>>1013583
>>1013584
where did he said that ICQ is not mossad botnet?
>moving from one botnet to another
smart action
>> No.1013603
>IRC doesn't keep logs
<he actually believes that
<he doesn't know anyone can enter IRC and record
>Also, why is it specifically a mossad botnet as opposed to a cia/kgb/mi6 botnet?
cia and mi6 are owned by mossad. and US is owned by Israel. so anything that belongs to cia/mi6, albo belongs to mossad
>>1013607
>Have you never heard of freenode, one of the most popular IRC networks? They allow Tor.
what he said >>.1013616
and even if you managed to create one account with Tor+socks, then it won't be anonymous if you use it but pseudonynomous, because everything what you write will be tied to one account. you won't be able to use different identity/account every time you enter
>>1013664
>XMPP + OTR is the best option for secure convos.
won't XMPP reveal when you are online and when not? since you are connected to some master server
or can you just connect to it for 5 minutes a day, read all messages, reply, close it?
>>1013858
>Also TOR is a fucking honeypot. Who still uses this shit after the FBI/CIA niggers invaded?
it may be a honeypot, but if it didn't work I would be in jail with 10 year sentence
>>1013864
>I don't think you understand how Tor works. No single actor can invade it.
there are possible attacks on Tor users. but they can defend from them too with some measures
Tor is pretty strong
>>1013994
>There's no reason to use anything other than irc or email now.
email is shit. even if you use PGP, metadata and all your contact list will be accessible to them. you would need to have 20 email accounts for each purpose and circle of friends. and you would need to check those 20 accounts for new messages
>At least with irc you can find some channels of relevant discussion that move faster than shitty forums that require email verification
you can use imageboards for that