/tech/ - Technology★

>>984334 (OP)

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/RationalWiki

All the information you need is here

RationalWiki is anything but.

(((rationalwiki)))

etc etc idiotarians

stopped reading there

If you disagree with RationalWiki, it means you're probably an irrational person. Just something to think about.

>>984367

You have to go back you sack of shit

>rationalwiki

for those who find wikipedia to be insufficiently kiked

>>984367

Every article they have about anything remotely right-wing completely throws rationality out the window. It's quite sad actually. Read their gamergate article for example. Full of logical fallacies. Big fun

>>984452

Every article they have about remotely anything completely throws rationality out the window. It's quite funny actually.

>>984342

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Encyclopædia_Dramatica

The plot thickens.

>>984334 (OP)

>+1SD iq'ers who don't understand the difference between rationalism and empiricism

>"hurr philosophy is dumb"

>"karl popper literally who? dont you mean black science man???"

>>984367

Sounds like an appeal to authority fallacy to me bucko. Meditate on the Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory axiomata with choice for 10,000 years and come back to me after you've solved the rest of the millenium prize problems

Eric S. Raymond revised the Jargon File to change references to UNIX sucking to MS-DOS because "the Unix philosophy is the same as the ITS philosophy" even though the "Worse is Better" article describes the MIT approach in ITS as the opposite of UNIX.

>>984390

><I've seen bonehead idiocy on the net before, but this tops it all -- this takes

The context of that post was Dennis Ritchie blaming BCPL for null-terminated strings in C, trying to pass the buck on why C sucks. Someone who knew more about BCPL said that it has counted strings, which it does.

>soggy lump of excrement you're using as a central nervous system

This seems to be a requirement to become a UNIX weenie. It would explain why UNIX weenies need AT&T employees to do their thinking for them.

>Do you

>realize that the person you just incorrectly `corrected' on a point of C's

>intellectual antecedents is the *inventor of C himself*!?!

This is one of the many things that suck about UNIX culture, which sucks just as much as C and UNIX themselves. If you say something correct, you are wrong because you don't work at AT&T, but if an AT&T employee says something incorrect, they are right.

    The JARGON file is being updated.  The guy doing so has
    changed the nasty references to Unix to refer to MS-DOS
    because "all the ITS partisans have now become Unix
    partisans, since the Unix philosophy is the same as the
    ITS philosophy." as he says.

YAAAARRGGGH!!!

If you would be gracious enough to identify this, um, I
believe the proper term is "loser", then we might have the
opportunity to clarify our philosophical differences.

These stupid shit-for-brains weenix unie "programmers" have
managed to break that mainstay of Western enlightenment and
education, the dictionary.  And I'll bet they excuse their
behavior by saying, "Well, it's all Greek to me"!

I suppose it's only appropriate that the invading hordes
scraped the librarian at Alexandria to death with shells.
They must have had a premonition that UNIX was coming.

>>984593

Remember that Eric SS Raymond will put you in the oven for being a UNIX/CoCksucker

>>984593

Lisp machines never heh.

>>984334 (OP)

>(((RationalWiki)))

>>984334 (OP)

baste and redpilled

>>984603

CoCs are a UNIX phenomenon because of how much code and how many developers UNIX and C programs need. The UNIX "design" methodology calls for a large number of interchangeable programmers. Linux is more than 15 million lines of code and has more than 15 thousand developers. They made the CoC because they need even more developers than that, or in marketing speak, "to help make the kernel community a welcoming environment to participate in."

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2017/10/2017-linux-kernel-report-highlights-developers-roles-accelerating-pace-change/

>Roughly 15,600 developers from more than 1,400 companies have contributed to the Linux kernel since 2005, when the adoption of Git made detailed tracking possible, according to the 2017 Linux Kernel Development Report released at the Linux Kernel Summit in Prague.

>>984612

UNIX weenies don't like Lisp machines because they're afraid that all their C and UNIX knowledge would become obsolete.

>>984703

What sucks is that Eric Raymond's reaction to that GIF would be completely different if the person wearing the boot worked at AT&T.

ER,

    Apparently you've misconstrued my complaints.  I
certainly never claimed to have personal ownership over the
jargon file; I was relaying the feelings of a large number
(probably most, despite whatever you wish to believe) of the
members of the community which the original JARGON file
documents (or, used to, anyway).  I don't know what the
legal copyright status of the material is, or what it was
when it was published commercially.  At least the ethics of
commercially usurping community property were and are
debatable.

    I don't really have time or inclination to argue with
you about your notions.  But imagine if someone took a book
that you and your playmates had written about your
childhoods, "updated it" to coincide with their very
different attitudes (which you, for the most part disagreed
with), and then published it under its original title.  I
think that's part of how a number of us feel.  Most of the
other MIT-AI people I've talked to seem to feel this way.

    I don't read this newsgroup, so if anyone wants to
correspond about this, you'll have to send me email.  But
mostly, I'm not very interested.  I'm certainly not
interested in debating your confused interpretations of what
our culture was about, whether myself or my associates
represent that culture, nor am I interested in debating the
technical merits of random operating systems.  My intentions
in my previous posting were mostly to clear up various
strange assertions regarding the old ITS crowd, and relay my
sense of violation.  Sometimes I think there's no hope of
people ever understanding what was going on back then.  Oh,
well.  I think I've said all I wanted to.

>>984767

Do you ever feel bad about bullying unitards this hard?

>>984771

why would he?

unitards have spent decades jerking each other off and rolling in the mud, and they're proud of it too.

they deserve more bullying

>>984771

>>984767

>>984783

Lisp fags would be right except they got BTFO by faster x86 Unix machines that cost half as much. Really they are just shitty losers for their failed inferior platform.

>>984767

>UNIX weenies don't like Lisp machines because they're afraid that all their C and UNIX knowledge would become obsolete.

Reminds me of that African propaganda where they say that white men have small brain and are afraid of it.

We're fucked.

>>986009

It looks like you're ACTUALLY shilling when you don't use red text.

It's over. The Jews won. We're absolutely, positively fucked. Guess I'll install Wangblows 10 and cry because there's absolutely no coming back. We're done.

>>986022

Ironic shitposting is just shitposting.