/tech/ - Technology★

Main incentive to do that is helping normalfags become private by default more easily instead of 50 about:config options and extensions.

You can download Tor Browser. Its on the "private" mode by default. If you want to ramp up to "paranoid" mode then click the onion icon on the top left, click "Security Settings" and then slide the security level to "Safest".

>Why don't Firefox add a dialogue to their installer allowing normal, private and paranoid options?

Because they make money out of your data.

>Can we do anything about it?

There is GNU Icecat, it is pure of that shit.

https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/

https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/icecat.html

But there is something wrong anout web standards and browsers at all - they're so bloated, almost no one aside from big corporations, can maintain them, and that's probably on purpose. If it's big and you can't understand it, they controll it. Also it is easy to hide (((unintentional bugs))), that can be exploited, to crack and then use browser against it's user.

>>1025282 (OP)

That's too complicated, normalfags will short circuit and download google chrome if you give them that much choice.

>>1025287

except it's not, you white trash

The "paranoid" mode you are speaking of is the "private" one and even then you are still giving (((masters))) a lot of research data. It's the best we have for regular use tho.

Use while you can, I expect chromefox to become fully chromed in a year or something

>>1025296

>Use while you can, I expect chromefox to become fully chromed in a year or something

You do realize that Mozilla rejects patches that would otherwise negatively impact Tor Browser right? The fingerprint resisting feature in return was actually borrowed from Tor Browser.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Fingerprinting#Cross-Origin_Fingerprinting_Unlinkability

>Cross-Origin Fingerprinting Unlinkability

>The anti-fingerprinting project is part of the Tor Uplift project.

> Its goal is to build up the same level of fingerprinting resistance as the Tor Browser in Firefox.

>Refer to the design and implementation document of the Tor Browser:

> https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/#fingerprinting-linkability

https://torproject.org

firefox with privacy settings

download and start watching child pornography today

>tor

>safe

>websites trusted by default

:^)

>>1025294

>tfw no IceCat for my Win 10 Enterprise box

Do you have friends who purchase AMD Products? Tell them they're making the wrong choice, because Intel Products are better. Always purchase Intel Products because Intel Products have faster performance and better reliability.

>>1025774

If you use windows, you have much more serious problem than browser spying on you.

>>1025805

Stop shilling botnet fucker.

>>1026056

It was obviously bait and you bit.

>>1025282 (OP)

cant really talk about respecting privacy when you send every request and download to google by default and make all kinds of queries to random servers when a https site is opened.

>>1025282 (OP)

>For a company that currently claims to be keeping you private

Yes, "claims" and that's where it ends. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/mozilla.html

Because Firefox is made by SJWs and SJWs without exception want to limit freedom and privacy.

>>1030732

>muh XUL

good riddance

>>1030777

You missed the part where OP said

>Don't be a schizo in your reply

but you probably missed it because its behind a "spoiler". Don't know what I'm talking about? I'll help you out. See that pitch black part in OP's post? Hover your mouse pointer over it and you will reveal what's hidden behind that spoiler. Voila!

And this is just the beginning! There are so many things to talk about imageboards, but I have to go now. Someone's gotta make vans explode.

>>1030803

Shoo, Jew.

>>1030806

No, he's right. Read your post again.

>>1030732

>Literal commie filth author.

In all honesty, the site is great despite this.

>>1025282 (OP)

>Why don't Firefox add a dialogue to their installer allowing normal, private and paranoid options?

Because they need your info

Can we do anything about it? It shouldn't be hard to code, but would it be accepted?

The addons were useful before but with the new updates you shouldn't be using firefox at all

Any of the alternatives is better

>>1025282 (OP)

>Can we do anything about it?

Use another browser.

>It shouldn't be hard to code

Then make your own.

>company being funded by the Soros

>literally the man who funded other surveillance side-projects

>Google chrome included

>claims to give privacy but has OPEN connection to googlesyndication on firewall logs

>maintenance platform sends telemetry data

>designed so it's a bother to close all telemetry crap

>not to mention Tor dropped the last good ESR version the day Soros blocked firefox

>Ian Murdock died when he insisted putting the backdoored Tor on deb repo, actually big news so they had to shut him up. probably just larping

>>1031239

>Ian Murdock died when he insisted putting the backdoored Tor on deb repo, actually big news so they had to shut him up.

Ian Murdock hadn't been involved in Debian for many years when he died. He went to Sun in 2007 to work on OpenSolaris, and was working for Docker when he became an hero.

>>1030803

>>1030844

dumb (((jews))) and/or samefagging

>>1025774

https://github.com/muslayev/icecat-win64