/tech/ - Technology★

Isn't this used to train google's AI? So maybe that's why they want you to solve it a few times. The solution is to just avoid websites that have it, such as 4chan. It's amazing what people will put up with though.

Google captcha is a piece of shit, and whoever designed it should be forced to sit in a straitjacket and forced to identify street signs for the rest of his natural life while connected to life support to extend his natural life to as long as possible, for all of the collective time he's wasted making us train jewish car driving AI.

>>830701 (OP)

Yes, and if your browser has spoofed user-agent or you don't allow cookies, after 10 minutes you will be prompted again to solve those ridiculous ai training puzzles. They get harder when your browser stands out from the crowd (e.g. not allowing all scripts/cookies/media/images/fonts and spoofing your user-agent). I fucking hate it. The 8ch's captcha is far more user-friendly.

Yeah, this is FUCKING BULLSHIT. I'm barely able to solve any of these Google AI DUMFUCK NIGGERISH GOATFUCKING "CAPTCHAS"!! It might find me suspecious due to my Linux-UserAgent, NoScript, VPN combo. I'll never ever use that shit again!

>>830703

It's been used for a lot of things. It started as something they used to digitize documents, then it was for cataloging street addresses, presumably for google maps, and now it's clearly used for AI. Google has a huge free workforce disguised as a service, and I'm amazed at how few people care.

Just don't go to sites that use such user-hostile gimmicks. If you keep going there, it only validates their abusive behavior.

Don't use JavaScript, faggot.

>>830701 (OP)

yes

>make virus botnet

>mass attack google direct IPs

>???

The worst part about tne captcha is that it's apparently not that hard to expoit.

>article on how to beat modern captcha

>checkbox click set to be off center of the box.

>choose the non-picture test.

>refresh on a timer until a microphone test is acquired.

>use virtual audio to record it.

>play it back through a virtual mic.

>puzzle solved.

<IT'S FOR YOUR CONVIENIENCE^TM

how could one engineer this for widespread use?

Either stop using sights that have it or ask them to replace it with a better captcha. Bonus points for no nonfree javascript

>830773

What's the microphone test?

>>830703

That includes all Cloudflare crap.

>>830799

Use VC's meme mail.

>>830801

You mean those "one more step..." pages? Yeah, they're cancer. But I don't have to deal with them here.

>>830799

tutanota or lumail

No ammount of rage is enough for jewgle and this shit.

I'm on qutebrowser.

>please solve captcha

>please select all images which contain cars

>once you select one, the new one loads SLOW, SLOW AS FUCK

>please try again

>please select all images which contain stree signs

>4 or 5 different images with different signs in sequence

>click verify

>it works

>roam around the site for like 5 minutes

>captcha appears again

I fucking hate modern web development and cia niggers.

>>830818

The captcha actually appears just for browsing a site? I've never seen that. Must be some shitty site.

install adnauseam and script a browser with it installed to hit websites with ads on rotation. hit google indirectly. you can script hitting google.com with random search terms but i imagine that's much easier for google to track and remove from the ad payment system. and you'll get with captcha's fairly quickly.

>>830823

also combine this with vpn-gate, since those vpn's are from random's computers there's a million of them and the IPs are constantly changing. eventually to fight it they'll have to ban huge swaths of ip addresses.

>>830759

Let's do it, that's what kek would want

>>830801

Surely not all. I browse here in Lynx or Links, neither of which has JS.

>>830819

it's rateyourmusic.com and yes it's one hell of a shitty site

>>830907

"We're sorry, but your IP address has been blocked from this site. "

Ha ha, you're right (I'm using a VPN addon, by the way).

Also worth noting is that Google Captcha is the only thing I'm aware of that can naturally detect if you've connected to 2 or more VPNs at the same time. It won't work at all and I have to go back to a single VPN connection for the captcha to load.

I miss the captchas that had the decoy word that you could replace with "nigger".

>>830921

Maybe your second VPN is used by every pajeet for botnets. Did you try to use it in one-hop config? Maybe you have shit config and DNS leaks?

What's the point of using 2 VPNs bought for your name?

Tor is made for this exact thing and just werks if you pick the right exits.

>>830902

It seems to be an option the site owner can turn on. It wouldn't be useful for 8chan, since they have their own system of mods (doing it for free) to police content.

With a VPN on, I find trying to use Google itself is actually the most annoying. "Please prove you're a human".

i saw a chinese captcha where a jigsaw puzzle piece pops up and you have to use a slider to slide it into a socket. a mini game like this is infinitely better than identifying fucking street signs, and i really hope this idea catches on.

>>830807

>>830810

On the question of email, how would you guys rate fastmail?

>>831113

haha holy shit, I mean, those overly-complex ones are usually there to throw-off bots, but I guess if you're autistic enough to type them then go ahead

>>831084

>a mini game like this is infinitely better than identifying fucking street signs,

Better for us, but not better for Google's AI/machine learning/computer vision training botnet.

>and i really hope this idea catches on.

It won't with Google or any other botnet captcha provider, but I suppose some DIY-minded forum or website administrators might use something like it.

>>831129

That's only if you're logged into a Google account. And by now the sign up process for that asks a fucking lot from you like your first name, last name and phone number.

Before it was almost nothing out of the ordinary.

>>830825

>>830823

>shilling for the jewish honeypot extension that does nothing again

>>831142

I wish people would stop broadcasting their info on the internet.

>>831120

Ultimately every provider can guck you over, and when the spooks come a'knocking they probably will. But it is infinitely better than gmail, because first they are not googlr amd they actually get income from you having an account so they do not have to datamine you. They still might though, read the TOS.

>>831206

>they actually get income from you having an account so they do not have to datamine you

This is precisely why I was considering them.

>They still might though, read the TOS.

Will do.

Thanks.

>>831129

>thingsThatNeverHappened.webm

>>831156

If you use email account for anything like work-related, banking/insurance, or buying shit online, the email provider is gonna have your infos anyway, because those places send tons of emails and bills/receipts to you. Even a couple decades ago, it was common to just use your ISP account email address (like frodo@netcom.com or whatever) and it could easily be traced back to you. Email has never been anonymous, or even very private unless you use PGP, but very few people do.