>>1031127
>I think it's easy to predict what someone stands for just by looking at their physical appearance. If you ever watched a video of protest you can see that people on both sides have distinct physical features and after a while you generate sort of generic person model that has a pretty good accuracy of determining that person's views. If probability of certain actions or views is genetic then my statement about Stallman would probably be correct. I've never seen any studies about this, though. Closest thing I've seen is Chinese using neural networks to detect criminals based on facial features (+95% success rate).
You are dumb as fuck. How do you know genes that code such a behaviour are connected with appearance? Read about the law of independent assortment and basic genetics before posting such a bullshit. Brain, language and culture evolved, so not everything has to be written in genes. Blank brain just downloads data from the world - thats learning. If young stallman had been thaught proprietary software, killing etc. is good, he would have beleived it.
>>1031148
>But Slavs are Aryan.
Yes of course, Hitler was aryan too.
>>1030994 (OP)
Also shitty thread. What would happen, if $random_event in the $random_year