Intelaviv Core i9 9900K's commissioned benchmark results disputed by an independent test

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Comment *

File

Select/drop/paste files here

Password

(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)

* = required field

[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 3 per post.

Flag

Oekaki

Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Options

Do not bump
(you can also write sage in the email field)

Spoiler images
(this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 3 per post.

File (hide): 6e4c5768cd23a12⋯.png (47.36 KB, 1328x1004, 332:251, Ashes.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): b1925077332461e⋯.png (41.53 KB, 1328x1004, 332:251, FC5.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): db252fdfd32aa13⋯.png (44.46 KB, 1328x1004, 332:251, ACO.png) (h) (u)

[–]

▶Intelaviv Core i9 9900K's commissioned benchmark results disputed by an independent test Anonymous 10/09/18 (Tue) 14:36:29 No.984694>>984778 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

>Intel comissioned initial Core i9 9900K benchmarking to literal who company Principled Technologies

>PCGamesN published the results of the Principled Technologies benchmark test early

>a Techspot writer is skeptical of these so he conducts his own benchmark test

>Techspot insisted that no NDA from Intel was signed prior to this

>Core i9 9900K review embargo is until October 19

https://archive.is/ktBLG

http://archive.is/3j3fv

https://invidiou.us/watch?v=6bD9EgyKYkU

▶Anonymous 10/09/18 (Tue) 14:53:58 No.984708

[furious hand rubbing in the distance]

▶Anonymous 10/09/18 (Tue) 16:05:26 No.984736>>984740

File (hide): 4766cf9e9b1eb14⋯.jpg (40.14 KB, 900x507, 300:169, 7b2588a42fffb8a13874e519c8….jpg) (h) (u)

Every time I hear about Intel in the news it's bad news. And this has been going on for at least a year now.

And what the fuck is up with this packaging. AMD's box for the threadripper looks like garbage too but at least it's still a fucking box.

▶Anonymous 10/09/18 (Tue) 16:10:18 No.984740

>>984736

They're desperately grasping for relevance after their whole kikery scheme got exposed and everyone has finally realized that they've always boosted their results by simply not performing proper security checks.

Now at least 10 year olds will ask daddy to buy the funny box at the electronics store. Might be the last customer base Intel has at this point.

▶Anonymous 10/09/18 (Tue) 18:00:07 No.984778

>>984694 (OP)

For the love of God please have RISC V and Power9 be consumer viable soon.

/tech/ - Technology★

General

WebM

Theme

User JS

Do not paste code here unless you absolutely trust the source or have read it yourself!

Favorites

Customize Formatting

Filters