[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / ausneets / cafechan / g / ideas / leftpol / lovelive / zenpol ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Pro Aris et Focis

File: e70079122b8039a⋯.png (641.49 KB, 741x624, 19:16, Capture.PNG)

e5ff1c No.554377

So same day Nunes memo dropped, 2nd Feb, DOJ released an update to the nuclear posture. I'll link below to way back machine.

It's been a month since I've read it… and honestly I need to re-read it, but in a nut shell it states America's weapons have not been maintained, while countries like Russia, North Korea, Iran and China all have fancy new weapons. Again need to reread, but there's stuff like threats from space and weapons that use new principles in physics.It also mentions that America is now willing to use nuclear response for non nuclear threats, and outlays plans to bring US up to speed with it's competition. It could be read, and spun, as a very aggressive action in some sense… and may alarm the public if reported in a certain way…. Personal opinion? It's a direct message to any of America's enemies, real or potential. America's back.

It didn't seem to fit… but it stuck in the back of my mind as something odd, Then on Thursday, when Putin made his State of Nation speech it all made sense. After he unveiled his new weapons, he made a direct comment about the updated nuclear posture. This of course, was translated to me via RT on a Facebook stream… but it's the best I had. Anyway, Putin says despite the US update, he is sticking to only answering nukes for nukes… which all sounds reassuring except for the fact, not all new weaponry are nukes. Now, I'm not saying or suggesting America and Russia are on the brink of war. But there is defiantly some showboating going on from both sides. Honestly, dunno about Putin yet… I say 200% watch the guy, but he would also make a great ally. Digressing. Sorry.

This is the news that's not really being reported… Genuine news between on the current America and Russia relationship, going on right now. Why is it not being reported? It doesn't fit the current narrative CNN has scripted. Why would Trump and Putin be showboating in such a way if their allies? More importantly, why wasn't any of this reported in the news? They showed the weapons, and the dodgy graphic of them hitting Hawaii. We've all seen the scary part… but we've not been shown all the bit's in between.

It's been a great red pill on Twitter.

https:// web.archive.org/web/20180202200026/https:// media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF

My gut tells me we're close… but they'll go down fighting.

712b91 No.554803

Let me try and explain myself better…

This document is a thorn in DS's butt. At the moment, it can't be spun Anti-Trump without hurting the narrative that Trump is colluding with Russia. Russia in turn, has publicly said it acknowledges the Posture Review during Putin's State of Nation. Dangerous talks of potential NUCLEAR war… Being ignored by MSM?

Right now with all of the Nunes memo stuff going on, DS can't have people thinking Trump is on the brink of potential war with Russia. That would destroy their narrative of collusion. This cover story is a backbone right now, if it crumbles, so does all the other recent conspiracies. It must be protected at all costs. So the Nuclear Posture review is simply ignored. No one knows about it. Despite…Let's just say there is language in here that you would think would get reported on.

If the media was truly free and honest.

Then Thursday… Putin Acknowledges Nuclear Posture in his State of Nation… Again no report. But they do mention all the scary parts. The image of the simulation hitting America and reports of weapons.., with no mention to the Nuclear Posture. More silence

More #fakenews

We need to flood Twitter with this. Control the narrative. Ask them to explain themselves.

We have more then we know.


259310 No.555933

File: 81b5d027ea2fb0b⋯.png (477.49 KB, 1039x1327, 1039:1327, Kazan Cathedral in St. Pet….png)

>>554377

>>554803

What you see is all for show, distraction, keeping up appearances.

Look at this video https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIHmYAwLo7A

Especially the opening Question to Putin and his responses at 4:40, 6:14, 6:45, 7:26 and his later use of 2 examples one being the head of human rights and the other the children's commissioner.

About the video:

On January 29, 2018, the U.S. Treasury Department released an unclassified list of “influential Russians” linked to the Kremlin. Dubbed the “Kremlin list,” the document was a legal requirement of a widened sanctions bill passed by Congress last year. At the Forum of the Presidential Candidate for 2018 (the upcoming elections will take place on 18 March, 2018) it was noted that the list appeared to have been put together haphazardly, using public resources including a list of Russian billionaires published by Forbes. Under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017, a law billed as a U.S. response to Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the Treasury was asked to draw up a list of “oligarchs and parastatal entities” within 180 days. Russian deputy Konstantin Kosachev accused the Treasury of simply “rewriting the Kremlin phone book.” And certainly, some inclusions in the list are surprising: Anna Kuznetsova, the children's Comissioner, as well as Mikhail Fedotov, head of the Kremlin human rights council. President Putin went on to explain that the list is entirely non-sensical and its only purpose is to perpetuate the “Russian collusion” allegations, part of the internal political struggle of the ‘deep state’ in the US. Since the recording, US President Donald Trump has stated he refuses to enact new sanctions against Russia, essentially going against the will of Congress.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / ausneets / cafechan / g / ideas / leftpol / lovelive / zenpol ]