

>object motion blur is fine

>>14881150

>object motion

Nobody is going to defend your shitty fucking idea of motion blur. It's a shitty fucking gimmick up there with Ambient Occlusion. Now once again, fuck off.

>>14897692

None of these posts were me and I even responded to >>14891600 (see >>14891664).

Just hang yourself, you retarded piece of shit.

>>14897709

>provides proof

>None of these posts were me!

Sure buddy.

>and I even responded to

And? You act like your faggotry isn't enough to respond to yourself.

Now really, fuck off. Nobodies buying your garbage.

>>14897709

Anon, please don't waste your time feeding (You)s to retards that only know how to double down.

>>14897735

>(1)

Sure bud.

I WANT TO FUCK THE FEMALE EGG THIEF

>>14897724

How the fuck did you provide proof?

Oh yeah, I would preemptively contradict "my own post" just in case a retarded nigger starts playing Sherlock one day later.

>Now really, fuck off. Nobodies buying your garbage.

And by nobody you are referring only to yourself, because only you seem to care. I would not even care about this shit if you merely disagreed with me, but I hope you die a painful death for accusing me of samefagging. Just kill yourself.

>>14897744

Alright, I apologize. I did not realize imageboards put such a strain on schizophrenic people.

>>14897772

>How the fuck did you provide proof?

By providing what you asked for faggot.

>I would preemptively contradict "my own post" just in case a retarded nigger starts playing Sherlock one day later.

You've been posting in multiple threads with the same pattern. There's 0 reason I shouldn't assume you're not retarded enough to do so.

>And by nobody you are referring only to yourself

And the several dozens of posts calling Object Motion Blur objectively retarded. Sure.

>because only you seem to care

That's why you keep getting replies calling you wrong.

>but I hope you die a painful death for accusing me of samefagging

Keep digging that hole.

Once again. Fuck off.

>>14897794

>You've been posting in multiple threads with the same pattern. There's 0 reason I shouldn't assume you're not retarded enough to do so.

You truly are schizophrenic. Burn in hell, you piece of shit.

>>14897824

>You truly are schizophrenic

Great argument

>Burn in hell, you piece of shit.

>you will never be this mad that you've been found out

Again, nice try faggot.

>>14897836

I am only mad because you are a piece of shit accusing me of samefagging, which is patently untrue. How would you react if somebody did that to you?

>>14897861

>which is patently untrue

Sure faggot.

>How would you react if somebody did that to you?

Being how I don't swap ID's unless I make it obvious I did I don't get the same treatment.

Again, fuck off.

We've come a long way, baby. People today like to play in high resolution with realistic depth-of-field blur. Just think about all the cool effects that we've come to love, like dirt and water droplets on the screen, the sun temporarily blinding the player, motion blur. All these effects take processing power (especially the last one), which means lower frame rates. Motion blur compensates for this and makes the game more immersive. Since it is so hard to tell sometimes what's going on with all these effects, abstract icons have to be put on top of the graphics to give the player pointers for orientation. Also, to deal with the fact that the information content of the graphics is decreasing, the level design and game mechanics should be streamlined.

>Why is there an insane samefagger in here shilling for motion blur?

Nononono, no. Just no. You got it totally wrong. Yes, someone might be pretending to be several people, but that doesn't mean one is samefagging. You see, shithead blur is an advanced online discussion technique emulating discussions in bigger groups in the real world, making your experience more visceral.

>>14898176

But I already have enough dolphin porn

>>14898163

>Motion blur compensates for this and makes the game more immersive

>we cripple our games to cripple the players eyesight

Sounds about right.

>>14890627

>grass burns when you spitfire

Huh that's a pretty neat touch. I don't like the motion blur, the color palette hurts my eyes and looks a little too saturated and the sound design is pretty shitty. Might be wrong but Spyro looks fucking T H I C C now too. Overall looks meh I don't think I'd buy this.

>>14898257

as a kid playing this game I unironically thought that his stomach was literally made of metal and never considered it was armor

>>14899488

What's wrong with the first pic, hitler?

>>14899508

I could shit a better model paint it green and call it a day

>>14890627

Is this made in Unity?

>>14903403

>being annoyed by parts of the game is autistic tard rage

I wonder who could be behind this post.

>>14898257

Why does Spyro have a cartoony beehive on the end of his tail?

TING TING PHWOOSH

>>14903403

however that as \may, can you say to be ththa THE nefertiti tata?? will you say? answer thank.

>>14897604

But Mario 64 isn't a good game.

>>14897604

Spyro is like a minecart sim expect the minecart can breathe fire and glide.

>>14890627

think they'll be able to capture the controls? it looks like spyro has absolutely no feeling of resistance when he rams the wizards. hopefully they fix that… the entire appeal of spyro was the way it controlled. the level design essentially being a racetrack with forks was great too, but the way spyro controlled is what made it fun.

i've yet to see a video that makes me think he controls like how he did in those original games. looks like he controls more like the new spyro, which would turn this entire development into a wasted effort. it'd be like remaking mario64 and having mario control like he did in mario kitty cat adventures.

>>14890715

It's not the critic who matters, whining about what the hero could have done better or differently, it's the hero, his journey, and his destination that make the difference.

It's easy to whine about other people's work, much harder to make work of any quality yourself. Critics are cowards almost every time.

>>14897692

I bet you also bitch about depth of field and Vsync.

>>14908629

>developers of a creatively-bankrupt remake

>hero

>>14908664

I knew I would get that exact snarky comment. Well done anon.

>>14908642

Depends on the game with DoF. Motion blurs cancer though and always will be outside of "muh aesthetic" games.

>that first webm

BING BING WAHOO

>>14912988

What so bing bing wahoo about it?

>>14898176

The only good Spyro game was the original.

Which I still play on Xebra

>>14890682

Do we have W.T. Snacks as a fucking moderator now?

>Muh color theory

Enjoy your 240p, dithering and warping textures. The remake is going to be my go-to way to play Spyro from now on.

>>14913013

He's a summerfag trying to fit in by repeating dumb shit he saw on here.

>>14915608

Or just play it on an emu at 4K with the warping fix. Only thing it can't fix is dithering.

>>14890655

>>14890715

>Unironic "shut up if you can't make something better!"

I fucking hate summer

>>14915608

all of those look great on a CRT, and there's even a fix for dithering.

>>14916179

4k butchers 2D assets, and the dithering fixes will be ported to emulators eventually.

>>14915582

no, just retarded censorious kikes.

>>14890627

I don't care for what they've done with the gem numbers, feels like mobile shit. The original did it way better. Other than that I like it.

>>14916267

S-video is not a "fix". Currently there are shaders that blend dithering far better than S-video and composhite. They're not perfect, mind you–but I'd rather use one of those than smear the entire screen with Vasaline.

Anyway, with PS1 you can simply enable 32-bit color rendering to do away with its form of dithering.

>4K fucks with 2D assets

Autism in its purest form. Enjoy your aliasing.

>>14916267

Also CRTs fucking suck.