Lawyer here…..
I follow the posts attributed to this tag and its predecessors. Some make sense, others seem as either LARPing or disinfo.
I find the QMap fairly interesting; in some cases more interesting than news items found on Drudge, particularly when relevant; see FRE 400s.
However, between listening to Rush or Levin on the radio or conducting independent research, I remain marginally skeptical in that some posts seem post-script of the news. I mean, what is the probative value if POTUS doesn't address voter fraud prior to '18 elections?
Yes, the success of the recent remake of the Rosanne Show is probative of the sentiments of a certain segment of the population. And, yes…public sentiment is vital. But…
If the commies use activist judges, dissemblers, and illegal votes… How do you cut the head off the snake?
Thanks for your time and consideration.