>>2689438 (OP)

>is blindly trusting the plan doing us any good?

I hope and pray every day that there is a Plan, but blind trust doesn't do us any good. I've said before that we desperately need a Tenth Man team (see "World War Z"), without which we are in danger of plunging into disaster.

>are we gonna keep attacking people on the board who question ANYTHING?

That does seem to be the way of it now. All questions, no matter how honest and relevant, are either shouted down or dismissed as shilling or concernfagging, and all criticism is interpreted as "we must be over the target!"

>>2690567

My support for Trump remains unwavered to this point. I understand and have seen each proof there is, i’ve been here since the beginning. Which also means i’ve seen every deadline and “big news” alert missed. I’m not downplaying the scale of what the president is up against but as for Q, i’m no longer sure. Most recently July being the month we discover the truth about JA and nothing. There hasn’t even been a dent made in the FISA case which we’ve had figured out since February. I’m glad someone here is picking up on this and not shouting me down as a troll.

>>2691724

>I’m glad someone here is picking up on this and not shouting me down as a troll.

I'll write more in a while, gotta have dinner now, but I think there is no problem about questioning the tease about Julian; it's simply too easy to sweep everything under the rug as "disinformation is necessary".

My personal grievance that bothers me most, though I have MANY questions, is the matter of General Flynn. When an anon wrote "Free Flynn", Q gave a personal reply of "Done in 30", and that decent and honorable patriot is still dangling.