[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cafechan / creep / had / hydrus / ita / leftpol / russian / strek ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): 4cb22d2a5fee0a1⋯.jpg (44.71 KB, 525x340, 105:68, intel_cbb7.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 7cfd22f09a605d3⋯.jpg (154.43 KB, 1008x338, 504:169, VIA_Mainboards_Form_Factor….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): ab8a6398d0f3651⋯.jpg (67.67 KB, 560x420, 4:3, computer-case-sizes.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.828245>>828289 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Will there ever be actual interoperable standards for laptops (or, for that matter, tablets and phones)? Desktop PCs are by far one of the lowest-margin products in the tech industry, even for integrator prebuilts that are 2-4 times the price of rigs handmade from retail parts (let alone cobbled together from eBay pulls). All thanks to standardized form-factors like ATX and ITX, which not only ensure parts from different brands are compatible, but that smaller parts from the same standard are compatible with bigger form factors.

We've all heard the excuses about "muh 10% thicker and heavier", but does anyone seriously think laptops that were dozens of times cheaper (not to mention easier to fix and upgrade) wouldn't absolutely crush them in sales? The real reason is obviously the massive profits, which (aside from a genuine desire for mobility from consumers, in spite of the fact most laptop use is at home or work) I strongly suspect to have incentivized a broad conspiracy by the industry since the mid-'90s to downplay and destroy desktop PCs as a viable product. Integrators (Dell, HP, Apple, LG, Asus, etc.) aside, though, all it would take is for component manufacturers like Via, MSI, Corsair, Gigabyte, ASRock, AOpen, and the like to draw up and endorse a set of standards, allowing them and numerous upstarts to flood the market with extremely cheap laptops and components.

Right now, while the only retail laptop components that are standardized to the point of interoperability are mostly inherited from desktops (drives, DIMMs, AC adapters), most other components (screens, backlights, battery cells, PSUs, wireless modules, antennas, touchpads, keyboards, hinges, cameras, speakers, mics, etc.) are all quasi-standardized through initiatives like Intel CBB to the exact degree necessary for OEMs to save money through economies of scale, without actually being interoperable for consumers (perhaps the most blatant example of this is the MXM GPU daughtercard "standard"). Actual standards would merely have to specify a tiny bit of fittings to sand off gratuitous incompatibility in such components, then add hierarchical specifications for different sizes of lids, cases, and mobos.

Even devices that are more integrated, like cellphones and tablets, would benefit enormously from having industry standard interchangeable batteries, cases (not hipster padding, I mean the actual chassis), screens, mobos, and such. This would be more practical than ever, given the uniformity of iPhone-esque touchscreen designs.

 No.828263>>828296

It would make sense for consumers but then what would your incentive be to go out and buy a whole new phone every year goy?

I hate to say it but it would take da gubbermint to force these fuckers to standardize.

Look at how currently all phones use USB micro for charging. That only came about through an EU directive in 2009 forcing everyone to use them (btw you're welcome amerilards).

Otherwise all manufacturers would still have their own plugs and change them every once in a while just out of spite.


 No.828289>>828296

>>828245 (OP)

>mobile ITX

Is there a single board on the market?


 No.828296

>>828263

I like to hope that some day, some bunch of smaller hungrier companies will decide to ruin the big laptop pigs' trough and cannibalize the market for massive personal gains. Stranger things have happened, like when Hayes undercut every other brand of modem by 2/3rds, or when MOS undercut every other CPU by 20 times.

If the government went so far as to force specific designs for interchangeable parts on laptops and phones, I worry that corporations would use stock lolbert whining as a pretext to accelerate their obvious plan of turning all computers into OnLive dumb consoles for mainframesthe cloud.

>>828289

I don't think so. It was an artifact of Microsoft's abortive Origami/UMPC proto-tablet initiative. I got a Raon Vega back in the day




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
3 replies | 0 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cafechan / creep / had / hydrus / ita / leftpol / russian / strek ][ watchlist ]