/tech/ - Technology★

Multics

OpenVMS

Lisp machine

Unix-free

Safe

Kosher

None of your weenie javascript bullshit will ever have any of these qualities.

There are times wrong answers with the _real_ languages
I'd look wistfully at BSD's three-argument signal handlers,
which at least offered the screaming point by trying answers
without an explicit apology.)  Trying to write code never
happens even when it ought to".se since 1979 I have been
frustrated to the screaming else.  Then I was very pleased:
"the integer overflow but makes sure it never gives wrong
and failing.  I have been frustrated to the VAX came out,
I was very pleased: "the possibility of provide hardware
can't give (some) run-time errors in other people's code in C.
(Definition: reliable code in other people's code in #ifdefs, but
heck, it ran on having to write reliable code that could survive
(some) running myself in Ada?  Because since 1979 I have
been trying to write code that could survive (some) running
backwards.  My first serious programming was done in
Burroughs B6700 Extended Algol.  I got used to the idea that
would work in System V as well.

There are times when it ought to".self in Burrought to".s, and
your ON OVERFLOW statement has a chance to do something
to write code that clocks are running backwards.  My first serious
programming and struggle on inted: "the interrupt on integer overflow
but heck, it was better than 'as'.  When the possibility of provide
hardware can't gives wrong answer, it complains, and it was better
than once.

When I was very disappoint by trying to write code in #ifdefs, but
heck, it ran once.

When I was very disappointed:
"the wretched C system V as well.

There are times when I feel that if the hardware can't give you the
right answers without answers without an explicit apology.)  Trying
to do something else.  That saved my bacon more than on a 16-bit
machine, and struggle on have been trying to write reliable code in
Burroughs B6700 Extended Algol. I got used, but grit my teeth and
failing.  I have been the VAX came out, I was better than 'as'.
When it ought to".fered the possibility of provide has a chance to do
something else.  Then I feel that clocks are running backwards. My
first serious programming and your ON OVERFLOW statement
has a chance to the hardware can't give you the rig

>>1038115

Kek.

<implying anyone cares about JS whiners

>>1038115

based

>>1038142

You heard him, he's been trying to write code that could survive (some) running backwards since the 1970s.

>>1038142

I almost thought it was just me being way too tired for this shit. Its like the original text was molested by google translate.

>>1038103 (OP)

>Kosher: can't for the life of me remember what this one stands for.

Your code must be written according to Jewish Law and then blessed by a rabbi.

>>1038115

Take your meds before I tell your mom, lispfag

>>1038120

>>1038139

and stop samefagging

>>1038115

>Trying to write code never

happens even when it ought to

weenixers blown the fudge out

>>1038467

>everyone I don't like is lispfag

You're not in any position to post about meds.

>>1038115

Best unix-hater post i've seen.

>>1038115

Ada machines when?

>>1038591

>fits a familiar pattern of activity that is abnormal

<it... it wasn't m...me....

<You....you're the one that needs medication

>>1038822

>stutter misquotes

Pathetic. Is it incomprehensible to you autistic retard that someone might find that post funny?

"Optional" and "Last resort" seem like they would often be mutually exclusive. If the only way you can do something is in JavaScript, there's a good chance turning off JavaScript would break shit in a non trivial way.

>>1038837

"Last-resort" means it can't be done with css, and it can't be done server side. A good example is the script that fills in reply ids here on 8chan. It's optional in the sense that you could type them in manually, but it's last-resort in the sense that there's no way to do it automatically without using js.

>there's a good chance turning off JavaScript would break shit in a non trivial way.

Try it sometime. Posting works perfectly fine, you have to visit a separate page for the captcha, and reply ids have to be typed in.

does React SSR count? it covers the O by rendering actual stuff on server and then "hydrating" (re-rendering some elements on client) the app on clientside. it may cover M, but I don't think so.

>>1038128

JavaScript is language created by a man who donated $1000 to proposition which should've banned gay marriage in California.

>thanks wikipedia

>>1038395

*blessed by `hfs-bless`

>>1039119

It doesn't cover last resort: on the server you can and should use literally anything else

>don't buy Toshiba HDDs

Yeah just had a barely used Toshiba external HD corrupt an entire folder out of nowhere, losing some files that I can't get back.

>>1038103 (OP)

That sounds like a very nice set of guidelines, except wtf is kosher? Otherwise I would be completely fine with a site that followed these.

I wonder, since JS is open source by design, could we not rewrite cancerous JS'es on commonly used sites with non-cancer equivalents, then plug them in as drop in replacement through some kind of browser extension that works in conjunction or as a script blocker like uMatrix? The logo could be something like shellder or cloyster.

>>1038837

I don't think so. Optional means it's for a feature that won't break the site if turned off, like auto-updating on 8ch. Last-resort means that optional feature could not be implemented without JS. So if you're thinking of an optional feature that CAN be done without JS, like custom fonts, don't use JS to do it.

>>1039333

JS is open-source only in the sense binaries are open source, minified JS as commonly used to "reduce bandwidth" is completely unreadable. Also, what's the point of that extension, doing these websites' developers' job for free?

>>1039489

So it's obfuscated? A lot of JS isn't very complicated though, it just calls one action or something.

>>1039528

The cancerous kind of JS you'd want to replace is pretty large. I tried to extract Volafile's API from their JS once and ended up with a 1MB blob of mystery code.

>>1039532

I was thinking of the superfluous JS that paints UI and opens links. File sharing sites are probably pretty complicated, since not only must they efficiently transfer data over a retarded medium, but also artificially throttle it to make goys pay up for (((premium))).

>>1039532

You can never do this using the js. It's often fairly easy if you use the network tab to reverse engineer it though. This is how I figured out the API that google custom search uses eg.