[–]▶ No.1010716>>1010720 >>1010727 >>1010731 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
http://web.archive.org/web/https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Debian-AH-Archive-Removal
http://archive.fo/CsP2T
http://archive.fo/4HAJp
>The latest notes from the Debian anti-harassment team on Wednesday caught my attention when reading, "We were requested to advice on the appropriateness of a certain package in the Debian archive. Our decision resulted in the package pending removal from the archive." Curiosity got the best of me... What package was deemed too inappropriate for the Debian archive?
>When digging further, the package raised to the Debian Anti-Harassment Team was "Weboob." Weboob is short for "Web Outside of Browsers" as it's an open-source collection of software to script and automate the parsing/scraping/gathering-via-API of web data so that it can be consumed by different modules/applications. Weboob.org describes itself as "Weboob is a collection of applications able to interact with websites, without requiring the user to open them in a browser. It also provides well-defined APIs to talk to websites lacking one."
>Weboob is Python-based and offers Qt-based user interfaces for accessing these different modules for reading data from different web-sites outside of any conventional web browser. Those interested can learn more about the software at Weboob.org. But, yes, the name is juvenile and likely inappropriate in most professional/corporate environments. Also raised were issues with the icons/artwork like: [pic related]
>Additionally, Weboob has some module/application names as well with "boob" in the string. Silly and juvenile, but should this package, which isn't installed by default on Debian or otherwise featured by the Linux distribution, worth removing from the package repository over the naming convention?
>Weboob was initially added to Debian back in 2010 and has been maintained since although briefly removed. A few months back though the issue was raised over the name/project having sexual references and that goes against the Debian Diversity Statement and values.
>During the discussions over the project's name, the following statement was added by the package maintainer to it: "Note from the Maintainer: This software, included binaries and maybe other content contain childish references to a specific women's body part. Upstream refused to rename it. There is no diminishing or insulting message so I decided to keep it in the archive. You may nevertheless feel uncomfortable using this tool.'"
>The Debian Anti-Harassment Team ruled that Weboob is against the Debian Code of Conduct in needing to be respectful. The team called for the program's removal from the Debian archive or to otherwise patch/fork it to remove the name/branding. Should the package not be addressed, they say the Debian FTP master should unilaterally remove the package.
>[British] Debian Project Leader Chris Lamb has indeed gone ahead with the request to the Debian FTP master to remove Weboob.
Who seriously cares about that frog suite?
▶ No.1010717
>naming convention
That's not what these words mean together, shitty author. You don't seem smarter for it. Just should've said "name".
▶ No.1010719>>1010740
strip
touch
finger
fsck
fsck
yes
yes
fsck
finger
finger
fsck
touch
fsck
eject
sleep
▶ No.1010720
>>1010716 (OP)
As long as the Jew controls the World, it will not stop.
▶ No.1010724>>1010729
Why would the faggots and trannies that run the Debian archive even care for boobs?
▶ No.1010725
is ubuntu also cucked at this point?
▶ No.1010727
>>1010716 (OP)
>requested to advice on the appropriateness of a certain package in the Debian archive.
These retards can't even udder the word 'boob' anymore?
▶ No.1010729
>>1010724
I bet they're self-conscious about their plastic boobs being garbage no one wants to touch
▶ No.1010730
>Fags get told what they're allowed to install
The binding to specific repos is bad for Linux tbh.
HolyC source code zip files that compile when run on other OSs when?
▶ No.1010731
>>1010716 (OP)
Quite gay, install gentoo.
▶ No.1010732
here we go streisand effect
this show of power from debian will fuck up their reputation forever
how immature do you have to be to be offended by boob?
everyone has licked a boob
even girls have
▶ No.1010738
we should also do away with the notion that a file is REQUIRED to be opened whenever the requester decides it has "permission" and the FILE not its "master" fileSYSTEM(of oppression) should decide whether it WANTS to be opened;;; every FILE should have a ROUTINE (not a PROGRAM) that determines whether it consents to the the OPEN command and it should be able to CLOSE Itself whenever it decides to rescind the consent
▶ No.1010740
>>1010719
>Please anon, I'm a
moe
little girl
who
needs her
tramp
womb
filled with
hot
▶ No.1010743
▶ No.1010752>>1010916 >>1010920
We need to rewrite our notions of userspace and privilege in a new inclusive langauge like C+=.
▶ No.1010754>>1010938
So they are going to remove functionality from their operating system because something has boob in the name? Sounds like a pretty logical conclusion to me to assume that if your OS has any sort of CoC, anti-harassment, etc, you run the risk of losing functionality in your OS over things you don't care about.
What promise do we have that some feature we depend on won't trigger some SJW and they'll have that feature removed?
▶ No.1010769
>weboob
Fucking knew it'd be them. I was even thinking of making a thread about weboob, although I hadn't heard they were being censored by debcuck. They have modules for many sites so you can access your bank, track parcels, watch porn, etc without a browser, either with a cli or gui. Link for anyone interested: http://weboob.org/
▶ No.1010779>>1010781
someone submit a bug report and request to have all instances of "ass" removed from Debian, not just packages about passwords but also /etc/passwd, manpages, wiki etc.
it's the same principle, maybe even worse because asses have been more important sexual features than tits far longer in the history of hominoids
▶ No.1010781
>>1010779
First lets get rid of "man" pages. Always seemed super problematic to me.
▶ No.1010786>>1010804
http://lists-archives.com/debian-devel/230825-should-the-weboob-package-stay-in-debian.html https://archive.fo/1SO0E
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906119 https://archive.fo/4HAJp
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907199 https://archive.fo/FtHIW
I just skimmed through some of their bug tracker and mailing list pages about the issue and from the sheer amount of pseudo psychological analysis and philosophizing poured into countless paragraphs of text you can clearly see that these people are no different than the impotent idiots that suddenly got into positions of power just to punish people for self satisfaction that have existed in history, whether it was the Jacobins, Rotfront members, Politkomissars, Stasi IMs and whatnot.
They just can't plain say that they're pissed these, ugh, white male software developers aren't self loathing, subservient members of the collective and change the name at the first peep.
Weimar 2.0 barricade fights are gonna be interesting with these people.
>Maybe some of the Weboob authors do not think highly of woman but we're discussing the package content and not judging people's thoughts (which we cannot be sure to know anyway).
sure thing buddy
▶ No.1010792
lol weboob (in its conceptual form) is the only proper way to deal with the web. it's impossible to make web browsers that are fast or even make a website with a good GUI. the solution is to scrape shit and feed it into your own GUI. of course debian fags would want it removed because it makes them feel uncomfortable in their """professional""" environment
▶ No.1010796>>1010800
Funny, I was actually thinking of developing something like this a couple weeks ago, I never knew this existed. I mainly wanted it for news & tutorial websites which just return plaintext, but for some reason in CY+3 need 30MB of JS and CSS just to do that. Maybe I'll contribute some modules to weboob for the sites I want since I don't have to build this system myself
▶ No.1010800>>1010894
>>1010796
Just be sure to name it WeCunt.
WebCondensed using no tricks...
▶ No.1010804>>1010808 >>1010810 >>1010923
>>1010786
>https:// bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906119 https:// archive.fo/4HAJp
>Ian Jackson
>https:// www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/ijackson.html
>I'm an atheist socialist liberal/libertarian logical positivist, or something close to that.
Imagine my shock. Wonder what this aging fruitcake thinks of his own software - namely userv (pronounced you-serve). Reminds you of muh slavery, doesn't it? Shame it isn't on the same archive.
▶ No.1010806>>1010814
This tits'r'us stuff looks interesting. Anyone here actually using it?
▶ No.1010808>>1010810 >>1010874
>>1010804
>socialist libertarian
Lolwat.
▶ No.1010809>>1010814 >>1010872
To most sane people "weboob" sounds completely normal, If someone would have asked me yesterday I would have guessed "weboob" is a name of a Chinese software company.
It's not like the software is fucking called WEBTITSRIPPER69 or something.
I feel very uneasy when maintainers of the distro I use are zealots who are for some obscure political reasons willing to remove software used by thousands of people.
Some people spent countless hours making/maintaining the package just to help people and now all that work is gone, collateral damage.
Users will have to go through hoops to keep their software up to date, not a problem.
Thousands of people will miss out on using cool software, acceptable casualties.
I guess it's human nature to abuse the power you have over others, still you should have some standards and not do so. The fact that it's not just virtue signaling anymore, but actual harm being done to users is what worries me most. (admittedly small harm, for now)
▶ No.1010810>>1010830 >>1010874
>>1010804
>I work as a cryptographer for a Cambridge technology company, nCipher Corporation Ltd. We make cryptographic security modules and acceleration hardware.
>I got my PhD at the Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
He sounds like a smart guy up to this point.
>>1010808
kek.
I can never understand how intelligent people can fall so hard for the corporate-monoculture concocted by Jews to destroy the west.
>I'll just act all faggy, and I'll improve my social score!
▶ No.1010812
apt-cache search tit |wc
265
H-how disgusting! We have lots of work ahead of us, fellow anons!
▶ No.1010814
>>1010806
It's something I've thought about a lot but never bothered looking for the solution. Sounds nice for casual browsing, but I wouldn't trust the maintainer for something like a banking website. I really wish they had some sort of API scraping toolkit for probing websites to go along with this.
>>1010809
This is why I don't mind all the fractured package repos around Linux distros. So shit like this doesn't affect the entire ecosystem.
▶ No.1010815>>1010826
This isn't only because of the name. They also used "homophobic slurs" in code comments.
▶ No.1010817>>1010865
Hey, hey! Miss me yet? =^_^=
▶ No.1010826>>1010837
>>1010815
Could you give an example?
▶ No.1010830
>>1010810
>I can never understand how intelligent people can fall
Because they don't know any better. People who have been told all their lives one thing is the only way and who live in an environment where any ungoodthink is punished with exile never a chance. They fall for it because it's everything they know, and it'll only get worse as challenging people to think for themselves is being banned.
▶ No.1010837
▶ No.1010865>>1010929
>>1010817
You are a scholar and a gentleman. Any clues on dotfiles? Because that puts even my finest gentoo rices to shame!
▶ No.1010869>>1010872
Looks like I'm moving to Ubuntu net install.
▶ No.1010872>>1010878
>>1010809
You can still install it off of pip, which isn't too much of a hassle if you already have python installed. I think someone should send in an email telling them to remove python as well, because it allows suh blatantly misogynistic package names.
>>1010869
I thought ubuntu just debian but with a different userspace. Do they really maintain their own set of packages?
▶ No.1010873
LOL CoCs won't affect anything!!! ;^)
▶ No.1010874>>1010882
Remember the "haha CoC hasn't changed anything yet, there's no difference!" retards?
>>1010808
That's not even the worst part.
>liberal/libertarian
>using liberal and libertarian interchangeably
He probably thinks they're the same, like a retard.
>>1010810
>I can never understand how intelligent people can fall so hard for the corporate-monoculture concocted by Jews to destroy the west.
>I'll just act all faggy, and I'll improve my social score!
You just partly answered your question.
Half of it is social contact, the other half being money.
▶ No.1010875
>weboob gets removed from debian's shitty main repo
So? this means jack shit when debian is almost 100% self hosted repos.
Either way though, this is quite the retarded reasoning.
▶ No.1010878
>>1010872
>I thought ubuntu just debian but with a different userspace. Do they really maintain their own set of packages?
Yeah, Canonical maintains their own packages separate from Debian
▶ No.1010880>>1010884 >>1010960 >>1010981
They were asking for it and deserve it, which grown-up man still thinks its funny to use private parts and sexual acts for their name and icons. Fucking childish man. No respect.
Fuck the CoC though
▶ No.1010882>>1010890 >>1010892
>>1010874
Libertarian is a subset of liberal, especially under a democracy where they have interchangeable end results, i.e. control by a small yet distributed and mutually hostile group of crowd movers. This remains true despite the words currently holding certain semiotic/cultural connotations (i.e. people usually think of one as right wing and of the other as left wing even though the distinction is nearly irrelevant in that particular case).
▶ No.1010883
▶ No.1010884>>1010885 >>1010887 >>1010942
>>1010880
>private parts
Only those under the age of 10 use this phrase.
▶ No.1010885
▶ No.1010887
>>1010884
I'm sorry, i meant to say my wee wee penis weenis boom boom.
▶ No.1010890
>>1010882
Yes, but they're still not the same.
Besides, current "liberalism" is social liberalism, which goes completely against libertarianism.
▶ No.1010892
>>1010882
imagine being this high on /pol/ flatulence
▶ No.1010894>>1010911 >>1010929
>>1010800
Why not call it Webitch?
▶ No.1010911
>>1010894
well now that's just silly
▶ No.1010916
>>1010752
Did you just presume my userspace!?
▶ No.1010920>>1010925
>>1010752
>+=
How dare you use an assignment operation!
▶ No.1010923
>>1010804
>libertarian
>wants to restrict other people from using certain pieces of software
shiggy diggy
▶ No.1010925>>1010942
>>1010920
>assignment
It's 2018, anon. They're now called reassignment operations.
▶ No.1010929>>1011012
>>1010865
Not mine tbh. But osiris script is probably the osbx1c.tgz here:
http://www.bitchx.com/scripts.php
>>1010894
It's called weboob because it's an acronym and also a pun. People used to be less hung-up and make jokes like this all the time, before everything became monitized, corporate, sterile, and the SJWs showed up to enforce the boring policitally-correct environment. Shit sucks, man. Nobody 20-30 years ago would have imagined the future would be so grim, grey, and lifeless. Hell, I'd rather be back there and using a 8 or 16-bit computer with 2400 baud modem to call dialup BBS. At least back then the future seemed bright.
▶ No.1010933>>1010939 >>1010942 >>1010955
CONSPIRACY PROPOSAL
what if that's not the real reason why they purged it? the real reason is jews bribed key debian people. this "boob" argument is just official explanation
and why jews would bribe debian?
because this project allows access of jewish websites and services without jewish:
-ads
-javascript tracking
-stupid jewish user interface
this project could extremely hurt jewish profits. jews will do everything to holocaust it
Debian got bribed
▶ No.1010936
Dont use debian but wonder if funny-manpages made it. Really though how can someone stand a stable non-rolling release OS?
▶ No.1010938>>1010939
>>1010754
>So they are going to remove functionality from their operating system because something has boob in the name?
Of course, No.
They are removing this functionality because it hurts jewish pockets (the software avoids ads and tracking on websites). They got bribed. we need to find those debian fuckers that decided to remove Weboob and we need to destroy their limbs
▶ No.1010939>>1010941
>>1010933
>>1010938
While I don't doubt you're right, the main problem is the CoC.
The thing about the CoCk is that it gives them a valid excuse to just simply remove non-kosher stuff.
You use subjective words like "harassment" and "sexism", then you fucking kill anyone you don't like for that, but defend the strongest ally because it's not harassment/sexism when he's doing it.
▶ No.1010941
>>1010939
Code of Conduct is a jewish weapon
SJWs are dumb soldiers used by jews to achieve jewish goals
▶ No.1010942>>1010952
>>1010925
No thats not either, its an augmented assignment. In whatever language this is there is no declaration syntax and C+ is a valid variable identifier, or this is som, then maybe its an assignemnt, but otherwise its an augmented assignment.
>>1010884
Or someone who uses java or C++
>>1010933
>conspiracy proposal
Lolwat. Whats a stupid jewish user interface though? Also, what kinda idiot knows how to use this and doesnt know how to either just download the python sources or use a PPA?
Really though did anyone else read it as web-oob first?
▶ No.1010952
>>1010942
>and C+ is a valid variable identifier
>not letting variables identify as they want to
Found the shitlord.
▶ No.1010955>>1010975
>>1010933
Pretty sure the minute amount of people that actually used this wasn't exactly high on (((their))) priority list
▶ No.1010959
Leddit threads about this (as usual cancerous):
http://archive.fo/xEpZI
http://archive.fo/yH4ak
▶ No.1010960>>1010968 >>1010979
>>1010880
>which grown-up man still thinks its funny to use private parts and sexual acts for their name and icons.
People who don't take things too seriously and aren't prude faggots. Also you have to realize frogs are much more open sexually than burgers, boobs are not at all offensive in France. Juvenile yes, but it wouldn't offend any guy (much less women, even burger women wouldn't be offended, it's only soyboys who whine about it).
▶ No.1010968
>>1010960 Barubaru-chan is quite chubby so she is sexy!
▶ No.1010975>>1010985
>>1010955
>Pretty sure the minute amount of people that actually used this wasn't exactly high on (((their))) priority list
that's true, for now
but if project become more popular and higher quality, eventually NPCs could start to use it too
they might want to kill it in infancy
▶ No.1010979
>>1010960
god bless the French
when I was a young lad a French movie was on TV in the early evening and it had some guy fondle and suck a chicks tits on the back of the bus, her getting banged and then the next morning she took a spread eagle piss in the garden where the mother of the guy walked by and gave the slut a disapproving look
vanilla was never an option from that day on
I think the woman in the movie was younger than 18 too
▶ No.1010981
>>1010880
I have a project named FAPP sitting on a US Government computer network.
It was funny as shit until a 60 year old woman asked me to explain it (she didn't get the joke).
The Flight Algorithm Prototyping Program is a 6DoF propagator that runs a user script to update forces and torques while doing Runge-Kutta Dormand-Prince. It gives you the seven layers of the US Standard Atmosphere 1976, but you have to invent the plane.
▶ No.1010985
>>1010975
But this is a project nobody had heard of, and now tons of people had. They'd have done better being way more discrete.
▶ No.1011012
>>1010929
The future and the Present are great, beautiful, and White. The sufferings such as these you menction and which have passed away were just the step. We are Free Now.
There's always the Terry Davis option, by the way.