/qresearch/ - Q Research Board★

The next couple of days I'll be away. Until Sunday.

Hopefully, if nothing weird happens, which now with the stable trip and the two stable boards (/qresearch/ and /theawakening/) is quite realistic, everything will work just fine.

I have a bot updating the site with new posts (server side) and a dynamic fetcher on the site itself (but which will not find archived posts, and does not store posts).

If, somehow, everything does get messed up, qmapanon can take over and can maintain his alternative version at qmapanon.github.io.

What would really help is a dedicated anonymous server where I can run my fetch-bots to scrape the boards for new q-posts and images and store them (back them up).

Also, I could use that server even to create features that require a server. Think of features for collaborative work (normy-friendly articles, answers, summaries, news, tweets, mind-maps etc.)

For anonymous servers, I need Bitcoins worthy of around $100 to hire one for a couple of months. That's why I'm shilling for shekels with the Santa Claus button. Hope you don't mind.

Appreciate your work mate love the news section also, where are you aggregating links from for the news? I'm using your site alot to correlate Q posts with potus tweets for clock research so it's been a huge help.

suggestion, show trump tweets side by side chronological, so we scan for anomalies fast

really appreciate the work, saving a lot of anontime

>>6264

If I did crypto I'd take care of it for you.

bump

Any way to enable iPad users(this site shows up blank) to see contents?

Sorry newfag/techretardfag here

>>6176 (OP)

Hello qcodefag, I was talking with spreadsheet anon anon, and he said that he had trouble with some jackass threatening to delete whole rows. I offered to help come up with a solution as I've been working as a software engineer for about 2 years full time. We thought it might be a good idea to have an app like yours, except with carefully selected admins which approve information, or a vote system to determine the validity of certain research. I think the admin route is best as we know they can spam a public vote with bots and shills. Effectively, this would be like an information source control app, and instead of submitting code they submit research for review and approval. Wanted to hear your thoughts on this. Also would you consider implementing this as an update to your current app? Frankly, it'd be easier to build on the great work you've already done. If you're interested in something like this I'd happily work on it with you as well. Thanks.

Put a "last updated" date/time or a version number somewhere in the 1st couple rows. Can use this info to decide whether or not to download and refresh my local copy.

Just want to thank you for creating this tool.

Just now I became aware that Q had posted a reply on /qresearch, and I wouldn't be able to find it without your help.

>>6895

Time diff for markers here:

https:// pastebin.com/UfNbiyMK