/tech/ - Technology★

>bloat

>exceptions

whoever made this is out of touch with c niggers

>>1007162 (OP)

>Not invented here

>How dare someone tell me how I should write C.

>I don't want to give up my freedom.

Because C++ is still the best programming language to use.

>>1007162 (OP)

>Github has no CoC

>Dropped

I will not spend even one minute on hate code.

>>1007167

Except when you have to work with pajeets and jungle riceniggers.

>>1007169

Definitely true, but you don't have to deal with those savages to code.

>>1007162 (OP)

>I made Cello as a fun experiment

>Can it be used in Production?

>It might be better to try Cello out on a hobby project first. Cello does aim to be production ready, but because it is a hack it has its fair share of oddities and pitfalls, and if you are working in a team, or to a deadline, there is much better tooling, support and community for languages such as C++.

>Is anyone using Cello?

>People have experimented with it, but there is no high profile project I know of that uses it. Cello is too big and scary a dependency for new C projects if they want to be portable and easy to maintain.

That's why. It's a "hack" that's a "fun experiment," and even the guy who made it said that if you're doing serious work, you should use C++ instead.

This looks horrible.

Because the good thing about C++ is having a big standard library someone else can maintain. C doesn't have that. The closest thing is GNOME's libraries but even those aren't as well maintained.

>>1007171

>I made UNIX as a fun experiment

>Can it be used in Production?

>It might be better to try UNIX out on a hobby project first. UNIX does aim to be production ready, but because it is a hack it has its fair share of oddities and pitfalls, and if you are working in a team, or to a deadline, there is much better tooling, support and community for languages such as FORTRAN.

>Is anyone using UNIX?

>People have experimented with it, but there is no high profile project I know of that uses it. UNIX is too big and scary a dependency for new PDP-11 projects if they want to be portable and easy to maintain.

>>1007186

>I made DOS as a fun experiment

>Can it be used in Production?

>It might be better to try DOS out on a hobby project first. DOS does aim to be production ready, but because it is a hack it has its fair share of oddities and pitfalls, and if you are working in a team, or to a deadline, there is much better tooling, support and community for operating systems such as CP/M.

>Is anyone using DOS?

>People have experimented with it, but there is no high profile project I know of that uses it. DOS is too big and scary a dependency for new 808x projects if they want to be portable and easy to maintain.

>>1007162 (OP)

Is there a library that turns C into S-expressions?

>>1007517

You can embed C code into Common Lisp with this library, so close enough:

https://github.com/y2q-actionman/with-c-syntax

>>1007162 (OP)

No generics == instant fail.

>>1007162 (OP)

> HTTPS Everywhere noticed you were navigating to a non-HTTPS page, and tried to send you to the HTTPS version instead. The HTTPS version is unavailable. Most likely this site does not support HTTPS

To the trash it goes.

Is it just a library?, how?, is it just a fuck ton of macros?

>>1007167

C++ is another trash moden style general language.

With C at least I can actually read exactly what the code is doing. Python, C++ and other niggerlangs you can use for years then open someone elses code and have no idea what's happening.

`typedef void* var;`

LOL

>>1009182

C++ has enough undefined behavior that this can make sense, but Python? If you can't into Python, you're a dumb nigger that has no business running a computer.

>>1009182

>With C at least I can actually read exactly what the code is doing.

Spotted the LARPer

https://www.ioccc.org/

>>1007169

Then the language is the last of your problems.

>>1009182

Your ignorance is not an argument in favor of C, especially when you don't know how many undefined behaviours and insane compiler optimizations exist for it.

>>1015573

>show chart proving that Python is simple enough to be used by Pajeets

Shooting your foot like a champ.

>>1007167

i thought the best language was assembly?

>>1015573

what the fuck is coffeescript

because I work in the real world.

bump

>>1015573

I just wanted to reply what >>1015574 already stated.

>>1007169

>Except when you have to work with pajeets and jungle riceniggers.

These have no place in programming, and if you're working with them, then you're at the wrong place. Find yourself a better job, some place that requires actual intelligence and creativity, and hence has no niggers and assorted trash.