[–]▶ e2d5e4 (12) No.13369>>13398 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
I am not really sure how to start this thread other than post the images I found. I feel like this needs it's own thread just for the sheer insanity it involves.
Some of it is decent, some of it is funny, some of it is just downright disturbing.
▶ e2d5e4 (12) No.13376>>13387 >>13394 >>13461 >>13521
And that's as much as I downloaded before my sides finally caved in and imploded.
▶ 6fcd28 (1) No.13385
>>13375
>4th pic
>Those goddamn noses
>read the filename
>Oh.
▶ 43c5a5 (2) No.13387>>13388 >>13391
>>13376
I for one applaud the recent uptick in drawfaggotry reposting and merry memery on /strek/. However, some of this shit needs to be spoilered or not posted, tbh.
▶ a595f3 (3) No.13388>>13391
>>13387
speaking of drawfaggotry
help
▶ 6d0049 (1) No.13391>>13395
>>13387
No we need more autism and more OC of Swolecard
>>13388
What are you trying to draw?
▶ d669c4 (1) No.13394>>13437
>>13376
Faggots belong in hell. Fuck you bastards. That coalburning porn star slut was worth fifty of you.
▶ 43c5a5 (2) No.13395>>13437
>>13391
i wasn't referring to autism or swoleverse - both of which are sacred pillars of /strek/ culture. I was referring to the slashfic-tier reddit faggotry posted above
Swolecrew is the only /strek/-approved homo-eroticism. this other gay shit belongs on >>/startrek/
▶ 45fe1b (1) No.13398>>13437
>>13369 (OP)
I like Manet and all, but I don't like the implication that data is a prostitute.
▶ e2d5e4 (12) No.13437>>13443
>>13394
>>13395
>>13398
We must drown out this faggotry with Swoleness. It is the duty of every /strek/ poster to be Swole, get /fit/ and drown the /d/egeneracy out with OC of our own. And if you can't find it in your heart to do such a thing, then you don't deserve that gym membership!
▶ 141b15 (1) No.13443>>13460
>>13437
SWOLE FOR THE SWOLECARD! FIT FOR THE /FIT/ THRONE
▶ e7e0aa (2) No.13460
>>13443
SQUATS AND OATS
LOWER, FAGGOT!
▶ 01644e (1) No.13461>>13462 >>13463 >>13465
>>13376
Why must faggots always try to ruin everything?
Why must Data, a robot with no biological need to form a breeding pair, be forced into a romantic relationship?
Why must LaForge, a guy who has been in a romantic relationship with his spaceship, be in a gay relationship with a robot?
Why a gay relationship between Garak and Bashir, when the entire point of their relationship was that of amicable enemies trying to deceive the other while getting information by themselves, like a pair of spies facing off against eachother, be turned into just another uninteresting romance, instead of the cloak and dagger style mindgame it was. It just takes all the interesting parts of it and throws it away.
▶ e2d5e4 (12) No.13462
>>13461
I did say I got it off Deviantart, I think that says enough?
▶ 77568e (1) No.13463>>13465
>>13461
>Why must LaForge, a guy who has been in a romantic relationship with his spaceship, be in a gay relationship with a robot?
>Be TurboAutist that is only capable of forming emotional connections with machines.
>Oh look, a humanoid that just so happens to also be a machine.
>Hot diggity.
It's still abhorrent.
▶ e7e0aa (2) No.13465
>>13461
>>13463
Geordie is his servant, not his lover. Google Olympia by Manet.
▶ e2d5e4 (12) No.13476
>>13474
Almost drinking as much kanar as Damar.
▶ da36f4 (1) No.13521
>>13376
>>13375
>>13373
>>13372
>its an "/strek/ posters must suffer" episode
▶ 188f69 (1) No.13522
>>13372
>tfw no fully functional R63 Data gf
▶ 959b52 (4) No.13547
Ending this fever dream on a positive note
▶ 0d960e (1) No.13816>>13818 >>13846
I wish Trekkies would get off their asses and spend some money on commissioning good porn art/stories or learn to draw/write ones.
▶ e2d5e4 (12) No.13818
>>13816
No you really don't.
▶ 58a52b (1) No.13846
>>13816
>inb4 anons start making Star Trek Yoshi Eggs Edition
▶ bf612d (4) No.14590>>14632
I knew JewJew Trek was gay but this is taking the piss slightly.
▶ bf612d (4) No.14593>>14632
BO may want to censor all these. Also we need our own fanart to beat back this hive of degeneracy
▶ 440d2c (1) No.14632>>14633
>>14590
>>14591
>>14592
>>14593
LOL why do you even have all this? You some kinda fujoshi or somethin'?
▶ e2d5e4 (12) No.14633
>>14632
I read that in Shat's voice.
▶ c82902 (1) No.14682>>14683 >>16590 >>16712
I got this for christmas. I feel like a total fag but it holds a lot of water.
▶ 9d6f26 (1) No.14683
▶ 302786 (1) No.14770>>16570
>>14700
>>14701
>>14703
Whatever happened to the TNG Edits?
▶ 8b4c15 (1) No.16559
Why is all Trek fanart shit?
▶ b5f010 (1) No.16570>>16619
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>14770
I think general grin had his channel deleted, and a lot of his videos were just way too long anyway.
gazorra had to change accounts too.
▶ 77e91c (2) No.16590
>>14682
Too bad it's not a horga'hn.
▶ 1679b8 (1) No.16619
>>16570
Kiketube was a mistake.
▶ 81f69e (1) No.16712
>>14682
i aint got a problem with that, at least it isnt a funko pop
▶ 635ab6 (1) No.17893>>17898
Stuff by Glee-Chan has been pretty good in a cute sort of way.
▶ 576a57 (1) No.17898>>17899 >>17900
>>17893
You've been spamming this shitty art all over the board for the past few days. I don't know if you're the artist or just a dedicated drone, but either way the art is not good. Stop posting.
▶ 7ade0d (4) No.17899>>17907
>>17898
>Being this triggered by cute art
Nigga what? It is pretty good by Trek fanart standards although to be fair that's not hard to beat.
▶ f7b985 (2) No.17900
>>17898
>Implying it's just one person
I only started posting it when I saw you got butthurt over it.
▶ f9a387 (1) No.17907>>17909
>>17899
It's fag art that only fags would like.
>>>/deviantart/
▶ f7b985 (2) No.17909>>17919 >>17938
▶ c1c932 (1) No.17919>>17938
>>17909
<I post things only to bother people.
<Oh no, I've been found out for the tasteless fuck I am, better call everyone a cuck and tell them to leave!
You're a very sad man. Do keep posting that art though, I am one of the posters who find it cute as well.
▶ 32e5de (1) No.17938
>>17909
Yeah don't be a faggot as >>17919 said. I like the cuteness as well.
▶ fb7746 (4) No.17961>>17967 >>17969 >>17984 >>18140 >>18259
Atalanta Anon here ( >>12711 ). I don't know where else to put this, as we don't have a thread specifically for personal artwork/projects and I don't want to be that faggot who makes a thread that no one's interested in. It's been a few years since I last did any Trek character design work, but I was in the mood for it last night, and decided to hammer out an idea for a member of the USS Atalanta's crew. I didn't used to care about the Andorians, but I've developed an appreciation for their design over the years. ENT can take some credit for that.
My current thinking is that she's enlisted crew, as she's more interested in scientific field work than in the officer track. Her specialization is geology. As the Atalanta is primarily a patrol ship, it has a proportionally relatively small science department. She and the ship's science officer are the only personnel on board who are fully qualified to operate the bridge science station. In terms of story presence, I imagine her being sort of like Scotty- a character who is frequently present and receives a bit of development, but is only rarely at the center of events.
I've dubbed the uniform the "outrider" variant. It is a unisex duty uniform which evolved parallel to the standard TOS uniform, based on the earlier uniform style seen in The Cage. The gray shoulder/collar area is meant to be a thicker, reinforced material, and is a visual allusion to the gray away-team overcoats seen in the pilot episode. One detail that I'm not 100% on yet is the chest badge. On the one hand, I'm tempted to go along with the retcon that the arrowhead was always the Starfleet insignia (instead of being specific to the Enterprise until some point between TOS and TMP), because it's simple and elegant and an iconic part of the TOS look. On the other hand, it would trigger my autism a little because I don't like violating TOS canon (even if it is a bit looser and more idiosyncratic than the canon of later shows).
▶ 05664d (2) No.17962>>17967
I'm also throwing my hat in for the pro-cute team. Also, does anyone know the thread that has seven-of-cute's ass? I saw it while phoneposting a couple of days ago, and now that I'm at my desktop I want to dl it.
▶ 7ade0d (4) No.17967>>17978 >>18000
>>17961
>Andorians
Did you do this secretly for Andorian Waifu anon?
>>17962
Here you go anon
>>17794
I presume this is the one you mean.
▶ 7f621e (2) No.17969>>17978
>>17961
that's a really cute design, anon, good job. I'm not too sure about the gray of the sleeve just ending half-way before the elbow, wondering how it would look like if the sleeve was all gray. Also are those pockets I see there, lel? The turtleneck is pretty nice tho too.
▶ fb7746 (4) No.17978>>17980 >>17984 >>17985 >>18140 >>18259
>>17967
>Did you do this secretly for Andorian Waifu anon?
I remember another drawfag had posted a cute Andorian back around the time I discovered /strek/, so that very well may have planted the seed.
>>17969
I didn't want to extend the gray any further. What was there is about as much as I'm comfortable with putting on a TOS-inspired uniform. I tried getting rid of the gray and I think it looks better as the traditional solid color.
▶ 7ade0d (4) No.17980>>17997
>>17978
What era is that uniform meant to be? if any
▶ 3d41b9 (1) No.17984
>>17961
>>17978
It looks good anon. The Andorian has a big butt.
▶ 7f621e (2) No.17985>>17997
>>17978
yeah, the solid colour might be better. I think the gray was sort of clashing with the black, looks better when you just have the two main colours.
I just noticed, but does she have freckles? bc that's really cute
also any reason she has short hair? Just your personal preference or is it something you imagine her character would have in-universe for whatever reason?
and I just reread you earlier post and this part
>One detail that I'm not 100% on yet is the chest badge. On the one hand, I'm tempted to go along with the retcon that the arrowhead was always the Starfleet insignia (instead of being specific to the Enterprise until some point between TOS and TMP), because it's simple and elegant and an iconic part of the TOS look. On the other hand, it would trigger my autism a little because I don't like violating TOS canon (even if it is a bit looser and more idiosyncratic than the canon of later shows).
what insignia would you have as the alternative to the arrowhead?
▶ fb7746 (4) No.17997
>>17980
It's intended to be mid-late TOS era, and would have been in use parallel to the classic uniform style seen in the show. This variant is designed to be somewhat more durable than the standard fleet duty uniform and would have been issued to ships whose crews were expected to engage in frequent and/or prolonged away missions.
>>17985
>I just noticed, but does she have freckles? bc that's really cute
I threw some texture on as an afterthought to prevent her skin from looking too smooth/plastic-like. It does kind of look like freckles, though, which is fine by me. I find that an endearing characteristic.
>any reason she has short hair? Just your personal preference or is it something you imagine her character would have in-universe for whatever reason?
It's mostly just a matter of preference, as I'm afflicted by whatever brain disease causes men to find short hair on a woman cute.
>what insignia would you have as the alternative to the arrowhead?
That's part of the problem, and one of the reasons that I'm seriously considering sticking with the arrowhead. I don't even know if smaller utility/patrol ships would have had their own insignias, as (AFAIK) all the non-enterprise Starfleet insignias seen in TOS were for Starbases or other Connie cruisers. Big ships and installations. There's not really anything canon to go off of for smaller utility/patrol ships.
▶ 05664d (2) No.18000
>>17967
That's the one!. Thanks anon.
▶ 7f1f2a (2) No.18140
>>17961
>>17978
I really like your work anon, I do.
▶ 4cd778 (1) No.18259>>18287 >>18288 >>21232
>>17961
>>17978
Is her Butt padded?
▶ fb7746 (4) No.18287>>18288
>>18259
No. I was drawing at 2am and was too tired to bother double-checking the proportions. Also I'm a hips man.
I want diaperfags to leave.
▶ 7f1f2a (2) No.18288
>>18287
>>18259
Is it bad the first thing I pictured when butt padding was mentioned was some sort of rear shock absorbing bumper on her ass?
▶ b979b3 (1) No.18819
▶ 77e91c (2) No.21146
>>18619
Properly pregnant females? That implies a penis entered a vagina. Seems not as bad as the earlier offerings in this thread. What am I missing? Or is this some kindof enema bulge porn?
▶ 7ade0d (4) No.21217
>>21214
Needs a Gowron edit.
▶ 488c72 (1) No.21232
▶ cbd897 (1) No.21367
>>21342
What are you selling?
▶ 4073ee (1) No.21619
>>21342
This was pretty cringeworthy.
▶ 9c3717 (1) No.21756