/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

>>835715

Amen🙏

>>840853

https:// youtu.be/0MtdyRDy4fU

>>851822

https:// youtu.be/k9IfHDi-2EA

>>842734

Revelation is sealed for the time "at hand," which refers to the fourth anatomical region of the right-side-up world of Daniel (p32) (the present age). But it is also an entirely symbolic work, obviously intended for the spiritually inclined (or enlightened) watchman with some self-confidence in identifying it's relevance to the more specific things that really matter presently. He has to have a lot of basic fundamentals right to see that too. So the work probably has more real-time confirming value than it does prophetic value. There is also little benefit in trying to explain Revelation prematurely, since it has such a specific voice and place - which may be why it is the only book that seems to caution against even that. The result is it keeps our minds open instead, which is a very good thing in itself.

Although we are in the fourth "age," there are actually three "days" that occur within it - but not by calendar measurement, by somewhat overlapping and interactive phases of natural development.

The first of these is the rebirth of the faith we are all seeing now. The second (or the fifth "day") is the development of wisdom and understanding. And the greatest manifestation of this comes as we recognize the parable context of historical records (not the prophets, but the stories) explains forces and dynamics of change in the present very meaningfully and usefully. The more we see that and work with it, the more we fulfill the subsequent needs of the 6th "type" development, which is offering and consummation.

The seven seals, trumpets and bowls is about getting through all of this.

There is a Scriptural plan for moving the STORM effort forward immensely - which is basically by gaining supportive association with churches. And Scripture makes this appeal thereto for us. Paul provides for this in a very brief letter he "encoded" in some of the ancient's unique manners of cryptology, apparently for just such use. He would also allude to this means of encryption in a story of Acts 18 where he got thrown out of a synagogue and started a new meeting place right on the same grounds (and canon). This occurred because he insisted on different interpretations of words and names in the reading of the ancients than what the former religious leaders accepted. This story is also prophetic of the time we live in now.

Many stories of ancient record metaphorically impart very useful considerations for matters of the present world now and our opportunities for the future. Those who deal with the real and present threats to society are generally already involved in the present paradigm of metaphoric re-enactments of the same processes of change in the present as those taught about in such ancient records. So we can now "hear" how the Bible speaks to and for the good work of many great men standing up for the best interests of the people of the world today completely apart from the church. And for the Bible to speak for them accordingly, obviously implies "God" is with them is such efforts.

The working theory of term and name interpretation Paul allures to in Acts 18 is outlined in the Introduction of the doc I reference below, and shown to be useful in that study. It is based on object oriented programming, but as applied to etymology. It just means tracing names and some terms to their primal roots and then re-developing them into more specific terms also derived from the same root terms, but as they make sense in the given (timely) "spirit" and rhetorical context.

Employing this means of interpretation for the sake of this appeal to church leadership simply means first setting the stage of time and place Paul's work for this targets, seeing the need for it (which we can all now see) and then showing how the communication is deciphered. This should then serve as a useful tool for anons and "enlightened" Christians alike to take to their local religious leaders and laity to reach the more established and older crowds (where it is particularly needed) with the need for support for truth promotion, and to appeal for it "with the voice of God." The general concept, even as Paul describes it, is for a "new room" (place, meeting schedule) for a different crowd we will ultimately bring. And we can also tell them it is all about recovering that younger generation they already know is missing from the church.

Concerning the related times (as thoroughly elaborated in the related study), the ordained time for the ministry of Paul was the third age - the 390 years of Ezekiel - from the time the Bible was ordered to be given to the people under King James in 1607 to the end (of time) of the six days of Adam (6K years, 4004 BC to 1997 AD). But Paul addresses most of his letters as from himself and his successor, Timothy. He would also call Timothy his son (his next generation). So, this "co-author" of Paul also represents the leadership of Timothy (for the present age) that comes after Paul's ordained time. In this time however, the literal reading of such works differs from (and takes precedence over) this alternative interpretive context of Timothy - even as Paul would also teach that the carnal wars (differs) with the spiritual, and further that the "letter of the law" differs from the "spirit of the law." Both Paul and Timothy are of the same Elohim (God), but work with different natural forces (of the seven of Elohim) that take place in successive times. No one text can speak to and for them both except (as also thoroughly elaborated in the work) those of Scripture that do so in the dual contexts of plain language and then hidden-then-revealed, encrypted meaning.

(continued)

>>861548

This encrypted context of Paul (that of Timothy) is only found in the "breath" (the meaning of "spirit") of those actually participating in the work of the time of Timothy (the present age), and bears upon different term and name meanings than those that have now long been traditional - meanings that "breathe" with their values, perception and their own hearing of parables. These things make for a different ambient vernacular and related tongue of interpretation. And as Paul would also teach, the carnal man cannot learn this tongue because it is only learned in the "breath" (discernment) and moment of those living it. So, while church-goers may not understand it, church leaders may be able to see the "profit" it would ultimately bring even them. And this prospect is the basis of Paul's appeal that is obviously intended just for us.

Without further ado, I will just demonstrate how this and all the other givens here apply to the book of Philemon, which is the simplest and shortest letter of canon Paul authored - and is all about this unique and timely, needed appeal.

The general overview of this letter is that it is addressed to a former friend of Paul who had a church in his own house and a slave that went missing. Paul met up with this former slave of his, discipled him and then sent him back to his friend asking he be provided a room and accepted as an equal. He also suggests he himself would also like to return to his house and bring five other ministers of his own church, all of whom would be needing "room" as well. But he also explains all this would be profitable to him too.

The sacred context of this general overview is that the times have changed from the third age (the last of the church age) to the fourth age, and the church business does not work the same any more. Paul even mentions he is now "aged," just as we can all relate to the fact his ministry in leading the church is now also somewhat beyond its more productive years. Paul knew this day would come, so he penned this letter as an appeal to those (religious leaders) that once knew and loved him, and for the sake of helping them "cross over" to the new values of what they have always called "the coming kingdom age." He also explains this appeal is for "his own heart" - a reference to the fourth, bottom-up section of the image of Daniel (p32 in the study)(the torso) - meaning it is "fourth age" Paul.

As the background to this story goes, the profitability (the meaning of Onesimus) of theology was once a slave to friendliness (the meaning of Philemon). A preacher needed only be friendly to make money and nobody else could except as he saw fit. But this was in the time of the service of King Saul, when public appearance was king (The people chose Saul as king for his appearance, whereas the successive leadership, characterized as David, was instead chosen by God for being "after the heart of God", and this is the one in profitable authority now).

(continued)

>>861558

The money (or meaningful progress) isn't with Saul any more. Saul is no longer king (as he was in the third age) and people now need meat more than milk. Onesimus is also a son of Paul, meaning he is also of fourth age ministry - when the Davidic pursuit of the heart of God is king. Leadership that truly fights the battles of the people (in our time) is then ordained and prospered to succeed the former leadership which previously aspired only by more superficial public appeal. And Onesimus is the means of transition into this new economy for old friends of Paul.

There was a time televangelists unfriended this cause of profitability. Since then however, several other forces of social influence have arisen to it from outside of the church and found profit therewith. And Paul has found them there. And he reasons, as he explains, he could just keep the profit of it all for himself or he could restore profitability to a house friendly to the further profitability of this same fourth age cause. And he would like to do this for friends he once had.

So he charters and addresses this cause as profitable to Philemon, Apphia and Archippus - which reads quite plainly, in order: "friend of" "increasing" "horsemanship." A house like this - friendly to increasing horsemanship - could profit from furthering the profitability of the war-horse work already being done by others promoting truth - simply by increasing the "horsemen" and/or the craft of those already doing it.

Then he goes on to say he himself might also come seeking lodging. And what he describes as the mission he would bring is the perfect top-down picture of the CBTS/STORM/Q truth movement we are now all about here. He characterizes it with names that fit all the inter-operative elements we all know very well as leading the present battle for truth and Christian destiny. He does this in the breath of Timothy - that is, by his hand and in the moment of his present-day experience, with the following five more names.

Epaphrus means, "One devoted to superimposing times, places or orders" - such as in comparing stories, contexts, or ordinal relations. This is what it takes to speak or hear in parables and to uncover timely, sacred messages and meanings from Scripture or even history. Paul also says this is a faithful witness for the church. And it compares perfectly with the Trump administration and all his old-school generals (who know where the bodies are) that are drawing from known events of their own experience and are obviously consistently pointing us to Scripture (not the church) because that is where all the answers we really need are found.

Marcus means, "warlike" in Latin, "hammer" in the Gaelic. A hammer or "to hammer" first appears in Scripture as the root term for the power of the sky to make rain (2nd day creation), which is also highly associated in Scripture with battle and political change. This compares perfectly with the work of the Q team and the Marines etc, and even for their known-to-them ability (with the rest of us here) to "make rain."

>>861570

Aristarchus means, "breakfast of champions." He is not well liked in Jerusalem (church leadership), but he gets along just fine with all these others, and he sees Paul all the way to Rome. In the present context "he" is the bread and info we have all produced on this board. This is the breakfast of champions people need, once the have WOKE.

Demas means "popularity." He comes and goes a bit. He brought these others to televangelists years ago, and then to secular music, then anons, and now to all the assets of leadership that partake of the work of this board. This "popularity" we seek now is primarily ascertained in social media (to control the narrative) as the overall purpose of all these forces together. Social media is now the battle ax of Demas.

Lucas is the doctor of, or the bringer of light. Light reveals truth. He represents the perception of the seven colors of light, or states of being - the "seasons" of natural process and organic creation. All of these "forces" make up certain elements that collectively comprise an interactive, organic system that can stand on its own. He understands the vision of this. And we all know another we all apprise for bringing light (out of chaos) is the internet-loved archetype of Kek.

All this is a thumbnail of how these names relate to fourth age theology. It contrasts with church doctrine arising from popular opinion, traditional values and the carnal "letter of the law" reading of Scripture - all of which can be unfriendly to those that "pursue God" for the greater cause in struggles the people do not even perceive, much less appreciate. So the additional profit to be found (Onesimus) is available only to better-informed leaders who do understand such things but see potential in being friendly to increasing horsemanship with (our ambassador), Onesimus.

The house of Phillip, (meaning, "love of horses") is another of several Scriptural views of this same collective, showing where it came from and characterizing it as powers of speech consisting of four cavalries (of horsemen). This is where we find "horsemen" keeping the (higher) law who know not the law - those who have found their identity and meaning (which happens to be in pursuit of the heart of God) in delivering the people despite what anybody thinks of them. And they all abide in the very world-authority (presently) of the Trump administration. Aristarchus also summarizes this particular take starting on p130 of the Snow White thread doc here: cog49.com/ft.pdf

Making all this known is now where the real profit is. Onesimus is the understanding of all this in hope of finding welcome among old friends of Paul friendly to increasing horsemanship. Should he find acceptance as a partner in such a house, the further bringing of this five-fold ministry (of Timothy) is his continuing mission.

(end)

>>861583

Interesting and detailed insights, I'll need to read multiple times to appreciate the essence…

>>861548

*correction

> (and takes precedence over)

… should be (is over-ruled by).

>>863608

Yesh, I know. Isn't it great.

Ya sure got my attention!

<crickets>

Sure thing Q is right.

This is the fellowship of the TRUTH with the band of Anons. We crave Victorious. ^_^

>>884696

No matter what; the Holy Scriptures are clear who wins in the end. Hence, Q is right,

WE WILL PREVAIL

Love the LORD

Love POTUS

Love Q

Love the Q group

WE WILL PREVAIL

>>907755

Yeah, first class memes.

>>884696

>but the enemy will eventually prevail…

Please don't put this in the future. It is now in the past.

>the great deception which will occur prior to…

Same thing here.

You mention the depth of Scripture, but you have not gone nearly as deep as many anons here.

There is a fourth dimension (time) to Scripture Jesus described as "leaven hidden in 3 loaves." It is for making a fourth "gospel," and pertains to the very present second advent.

That is what this is about.

>>840901

It presents time elements to the relevance of all Scripture in new ways that make a lot of things make much better sense both in history and in politics, and in futurism.

>>908035

Some very good points and hoping and praying you are correct about the great deception being behind us and the forces of darkness and evil are in the process of being defeated beginning the new era that many call the Millennium. As many prophetic scriptures in the Holy Bible are; very difficult to see looking forward and clear as day looking back all done on purpose. I'm all in for the second advent, but are you saying it is here now? Since time is an illusion, perhaps it is here spiritually but is it already here physically in our time and dimension?

>>908311

The writings of Moses and the prophets have 3 valid contexts - the literal, the symbolic and the sacred. The literal is the simple meaning. The symbolic has long under-girded a lot of Christian principle, both in the pulpit and in law. The Constitution, for instance, is said to have been some 27% built of Moses just because of how it incorporated some of the same principles of order.

But the sacred context has historically been completely unknown. It is completely reserved for its own time (presently). There is a good metaphor for how it changes theology on page 8 of that doc above. That doc also goes into a lot of Scriptural time and place details that explain why and how it applies to our time. But sacred context gives us a whole new picture of reality thru theology that is best witnessed in its entirety. While we generally weigh new theological considerations in contrast to others we already hold (which often makes more valuable points seem wrong or sort of bland), sacred context builds a whole new and different picture consisting of elements that all attest to one another, and that add up to a much more powerful overall understanding and perspective of the world.

The 4 "wall of text" posts above show how Paul manifests the sacred context for a specific purpose right out of Philemon.

>>908311

>Since time is an illusion…

This is a great point. As it turns out, the Scriptural meaning of time is in regard to the divine process of creative change (and life development). This is why there are references to time slowing down (sun going backwards or standing still) or speeding up (like sower overtaking reaper).

>… perhaps it is here spiritually but is it already here physically in our time and dimension?

So this would pertain to where we each are in our cooperation (existence) with that process - the processes of creation. Access to the fourth dimension of understanding means we now no longer all live in the same dimension. Because of how time is taught by the Bible, we could say we live in the future if we are ahead of others in how we regard the divine will and its unfolding.

And we are taught to ask for "tomorrow's bread today," to have just such strategic placement and advantage in such processes (of course, King James interpreters did not want us to know this, so they reserved it to the high priesthood, as temple order decreed - where each day's bread was made the previous evening).

This is another song that came out not long after this study first appeared, which many believed was inspired by it >>840901

Ironically, it is about stormy weather in "small spaces" - seemingly a metaphor for it getting around in small circles at first.

A MUST watch.

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9GgUK2ZJLA

>>960285

Somebody picked the WRONG thread to post this in.

Just like all the other Calvary churches, this Jewish preacher is one of the most destructive, LYING DOOMSAYERS in the Christian world today. He has all his bearings wrong for understanding how Scripture speaks to the present world today. He follows and knows only the "letter of the law" that leads to death and knows nothing of the "spiritual law" (and the spiritual interpretation of Scripture) that leads to life.

I would encourage whomever made the mistake of posting this here to either find another board to spread your filth on or to research the general context of political understanding this whole board is about and learn from that. What you will find is the very intent of this preacher - to criminalize Russia, Assad, and the Iranians is entirely in the guise of political exploit the Satanists and Luciferians and Israeli underworld globalists are foisting on the Western world to incur its own demise, and that these are exactly the very criminal elements on the global landscape this whole board was formed to contend with.

>>834316

Darkness cannot consume or diminish light. Light can always diminish dark. Think about it. They cannot win. They were damned from the moment they signed up with their cruel masters.

>>973033

Amen. The ending is no secret. It’s all there for all to read and know. Thank you God the Father.

>>861548

Smart man.

A little advice…

Zoom your' scope out a bit.

This may help you actually see the spiritual at work above all this.

You have strong faith. Use it. Fly.

>>984463

Thank you. That is very kind. And you are very wise to see that.

You might also note the big picture is far out of view for most.

So we make things on Earth as they already exist there

by planting the seeds thereof in the much narrower scopes

of personal existence for others.

Have faith in Q and the Q team and have faith in POTUS.

TRUST Q AND POTUS

Congressional group asks FBI boss Wray to explain Apple lawsuit

How dark can crims really go?

By Richard Chirgwin 16 Apr 2018 at 02:00

21 Reg comments SHARE ▼

Ten members of the US Congress have asked the FBI to explain its battles with Apple, after doubts were raised over the extent to which criminals use encryption to "go dark" and evade law enforcement authorities.

Criminals using encryption to evade law enforcement – "going dark" – is the foundation of the FBI's calls for a special legislative mathematics and not-backdoors that means good guys can access bad guys' messages, without compromising everyone else.

But a recent Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General report cast doubt on just how often crims "go dark". The report, by the Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG), included statements that “appear to indicate that the FBI was more interested in forcing Apple to comply than getting into the device”.

Now 10 members of Congress have written (PDF) to FBI director Christopher Wray asking for answers.

Shrug

You won't believe this, but… nothing useful found on Farook iPhone.

In their letter posted Friday, April 13, the group said they are "troubled" by the report, which was penned in the wake of the November 2015 attack by San Bernadino shooter Syed Farook. During its investigation into the incident, the FBI conducted a very public battle with Cupertino over access to Farook's encrypted iPhone. The FBI took Apple to court demanding a special iOS build to crack the iPhone 5c, something Apple defended on the basis that it would set a bad legal precedent.

In March 2016, the Feds said they'd cracked the phone and withdrew the lawsuit, and later, then-FBI director James Comey said a third party banked more than a million dollars to crack the phone (which in the end didn't really help the case).

The OIG report suggested the FBI's Remote Operations Unit (ROU) might have access to a third-party vendor's crack for the iPhone, but investigators in the San Bernardino case didn't ask, and the ten Congressman would like to know why.

They're also concerned at hints that there's a degree of turf-warring within the FBI, between the ROU and the Cryptographic and Electronic Analysis Unit (CEAU), which was frustrated that the ROU's vendor contact jinxed its lawsuit: “The CEAU Chief told the OIG that … he became frustrated that the case against Apple could no longer go forward, and he vented his frustration to the ROU Chief.”

The letter says the timeline detailed in the OIG report “undermines statements that the FBI made … that only the device manufacturer could provide a solution”, and raises the possibility that “the FBI has not been forthcoming about the extent of the 'Going Dark' problem”.

They also highlight that rather than the more-than-a-million Comey discussed in 2016, Cellbrite claims it can unlock an iPhone for about US$1,500.

The group add that the FBI's claim that it was unable to crack 7,800 devices last year seems “highly questionable”, now the existence of third-party unlocking tools is common knowledge.

The letter asks the following questions of Wray:

Have you consulted with relevant third-party vendors to understand what tools are available to help the FBI access device content?

Do you agree that there are solutions available to help unlock or decrypt nearly every device on the market? If not, why are these solutions, particularly [Cellbrite and GrayShift], insufficient?

Why can't the FBI unlock the 7,800 devices? Have you attempted to use tools developed by third-parties to unlock these devices?

Of these locked phones, how many are equipped with biometrics or how many have data available through a cloud service, which would provide additional means to access data or unlock phones?

For each device that you have not used a third-party tool to unlock, what is the rationale for not doing so?

The signatories to the letter are Democrats Zoe Lofgren, Jerrold Nadler, Ted Leiu, Jared Polis and Suzan DelBene; and Republicans Darrell Issa, Jim Sensenbrenner, Ted Poe, Matt Gaetz, and Jim Jordan. ®

>>842734

>there are so many opinions

That number narrows as people (of our time) increasingly perceive the real events to which all that metaphoric vision points.

Really nice video from abeldanger.org

These people are SICK…

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvWZ3NlvGzM

>>884696

You forget the law of first mention in the Bible. Very important, God kicked lucifer that use to be a musical angel that thought he could ascend higher then the All Mighty. He and fallen angels were banned to earth which they are running with deceptions excepts us & hopefully more later. Remember Evil Pople had Enoch removed as it first mentions all the fallen & the arts taught, area which I have got to Antarctica somewhere. 7 mts 3 face 1 way 3 another, sun shines constantly & dry. Parts of Antarctica get less than 1/4 rain a year. Frozen desert." Blue Light Probably" close by as well as FitBit Location. (My Thought) ENOCH Fallen Angels & Technology each teach. Rapture, Enoch was a friend of God lived 365 days & walked to Heaven with God. Great Prophet that Saw END TIMES!

Another eye-opener

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmNzEpbkftU