/v/ - Video Games

>>14347095

That's because Sephirot is cannonically gay, as show in Crisis Core.

>>14347095

Where's that shill who kept trying to justify the game cutting you down to 1 HP attack?

>>14347355

Gone as expected.

>>14348177

Esports

NO GABRANTH, NO BUY

>>14348177

>Vanilla dissidia is great for what it is

>Duodecim ruins some characters and adds some shitty gimmicky ones but it still plays mostly the same

>All they needed to do for another release to sell well was add some more characters to the roster and release it on a big platform like ps4 or pc

Of course they completely fucked it up because we're not allowed to have nice things in this timeline

>>14356844

>Duodecim ruins some character

In what way? As far as I remember everybody got improved, aside from removing a few character's infinites.

>>14357001

I think I remember Shantotto and Terra had some nerf, and Gabranth got hurt by the EX Mode mechanics being nerfed.

>>14357412

I don't remember much about Terra but Shantoto got buffed the fuck out of.

She was a borderline joke character in the original, but she's actually good in 012.

Gabranth was hurt by making assists break ex mode and by making exmode and the excombobreaker mutually exclusive instead of getting both.

But his core moveset was improved.

He is overall better, you just need to play more carefully while the opponent has assist, and try to assist break them before entering ex mode

>>14347162

Beat crisis core and never got that vibe. Sure you're not seeing what you want to see?

>>14347355

Well I for one defended it before and you sound like the irrational type so if you want I can defend it again, though it seems you'd rather call anyone with different opinions that you a shill. Luckily one of the few people who actually know what they're talking about did a video entirely about this to oppose the people who love straight up lying about this game so I'm going to unironically shill that since him and his channel deserve it. I recommend watching it first before saying anything else. The video also doesn't go into HP attacks that are two in one or have passive effects though.

>>14348177

>it's not 1v1 so it's a Gundam clone, despite the previous game having assists and the franchise being party based

I have absolutely no idea how anyone could actually think this if they had ever played any Dissidia game for even a minute.

>>14356799

Yeah! i was so dissapointed when i foud out he wasnt in the game.

But i wonder how they will ruin him in this new system.

NT kinda made me smile when Sephiroth seemed to be buddies with Kefka or at least appreciated his insanity. For some reason that made me laugh.

Kinda makes sense they both have similar backstories.

>>14389369

Ramza basically works in the same way he used to except he can also power his team up. If they just want him to be exactly the same they can do that, but there's a lot of new interesting things they could consider doing with him.

>>14389309

>>14389451

Ah, there you are shill-kun. Saying "RAMZA PLAYS THE SAME BUT HE'S BETTER" is the same defense Combofiend used to defend MVCI ditching people like Magneto, y'know.

>>14389484

It's also not what I said as that was in response to him acting like a character like Gabranth couldn't be added at all the way he was in this "new system" that is extremely similar to the old one where it actually matters. Plus changing or adding to how someone plays isn't ruining them.

>someone thinks I'm wrong? only one person could EVER think that so he must be a shill!

Should I call you delusional-chan or something?

>>14390281

The old games had tons of balance issues all over the place, not just in regards to Brave to HP chains, but changing them to something like that isn't much of an answer and would still ruin what's so unique about the Bravery system in the first place. People are upset about the "lack" of HP attacks because all they can do is look at the surface in the most basic way, while ignoring how all your other moves are actually important and usable now, how versatility stems from far more than just where HP damage comes from despite many HP attacks counting as two different attacks or having passive abilities and the old game having many repeats and similar moves (many of which were pointless anyway thanks to the balance) and how Ex Skills tie into it all too, which lets you play whatever role on the team you wish.

If you're chasing people that often then you're clearly chasing the wrong people and not being where you should be, because with 6 people on these stages there will always be something close enough. A lot of this main paragraph really reads like you're far too used to Gundam and discounting this game because it's different. I don't really know how you could imply you're not engaged with enemies in NT when there's more enemies to engage with and there's more to engage for, or taking obvious beginners not using communication as "Well I guess there's just no reason to communicate like in the other game.", or taking advice about using the map as meaning that there's no reason to look at the screen itself when obviously you would and should be for attacking and defending. I wouldn't call movement sluggish but I would say GV's movement and attacks seem very floaty and weak with all the sliding and gliding. NT feels weighty but responsive (barring lag) while still having a strong fast pace to it since you need to be aware of the field, the name of the game is actually having some satisfying commitment and payoff to actions and to that end it's just a very different kind of game, so it's not a case of right or wrong and saying something like that speaks inexperience or personal bias with one or the other. Though it sounds like you don't have as much experience with the whole series overall, that was mainly aimed at those making shitty comparisons between the old games and this one rather than comparing it to an overall different game.

Game is shit, don't buy.