/tech/ - Technology★

Start by using OpenBSD, DragonflyBSD or NetBSD. That gets you pretty far from the GNU-males. To the best of my knowledge, the Linux kernel does not compile with Clang, but Debian do/did have a project to try and fix that.

For an editor you could use Vim which is free/niggercharity ware. You can still use Firefox.

>>881133 (OP)

>but sadly GCC is still widely used, even though Clang and LLVM are inarguably superior.

Please kill yourself OP. They are both the same pile of c++ cancer shitware. Try building them both and then going back and building the last version of gcc that didn't require c++. Current gcc and clang both take at least a couple orders of magnitude longer then old gcc did. On top of that they both are on a race to the bottom to see who can generate the most unsafe binaries the fastest, while simultaneously seeing who can stray the farthest from what the code specified is actually supposed to do.

>>881138

>recommending furryshits and ugandan shovelware

Fuck you as well.

>>881145

Do you have a better alternative to those? I know Intel has a compiler, but that's out of my reach.

>>881153

No answers, just idiocy. Perhaps you need to go back to yahoo answers.

>>881155

If you're asking for software advice, then this fucking thread belongs to the Sticky, but you clearly don't comprehend that.

>>881157

I want >>881145 to explain the alternative after shitting on the two most common ones. I don't need software advice. If you have nothing constructive to add to this thread, please refrain from wasting more of people's time.

>>881155

>>881152

>>881158

REAL PROFESSIONALS WRITE THEIR OWN COMPILER! Also, GNU Emacs is the superior editor. You wouldn't use vim, if you wanted a truly minimal editor. I don't think that GANOO will die any time soon.

For the record, I think that ganoo license and bsd license are as good.

>>879891