/tech/ - Technology★

>rust

ew

>>807963

i put a trigger warning right in the title just for faggots like you. why do you feel the need to reply to the thread if you have nothing to say?

at least sage this shit

Sweet. Rust's developers may be shot through with SJW weasels that would be the first up against the wall in case of civil war, but it does seem to be capable of honestly improving developer productivity and code safety, which is huge for a native compiled non-GC language.

>mozarella

kill yourself sjwnigger

>>807956 (OP)

>discuss

rust rust rust poop

>executing javascript

Is this it?

Is this the year of Rust?

Is this the timeline of Rust?

>>808013

>someone create an issue and complain about this choice of words

I know you're just shitposting, but if anyone wants to raise an issue make a suggestion that can also be triggering, then someone else raises another issue with another triggering suggestion, and so on.

AOT here, JIT is shit.

>>807956 (OP)

I'm sick of rust threads it's bean more than a year and I wish more than ever that it would never had bean created.

Also the winning about JS can easily be solved by not using any JS.

Remove JS and you solve 99% of the problems of the web.

>Rust

Where are my double linked lists?

>>808265

i will never stop making rust threads :^^^^^^^^^^^^^)

>>808279

right here: std::collections::LinkedList

I fucking love rust

>>807956 (OP)

Kill yourself.

>>807956 (OP)

>our browser is abysmally slow

>let's put a compiler notorious for being slow into it and run it on every single page load

>>808394

Actually, it's for JS. It's written in Rust.

>>807965

Right wing trigger warnings? Sneaky schlomo.

>>808394

That's probably the best gif you could have chosen for reasons you won't understand here

Rust can still be stopped.

We just need to get some big name to declare 2018 "The Year of Rust on the Desktop"

>>808576

It's ok anon, we've got Mozilla on the case; everything they touch turns to absolute shit. As for the Rustroach infestation here, spraying them with Ada helps.

>>808577

quick Ada question: how do you use buffered output?

>>808595

No one has actually ever used Ada.

>>808614

That's a weird graph to have with that answer, but OK: when I looked around I saw hints of "oh gnat has a switch" or such, so I kept looking.

>>808614

How does a huge pile of corporates and government generate a massive language spec yet somehow not even handle simple "Hello, World!" buffering?

>>808623

Meh, I switch out Ada-related pics from time to time, and it's kinda hard to find a pic that's both about Ada and about I/O buffering.

Have some documentation:

https://docs.adacore.com/gnat_rm-docs/html/gnat_rm/gnat_rm/the_implementation_of_standard_i_o.html

>There is no internal buffering of any kind at the Ada library level.

>>808625

>Ada

>massive language

The spec is excessively detailed and precise, as it should be, but massive? Nah. There are a couple of things that probably should be in the standard library that aren't, like bignums.

>>808627

>massive? Nah

The spec is a thousand pages long. C++17 is around 1300 without the index and is considered to be impossibly bloated.

>>808601

I use it at work

>>808645

Are you one of the many embedded devs that frequent /tech/?

We sure have a lot of those.

>>808641

The Ada standard also covers a lot more than C++ in a more detailed, consistent, and saner way. For further comparison, consider that the C11 standard is about 700 pages and the Common Lisp standard is about 1100 pages.

>>808648

Sorry, Javag, but the FP circlejerking board is on halfchan.

>>808614

Problem with this graph is the tools have to be done by a developer, so really you've achieved nothing.

>>808648

Not really, it is for simulation in defense

>>807956 (OP)

>a new hope

>naming your shit after a stupid b-movie that eventually was artificially memed into popularity