>>943644
>I find it fascinating how every time Stallman's political notes are mentioned, it always solicits the same response of ethos-driven condescension, but, ironically, they never seem to justify their remarks.
>Just a haphazard retort without any real warrant or context or meaning so presumptuous that one might think it expects to be lauded by its sheer baselessness and pretension.
Please tell me why you needed to onanate over how grand your lexicon is, instead of simply saying:
It's fascinating to me that people always are critical of Stallman's political opinions, but if you ask them to expound, they refuse to justify their remarks. Funny how that works. (I'm adding that last sentence because you're purporting that post as an "offhanded joke".)
The only reason you would write in such an periphrastic manner is to appear more intelligent. You failed, knuckle dragger.