>>875079
>totally dismissed some guy's claim because it didnt meet your exacting standard of evidence.
But anon don't you know that evidence is to be dismissed if it doesn't fit one's preconceived world view? The typical leftist's standard of evidence will never be met because the leftist will move the goalposts and shift the discussion into a recursive labyrinthine time sink of absurdity while spewing buzzwords to draw in fellow dipshits in an effort to generate credibility through numbers. It's why leftists hate anonymity and instead flock to discussion platforms where upvotes, karma or reputation points are prominently displayed. Their entire line of argumentation relies on rhetorical tricks and thinly veiled fallacious lines of reasoning.
It doesn't matter if you provide your 4k real time video, you'll get in response a 'not-all x are y, this is a one-time anomaly, that's just your opinion, that video is fake, that video was encoded with software x which is made by company y that once donated to a right wing charity therefore your video is irrelevant' all interspersed with the typical buzzword lexicon starting with "ignorant, bigoted, racist, kkk nazi, literally hitler, tinfoil, consiracy theorist" and the list goes on.