>>14836870
>that cancerous post
Fuck off with that shit. I can instantly spot any devils and snakes who have the silver tongue (especially jews). These little shits can pretty much 'talk' and persuade just about ANYTHING to sound like the opposite of what it truly is. Like how this faggot tried to word his way to make things that are inherently 100% gay and nonmasculine (gay blowjobs and anal sex between guys) sound completely and totally masculine. Bull. Shit.
There's a reason we teach Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal in schools these days. (That essay where he persuasively argued that eating kids is acceptably ok). It's to highlight that silver tongued individuals can distort the reality of things with just words alone. Like how this poster was trying to convince you that even the most stereotypical, effeminate, weak, degenerate homosexual was Somehow more """masculine""" than a typical straight man.
The only way to combat this persuasive kikery is to be stubborn and unrelenting when it comes to the truth. If your gut is telling you that something's wrong (like that post arguing that gay sex is "manly" because dead "Roman faggots did it"), It's Fucking Wrong. End of story. No ifs, ands, or buts. Don't let it fucking deceive you for even a tiny bit.
The truth: Homosexuality is NEVER a masculine thing to do.