/tech/ - Technology★

I use Chacha20. Checkmate :^)

>>808864 (OP)

Prove that CIA and israel didn't use thier mind control satellites to force you to make that post to try to scare people away from ecnryption

>>808866

cool, bro, but I am speaking about AES hardware acceleration, which is commonly used, even by /tech/

>>808888

This post is not to scare people from encryption, but to scare them from using Hardware accelerated AES. or from AES at all

and there are no mind control satellites

>>808895

>scare them from using Hardware accelerated AES. or from AES at all

That's a fine thesis to start with, but you then need to buttress it with facts and arguments instead of asking people to prove a negative. Otherwise, I can tell you to prove that mind control satellites don't exist.

I use blowfish tho

Also

> using Intel anything

>>808864 (OP)

I cannot. Intel says, "Just trust us goy!" and I'm left without any other option.

>>808891

>using intel chips new enough to have aesni

>>808898

>That's a fine thesis to start with, but you then need to buttress it with facts and arguments instead of asking people to prove a negative. O

https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/article/165683/aes-wp-2012-09-22-v01.pdf

Look here.

Basically, software that uses AES-NI talks with INTEL cpu like this:

software: "Hi Intel CPU, I want you to encrypt data 389535893853893589289 with encryption key MYPASSWORDSUPERHOLOCAUST"

intel cpu: "Yes my friend, it is fully secure (tm), here is your encrypted data: 896489439247972478424"

so basically fucking intel cpu can save your key in special memory, then send your key to israel by network (using INTEL ME botnet), or just wait until police takes your PC so they can read the key using special instruction.

How can people be so dumb to trust Intel jews when it goes to encryption?

>MUH intel is good for consumers, they will help us in encrypting data against government :^)

the US government is requiring all encryption software to have backdoors

Do you really think, they wouldn't require intel hardware to have backdoor in hardware encryption instructions?

AES-NI sounds like wet dream of feds and jews, whatever encryption software you use, if it uses AES-NI, they will get your key (password)

>>808895

>That's a fine thesis to start with, but you then need to buttress it with facts and arguments instead of asking people to prove a negative. Otherwise, I can tell you to prove that mind control satellites don't exist.

Intel or any hardware/software related thing is a technical matter.

If you want to prove it then you need the blueprints and the software of the said hardware with possible reproducibility.

It's provable but only on the condition that Intel and other releases their hardware.

For mind control satellites (should be renamed influential behavior satellites) except if you can go and verify them yourself in space it can't be proven.

So idk.

But there's shit tons of patents on subliminal bs see for example:

https://www.google.com/patents/US4395600

>>809257

Even if they release their official blueprints, you still cannot prove that your device has not been tampered with. The only saving grace is that if the glow in the dark agencies wouldn't use this against you in court, because it'd blow the lid on their operation. At best, they would have to resort to 'parallel construction'.

>proving a negative

go back to /killcen/

>not using superior Grasshoper

It's like you all want to be cucked by CIA glowing in the dark niggers, right anons?

Start using based Russian cryptography now.

>>808864 (OP)

Two things:

1) Software should give you the option not to use AES acceleration. If it doesn't, boycott it.

2) Is Intel ME the Clipper Chip v2.0? If it is, boycott it. Unless you get it for free, it means you're buying it, which means you have the choice, to not fucking buy it.

>>809603

>boycotting free software

Are you retarded? Just blacklist the module in kernel

>>809603

>1) Software should give you the option not to use AES acceleration. If it doesn't, boycott it.

Why would it support AES acceleration at all? What's the point of encryption when your keys are being sent to CIA niggers and israel niggers?

Also, people are too dumb to use options, they use default ones.

>>809658

Why do you believe that encryption keys are sent anywhere? Does anybody have documented proof that this happens? Or is this all academic theory, "I don't know how it works but I know it's happening because my gut feels it".

>>809675

They try to log everything and encryption keys are very small, so why not. It wouldn't be anything very shocking. And it probably wouldn't get sent to Israel or other place that sticks out, but rather a very commonly accessed host/net, like Cloudflare or Google for example. Wouldn't be hard at all for the Intel ME to slip in key data into whatever other data you're transfering to their honeypots already.

aes acceleration is the nigger encryption layer. might as well use it for that because it's free, save the cpu cycles for something else on top of it.

>>809920

If you're installing proprietary games and Microsoft Windows, you might as well use Intel ME. If you want freedom, then you must not install Windows and you must install your proprietary games.

>>809597

>use American hardware

>get buttfucked by CIA jews

>use Russian hardware

>get buttfucked by FSB jews

>>810071

>Russian hardware

Like what? Don't they only make CPUs for their own military?

>get buttfucked by FSB jews

Since I'm not russian that's preferable. KGBnegroes share no info with my country, CIAniggers do.

How much could be stored in the key memory?

What if millions and millions of keys are feed to the accelerated AES?

How to they store them? Will they overwrite keys as memory overflow?

Will they priorities to store keys that are used multiple times?

Feed millions and millions of keys multiple times.

What if a program feeds the accelerator with this fuckton of keys nonstop, all the time the computer is powered on. Will that fuck them over?

If keys are sent out, it should be possible to sniff that.

>make a wifi safe room

>after encryption is done, destroy CPU

wow that was hard OP

AES at all is unsafe as it's a known quantity. Implementations likely all compile down to a very similar set of instructions with modern compilers which is a pattern that hardware could be listening for and leaking data from.

>>816532

>going through all that trouble

you retard. use pen and paper.

>>816725

You forgot dice. Human brain is a damn bad random number generator.

>>809228

>>808866

>software encryption is completely safe on the other hand

it is not. your key must go through your processor whether you like it or not, or it could be retrieved from memory. it's just a matter of identifying when something is a key

>>817347

Of course, all I have to do is look into the memory and search for "sekrit key". That's the first part of hacking that everybody knows.

>>810076

Putin is a jew puppet, the united states is an israeli puppet state.

They do share information, all the time.

And wikileaks already showed to us that there's a worldwide international digital spying organization spying every country in all continents situated in the major power of every one of the continents with the united states in charge. In the americas the one in charge of spying is united states in big part of asia and europe it's russia.

>>809920

Well AMD FX-8370e which clocks to 5Ghz does not have ME equivalant (so no PSP), get a non uefi Gigabite board ga-990 *** range low revision and you are good to go. This has AES-NI but no way to give it to someone ey m8.

>>829767

They don't need your encryption if they want you in jail. They can make up a case and put you in jail because they want you there.

If you really have some secret valuable information, then they'll use their backdoors, but won't disclose it, and still put you in jail, or make you suicide by 3 gunshots.