/v/ - Video Games

>>13901616

Oh piss off m8.

they need to make a WW1 total war already.

>>13901799

But why?

>I'm totally not a shill guyze

>now look at this Throne of Britannia™ game

>don't you want to buy it goy?

Fuck off

>>13901958

>>13901964

It is not even a screen of the Britannia game.

Attila runs like shit even on lowest settings. I also have no idea how to play it since they insisted on shoving all this grand strategy shit into the newer games where you have to elect a council family feudes. Fuck that shit.

The best entry in the series is Napoleon because it the engine works well with guns.

>>13902237

It's very strange because Attila runs pretty well on my Xbox-tier computer.

>I also have no idea how to play it since they insisted on shoving all this grand strategy shit into the newer games where you have to elect a council family feudes. Fuck that shit.

How? It's literally just a matter of electing your family members/nobles into higher position so they get more bonus and your faction as a whole can get more bonus.

You can entirely ignore it btw.

>>13901599

>edging myself

What did he mean by this? If this is some strange euphemism for hype then you're even more retarded than I first thought, shill-kun.

>>13902389

It actually means I'm playing Attila to cure my hype for Throne of Britannia.

"Transparent", doesnt even come close to describe this thread

>>13902416

You can track my IP, it's an honest to God Total War thread.

>>13902250

Is cav still the ultimate weapon? I'm an infantry person and hate how 99% of battles in TW games are decided by rushing copius amounts of cav right into your enemys flanks until he collapses.

>>13902442

Cav is very good in Attila.

As a total-infantry faction, you are gonna have to be a very good commander, at least for multiplayer. Against the AI, all you need to do is having a solid wall of infantry supported by onager and archers to lure the cavs in.

>>13902449

I reinstalled attila literally the other day but can't force myself to play it.

What's a good faction for a first run?

>>13902457

Depends, if you want a super easy game, the eastern roman empire, the sassanid due to large territories, armored troops and good economy bonus.

If you want medium challenge, the frank, the burgundian, the goths, basically the germanic factions.

If you want a hard challenge, the nordic faction, especially the saxon, the celts and the Western Roman Empire.

I never play the Huns and the niggers so I do not know about them.

Also, play the tutorial first!

I'll be excited when they learn to fucking optimize their garbage. CA lost all goodwill with me when they fucked up Rome 2. Not even from an optimization standpoint, but also the start of what feels like increasingly more dumbing down of the series. I really want to love Total War but in-between its demanding to squeeze my fucking wallet dry and the fact that it could less of a fuck if things run smoothly, CA can fuck off.

>>13902470

Which factions have the shock inf you were talking about in the OP?

>>13902484

The eastern roman empire, the burgundian, the nordic all have shock two-handed axes units.

The most OP-est is the huscarl from the Jutes, and it's in the op picture.

>>13902483

Rome 2 has actually been optimized pretty well nowadays.

Their newest expansion just drops too.

>>13902490

The goths also have the falxmen units, but they are less deadly because axes have bonus vs infantries (more like everything since they can charge cavalries and kill them too).

>>13902490

>>13902498

I might give attila another try, after all i already spent the money on it.

Still think that Napoleon was the most fun.

>>13902573

Shogun 2 Fall of the Samurai is sort of a mix between Napoleon line and shoot and medieval hack and slash combat, also try that sometimes.

>>13902581

I did beat the "fall of the samurai" campaign. It was alright still not better than NTW. Does the basegame for shogun 2 have any guns? I might play it if there are no guns at all and it's just swords and maybe bows. I think the mix of guns and swords doesn't play very well.

>>13902606

Vanilla Shogun 2 has matchlock units, basically the handcannoner in medieval 2, a very small part of the game.

The Shimazu has a special gunner unit that can knock people back, super OP.

Rise of the Samurai has no guns, though it lacks variety.

>28 replies

>OP is 15

Really makes me think.

>>13901599

>Come on guise, no Total War thread?

fuck off shill

>>13901776

>make a gunline faction into male centered one

JUST

>>13901794

that would suck, format is ill suited for this kind of warfare

>>13901794

There is a WW1 mode for Napoleon it's pretty bad imo

>>13901599

End your existence immediately

>>13902628

>>13902629

>>13902637

>>13902655

These shill accusations are clogging up the thread.

fuck off negro

post a roll cyoa

>>13902664

You're clogging up the toilet nigger.

>>13902669

This is a white man game about white history, negro.

>>13902671

Your post has nothing to do with the game.

>>13902664

>t. a (17) op with 28 replies

>clogging up anything

go back to cuckchan

>>13902677

roll

>>13902679

Thread was having a nice discussion until you lot.

Oh well, just wait until anybody asks a question, Total War games are endless.

>>13902681

>having a nice discussion

You mean you and your sockpuppet/other shill were bumping each other while pretending to talk about the game?

>>13902686

Nah, writing styles are different, you can do your investigation/IP tracking.

>>13902677 (checked)

Roll

>>13902677

roll

>>13902677

rollan

i feel kinda bad for you op

>>13902702

It's okay, m8.

Every attention is good attention.

>>13902697

>chuuni meme

Wew

>>13902702

>Feeling bad for a shill

Come on, nigga.

>>13902702

>feels bad for an obvious shill

>>13902704

>admits right here that any attention is good attention

You have brain cells. Please use them.

>>13902707

I'm not a shill m8.

>>13902708

Explain? Just want to have a Total War thread m8.

>>13902711

>>>/cuckchan/

>>>/treblinka/

>>13902873

Bump.

>>13902711

>>13902709

>m8

go back to reddit please

>>13902897

leddit doesn't have good TW threads.

>>13902677

Roll

>>13902389

Edging is when you see how long you can orgasm without ejaculating. Sort of a perfect analogy for CA after Medieval 2.

>>13902958

Nah, my place is here, friend.

Soon, the TW fags will wake up and this thread will be filled to the brim with discussions.

>>13902986

My first TW is Medieval 1 though, and Attila is still one of the good TW games.

>>13902993

I guess as long as you're pirating it, no harm done. But, if you've played the original Total Wars, you know you could always unlock all factions from inside the game. So, even if you don't get into battles enough for the inferior engine to phase you, you'd still suffer from major battered housewife syndrome just for tolerating the nickel and dime bullshit and the $8 price tag for unlocking factions.

>>13903016

Eh, that's a dirty practice but it doesn't actually harm the quality of the game.

And they usually release completed edition that has all the DLC anyway.

>>13903021

You're supporting a dirty practice either way. This is why you don't belong here.

>>13903021

>And they usually release completed edition that has all the DLC anyway.

>Rome 2 came out 4 years ago and there is still no complete version for sale

Shill-kun, you're an embarrassment to your profession.

>(27)

>>13903035

He just realized that Medieval 2 already has Viking Invasion, so he just wasted sixty dollars.

>>13903035

>i forgot to turn off the oven

>>13903029

Rome 2 apparently isn't finished, there's just a new DLC coming out for it.

>>13903027

Beggars can't be choosers.

>>13903039

Medieval 2 didn't have viking invasion, Medieval 1 did.

The britannia campaign in Medieval 2 was much after the Viking age (after the Battle of Hastings).

>>13903136

I don't remember if the Medieval 1's Viking invasion is actually about 800s era England but meh….

>>13903136

>>13903231

>blatant samefagging

kek

>>13903269

Europa Barbarorum is great, I love that mod.

>>13903269

Third Age Total War.

Medieval 2 has the best mods.

But Attila is also getting some good mods like Viking and Medieval 1212.

>>13902677

finally, roll

>>13903300

Why do I have to shill for a 2 year old game, man?

Truth is Attila has some good conversion mods.

>>13903312

Anon, he's just a really passionate fan. It's not like the life of his wife's niglet depends on him earning his daily shekel shilling on an anonymous imageboard. Nobody could be that pathetic, right?

>>13902483

but now you can actually experience battles in the games instead of auto-resolving 10,000 vs 10 battles for 40 hours before getting to one decent fight

>>13903368

I have done none of the above, famalam.

I shoulda shill Rome 2 if SEGA really wants some quick buck for the new DLC.

>>13903407

Cuz it might be confused with the Britannia kingdom expansion?

>>13903403

The pike and shot were present in Medieval 2, if you ask me WaWa is more of a precursor to Medieval 3.

>>13903427

Cuz Attila is also a good game?

>>13903432

Alright then, explain what makes it a good game and anyway better than former TW without resorting to >muh graphics

>>13903317

where does one apply for these magical shilling jobs?

>>13903494

PR rep at CA

>>13903468

Unit variety, distinct cultural and religion system, and diplomacy that works, good expansion campaign.

I also own Attila but have never played it.

I spend 600 hours into Med 2, I just don't know if it is as good.

>>13903616

Not as good but still good. Start with the prologue.

>>13902677

Rollin

>>13902677

roll

content-less sage

>>13902677

Roll/

EB2>R2

this thread is like /pol/

>>13903016

Isn't Total War 3 Engine shit though? What's the point of playing even Shogun 2 if it's using that engine?

t. fag who has played up to Medieval II Kingdoms, but not Medieval I.

>>13905219

Which is like /b/

>>13902677

roll

>>13905337

Shogun 2 almost made up for the shit engine with polish and styles. Just believe in fantasy samurai honour of only fighting one on one and it's bretty good. FOTS though is genuinely the best TW with muskets and it feels so fucking good to decimate a massive katana wielding samurai army with a gatling gun and some riflemen, think end of The Last Samurai sort of shit.

>>13904083

>Been done better and more diverse, not a rock paper scissors style of combat.

Attila doesn't have rock paper scissor style combat farm, it's like Medieval 2 where cavalry can beat spearman depending on where they charge, and shock infantries can get beaten by spearmn if they get charged.

>That apparently was just a bug in Med 2 and the whole point of TW isn't to have gsg style interlocking empires but instead to use diplomacy so you aren't getting raped from all sides at the same time.

The grand strategy part is not for show in Attila, you can actually have a 8 turn of peace due to the honor and trustworthy system (if a faction just decides to break peace treaty, they can but it makes everyone dislike them).

>naval shit, all of it

It's not all bad, really, but yeah I just skip naval shit if I can.

>no collision

Wrong, collision matters in Attila, slam a unit in spaghetti line will net in more kill than in a square line.

>bloated to fuck

Explain?

>didn't really capture the apocolypse spirit it was going for

Except it does, constant Huns raid, the ability to raze a settlement, climate change. It really does feel apocalyptic when the Huns capture one of your city and raze it to the fucking ground, destroy hundreds of turn investment into it.

>was just a shitty redone BI

It's an expanded BI farm, I don't think I can play BI now that Attila exists.

>jewing it out as a new game instead of a much cheaper expack like the game it's trying to be

Attila scope is Rome 2-tier and deserves to be its own game.

>2 bong bucks for blood

Been like this since Shogun 2 already, there's an excuse for this because of the germans.

>10 bong bucks for a single campaign, 6 for a culture pack

That means it's kinda cheap compared to actual expansions in that past that cost $20 or $35, Age of Charlesmagne is worth more than $10.

>fucking over the people who bought Rome 2 by taking the most fixed version and putting it behind a £45 price tag

Rome 2 is still being fixed atm, Attila is a different beast.

>cluttered fucking unit cards

True with Rome 2, not with Attila.

>not being able to have armies without generals

This is a problem yes, I agree, but it's done to prevent spammable captain army.

>>13903414

>>13903432

>Cuz

Who let an actual nigger in?

>>13905567

Well, I have no reason to shill for it, famalam.

>>13905626

That's no reason at all, amigo.

Attila is a good game and I'm simply discussing it.

I could move to WaWa though.

>>13905662

>Attila is a good game and I'm simply discussing it.

You're also the only one and you should take a hint when almost half the thread is you alone.

how shit is empire divided? Did they improve anything in terms of AI?

>>13905691

It sounds like they are making Attila within Rome 2, weird enough.

You can see the faction similarities (Goth, Saxon) between them.

>>13905726

>Nigga' what? And charging any fucking type of troops' flanks should fucking destroy them that doesn't stop it being RPS, it just makes it not fucking retarded

So it's not RPS then considering RPS means hard counter without nuance, also, you can't charge archer into infantry's flank and expect a win.

>First of, don't you fucking ever dare to even slightly call Atilla a gsg or I will just crown you the King of retards right here right now. And wow diplomacy works the exact fucking same but with a few new modifiers

Except it fucking works unlike Medieval 2, you can have long lasting peace.

>Double wrong fucker, there is zero collision in the warscape engine. It's all coded to make it seem like there is because the engine was designed for musket combat

But there is collision in Attila, even the goddamn animation matters (see javelin precursor vs axe precursor), you can literally see it when you slam cavalry into infantry.

>It runs like dog shit most of the time due to being a poorly optimized piece of bloated shit

Not anymreo.

>Oh wow they were able to make it slightly better in a few very small parts with a a budget which was most likely 10 times as large and 10 years worth of tech, 8/8 gr8 m8

Attila on its own is much bigger than BI though, all the expacs make it into a full length TW titles now.

>If they're going to re-use all of the same assets then have the audacity to charge me the same price then they're cunts, no ifs ands or buts

They re-use some voice works, man, all the other contents are new.

>And I would say pirate Shogun 2 for its shitty DLC practice and don't ever try to excuse a company charging for something which could have been just disabled for the Kraut version

Isn't that just bad for the kraut though?

>Kingdoms was in no way pricey for being 4 campaigns in 1 package which I got for £20 new.

Kingdoms is much shorter than say, Age of Charlesmagne though.

>The culture packs however were content held to ransom for a total cost of £30 if I want to play the game fully

True it's a shit deal, but nowadays CA has opened to FLC where they just update the faction with no cost.

>Atilla came out in a better condition that Rome 2 was in at the time, now tell me how that wasn't CA going "Fuck you got mine"

And CA actually pays for it since Attila sold less than Rome 2 despite being a more solid game.

>How was it a problem?

Stack of doom, m8, you can still do this in Attila but there is only a limit amount of armies you can muster.

>>13905765

>RPS

It is a hard counter when you don't use tactics fam and no shit does the poorly equipped non-melee troops dissolve when put into melee

>diplomacy

Again, Med 2's diplomacy was due to a bug because of one line of script, fix the script and enjoy Attila level diplomacy for the low low price of being a good game :^)

>collision

Coding to make it look like it's happening, the engine can't handle proper collision

>bloated

Oh wow after 2 years they finally made it run slightly better, give them a medal

>expacks

So you're saying for me make attila into a full TW title I have to spend almost £100? Wow what a bargain

>assets

Hahahaha, you're telling me that a company which wants to make as much money as possible didn't reuse assets? For that I crown you King of the Retards

>bad for the kraut

No you retard, they're never allowed blood in their games. They can't buy that DLC, so it's bad for EVERYONE else 'cept CA of course ;^)

>Kingdoms

>short

>think of the poor company because they fucked over their customers they made less money boohoo how awful

Think about that one again

>stack of doom

Stacks of doom I can deal with, having to only have a couple of armies out on campaign because I need the rest of my generals to guard the homefront? That shit pisses me off

>>13905853

>It is a hard counter when you don't use tactics fam and no shit does the poorly equipped non-melee troops dissolve when put into melee

So it's not hard counter then considering equipment matters, morale matter, who charges first matter.

>Again, Med 2's diplomacy was due to a bug because of one line of script, fix the script and enjoy Attila level diplomacy for the low low price of being a good game :^)

Well, diplomacy is huge in TW game (unless you want to auto-resolve battles again and again), so Attila having workable diplomacy is a boon.

>Coding to make it look like it's happening, the engine can't handle proper collision

But it can though, you can see it in the vid in this thread.

>So you're saying for me make attila into a full TW title I have to spend almost £100? Wow what a bargain

It's a shame they haven't made a full compilation of Attila, but maybe there's still an expansion for it.

>Hahahaha, you're telling me that a company which wants to make as much money as possible didn't reuse assets? For that I crown you King of the Retards

Most of the contents in Attila are new though, with SOME reused assets.

>No you retard, they're never allowed blood in their games. They can't buy that DLC, so it's bad for EVERYONE else 'cept CA of course ;^)

This is bad I must say, but at least it's cheap, and if there is a complete edition, blood is in it.

>Think about that one again

Kingdoms is 4 small campaigns, Age of Charlesmagne is a new grand campaign that stretches over Europe with 100% new units and events.

>Stacks of doom I can deal with, having to only have a couple of armies out on campaign because I need the rest of my generals to guard the homefront? That shit pisses me off

You can muster more armies if you conquer more territories and get bigger, it's logical.

>come back to this thread

>see an anon biting the bait fucking hard

>shill nigger reaches (43)

What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>13905884

>RPS

1v1 it's a hard counter, using actual tactics mitigates it

>diplomacy

It was a tiny part to make sure you weren't about to be gangbanged, nothing else as TW is all about the battles that's why it's not a gsg

>collision

I again say coding to make it SEEM like it's happening. Code can't make up for engine limitations and when you provide me with collision in older games don't then take it away from me

>price

Holding content behind pay walls while still charging full price for an expack is never good

>assets

Again, you're King of the Retards

>blood

It doesn't matter if it's cheap it's a shit move

>kingdoms

That's 4 new campaigns with all new factions all with new troops so I'm going to just say 400% more content for the same price as two campaigns

>general armies

No what is logical is that you don't need a guy with magical abilities who is the only one who can take people outside a town

>>13905918

Depression and I've got nothing better to do at work so might as well get paid while anti-shilling

>>13905978

>1v1 it's a hard counter, using actual tactics mitigates it

It's not just tactics, equipment, morale and formation also come into play, so it's not a RPS system.

>It was a tiny part to make sure you weren't about to be gangbanged, nothing else as TW is all about the battles that's why it's not a gsg

Uh, diplomacy also gives you money, and money is how you buy troops, so I think it's 1/3 of the game. It doesn't even need to be a GSG in order to have a diplomacy.

>I again say coding to make it SEEM like it's happening. Code can't make up for engine limitations and when you provide me with collision in older games don't then take it away from me

But it does have collision, unit get knockbacked when they get charged and cannot fight, if you spread your unit, you kill more by having having more area.

>Holding content behind pay walls while still charging full price for an expack is never good

For your record, Age of Charlesmagne costs less than a full expac despite having full expac-tier content.

>Again, you're King of the Retards

But what I say it's true.

>That's 4 new campaigns with all new factions all with new troops so I'm going to just say 400% more content for the same price as two campaigns

Only the America has totally new factions with new troops, Teutonic, Britannia and Crusades didn't have fully new factions nor new troops, while Age of Charlesmagne is actually fully new with everything rebalanced.

>No what is logical is that you don't need a guy with magical abilities who is the only one who can take people outside a town

Historically, generals lead campaigns, armies just don't randomly march off the gate with a captain.

>>13905918

Please explain to me the point of shilling for a 2-year old game?

Why?

>>13905978

Can't you atleast play vidya or something?

>>13906087

Don't play dumb with me, you know exactly why.

>>13906139

I actually don't know, man.

Explain to me. Buying Attila at this point changes nothing.

>>13906072

>RPS

Take any unit of the same level and put them up against each other 1v1, spears beat cav beats inf beats spears, it's been their design policy since Shogun 2

>diplomacy

Getting pocket change from it doesn't make it 1/3 m80, it's there to make sure you don't get gangbanged

>content price

I'm talking about the culture packs fam, and the Goldman dlc is the only one worthy of its price tag

>reusing assets

So they build up an almost entirely new game within 2 years? Without using massive amounts of old assets? A company which is known to nickle and dime its customers? Nope must have done it ;^)

>kingdoms

New factions: 6 in America, 4 in Britain, 2 in Crusades, 2/3 Teutonic. All of them have unique units. All for the low price of £20 new.

>general armies

Generals lead campaigns, captains were sent out to deal with homefront defense. I can only use my generals to do both.

>>13906139

Nah, can't run .exe's due to not being allowed admin priv. But it's nice that they don't check my web history and I bring along a memory stick to shitpost and read books

>>13906259

Emulate gayms on phone nigger.

>>13906286

Too poor to afford a smartphone nigger, the rent in my area is so fucking high that my paychecks barely even cover it.

>>13906259

>Take any unit of the same level and put them up against each other 1v1, spears beat cav beats inf beats spears, it's been their design policy since Shogun 2

Uh, 1vs1 wise, it's true since Rome 1.

>Getting pocket change from it doesn't make it 1/3 m80, it's there to make sure you don't get gangbanged

The Roman empire sues for peace and give me 10000-20000, m8, it's not pocket change.

>I'm talking about the culture packs fam, and the Goldman dlc is the only one worthy of its price tag

The culture packs are indeed pricy, I cannot defend them.

>So they build up an almost entirely new game within 2 years? Without using massive amounts of old assets?

They modify them, famalam, but you wouldn't be seeing Rome 2 units in Attila.

>New factions: 6 in America, 4 in Britain, 2 in Crusades, 2/3 Teutonic. All of them have unique units. All for the low price of £20 new.

While Age of Charlesmagne has 6 new factions with completely new army and costs less than $20 (or so I remember).

>Generals lead campaigns, captains were sent out to deal with homefront defense. I can only use my generals to do both.

Technically you have town garrisons for that though, and town garrison can indeed support your generals. I just don't see how historically a captain can be mustered and move outside of his camp for military campaign without a general's order.

>>13906312

>>13906286

How about instead of arguing, you play some Attila?

>>13902677

rolling

>>13906323

>RPS

That's just wrong though, you can destroy everything with hoplites.

>diplomacy

So you're saying that because you can game someone for easy dollar dollar that makes it's 1/3 of the game meaning it's just as important as the battles?

>assets

You say modify I say reuse, just because you throw a different colour of paint on your house doesn't mean you made a new house

>kingdoms

Last time I checked 15 > 6 and for £20 I could play in America, Christianise the baltic, crusade in the levant, and beat up smelly irish in Med 2 or play with 6 new factions in the same area as before and get to play as Belly the badass with a Roman Empire which shits itself meaning I have to play clean up for them like their baby sitter

>general armies

Wow, never knew that switching up town garrisons, ambushing armies in my territory, dealing with bandits, and being scouts are now all considered military campaigns

>>13906326

And learn to read nigger, I can't as I'm at work so I get to argue with you while reading

Nothing gets my dick harder than charging shock infantry in main enemy line.

Berserker in Rome 1

Dane axe/zweihander/varangian guard in Medieval 2

Grenadier/Elite line in Empire/Napoleon

No-dachi samurai in Shogun 2

Dane axe/falxmen in Attila

Hammerer/slayer/greatsword in WaWa1

>>13906405

>That's just wrong though, you can destroy everything with hoplites.

Wrong, throw berserker at them.

>So you're saying that because you can game someone for easy dollar dollar that makes it's 1/3 of the game meaning it's just as important as the battles?

It's to help to avoid battles altogether and give you money in order to buy more units, and money is half of the games so I say yes.

>You say modify I say reuse, just because you throw a different colour of paint on your house doesn't mean you made a new house

If you modify your house and throw in a new coat of paint, it becomes a new house.

>Last time I checked 15 > 6 and for £20

But Age of Charlesmagne has all new units, all new events, it's almost like Fall of the Samurai in scope.

>Wow, never knew that switching up town garrisons, ambushing armies in my territory, dealing with bandits, and being scouts are now all considered military campaigns

These are all military campaign movement, especially ambushing enemy armies and scouting.

>>13906312

>Too poor to afford a smartphone

>the rent in my area is so fucking high that my paychecks barely even cover it

Wew, how much is your rent anyways?

>>13906326

Why would I? Though if you pay me $9.99, I will.

>>13901776

I've allways found those easier to play but it's probably just my preferences that is i dislike using cavalry and only use very few elite troops of it, usually the few groups of bodyguards you get with your king/prince/lords etc for the sake of "leveling" them up.

>>13906432

>berserkers

I forgot about those cunts

>diplomacy

Money isn't half of the game fam, building up your economy to handle massive armies and to create the best forces is

>assets

If I redone the tiling in my bathroom that doesn't make it a new house, it makes it new tiling you dipshit

>kingdoms

Less FOTS and more ROTS fam, fall changed the entire way that the game is played changed, moving away from melee to ranged

>general armies

Switching up town garrisons is not a military campaign. The defense of home territory isn't a military campaign. Scouting is now impossible because you need a general for any army

>>13906484

Rent is about £14,000 a year for a 1 bedroom flat in a place where I can get to work and use public transport and I can't get a car as insurance alone costs about £1,000 a month. Life is suffering here

>>13906521

>£14,000 a year

Jesus fuck, you need to find another place quick.

>I can't get a car as insurance alone costs about £1,000 a month

Is it mandatory to insure your car there? Since you know, you could just not insure it and pray every second no bullshit will happen to you.

>>13906582

I know man, I'm trying to build up savings to try and move but it takes a shit load of time. And yeah you need insurance otherwise you get arrested and your car impounded and not only is £1000 the smallest amount I can pay that is only third party so even if I do have my car get fucked up the insurance company won't pay shit to me.

>>13906602

>Third party insurance

>£1000

>Per fucking month

Holy shit, you're really having it bad. Currently where I am right now, you just have to pay for that compulsory third party insurance every time you're renewing your vehicle registration, and as far as I know, it's not as much as that. I'm so sorry anon.

>>13905658

>Did attila actually ever improve over Rome 2?

Yes, it improved and mostly fixed everything wrong with rome 2, especialy the atrocious UI that made the campaign map a torture session, in attila it is actualy fun to manage your provinces. The tone is much darker than in rome 2, wich helps a lot, i prsonaly hated how they tried to make everything sparkly in rome 2, it was like it was the first time the devs found out about occlusion and bloom effects and decided to shove it into EVERYTHING, it was hard to play the game for more than a few dozen minutes without your eyeballs bleeding and you suffering an aneurism. Attila has a more contained campaign and there is a sense of "rushing against time" to do things properly because by turn 30 you are hit in the face with a shitton of calamities that make the game interesting and hard, famines, plague, hordes of huns, diplomacy breaking down as the world literaly grows poorer and more desperate. Planning is actualy require unlike in rome 2 or previous TW titles were after you got a good army you could basicaly steamroll everything forever.

>Also does anyone else think english units should get greenwich armour if tou make it past 15?

The only thing the english deserve is a nuclear holocaust

>>13906647

I'd also have to have a car that was atleast worth £5000 for an insurance company to even think about insuring me as well. But atleast I have a decently comfy security night job which means I can do shit like this and learn political theory while getting paid. Plus I can have an entire weekend out in London getting shitty drunk with friends for about £30 including travel. Also have just enough cash that I can go to France, Belgium, Holland, or Germany every few months for about £300 which is great.

>>13906767

Sounds like a nice comfy job, atleast you got that going for you.

>>13901776

Dwarves in Total Warhammer were probably the most OP race in the game. One gyrobomber is all you need to win pretty much any battle. Seriously, you'd have to try pretty hard to lose with a gyrobomber. They also have stupidly high morale and are tanky as shit.

>>13907315

Were they buffed, they were really ineffective in my game.