/qresearch/ - Q Research Board★

BO please ban namefagging.

Tripcode should only be used to identify Q.

>>708024

>Please ban namefagging.

BV here and I think we'd be happy to if given instruction by Q. They have to understand that if we 'force anonymous' that they will NOT be able to see the 'Q' in their post and ONLY their tripcode.

Mar 18 2018 02:17:42 (EDT) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 5f0f27 705264 NEW

Why are trips allowed?

Whitelist.

Q

I thought this meant that Hillary was whitelisted to take a specific trip to India -- rather than a reference to tripcodes here.

>>708061

It sure could be.

I don't see what's wrong with opening communications for further clarification.

Nothing changes until the go ahead is received.

Well done laying out the options and how each would play out.

Q team has responded in past when presented with options, such as creating own board.

Agree that banning it a tough one, as many use VPN services are get caught in the cross-fire, happened to me this week, had to change IP's after a reboot because that one was banned due to some fucktard.

There are really two key modes for the board - LIVE and ARCHIVE.

Deleting posts by an ID primarily cleans up the archive, impacting future researchers. Better than banning. Banning without deleting accomplishes little. Deleting is quite extreme, had it happen to me once when caught in a cross-fire, and it was incredibly disheartening, so it's a risky approach, morale-wise. Also gets at censorship, the lack of which is a very significant positive for this board.

The shill and shitposts serve to harden newfags, and also provide chaff for those coming that can't read between the lines and see real from fake, anon from shill.

Increased use of the Spoiler should be encouraged. Avoids censorship, and puts onus on the anon to see or not to see (in the end, the choice will be yours anons!)

>>708055

Given the following, how is it that you feel you haven't been given instructions by Q? It seems pretty obvious in his/her/their post.

Mar 18 2018 02:17:42

Q !UW.yye1fxo

Why are trips allowed?

Whitelist.

Q

>>708175

Currently the only way to comply is to make it so they cannot input 'Q'. It seems obvious from their post that they are asking for a whitelist, which we already have and is enabled.

>>708220

It seems that he/she/they are asking for "Q" posts to be uniquely identified, so that there's no confusion. Yes, it's true (in a way) that that's the case now but only if you understand the rather subtle difference between a non-bold and bolded tripcode, which isn't really the case for new folks.

I think there's important stuff coming and Q feels like the current situation isn't tenable. If the "best" way to solve the issue is to force anonymous on all (based on the "Works well" comment above), perhaps that's the way to go.

I don't personally dispute the notion regarding "herd immunity" but Q would not have posted about the trips and whitelist if it wasn't an issue.

My thoughts anyway, hopefully helpful.

Thanks for dealing with a thankless job!

We need to stop being so focused on ourselves in here….why were so many Anons and Patriots confused over Hillary's trip to India with Huma?? I know I was….I would just like to know what whitelist means…if this board is already controlled, Q isn't talking about this chat, he's giving us a reason for the trips made by people who are supposed to be sporting ankle bracelets and have their passports revoked. But I digress!!

>>705578

Is pretty important to this thread.

https:// media.8ch.net/file_store/6828c6503f286f2eacf1eaff9226cd0a8c7601f9fab5a46faa5446bce7f2acc2.png

I don't know if there's a way to auto change the tripcode to something else in the name field, but I am sure that all anons would appreciate it if the tripcode was automatically changed to something else unless Q was posting.

https:// www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm

Intellectual property

>>708342

I do agree. Especially in context. Q didn't even respond to these types of allegations, or even respond to Fake Q, which would have been the logical thing to do as Fake Q was posting in that thread and had been posting. It was just a drop out of the blue.

>>708397

>>708342

If this is ignored then it's clear you are all right. As someone who can potentially do something about the situation I can't just ignore the possibility. We've recently changed how we mod and if we're being asked to shorten the leash in some manner we are happy to comply. As I said in OP FakeQ is allowed to run around to build herd immunity, same with FE.

Like previous noted by BO we are compliant with the current known spec. I don't see the Hillary Clinton et al trips as a big deal because there's no way they can't track her.

>>708436

but a "larp" isn't fake and gay?

"The shill and shitposts serve to harden newfags, and also provide chaff for those coming that can't read between the lines and see real from fake, anon from shill. "

I disagree. The huge number of shill/bot posts and memes has made it hard to read/learn/research for those of us who have been here from the beginning, but have limited free time to sift through the garbage filling the board. I find I am spending less and less time researching topics that interest me because the boards are filled so quickly and I am wasting time scrolling past junk.

I am sure I am not the only one feeling this way, and am aware this is part of their strategy. The number of quality posts has dropped to 25% IMO.

Again, my opinion, but we don't need shills to build immunity to fake news. POTUS has honed that skill in us.

I've seen a few posts about people leaving the board.

Q can correct me if I am wrong, but this board was for research/learning/redpilling/assisting the agenda using a hive-mind, not for battling shills. Censoring is a fine line, but one that needs consideration if this board is to remain viable.

>>708484

I completely agree with you as I'm feeling the same way.

>>708484

I don't understand why you are all so against making new threads for your research. Research threads ARE being stickied. We also have a meta thread where you can voice your concerns. We also have a report button is someone is derailing your research thread. Please for the love country make your own series of threads, trying to cram every single thing into General is foolish and no amount of moderation will help at some point. Q said in the coming months this board would be very very popular, the problem of a fast moving General isn't going away but thankfully it's just one thread and you can make your own.

>>708507

But there are other options, I agree with you but what I think means fuckall.

So I'll play devil's advocate here a little.

What happens if SHTF this coming week and we get a lot of Q posts, and in the middle of that we get a bunch of (fake) Q posts? In the heat of battle it could get very confusing, especially for those phonefagging (hard to see the non-bold tripcodes) and newfags.

This is not a hard-core argument, just thoughts.

>>708436

^^^^^^^^^^^

Sez the fake and gay larp

>Why are trips allowed?

I can see only three possibilities for this question:

<1. Hillary is "allowing" herself to trip to set up some kind of disability defense.

I doubt this option, because her recent trip looked real. I think she is falling. If she wanted

to set up a defense, she'd to the "brain affected" method being used by NoName and Pelosi.

<2. Trip meaning "trip codes."

This would be to say that Q has trip codes to prove he is not FakeQ, but that's in the bread

already. Q was a newfag when joining, but Q is not stupid, so has learned our ways. I'm certain

Q knows the warning is in the bread, so no need to point this out.

<3. Trip means "travel."

This could have several reasons, and I think it is the best candidate for Q's meaning.

<A. Q and team are allowing travel (trips) so they can watch the cabal, see where they go,

see whom they meet, maybe hear what they say. Good chance for intelligence gathering.

<B. The black hats are whitelisted as a lingering effect of RT's Dept of State.

He was more of a blackhat than has been suspected heretofore, and white listed them to

allow them to travel. I give this option low confidence, too.

<C. The whitelist allows travel to specific "safe" countries.

The Dept of State has listed only countries that we have weakened the power of the cabal.

This allows them to travel, with the assurance they cannot escape to a non-extradition country.

<D. They are allowed to travel, because one of the destinations is going to arrest them for foreign crimes.

I like this option a lot, but it would be too difficult to coordinate. Let's say Singapore arrests

Hussein on his next visit. Do you think HRC would ever go there after that? Of course not.

Good hopeful plan, but not reasonable to implement.

My guess: Either RT set this up, or Q-Team allows restricted travel to not tip their hand and

to gather intelligence. I really don't know the answer to any of this and I see no way to dig

for an answer, so all we have is brainstorming and speculation. This is my contribution to brainstorming.

I see on the general boards that there are suggestions to make Q's tripcode a unique color (not green). Is that reasonable to implement?

>>708555

Not against it at all, and do look at the other boards. However, when Q posts, the best place to see the hive-mind at work to decode is the main board…at least that is the way I work.

>>708673

Stupid. Learn to spot and ignore shills. If you can't learn, don't post.

>>708484

Good points.

Is there a way to make fake q posts to show up as #D3D3D3 so they can't be seen unless you hightlight them? Just my 2 cents.

>>708653

Best analysis on this post. Thanks Anon

…or option C.

send black ops to F kues house and scare the living shit out of him.

>>708701

Usually in a discussion intended to move in a positive direction one does not start one's response with the word "stupid", especially when directed at others working toward a positive outcome.

Your assumptions are asinine at best but thanks for the repartee.

>>708698

There is nothing I can do about the speed of General, physically and literally nothing.

This is why we put such emphasis on Filter+ and are pushing Research threads.

This is also why having the notable posts is important.

>>708653

As long as 2 is a possibility I have to look into it. If this thread is ignored we'll know I worried for nothing. Appreciate the input 100%.

>>708701

Adult Principle #1: Be patient. No matter what.

Adult Principle #2: Don’t badmouth: Assign responsibility, not blame. Say nothing of another you wouldn’t say to him.

Adult Principle #3: Never assume the motives of others are, to them, less noble than yours are to you.

Adult Principle #4: Expand your sense of the possible.

Adult Principle #5: Don’t trouble yourself with matters you truly cannot change.

Adult Principle #6: Don’t ask more of others than you can deliver yourself.

Adult Principle #7: Tolerate ambiguity.

Adult Principle #8: Laugh at yourself frequently.

Adult Principle #9: Concern yourself with what is right rather than who is right.

Adult Principle #10: Try not to forget that, no matter how certain, you might be wrong.

Adult principle #11: Give up blood sports.

Adult principle #12: Remember that your life belongs to others as well. Do not endanger it frivolously. And never endanger the life of another.

Adult principle #13: Never lie to anyone for any reason.

Adult principle #14: Learn the needs of those around you and respect them.

Adult principle #15: Avoid the pursuit of happiness. Seek to define your mission and pursue that.

Adult principle #16: Reduce your use of the first personal pronoun.

Adult principle #17: Praise at least as often as you disparage.

Adult principle #18: Never let your errors pass without admission.

Adult principle #19: Become less suspicious of joy.

Adult principle #20: Understand humility.

Adult principle #21: Forgive.

Adult principle #22: Foster dignity.

Adult principle #23: Live memorably.

Adult principle #24: Love yourself.

Adult principle #25: Endure.

Personally, I find "Fake Q" useful because

1. Sometimes you can gauge when we are over target by the content of his posts.

2.I use him as 'fly paper' - he draws in all those who don't have anything to offer the board (we all know not to engage) & also other shills. I gather them all together then do a bulk filter. Only takes a couple of minutes and you have a nice clean thread.

>>708436

Your mom is a larp, foggot…

>>708061

This. I'm almost certain this post was Q's way of silencing some doubt that has been on the board. "Where are the arrests?" "Q is a larp" "See Hillary isn't on watch/indicted" these kind of posts. McCabes firing was the "March Madness" Q talked about and I'd like to think we are about to see a lot more shakeup in this country meaning job terminations and arrests. Those that are "whitelisted" aren't top priority maybe?

>>708779

I did not say to ignore point 2. I said I personally give it low confidence. What would be your reason

that Q posted about trip codes?

>>708935

There is also a bold + underlined fake one as well.

>>708055

Thank you BV for not changing anything until Q specifically says to.

>>708061

It does. Whitelisting has nothing to do with trip codes. If Q was talking about trip codes, he would have said trip codes.

>>708175

Seems pretty obvious Q was not talking about trip codes.

>>708312

>I think there's important stuff coming and Q feels like the current situation isn't tenable.

Pardon me, but how do you know anything about what Q feels??? Stop projecting your feelz onto Q. He was not talking about trip codes!!! Whitelist have nothing to do with trip codes.

>>708947

>>708984

https:// qanonposts.com/?q=trip

trip more often refers to tripcode than trip(vacation)

whitelist for trips was implemented for Q

There IS a whitelist for tripcodes.

>>708987

However, BO was the first to use the word "trip" as shorthand for "trip code." From this, it is merely

Q staying with established protocol to continue said usage. I still lean toward "travel."

>>707967 (OP)

Are you saying Q doesn't know how to spot fake Q?

>>709002

It's not up to me to decide, only to show that I am listening and willing to comply. I can handle being wrong.

>>707967 (OP)

At CBTS, there was forced anonymous. You could not enter a name unless you were white listed. Why can that not be instituted on this board as well?

Seems to clear up many issues and much confusion.

>>708984

Lurk moar.

>>708342

This anon gets it. Whitelist means, because of her stature, she is allowed to globe trot. She has not been black listed yet.

>>708445

It's not about "tracking" HRC. It's about equal justice under the law.

>>708484

The only thing you need to do research is Q's drops. They are always at the top of each and every bread. The quality of posts dropped some time ago and they are continuing to drop. That has nothing to do with shitposting. Banning anyone will cause even more to leave, myself included.

Not likely Q will address this. It's not an issue for him. He has a dedicated board to post on and it's been working as it should.

It's not a question of whether we NEED shills. It's about censorship. Banning is a slippery slope. Who becomes the judge on what should be allowed or not? You? Me? What makes any anon better than another?

>>708589

>>708709

Here's a tip for those who are really bothered by fake Q. Filter him in the following way. Upper right hand corner, click on Options. Then click on filter on the left side at the bottom. Enter the fake Q's name (which is real Q's trip code.) Enter that in the NAME only line. That will forever block you from seeing the fake Q. The real Q uses a trip code, not a name. Filter is your friend.

>>708987

Please show me where Q authorize a whitelist for trip codes. It doesn't exist. I'll give you that trip is more often used for trip codes, but given the debate last night about HRC traveling, I believe that is what Q was referring to. If Q had an issue with fake Q, he would have addressed it with BO or CM.

>>707118

replied to:

>>706327

This would be an easy fix it seems?

>>709144

you're an idiot

>>709121

When this board was set up, Q gave instructions on what he wanted done. If he wanted it changed, he would contact CM.

Anons need to learn how to use their own filters to block those that really bother them.

>>709183

>Pretending not to know CM implemented whitelists and told cbts about it.

>>709202

>contact CM

CM only steps in when absolutely necessary. We are encouraged to solve our own problems. There was no way to whitelist only some tripcodes it was either have them or ban them outright. This feature was added to rectify that oversight. In regards to the 'Fake Q', we have options, those options have repercussions, we are waiting for verification or null verification. If Q posts again and this is not addressed then BV was wrong and life goes on. All this concern trolling about asking for verification is very very lol.

Board Owner

Board Volunteer

Codemonkey

All have red text when they post.

Why can't Q?

Would be a simple change IMHO but I don't know much about 8ch.

>>708653

I lean towards 3. This from Wiki..

Whitelisting is the practice of identifying entities that are provided a particular privilege, service, mobility, access or recognition. Entities on the list will be accepted, approved and/or recognized. Whitelisting is the reverse of blacklisting, the practice of identifying entities that are denied, unrecognised, or ostracized.

However, I do see where the other examples are pertinent but right now I am leaning towards the actual travel or taking a trip,, as the "trips" meaning.

Reposted from General #878

>>709171, >>709192, >>709269

rt >>709114

Because it doesn't matter, if the whitelisted trips are still secured.

As a matter of fact I'm seeing a ploy where:

1) fake q's invade the board

2) general shit stirring commences, BO/BV refuses to ban/delete (mostly because of the last ploy against BO/BV)

3) some flashpoint issue is manufactured to try to get the BO to change stuff again, I think to see if Q will bail again (in this case, concern around Q mentioning trips and whitelists)

I would not change a damn thing unless specifically requested to do so by a tripcoded Q (note the non-use of the word 'trip')

This is another ruse cooked up by clowns.

>>709492

If they are using their whitelist privileges, makes keeping an eye on them more efficient. Really though, where can anyone run nowadays?

Code monkeys java script screening add on does a great job! It shows Q's trip code with a yellow background, it tells you how many true Q posts are in each bread. If code monkey would add this to the base code it would solve the problem.

Also the source link for code monkeys java script add on should be in every bread till a permanent solution is found.

All you have to do is copy and paste the script.

Adrian Lamo, the notorious computer hacker who turned in Chelsea Manning to the FBI and was arrested for hacking into The New York Times and Microsoft, has died in Kansas at age 37.

Sedgwick County spokeswoman Kate Flavin said Friday that Lamo’s body was at the morgue in Wichita. The Wichita Eagle reported Lamo was found dead in his apartment Wednesday.

Charley Davidson, a Wichita police officer told the media outlet there was “nothing suspicious about his death.” It was not immediately clear how Lamo died.

Another Kansas reference???

http:// foxnews.com/us/2018/03/17/adrian-lamo-hacker-who-turned-in-chelsea-manning-to-fbi-found-dead.html

>>709183

You misunderstand the bans then.

What happens if you keep talking about only anime on a DIY board? Offtopic & bannable.

And spooky on /VG/? Offtopic & bannable.

My question is, how are we so unlike EVERY. OTHER. BOARD. OUT. THERE?

Our subject matters may be rather wide but to lower the moderation to nothing is disrespectful to everyone here who's trying to get work done ON OUR OWN WORKBOARD.

>>710787

This isn't /b/ either, where everything and anything goes, we have the luxury of having an outside measuring stick to gauge how on topic a post is or not - the Q crumbs themselves.

Which means it isn't entirely the judgement of an individual anon, they're simply the one to hold that stick up to your post history.

>>710787

>My question is, how are we so unlike EVERY. OTHER. BOARD. OUT. THERE?

Specifically that we are a watering hole for many different communities and I'm not in a position to be the arbiter of truth especially in a General which is supposed to be a catch all and not everybody's sole source of research real-estate.

This thread is being unstickied because a decision about the fate of Fake Q has been decided, more details at some point.

>>708653

>I really don't know the answer to any of this and I see no way to dig for an answer,

>so all we have is brainstorming and speculation.

Agreed. I believe you've presented all reasonable interpretations here.

>>708779

>As long as 2 is a possibility I have to look into it. If this thread is ignored we'll know I worried for nothing.

Also agreed, best course of action for management. Carry on, Anons!

>>708653

Just to throw another log on the fire:

I, too, read the Q post are 'trips = travel' (- although my mind went to Tillerson's trip to Africa.)

Below is a description of "Application Whitelists" which, in my mind, I could apply to Hillary. She is a known puppet whose strings were cut. May as well let her 'carry on' because you know who interacts with her and Q team can continue to listen (we hear you). This is allowed rather than slap her with a sealed indictment NOW and risk introduction of NEW 'malware' which needs to be searched out and made inert.

APPLICATION WHITELIST:

"An emerging approach in combating viruses and malware is to whitelist software which is considered safe to run, blocking all others. …Some deem this superior to the standard signature-based, anti-virus approach of blocking/removing known harmful software (essentially blacklisting), as the standard approach generally means that exploits are already in the wild….These products may provide administrative control over program whitelists in addition to preventing introduction of new malware. (wiki-ped-ia)