[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / fairy / hydrus / len / mai / plyn / soyboys / turul / zenpol ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Pro Aris et Focis

File: d2e4243da81941b⋯.jpg (38.38 KB, 400x270, 40:27, Paul's study 1.jpg)

File: 349f03ed286600c⋯.jpg (33.67 KB, 304x400, 19:25, Paul's study 2.jpg)

File: 609e19ddf98947c⋯.jpg (30.9 KB, 317x400, 317:400, Paul's study 3.jpg)

df016d No.520557

THE STORY OF SANDY HOOK AND THE AGE OF THE MOTHERS.

Sources:

https:// jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2017/09/sandy-hook-scam-why-mothers-ages-matter_1.html

http:// themillenniumreport.com/2017/09/sandy-hook-scam-why-the-mothers-ages-matter/

The average age of the 20 women who purport to be parents of the purported child victims at Sandy Hook was 36 years of age at giving birth, which is 10 years older than the average of 26 across the nation. He calculated the improbability of that occurring by chance at 109.4 quadrillion to one! In other words, their children ought to be about 10 years older.

In order to present the most accurate and scientific studies of Sandy Hook, we are responsive to communications from other students of this elaborate scam, including some who have arrived at different results in calculating the improbability of the mothers’ ages. Paul Majchrowicz, for example, arrived at a different estimate–which is documented below–that it is 812,043,102 more likely that the children were born in 1996 than in 2006, as the official account maintains.

That, of course, remains a very substantial improbability and strongly supports the inference that something is wrong. Why does it matter? Because from the beginning, the photos of the children looked as though they were wearing clothing that was about 10 years out of date. And we had other grounds for suspecting that the children were fictional characters created out of photographs of other children when they were younger.

This has to be one of the most powerful proofs yet that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Lenny had already been outed by having sent Kelley Watt a “death certificate” for Noah Pozner that turned out to be a fabrication. If Noah had died at Sandy Hook, Lenny would not have had to fake it. This is another example of the power of collaborative research using the internet–and further proof that Sandy Hook was an elaborate charade. And you can stop scratching your head over why the mothers’ ages matter.

So we now see how the pieces of the puzzle fit together. The women are too old to be the parents of six and seven year old first graders. During interviews, some of which have become rather infamous, they don’t react as though they had actually recently lost children because they hadn’t. Which also explains why the parents were not allowed to see their dead kids but identified them on the basis of photographs. There were no dead kids to see. They only existed in photographs. It was a scam.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / fairy / hydrus / len / mai / plyn / soyboys / turul / zenpol ]