No.8085
Why do we have so many former military on SSC?
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8086
maybe its because they have the courage to change their opinions?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8087
>>8085
>like 3 guys, maybe one of whom posts frequently
>so many former military
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8088
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8089
>>8088
Fuck off you individualist faggot. Some of us still have a sense of community.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8090
>>8087
Now down to two after Sastan got the banhammer for making fun of vegetarians.
>mfw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8091
>>8090
More proof that Scott is anti-conservative.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8092
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8093
>>8091
well he's clearly a lefty type so that would make sense would it not you faggot?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8095
>>8093
Scott is hardly leftist. Compared to the typical Democrat, he's practically a reactionary.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8096
>>8095
Scott dreams of an infinitely egalitarian community of civilized, nice and cooperative peaceful humans made of all of the humans.
Which is more leftist than any Democrat you could name.
He objects to *fighting*, especially from the groups that supposedly align around niceness, community and civilization. He doesn't address -much- the fighting from the group whose main ideology is "muh ingroup fuck yeah, screw everyone we can win fights against" since he takes it as a given that it is self-proclaimedly what he sees as evil.
QED : you are a fucktard.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8097
>>8096
While that's what he WANTS, the only way he thinks we can get there is by using AI gods to bypass Gnon/Moloch, which is…fanciful.
I think his motivations are quite different from those of typical leftists. He doesn't really have that ressentiment-fueled leveling instinct (though he does have the world-denying instinct, and his moronic version of utilitarianism). His utopian vision at least involves bringing people "up" instead of tearing down anyone who is successful.
In terms of how he sees the world as it is, he's nowhere near the left. e.g. in the recent post against Myers he casually dropped a bit of blatant HBD (Ashkenazi IQ) that's completely incompatible with leftist thought. Similarly on feminism, capitalism, etc.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8098
>>8097
>He doesn't really have that ressentiment-fueled leveling instinct
I think this is what separates him from most leftists. He doesn't seem to have the hatred of inquality(ies that are not currently favoring him) that is typical in those groups, but rather just wants everyone to be at least at some sort of base level of comfort.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8099
>>8095
>forces people to bend over to trannies' delusions
>practically a reactionary
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8100
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8101
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8102
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8103
>>8101
While I am pleased this image has resonated with so many of you, I've noticed you've made the following slight missteps:
First of all, you seemed to have used a service which introduced a watermark onto the image, which is a blight unto mine eyes.
Second, and least important, you seem to have cropped "slate star codex was a mistake.jpg" to make your image instead of using "scott black.jpg", which might have looked better. This crop job also left a black bar at the bottom of the image.
Third, you have degraded the image quality of your meme by not saving your image in a lossless format (the most appropriate one in this case would likely be lossless jpeg, which you can read about here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_JPEG). This is most easily detectable (on close inspection) by the artefacts it has introduced around the text in your image. This is likely a result of the service you used.
All in all, it was a good meme, but I know you can do even better!
In accordance with your expressed wishes I have saged this thread.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8104
>>8103
Whoops, one of those images was supposed to be one of this image.
(slate star codex was a mistake was a mistake)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8105
I'd like to fuck Scott in the ass, but more than that I'd like to fuck the author of >>8103 and >>8104, who has put so much sincere effort into the rehabilitation of the dismal memeage on this board.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8106
>>8105
It's like they say: you meme what you sow.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8107
>>8100
He;s just pretedngin to lure em into a false sense of security.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8108
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8109
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8110
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8111
>>8103 here, I'd like to issue something like a /ratanon/ anon rat erratum:
I wrote
>the most appropriate one in this case would likely be lossless jpeg
but it turns out that it's tricky to generate lossless jpegs, and all the tools I've been using are incapable of doing so, even as they told me they were. So png is probably for the best, because you know that you're getting real losslessness.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8112
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8113
>>8103
Honestly, I think you omitted the most important flaw of the image, which is that the top text is so large it completely obscures his face. This usually happens when people use automatic generators instead of just taking 30 seconds to do it in GIMP
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
