/tech/ - Technology★

No one cares about degeneracy here, go away.

what makes it good for browsing pronz? better watch out son im about to release nigchink once i get the downscaling to work in <10ms

i'd imagine nigchink is better for pronz anyway since it's optimized for satellite imagery. ctrl/shift/alt + wasd or arrow key for panning at various speeds. 0 judder and 0 input latency. 0 judder means on a CRT or 0-motion-blur LCD you can see all the fine detail of the image even while panning. mouse panning. click for next image, alt click for prev image. wasd/arrow keys for going to next/prev image. pgup/pgdown for seeking n% into the gallery. fast (0 frame delay) zoom in / out. will have the fastest image loading in the world, etc. imagine feh but actually fast and not buggy

>Build dependencies:

> TGUI 0.7.7

> SFML 2.5.1 (Older versions will cause certain jpegs to fail to load, which will cause tgui to throw exceptions and crash)

> TGUILua 1.0

>

>Other dependencies:

> GL

> X11

> freetype

> jpeg

> Xrandr

> udev

> file

pfft. nigchink literally only needs libjpeg and libpng (and still works with X11)

>>1046925

>what makes it good for browsing pronz?

Usability aimed at making it easier to jack off while browsing images.

I am not familiar with nigchink, I'll see what I can see about it.

>>1046926

it's in vipquality stage. only real Gs have access to it right now

>>1046913 (OP)

why would i use this instead of eog? its probably a disk raper just like all other image viewers that support browsing are.

>>1046929

Good question, because I used to use eog.

Directory browsing from the image viewer and vertical image scrolling. Eog was what made me try my hand at making a new image viewer, because of how inconvenient I found it to browse porn.

>>1046930

i would be fine with anything else but eog is the only one that does not try to load every file in the directory when it opens. in other viewers you can only view single files if you dont want to wait while it rapes the disk for a minute before the picture even becomes visible(its a really big directory but this works fine in eog so its a issue in the other viewers). eog allows going to the next picture by pressing the arrow key and it only loads the file that is visible so no disk rape happens.

>>1046933

I do the same. I only load an image if it's going to be viewed.

>>1046935

maybe i could try that then. before eog i used mirage(some shitty abandoned python viewer but it had a nice minimal ui and its the picture that i want to see not the ui) and tried everything else that was in the repos but they had the same problem or didnt have all the features that i wanted.. its really slow when you try to load some 5000 pictures at once from a network share and hdds.

>>1046929

HAHAHAHA

gthumb and eye of gnome are an aids piece of shit. plz try feh or gwenview or something

>i would be fine with anything else but eog is the only one that does not try to load every file in the directory when it opens.

but it takes an entire minute to start

because Gnome

>>1046943

it opens instantly. none of the others do because they scan through every file thats in the current directory before anything else happens. the gnome people and possibly op are the only ones who have done this right.

>>1046952

also feh and similar wont really count because they dont even support image browsing so you have to open every file manually instead and thats even worse than waiting a minute for the slower viewers

>>1046952

m8 i tested like 40 image viewers on linux and windows (mostly linux) and pretty much anything including a broken piece of shit using some ricer toolkit is faster than gthumb/eog.

feh supports image browsing. just run feh gay_nigger_eating_ass_100pics.

>>1046963

i dont know what kind of 30 year old computer you are using but the gnome viewer does everything instantly on my x220 and desktop. but like i said i can try something else too but it has to support image browsing without preloading the whole directory like all the viewers that i tried did. you can try that yourself too.. put 5000 or maybe even less is enough pictures on a hdd in one directory and open it.. if you dont see a picture immediately and hear lots of hdd noise then its preloading the whole directory.

>>1046979

i know exactly what hardware an x220 has and it will most certainly not be instant.

>if you dont see a picture immediately and hear lots of hdd noise then its preloading the whole directory.

5000 jpgs will literally use all your RAM to preload. i cant remember what feh does but it might check each file to see if they are "valid image files". nigchink on the other hand merely collects a list of file names

>>1046982

thats probably what eog does too. anything where you have to open all files is going to be really slow and should never be done if its not really required. i did try many alternatives before this eog and they all were very slow because they were doing something to every file

>>1046982

> i cant remember what feh does but it might check each file to see if they are "valid image files"

Yeah, I had this issue on the first version of EOL, then I started to cheat by using common file extensions before trying to run an actual check.

I use sxiv, it's very scriptable. you can select pictures in sxiv and after closing it pipes the filenames to output. You can easily script your own sorting/tagging system that way.

>>1046919

> not using the same software to read the dead sea scrolls and other manuscripts

>>>/leftypol/

>>1060624

"linux" stfu and try KDE. "linux" smh>>1060624

>$CURRENT_YEAR

>porn

>>1060652

This tbqh. Just get a girlfriend already.

>>1060654

>girlfriend

No, current year "womyn" are garbage.

Just use your imagination when you wank.

>>1060658

>>1060658

found the incel lol

>>1060662

Dude is actually pretty on point. Do you sincerely think the average 100+ IQ anon wants to settle for a tumblr, tindr, liberal brainlet? Most people in their right mind I think would prefer to find a decent companion, (note: hard to come by) not just some random on the street, attractive as she may be. Intelligent people prefer to make ONE good choice, versus 5 or 6 pointless choices in a lifetime.

>hehe incel

Doesn't solve anything, only time, patience. Less you end up with an idiot and find better options down the road feeling stupid for your impulsive liberal behavior. Fapping doesn't solve anything though, gotta work on self improvement.

actually thread related: feh, sxiv

>>1060670

feh cant downscale so all those million pixel pictures will be unviewable. it seems to support some config files but the format is not documented anywhere.

>>1060662

you realize calling someone an incel on a chan is like calling someone a racist on stormfront, right

>>1060691

try checking "man feh" in the terminal, feh has other .config options.

>>1060700

Or calling someone a racist on an imageboard, for that matter.

>chans

Really nigger?

Not even every futaba channel-style imageboard has -chan in the name, so your newfag speak is even more embarrassing.

>>1060713

>Not even every futaba channel-style imageboard has -chan in the name, so your newfag speak is even more embarrassing.

Yeah, but not every imageboard is a Futaba Channel-style forum, so the point is kind of m00t

>>1060716

Not quite- the other type is pretty well established as being called a booru.

>>1046919

You're not my representative, faggot.

>>1046933

ristretto

>>1046919

>>1060652

>>1060877

As all we can see, StephenLynx is destroying our minds.

https://www.pornhub.com/users/stephenlynx

Begone, demon!

>>1060847

it does open the selected image immediately but loading of ~3000 other pictures does still take a while.. ~100 pictures/second

Geeqie

feh (with adjusting the default parameters)

>>1046919

Thanks for speaking for all of us. For a moment, I thought I was an individual.

>>1064077

Are you this new to /pol/chan?

>writing software for degeneracy

This is like one of those open source Bible readers, but worse.

I use viewnior to look at pictures of cute dogs, has never failed me

what is even the point

how is this any better than fucking a woman

i don't get it. saged for gay

>>1064102

>This is like one of those open source Bible readers, but worse.

What do you mean "worse"? This doesn't necessary contain inbreeding, pedophilia, jewdaism and promote it so it's obviously better.

>>1064077

>(((individual)))