>>666781
Lucis Trust – a complex problem!
The three "B"s:
Alice Bailey
Annie Besant
Helena Blavatsky
Theosophy:
Founded by Blavatsky and Charles Ledbetter, late 19th c.
Blavatsky + Ledbetter once held a seance/meditation (not wure which) together in which they tried to imagine the shape of a proton. From notes and drawings of the time, they were apparently successful quite a long time before it was "discovered" by particle theorists.
Lucis today is the philosophical/spiritual/educational core of thinking in the United Nations. In fact, they have a couple of floors to themselves (or used to have them) in the UN building in NY.
Prior to the UN, the thinking of Blavatsky and Besant formed the core of spiritual thinking in the Nazi inner circle. Considerable money was spent by the inner circle in global searches for artifacts, intelligence (info), and "entities" (such as the famous Tibetan Master who appeared in person to the three Bs, wherever in the world these three people were–a semi-mythical creature it would seem.
Baily was a truly productive writer who produced many books on many different subjects with many different memorable themes.
Example: Money is a Spiritual Substance. A small part of another writing.
Example: The Problem of the Jews. This is a very thorny and problematic exposition all on its own, and naturally a little difficult to obtain except from a shop specializing in spiritual/esoteric writings.
As for the theory:
First, Theosophy:
The world of humans has a fixed number of souls. These souls came to earth all at once, although they were allocated bodies only gradually. Souls without bodies are cared for between bodies.
Humans are born into many different circumstances and many different "races". Now, the claim can be made, and was made by Bailey, that "races" is a spiritual term and not particularly a physical designation, although there are relationships between the spiritual and the physical/biological. Of course, Aryan and Jewish are two races, but there are a few others.
The Problem of the Jews refers to the problem –for the enlightened beings on earth– is that the vast numbers of unenlightened, spiritually ignorant people represent a powerful physical force. They can rise up and annihilate the enlightened, causing all humans to start over at the bottom again.
The point: All humans strive to perfect enlightenment–mastery of spirit, becoming Masters. The goal is all of humanity will some day "ascend" to perfect knowledge and wisdom –mastery– but no person can ascend completely unless ALL people ascend together.
Now an ugly, TOO literal reading that was understood all too well by the inner circle of the Nazi leadership: The Aryans (referring not to blue eyes and blonde hair but to the race that conquered the Indus valley some 4k to 8k years ago) are the most enlightened; their task is to bring the other souls up with them; they other souls are currently "locked into" racially inferior bodies (races); it is not only "not bad" but it is actually "helpful and kind" to liberate these souls from those inferior shells so they can one day be reborn as Aryans themselves. Indeed, such was the thinking among the leaders "in the early 20th c."
Theosophy was once a powerful and dynamic organization, around the time their spiritual leader was Krishnamurti, who at a moment of enlightenment of his own more or less turned against the Theosophy model and went on his own to teach.
Subsequently, theosophy as a popular spirituality or teaching has waned to almost nothing. Except among the leaders in the UN of course. (!!?) What are they up to there, and how have they gotten themselves into such a core position in global thinking, with, relatively speaking, almost no followers at all among rank and file?
Who are they?
What have they to do with Global Initiatives?
We know they favor "One World Religion".
We know they favor a hierarchy of enlightenment and understanding, and want humanity to be ruled by those who are more ascended in this hierarchy.
We do not know at this time who, if any, Lucis/Theosophy leaders are "ascended masters" who are worthy of dictating the course of human action of all kinds.
What are they doing positioned where they are in global political and economic thinking ?!