▶ No.916116>>917595 >>922902
>>916112 (OP)
>(age >= 22)
Are am*rican feminists unironically paedophiles? Disgusting!!
▶ No.916122>>916126 >>929668
Most women are not analytical, and tend to prefer jobs where they can work with other people. Why do more women choose to enter nursing than men?
▶ No.916126
▶ No.916129
>>916112 (OP)
Wow it's as if men and women have different interests or something!
▶ No.916130>>918539
They don't prefer programming.
Norwegian documentary called "Brainwashing" which hammers that point home (english subs)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVaTc15plVs
>most gender equal country in world by whatever feminist metric
>men and women are even stricter in their own work categories than in muh patriarchy muh oppression countries
▶ No.916135
>>916112 (OP)
Because in free societies women choose to do different things. Just look at math majors. Its almost 50 50 men and women. For math grad students though its almost entirely male. This is because all the women become math teachers.
▶ No.916150
Because there are already too many.
▶ No.916152
▶ No.916162>>916166 >>916282
>>916112 (OP)
>Is it really because of a sexist and unwelcoming atmosphere?
Programming is, generally speaking, rough and unwelcoming occupation. As a programmer you are at intersection of math, engineering and business and you need to constantly balance between all those.
>Most nerds would love to have a woman among them right?
I do not care about coworkers sex, but whole modern feminism bullshit makes it a bit harder to work with females.
▶ No.916166
>>916162
>I do not care about coworkers sex, but whole modern feminism bullshit makes it a bit harder to work with females.
Modern feminism bullshit has poisoned the well in many ways.
▶ No.916171>>916174 >>920542
women are too smart to waste their lives in front of a screen to make a machine obey arbitrary rules
▶ No.916174>>916177
>>916171
True. They just need say 3 magic words to an unfortunate cuck, who has to waste his time in front of the screen in their stead.
▶ No.916176>>916201
>>916112 (OP)
Because programming expects you to study and train for years, all the while (rightfully) getting shat on by everyone because your code is shit, after which you'll eternally have to argue why you are worth more than pajeet, who can't use a toilet let alone a computer.
Nobody that doesn't love programming is going to seriously pursue it, and women are genetically incapable of love.
▶ No.916177>>920507
>>916174
thing is, even if you don't have a vagina you can still find cucks who obey you and do things for you. It's called being an entrepeneur.
▶ No.916201>>916211 >>916671
Same reason there are more men in mining and more women in teaching. Everything else being equal people pick something they enjoy. The only way to avoid it is to have the government force people into specific jobs to make the numbers look neat despite the people being miserable.
>Most nerds would love to have a woman among them right?
Depends. If I have a stake on the product I prefer not to as they distract me (unless they're ugly but then what's the point?). If I don't care however, yeah as they're easier on the eyes.
>>916176
>women are genetically incapable of love.
Women can love their children if nothing else.
▶ No.916211
>>916201
>Most nerds would love to have a woman among them right?
They do until they figure out how much of a problem is causes. Women are primarily concerned about the social pecking order no matter what the situation is. This is why they're so awful to deal with in the workplace and gravitate to positions where they have social power (HR). If you cross a woman in the workplace she will drive you out somehow, you're either going to get fired for harassment or she'll turn your co-workers against you. This isn't (((all women))) but it is the vast majority. Assuming a woman does like you at your workplace that will quickly turn the hate. This is the worst possible situation you can find yourself in at the job. It will not end well for you once she's set her mind to having you as more than a co-worker. Even if you turn her down gracefully you'll be signing your own walking papers because she'll use everything in her power to oust you once this happens.
It's simply impossible to be genuinely nice to women in the workplace. They either see it as a creepy attempt to come on to them and report your for harassment or they'll assume you're flirting and keep pushing you until you turn down their offer of a date and activate the hate. It's best to simply ignore them and get a job where you do not have to worry about women hanging around.
▶ No.916219>>916241
Guys own girls. Ummmmm isn't that a little sexist?
▶ No.916241>>916251
>>916219
>guy owns girl
>girl still doesn't go out with him
kek
▶ No.916243>>916246 >>920539
If you could choose between doing something as autistic as programming or getting married and just having sex for a living would you pick the former?
▶ No.916246>>916259
>>916243
If you could just strawman or make a proper argument would you pick the former?
▶ No.916249
>>916112 (OP)
>Most nerds would want a woman among them, right?
Look, there are plenty of intelligent, good-looking women out there that share my interests. I've dated a couple within the last year. I didn't meet either of them through work.
▶ No.916251
>>916241
>not killing her boyfriend so your slave girl goes out with you
▶ No.916255
>image
>girl is an object
Ugly. Beautiful grills are structures!
bool willGoOutWithGirl(girl* grill) {return !grill->ugly;}
We already had a thread "Let's prove /tech/ that women can code too" and it was horrible with soyboys and even a fucking woman screaming about how capable their vagina is.
Thread pls die
▶ No.916256
>>916112 (OP)
>Why do (You) think there are so few women in programming?
Because they're being pushed out of the market by Indians that'll work for less money.
▶ No.916259>>916268
>>916246
>strawman
I don't think that word means what you think it means bud
▶ No.916268
>>916259
strawman. isn't it obvious?
▶ No.916281
>>916112 (OP)
>Girl is an object
>Guy owns a girl
lol
>Girl object is initialized with a default constructor even though only a non-default constructor is defined
And it doesn't even compile. Congrats ladies, you sure showed us who's boss!
▶ No.916282
>>916162
>I do not care about coworkers sex, but whole modern feminism bullshit makes it a bit harder to work with females.
This. My company no longer hires women after certain #metoo inspired incident in her social media. Basically what happened was one bitch was virtue signaling hardcore of "micro aggresions" and "toxic masculinity" she "experiences at work" which legit has no grounds whatsoever. Thank god boss is smart and just ignored it all, he knows what's up. Now everyone is pretty much waiting for rest of the ladies to walk themselves out as atmosphere is stupid tense.
▶ No.916294>>916301
>>916112 (OP)
>Why do (You) think there are so few women in programming?
Here's another question
Why do (You) think there are so many women in children care?
Here's another question
Why do (You) think there are so many men in oil drilling?
▶ No.916301>>916306
>>916294
>Why do (You) think there are so many women in children care?
Because there's discrimination against men going anywhere near children.
>Why do (You) think there are so many men in oil drilling?
Because it requires strength and resilience and men are stronger than women.
A better question to do would've been why pretty much all the greatest names in philosophy, physics and sciences in general are men and the answer is because women simply are not as smart as men. Thousands of years of evolution made it so women are valued by their beauty instead of their brains or strength and there's nothing wrong with that, it's just mother nature doing its thing.
▶ No.916306
>>916301
>Because there's discrimination against men going anywhere near children.
Possible but you miss the point.
>Because it requires strength and resilience and men are stronger than women.
Yes but you still miss the point.
>women simply are not as smart as men
I wouldn't say smart. Woman's have their own way of thinking than men. I think that we are comparing something that isn't comparable because both thought process of the two sex are different. Of course that does not mean that none of them can't have similar process on exceptions.
> and there's nothing wrong with that
I agree.
My question is that why are some woman or men are constantly trying to know who's the best ? Aren't males and females goals just to find mates and produce offspring's ?
I say that because the actual general climate goes against the most basics of our instincts (which is survival).
▶ No.916651>>917669
>women in 80's
>write successful game titles singlehandedly
>women today
>write things like Gnome and systemD with help of men and pajeetss
▶ No.916671
>>916201
>more women in teaching
because men don't like kids and teaching in general, and the pay is shit. that's all. Also, you get shit on constantly by self-entitled parents who think their special snowflake son failed because of you (while their kid has a blank binder and no textbooks).
Education is in the gutter right now at least in the 3rd world thanks to (((inclusivity))), (((welfare checks))), and (((no child left behind)))-like policies. You can't expel kids ever, even if they do drugs beat up their teacher because expulsion is "stigmatizing". Truth is, schools shouldn't put up with such delinquents at the expense of ruining everyone else's education.
Due to the former, most public schools are flooded with uninterested, illiterate niggers and drug junkies who attend to collect welfare, while white people opt for repetition, nigger, and druggie-free private schools which is bad because most private schools treat teachers worse than Walmart, jew you out of your money, and consider parents customers, so they pass their kids even if they don't know shit so they won't switch schools.
t. relative of teachers
▶ No.916732>>917756 >>917795
>>916112 (OP)
most guys were into programming because they were socially isolated and had nothing else to do. otherwise they'd play football, have a girlfriend, and be CEO at nignog corp. now as of the last decade programming has become a fad and everyone is into it period
▶ No.917541
James Damore explained this pretty well, and his memo is backed by solid scientific evidence.
▶ No.917595>>917829
>>916116
I think you got something mixed up there
▶ No.917669
>>916651
>write things like Gnome and systemD with help of men and pajeetss
They write documentation and make icons anon. Sometimes they edit comments in source code. The development is all done by others.
▶ No.917684
>>916112 (OP)
Do the exact same then against women and you will be targeted for life.
▶ No.917739
Please go back to leftypol.
▶ No.917756
>>916732
Projecting hard, I see. Men are more into programming because autism is almost a male only thing.
▶ No.917795
▶ No.917800
▶ No.917829>>917854 >>922902
>>917595
The program filters out guys over age of 22 and ugly ones.
Dating 20-year old children is outright peadophilia and ungodly thing in the Land of the Free!
▶ No.917854>>917862 >>922902
>>917829
On the contrary, if you actually read the image, you'd notice she is looking for guys equal or over 22 years old (which is her age btw).
▶ No.917862>>917865 >>922902
>>917854
Why isn't she referencing the age defined in her Girl class and instead hardcoding 22? Makes zero sense. She creates her new Girl object, doesn't set the age (what's the point of the method then, sweetheart?), and hardcodes 22. What a dumb bitch.
▶ No.917865
>>917862
The fact that she creates a class and an object but doesn't actually use the feature set that comes with that garbage and just decides the hardcode the age of 22 is fucking retarded. This just serves as another piece of proof that normies (and most women) should get the fuck out of software development/engineering. How can you fuck up something so basic?
▶ No.917912
>>916112 (OP)
Because they all use thisUglySyntax()
▶ No.917917>>918077
Women aren't biologically capable of doing the hard stuff. They don't think quickly and have poor reaction time. They always need a "women's league" when competing with men. Trying to force them into roles they aren't any good at is stupid. They have an important and difficult job to do in raising the next generation and it should be obvious why certain people (psst it's the Jews) don't want them doing that.
▶ No.918073
Less women are social outcasts and it is usually social outcasts who take the time to learn about computers. When socially successful women attempt to break into technology with no knowledge or effort, they are met with reasonable ire which they attempt to bullshit away as misogyny.
▶ No.918077
>>917917
There have been technically capable women throughout the history of computers. Don't conflate low incentive with being incapable.
▶ No.918101
Biological differences between men and women that everyone pretend to not exist.
Talking in the level of collective, women tends toward working with other people and men tends toward working with exact sciences (engineering, computer science, finances...).
It's good to have this division, if everyone was the same, many problems would end up not solved. But useful idiots have to tell women that they should do men's work because everything else is evil and patriarchal and doing men's work is freedom, but having babies or working is some other areas is female slavery.
Typical social marxists talking points.
▶ No.918119>>918195
▶ No.918123
it's hard to say for sure but the programming courses that I've taken over the years have only had 3 girls (more or less) in each course. For the most part 1 or 2 would wash out within a few assignments. The girls that stayed were usually women that didn't care about their appearance and would dress in t-shirts and jeans. they wouldn't talk to anyone and some would just sit there and read manga the whole class. watching them program
was no different from the other programmers in the course. they would sit there and hack away at the key board or sit staring at the screen looking for bugs in they're code.
>social aspect
of programming is what girls aren't willing to put up with. they are social creatures that like being out and about with each other. the few that are willing to sit at a desk for hours on end writing out functions are the same
that don't shower as often as they should and don't wear make up. they look like tomboys.
>good looking girl programmers
mostly had beta males around them do all of the work for them. every (EVERY) assignment was done as a small group or as a pair. some beta retard would nervously hack away as the woman would be on the phone and
occasionally ask the guy a question. watching that parasitic relationship take place in plain sight was something that would occupy my mind at night.
poor fuckers didnt have any kind of defense for such an interation
they would happily slave away coding only to turn they're assignment code over to these leech qts
▶ No.918127>>918136
>>916112 (OP)
Heres a heretical thought (in the current year dark age): Perhaps the two sexes are not identical and are better at different things.
▶ No.918136>>918217 >>918218
>>918127
office jobs aren't manual labor
▶ No.918170
Same reason there are fewer women with autism.
▶ No.918195
▶ No.918205
>>916112 (OP)
>Is it really because of a sexist and unwelcoming atmosphere?
No.
Every single software engineering job I've had except for my first has had at lead one female, but most two. I've always worked in close proximity to the entire department and never have I heard 1) male employees striking up inappropriate discussion or 2) making crass remarks to the females. I know I don't represent all workplaces, but I've worked with more male engineers than I have fingers and toes x 1.5 and you would think at least one of them would be cracking dick jokes, talking about tits, or degrading other females even on the "micro" scale.
The truth is that engineering requires a logical and analytical brain. This is what attracts males to the field. Females simply lack these attributes which is why they choose professions centered around care-giving or fields for which emotions are prime requisites.
Also, the code in OP pic SUCKS. Holy shit I want to rewrite it but realized I have other things I'd like to do.
▶ No.918217
>>918136
>evolution, womb conditions, nurture and hormones affect absolutely everything (except brain, that would be racist and sexist)
▶ No.918218
>>918136
This. There are plenty of female chess grandmasters. Sexists btfoed
▶ No.918236>>918240 >>918241
>chess
>a game where you win if you memorize more moves than your opponent
>having anything to do with intelligence
Also all female GMs are rated below male amateurs just like in physical sports
▶ No.918240
>>918236
Pattern recognition is literally the definition of intelligence you stupid fuck.
▶ No.918241
>>918236
>a game where you win if you memorize more moves than your opponent
>having anything to do with intelligence
This. Go is the thinking man's game.
▶ No.918250>>918253 >>918273
Because it's a free fucking country and women don't want to be in programming so they don't. God fucking damn jesus cocksucking christ cunt why can't anybody fucking get the bull fucking pussy over it.
▶ No.918253
>>918250
This new cuckchan wave is hitting pretty hard
▶ No.918273
>>918250
Nuh uh, women don't want to be in programming because of all the sexism.
If you remove all the men from programming then women can reclaim it.
▶ No.918335>>918342
>>916112 (OP)
I work as a programmer in a fucking boring big company. Alla i do are programs about taxes and stuff. I work with females everyday and all i can say is that they are so fucking annoying and most of them so stupid compared to males. I hate them most of the time.
▶ No.918342
>>918335
elaborate, how are they annoying you? are they also programmers?
▶ No.918346
>>916112 (OP)
>Why do (You) think there are so few women in programming?
They are more inclined to pursue something like gender studies which only really qualifies you for working in Human Resources. Or starbucks.
▶ No.918347>>918352
Because programming isn't fulfilling to someone with a woman-sized ego whos pride needs to be validated with compliments and positive reinforcement 24/7.
▶ No.918352>>918356
>>918347
>whos pride needs to be validated with compliments and positive reinforcement 24/7.
Why are women so dependant on this shit?
▶ No.918356
>>918352
Because they're women.
▶ No.918539>>931169
>>916112 (OP)
Imagine if a guy had written:
class Guy {
private int age;
Guy(int age) {
this.age = age;
}
public boolean willGoOutWithGirl(boolean isGirlFat) {
return (age >=16) && (age <=19) && (!isGirlFat);
}
}
class Girl {
private Guy guy = new Guy();
private boolean isFat = true;
public boolean willGuyGoOutWithMe() {
return guy.willGoOutWithGirl(isFat);
}
// Guy can see how fat Girl is, no need to ask! ;-)
}
>>916130
I remember seeing that TV-series as it aired in 2010. It was the lulziest documentary aired that year and caused drama long after it was sent. Everyday people were commenting on it, and one of the people interviewed there, Jørgen Lorenzten, a gender researcher, was relentlessly mocked by the public for his views that gender is almost exclusively an aquired behaviour. I really miss 2010.
▶ No.918540
It's probably because all the managers are business majors and they constantly harass the women to ask them why they don't feel welcome in the field. I'd hate being in a room where I'm constantly singled-out for being who I am and told I'm special just for showing up.
Then the soyboys have the gall to blame the "misogynerds" when it's their behavior that drives the good ones out. Worse, the women who just want attention and to get a free pass when their work sucks will stick it out because they won't be fired. Then women actually do get a bad reputation because all the ones there are the unqualified ones.
▶ No.918781
>>918348
>shalom ayash
EVERY FUCKING TIME
▶ No.919022>>919042 >>921681
It's genuinely hilarious how popular media has been able to convince every generation of women that horny, young, usually less socially capable males just can't stand the idea of having more access to females who are interested in the same things they are.
<The obvious reality is that society loves to pick on undesirable males.
Also, what's the point of this code? You have to assume the classes are nested in another class since they're private right? You can't change the Boolean field of Guy and I don't think you can even create an instance of Girl since it's constructor is private? Maybe this isn't C#?
▶ No.919030>>919039
I'm a carpenter and a welder. Guess how many fucking woman I see at my job.
Guess how many secretaries I've seen. I don't think I've seen a male secretary in my life.
It's just interests.
▶ No.919039>>920233
>>919030
Would anyone even hire a male secretary tho?
▶ No.919042
>>919022
or is this Java? I don't know I've never seen Java code before...
▶ No.919047
▶ No.920233
>>919039
I tried, but all male applicants were either faggots or otherwise mentally disabled.
▶ No.920237
>>916112 (OP)
Because women are too mentally retarded to handle it.
▶ No.920241>>920435
>>916112 (OP)
No matter how much this new wave of stupid liberals fumes at it, men and women are different (who could have guessed, different things are different?), and have different interests.
It happens that men have more qualities relevant to tech, and the nature of men makes them attracted to tech, whereas women are not only less fit for the field as a whole they are also naturally put off by it.
If I was asked why I'm not a nurse I'd answer I don't have an interest and I don't know if I'd be any good at it, and I can say most men think the same, but I also think women would be more confident in their nursing skills and they would be more interested in it.
▶ No.920435>>920504 >>921778
>>920241
Nurses are very important so why do they earn so much less than tech guys?
▶ No.920504
>>920435
because there are more available nurses with the skills to do the job good enough to get by?
I'm tired of all of this women in tech bullshit.
A more interesting question these so-called feminists should answer is why our society is so quick to dispassionately dispose of male humans on the bottom third of the bell curve. The pussy-pass is a hell of a drug.
▶ No.920507
>>916177
>I'm an auntieperner which means I'm too pretentious to say I'm a business owner in whatever industry I'm trying to change
▶ No.920539>>927233
>>916243
but dealing with children is hell
▶ No.920540>>920542 >>920545
>>916112 (OP)
Because they legitimately suck at it. Programming is the process of making many thousands of decisions. Women suck at making decisions; therefore, women suck at programming. It really isn't that complicated.
▶ No.920542>>920556
>>920540
women aren't shit at making decisions
see
>>916171
▶ No.920545>>920556
>>920540
>Because they legitimately suck at it.
see QubesOS
▶ No.920556>>920575
>>920542
Attaching oneself parasitically to a beta provider doesn't demonstrate decision making skill. In fact, it demonstrates the opposite: a woman attached to a beta provider delegates responsibility for her wellbeing to the provider, freeing her from the responsibility of having to manage her own affairs.
>>920545
I run QubesOS. Joanna is certainly better than average; but if you've ever spent any time in their google groups troubleshooting issues, you'll quickly learn that while she's the public face of the project, the real heavy lifting is done by the men behind the scenes.
▶ No.920575>>920582
>>920556
Did you tell her that she is just a public face and doesn't do any real work?
Would you get banned if you did that?
▶ No.920582
>>920575
>Would you get banned if you did that?
More than likely. Stronk womyn who've made a career out of being stronk womyn tend to be allergic to truth. But it's not like she's incompetent or unskilled; just that if it weren't for the fact that she is a woman, there would be nothing to differentiate her from the crowd.
▶ No.920622>>922918
I have fixed the code. Girl's age is private and not accessible by Guy. Girl's virginity is private and not accessible by Guy. Cupid chooses to inform Guy of Girl's age and virginity, because Cupid is the initializer and knows everything about both of them. Guy's ugliness and richness is public because he's not a liar, and freely provides them. Through Cupid's configuration of Girl, Guy, and the information provided to Guy, Cupid can control the outcome of the matchmaking.
public class Cupid {
private boolean girlIsVirgin = false;
private boolean girlAge = 22;
private Girl girl = new Girl(this.girlAge, this.girlIsVirgin);
private Guy guy = new Guy(true, false);
Cupid() {
try {
guy.willGirlGoOutWithMe(girl, this.girlAge, this.girlIsVirgin);
} catch (ThotException) {
System.err.println("Caught ThotException: " + e.getMessage());
}
}
}
public class Girl {
private int age;
private boolean isVirgin;
Girl(age, isVirgin) {
this.age = age;
this.isVirgin = isVirgin;
}
public boolean willGoOutWithGuy(Guy guy) {
return !guy.isUgly || guy.isRich;
}
}
public class Guy throws Exception {
public boolean isRich;
public boolean isUgly;
Guy(isRich, isUgly) {
this.isRich = isRich;
this.isUgly = isUgly;
}
public boolean willGirlGoOutWithMe(girl, age, isVirgin) {
if (age >= 22 || !isVirgin) {
throw new ThotException();
}
return girl.willGoOutWithGuy(this);
}
}
▶ No.921131
not enough men willing to do their homework.
▶ No.921675
▶ No.921681
▶ No.921692>>921712 >>921766
I'll give you my two cents about it.
I can tell you that despite being strongly interested in the field, now, after all the discrimination in favor of women, I would never personally work that.
I would be met with the expectation that I was unqualified and hired entirely because of my gender. And justly so, because it's true for most of women in tech nowadays.
My entire career would be marked by this. All people have impostor syndrome, but now, I would be forced to actually be an impostor, since I wouldn't be hired on merit. I don't want to spend years wondering if I got hired because of an F on my resume and feeling like I'm not as good as anyone else there. I don't want to blush at a conference as a diverse Pythonista yells at people and I get awkward looks as well.
The efforts that have been made to get women into programming have been entirely phony and uninterested in what women actually want, because they aim to virtue signal. That's why they haven't worked.
What women want is flexible hours, part-time work, more communication with people (pair-programming, mob-programming), and to be highly engaged socially, so as to feel like they matter and are making a difference in the world. We want to feel valued because of our merit like any other employee.
All that seems incompatible with what Silicon Valley is now. It's entirely about churning out money making software fast, getting on bandwagons of the latest buzzword trend, being a rockstar programmer, dropping old stuff at the drop of a hat.
Everyone can tell the social aspect of projects nowadays is just phony. Google's making drones. Most of the available work is making software that we all know could be dropped at any second and never accessed again, and it will happen inevitably, that's games, online apps, services, virtually everything. I couldn't, in good faith, work on a product, for example, that I know will have people getting fucked over in all sorts of ways, whether it's selling out their info, or just making the product they bought unusable, since they were too dumb to understand they were basically renting it in the first place and never really owned it.
Yes, there are one-man open source projects, but that doesn't jive with wanting more human contact rather than less. There are also open-source companies with integrity left, too, that's a good fit.
These are at least the reasons why women specifically interested in programming are not doing it, in my opinion. There are much better opportunities elsewhere.
Overall, however, there are few women in programming because on average, women are not as interested in STEM as they are in social sciences. As long as women are free to choose, we'll never have a Marxist utopia of a 50/50 split. And that's perfectly fine. There's nothing wrong with that.
▶ No.921712>>921750 >>921927
>>921692
>so as to feel like they matter and are making a difference in the world. We want to feel valued because of our merit like any other employee.
The ONLY thing women care about is "mattering", being "special". Fucking snowflake syndrome. Obviously you prefer pair/mob (wtf even is that) programming because then someone else can do the work while you sit there feeling "special".
Also kys you fucking tranny
▶ No.921750>>921766 >>922913
>>921712
I hope your life gets better and you feel more accomplished and happy, anon. I'm sure there are women who have loved you and cared about you. You are worthy of love and respect, even if you're at a low point in life.
▶ No.921766>>921770
>>921692
>Google's making drones.
Recently, there was a spat at Google over Google working on software for image recognition in drones. Is helping a drone pilot discriminate between an armed and unarmed man making the world a better or worse place? The Liberal trash at Google think that not helping the DoD is making the world a better place. They think that drones firing missiles into weddings is a better world. They could have written software that could have told the pilot that that was just a backwards, redneck, Afghani wedding, but fuck those brown people. Liberal compassion says that they had to die, it was Liberal charity towards the newlyweds.
>>921750
>I'm sure there are women who have loved you and cared about you.
My mother. Shows what a dumb cunt she is.
▶ No.921770
>>921766
SWPL: artisinal handcrafted wedding dronings
▶ No.921774
>>916112 (OP)
*changes all pronouns in your source comments*
▶ No.921776>>921777
why force them there if they dont like it? they would be doing it if they did like it..
▶ No.921777
>>921776
because women are strong, powerful, and motivated, more than most men, and that's why we have to gently entice them and make sure everything is very soft and no mean bad words. rapists like you can never understand, sweetie.
▶ No.921778
>>920435
Because there are fewer programmers available, while there are many nurses, and they're mostly female, so they don't negotiate for their pay. When men got into the field, average pay for nurses went up.
▶ No.921784
>>916112 (OP)
>can't even use the pajeet language properly
a picture is worth more than a thousand words, OP
▶ No.921854
>>916112 (OP)
What I find saddest about this is mostly that its a perception. Granted, as someone who does programming, I don't like to interact with other people. Shup up, fuck off, and take your transracial lesbian bullshit to someone who doesn't think that you're mentally ill (I work in the defense industry, can you tell). As for that, though, I generally work with people, real people who are trying to solve real problems. I would rather that those fags in systems engineering do the people work, but systems engineering is expensive and the government is cheap. Take, for instance, building a dam: dams are generally built for flood control, irrigation water, and/or electricity generation. Building a dam is about solving real problems of real people. Putting food on tables and lighting homes (powering refrigeration). Somehow, Engineering got a bad rap that it does meaningless work in design rooms, and Feminism got the good rap that helping a man with his hurt feelings that wearing a wig and a dress doesn't make him a woman is meaningful social work.
Then again, if dumb cunts are stupid enough to fall for this bullshit, maybe they are too stupid for those fields.
▶ No.921927>>921984
>>921712
>what do you MEAN men cause women to leave? All men would love to have more women in their hobby
▶ No.921984>>922107 >>922117
>>921927
only beta soyboys want women at work because they think the women will be impressed by their programming prowess, which of course is utter bullshit
▶ No.922107
▶ No.922117>>922417
>>921984
What kind of logic is that? How can you honestly tell me that there are men out there who study computer programming and get programming jobs for the express purpose of impressing women? To me, that's equally as nonsense as studying automechanics to impress women with car fixing skills or studying law to impress women with legalspeak.
▶ No.922417
▶ No.922898
>>916112 (OP)
There are few women in programming because quite simply women suck at programming. Why are there so many women waitresses? Because women excel at taking orders.
▶ No.922902
>>917862
>>916116
>>917829
>>917854
I always suspected /tech/ was populated by women. You fucktards can't even read code in a pajeet language. Go back to >>>/girltalk/ and stay there.
▶ No.922912
They find it boring or not interesting.
or as the narrative puts it, sexism by the evil patriarchy
▶ No.922913
>>921750
>who hurt you, the post
Hi Reddit!
▶ No.922918>>922948
>>920622
>class Guy throws Exception
???
▶ No.922948
>>922918
I guess that should go on the method itself, I haven't done Java since college.
▶ No.923596
>women can't even do java, a language designed for pajeet codemonkeys
oh my sides
▶ No.923606
▶ No.924324>>924552 >>929677
in reality, the granting of so-called equal rights to women, as demanded by Marxism, does not confer equal rights at all, but constitutes the deprivation of rights, since they draw women into a zone where they can only be inferior. It places women in situations where they cannot strengthen their position with regard to men and with society -- but it only weakens them
- Adolf Hitler
▶ No.924549
>Most nerds would love to have a woman among them right?
No. Women create dramas and manipulate the weak minded into attacking everyone else.
▶ No.924552>>924558
>>924324
Wasn't the first female fighter pilot in Hitler army?
▶ No.924558
>>924552
there was a famous female flight instructor in the german airforce IIRC
but back then germans thought women should not have to fight because they are too important for the country
▶ No.925691>>926807
Women are too afraid and cucked to approach men they find attractive outside of work. They will literally die alone after a life of nothing rather than make the first move. They "get bored easily" because they are boring and un-curious.
YOU DO NOT WANT THIS COWARDICE OR LAZINESS IN YOUR BUSINESS DECISIONS.
This is why women don't get into code, and choose make-work. A man is already doing the hard part. Is it Friday yet?
▶ No.926807
>>925691
>choose make-work. A man is already doing the hard part
???
▶ No.927233
>>920539
For men.
Halfway decent women love it.
▶ No.927243
women choose different
thats why
no reason to make it more complicated than it is
▶ No.929397>>929424
>>929386
The one on the right with the blue shirt is the only good one.
▶ No.929424
>>929397
But having it at all in the Eastern "Silicon Valley" is a luxury in and of itself.
▶ No.929510
>>929386
None of them look happy.
Face it, women hate real nerds.
▶ No.929668
>>916122
This. Women lack the autistic tendency of men to be able to stare at code for hours looking to find a bug. It's as simple as that.
▶ No.929677
>>924324
>A man strives to get direct mastery over things either by understanding them or by compulsion. But a woman is always and everywhere driven to indirect mastery, namely through a man; all her direct mastery being limited to him alone. Therefore it lies in woman’s nature to look upon everything only as a means for winning man, and her interest in anything else is always a simulated one, a mere roundabout way to gain her ends, consisting of coquetry and pretence.
- Schopenhauer, On Women
▶ No.930074
probably already been said 1'000 times already in the tl;dr thread but
A) females in general are not typically capable of the higher-level abstract thought processes which are fundamental to fields like mathematics and software dev
B) their emotional ups and downs make them in general unreliable as team members in the workplace. real-world anecdotes abound in industries of all types relating women's meltdowns in the workplace.
those two basic issues are what prevents -- and will always prevent as long as software has to actually, you know, work -- a sizable percentage of females from becoming professional software devs.
▶ No.931169
>>918539
>return (age >=16)
This is a heinous outrage. 16 is too fucking old.
▶ No.933835
they get bored easily and thus fuck with the people who actually do real work in that field and are promptly "let go" because of it, either that or they just quit because no one is taking their bait