[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8cup / acme / arepa / bcb / cutebois / general / qanon / tacos ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


First time on QResearch? 8chan? Click here, newfag.


File: ca75cde9a1a5928⋯.png (284.39 KB, 655x425, 131:85, ClipboardImage.png)

3236cd No.2343684

POTUS caller out the makers of the Trident II, Lockheed at the Made In America Speech not long ago. He points them out after talking about the F35 being parked on the South Lawn and then calls out Lockheed saying "you can't see it"… Was that notable?

649bbb No.2344988

Just gonna put this here, too, because too many people are misunderstanding what was going on, I believe.

Missile not aimed at POTUS.

AF1 diverted as SOP.

False Flag Nukes on CITIES.

SUM OF ALL FEARS.

RED OCTOBER.

This IS NOT A GAME.

Anons need to realize Q wasn't telling us the missiles were headed for AF1.

These people ARE SICK.


b59461 No.2345295

basically the totality of my digs

they were likely going to target the flightpath of AF1 from a rogue C_A (now cabal) Ohio Class sub

POTUS was alerted, so they re-routed the flight to go to crete instead of over the pacific

using a Trident D5 ICMB, they were either going to use it armed and airburst detonate the ordinance, or use a test/dummy missile and attempt to hit the plane along its pre-determined flight path

a F16 using a NCADE anti ballistic missile system (or a moar advanced version) shot the missile down

after realizing AF1 was re-routed, they could have also targeted major cities in a VARY WIDE RANGE (~7500 miles)

in this sauce: https://www.exopolitics.org/the-secret-navy-behind-the-ballistic-missile-attack-on-hawaii/ there is C_A docs that show they have multiple ohio class subs

they also talk about how after the hawaii FF, the sub that did that was likely sunk

no way to know if this one was also sunk

there are parts of this event I'm missing in this explanation, but would discuss them


649bbb No.2345774

>>2345295

So a little Column A and a little Column B. Thanks, Anon. Nice digging.


3236cd No.2346226

Didn't Q refer to D5?

>>2345295


3236cd No.2346272

Was just in that neighborhood in late May…

>>2345295


3236cd No.2346300

Could he also have been calling them out in reference to where the rogue Tridents came from regardless of target, and that they(Lockheed) were the builders?

>>2344988


1cb6d8 No.2346322

>>2346047

I'm doing some studying here and thoroughly reading the comments over here: https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/was-there-unannounced-missile-launch-on.html

Along with other information that I've seen here on the chan and have come to a few conclusions.

The missile is on a horizontal trajectory at the time of this photograph. Consequently, the contrail behind the missile proper is wider than the rest of the contrail. It is also fairly high in the sky, I haven't found a resolution for the camera along with a location to compare the missile size to the camera resolution to get an accurate size on the missile.

Multiple comments on this blog testify to the fact that no one heard this missile. However, several comments mention the FLASH of the missile. That tells me that the missile was either launched from near Bangor or (most plausible) miles out to sea. One comment says that it was launched in transit from Bangor, but even that would have been heard and visible for miles around.

So that leaves the only logical explanation. The missile was launched far enough out to sea that it was not heard by anyone on land and in the photograph the missile was at least 10,000 to 20,000 feet high. A person who figured out the resolution of the image, the distance from the image, the angle of the camera, and the other relevant details would be able to prove that this was a nuclear missile launched from a Trident class submarine or that it was something else. Cam 4 is where the image came from, same general view of Cam 2 in the picture attached.

From what we know, the camera had a 20 second exposure. Trident missiles fly at 13,600 miles per hour. In a 20 second exposure, that would be 75 miles.

75 miles sounds like a lot, but lets see this: Assuming the horizon is very clear and no obstacles, and the jet plane cruises at 11,000m (37,000feet), from geometry results, the maximum distance at you can see it, until the plane drop below horizon, is around 374km or 230 miles

So, that makes the 20 second exposure very plausible and proves that this was a genuine missile. And, then, lets combine that with the fact that the missile contrail disappears behind cloud cover just a few "miles" behind… and all of this starts to make more sense.

I'm going to assume that this was an ICBM that was fired from a Ohio class submarine and was a TRIDENT. The range of that missile is 7,500 miles. So, within 30 minutes of this launch, was there ANY reports of noise anywhere along a path from Whidbey Island to Seattle and beyond? Hell, ANYWHERE over the CONUS was there a unexplained explosion within 30 minutes of the time of this photograph?

Remember, POTUS flew around the world the OTHER way to avoid this.


3236cd No.2346542

Holy crap. Just reread tweet:

FF Weather Alert WW

The pictures were from a weather camera.

Coincidence?

>>2345295


ffdae2 No.2347418

>>2344988

>Oh, no. Some niggerspic city gets vaporized. How terrible.


3a4a0f No.2349931

>>2345295

Awesome infographic, anon! I work hard to red pill on twatter, I think this could be very useful!

WWG1WGA


e03307 No.2349949

File: 784de7a897486ad⋯.gif (3.34 MB, 480x360, 4:3, IMG_4634.GIF)

File: 685113bba96757a⋯.gif (2.65 MB, 450x228, 75:38, IMB_aEJEJZ.GIF)

File: 9fb3728d78bf714⋯.gif (4.87 MB, 346x312, 173:156, IMB_KiFVhi.GIF)

File: bb6c452aa7c8172⋯.gif (576.2 KB, 500x374, 250:187, IMB_aH9hqi.GIF)

File: 38233ab25aa8ccd⋯.gif (1.69 MB, 350x272, 175:136, IMB_IdFGaX.GIF)


9ff1d5 No.2349984

File: 939f4950d9a96d2⋯.png (692.4 KB, 848x619, 848:619, 560c6c82afc5958bfe29704670….png)

>>2344988

okay then

so, er, kill them all?


9ff1d5 No.2350042

File: 78705e6a48a264a⋯.png (282.88 KB, 1366x768, 683:384, 2018-06-20 (34).png)

>>2346226

yes here

and the full revealing of this has occurred just at the right time for the lunar hints in this to hold i think


b9f74d No.2350103

>>2346322

Hey, wacky idea here.

Why not study with a Missile expert instead of a Weather expert.?

BTW Vertical is up/down. Looks "up" to me,

Angle suggest it may be headed for higher altitude before downward inclination.

If that is a Trident (as was suggested by a navyanon) it would get targeted for a location and is unable to "track" as a surface-to-air missile would.

No they might self- detonate in air (as some other poster suggested).

I guess he doesn't know about "blast radius" and effects within 1020/30 /40 miles.

Crispy critter best case. vaporization is greater likelihood.

If shot down before it was "armed" the warhead - no blast.

Splash.

Not an expert - just somewhat informed civilian


b9f74d No.2350132

>>2349931

Yeah , the message is so clear and obvious that everyone will know exactly what they mean

/sarc off


3b986a No.2350142

>>2350103

So there might be up to eight missing thermonuclear warheads and no one seems concerned about it.


81ecd8 No.2350247

>>2350042

your autism is too strong for me.

oy vey… I'm going to go take a nap.


908785 No.2350323

File: 8e9a6239ec9be18⋯.jpg (98.34 KB, 816x528, 17:11, dead man walking.jpg)

File: c4b0b67facc926c⋯.jpg (284.81 KB, 816x528, 17:11, done fini.JPG)

File: d0f299821aad7fe⋯.jpg (208.23 KB, 408x528, 17:22, fake news.JPG)

File: 6f655748950ab03⋯.jpg (240.59 KB, 816x528, 17:11, same damn fucking commies.JPG)

File: 2d1e9398c86afc9⋯.jpg (188.4 KB, 408x528, 17:22, prince andrew and rachel c….jpg)

Need any volunteers?


908785 No.2350378

File: ce6c1fe7e9666b3⋯.jpg (84.83 KB, 528x408, 22:17, bigger gitom chief.JPG)

File: d6dcf5ccf940352⋯.jpg (150.14 KB, 528x408, 22:17, strzok vs sparky.JPG)

File: 0715f754e2cb497⋯.jpg (252.29 KB, 816x528, 17:11, now for your nightly propa….JPG)

File: db43a488f7c4ad3⋯.jpg (138.17 KB, 528x408, 22:17, fuck facebookversion.JPG)

>>2350323

[reply to this post]


908785 No.2350478

File: 4977529ae2f1752⋯.jpg (107.17 KB, 576x384, 3:2, Death Penalty for all trai….JPG)

File: e139684877f0b88⋯.jpg (85.48 KB, 528x408, 22:17, democorpses motto.JPG)

File: cd21ee27ad68078⋯.jpg (45.55 KB, 576x384, 3:2, 29570761_10210941846847729….jpg)

>>2350323

[reply to this post]

Old Sparky Loves Traitors


908785 No.2350771

File: 47b87b95bc0c1dd⋯.png (618.91 KB, 600x800, 3:4, antiamerican.png)

File: e85d5e2b4b12a72⋯.jpg (195.19 KB, 408x528, 17:22, Its not immigrationbtactof….jpg)

File: 52f79d009316da7⋯.png (13.93 KB, 516x269, 516:269, our country.png)

File: 80ed8b2a252f9a2⋯.jpg (61.26 KB, 816x528, 17:11, died with jfk.jpg)


908785 No.2350791

File: 0c3f3d29803db95⋯.jpg (59.62 KB, 816x528, 17:11, 22853.jpg)

File: 25b79399ed09ff3⋯.jpg (285.86 KB, 816x528, 17:11, dead hen chickfila.JPG)

File: 45e3fc1c358e963⋯.jpg (177.36 KB, 576x384, 3:2, dopes on a rope.JPG)

File: da65fa121cb1192⋯.png (569.98 KB, 503x557, 503:557, dkdiiflo.png)


9c2589 No.2350924

File: 87032fa573f463b⋯.jpg (1.53 MB, 3292x2188, 823:547, D5_Takedown.jpg)


908785 No.2350973

File: 499ad3cca39cd6b⋯.jpeg (95.2 KB, 964x614, 482:307, 5b2a07bcb2c56.jpeg)

File: c8341833b930ea5⋯.jpeg (34.37 KB, 500x460, 25:23, 5b2a078c9c436.jpeg)

File: 4d84d556d2370c1⋯.jpg (97.13 KB, 528x408, 22:17, feel the burnnnn.JPG)

File: 1dbf802abb74706⋯.jpg (194.82 KB, 816x528, 17:11, QAnon.JPG)

File: dbafff298b40762⋯.jpg (30.5 KB, 408x528, 17:22, 14358804_10206772208209369….jpg)


9c2589 No.2351183

>>2344988

You are correct, Anon.

At first (over a month ago) I thought this was a surface-to-air missile launched against AF-1 while flying over WA state.

Then, some Anon in another thread pointed out that the peaks did NOT match the volcanoes on WA west side. So a search led to Unimak Island, AK (Aleutians) as a match.

Then, the timing was checked. POTUS landed in Singapore 86 min after the WA launch, as verified by local reporters and the weather cam timestamp. An ICBM would reach its target in probably under 30 min. Maybe AF-1 would have landed about 56 min earlier, had it not been warned of "incoming".

Most of the related posts since then, about trying to hit AF-1 over WA, the missile being a Tomahawk or a helicopter, or that a "D5" and a "Trident II" are two different things, etc., etc. are nothing but clown/shill bullshit.

I can't believe that dumbshit bakers keep posting that shill garbage as "notable", over and over again, when all one has to do is check AF-1 arrival time in Singapore, time zone difference (15 hr) between Singapore and WA state, missile capabilities, ranges and launch platforms, and so on.


908785 No.2351922

File: 549e097dcc734bc⋯.jpg (124.81 KB, 528x408, 22:17, brennanshittinginhispants.jpg)


f6de10 No.2351939

>>2346322

Ummm… I'm not sure how Bangor got into the mix here. Bangor is in Maine. The weather cam is in Washington state.


908785 No.2352035

File: c245b3bdbe9630d⋯.png (4.3 KB, 381x131, 381:131, regardless.png)

File: 7077f45b17a98a3⋯.png (2.45 KB, 407x51, 407:51, regardless2.png)

>>2344988

Regardless…it was an unauthorized missile launch

Who launched it? Who had or gave authorization to launch it? And why no mention of it by the MSM? And while AF1 was possibly in route…if it was, this was definitely a threat…certainly if AF1 re-routed. We're still talking Treason.

Even if there's a few known ways to intercept a missile.


908785 No.2352306

File: f8abb571b8fc336⋯.jpg (101.76 KB, 576x384, 3:2, these parasitesarestupid.JPG)


908785 No.2352373

File: fdc818070a8e5fe⋯.png (500.9 KB, 998x686, 499:343, kdkdiii.png)

File: 753a6b8d20d8538⋯.jpg (20.88 KB, 534x401, 534:401, 636646655287304742-NightCa….jpg)

File: d0b6d64d89c2acc⋯.jpg (37.09 KB, 265x205, 53:41, Missile.jpg)


b9f74d No.2352589

>>2351939

Doesn't matter since many of his assumptions are irrelevant or just plain wrong.

A Trident can't track a flying object. Its target is fixed ground location (within 300 ft)

Three stage so speeds may be wrong too.

The is the sixth grade version of "analysis"


dcded9 No.2352775

>>2351274

So the USN is not testing or using any kind of sub-based, shallow water, vertically launched cruise missile designed to carry an air to air missile capable of taking out bombers, cruise missiles or ICBMs. Hmm, we should make one…


b9f74d No.2352933

>>2352775

You have your weapons all mixed up.

Surface-to -air exiists but not with a Trident

Air-to-air are fr air combat (other aircraft)

Cruise missle is geography based - not for mobile targets like planes

Shallow water is not required, particularly for nuclear subs. They go deep and solo for protection, otherwise air-cover.

In short, they have about 200+ years experience with war ships so I think they have all the bases covered.

But "you" think we should make one?

Free speech, right?

Why don't you call the Pentagon with some of your ideas. I'm sure they are interested in amateurs giving the advice.


001884 No.2353901

New theory.

1) The missile could not have launched from Puget Sound, WA. People would have heard it and lower level smoke would be seen.

2) The light might be traveling horizontally rather than vertically. If so the light is traveling from the distant cloud bank towards the camera, over head. It's travel is like a meteor.

3) The head of the light looks like a rocket lit on one side from the morning sun. The dark side is unlit and is lost in the over exposed cloud color.

It is travelling overhead, not up.


001884 No.2353953

>>2353901

Okay, I see I was late to the party >>2346322 carry on.


229ca4 No.2354034

>>2351939

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Base_Kitsap


ad67ad No.2354730

>>2352373

No missile leaves an exhaust trail straight and off center like that, or looks that large at a distance, especially with such an exposure time.

The two missiles Q has refered to were Japan and Hawaii missiles with both of them activating the EBS system. Whidbey didn't activate EBS because Whidbey wasn't a missile.

It was a Pleiadian mothership.


1cb6d8 No.2354824

>>2352589

>Doesn't matter since many of his assumptions are irrelevant or just plain wrong.

I'm just a blind civilian trying to make sense of this shit.

>

>A Trident can't track a flying object. Its target is fixed ground location (within 300 ft)

Wasn't intended to track a flying object. It's what they had. Air burst.

>

>Three stage so speeds may be wrong too.

Yes speeds could be wrong I was just using them to prove the 20 second exposure wasn't out of line due to the fact the missile was flying on a horizontal plane.

>

>The is the sixth grade version of "analysis"

Are you doing any analysis? Better do a 6th grade version than to do none at all.

>>2353901

3) The head of the light looks like a rocket lit on one side from the morning sun. The dark side is unlit and is lost in the over exposed cloud color.

Pretty much what I noticed as well.


71cdfc No.2355121

File: 17bcebdd0aad3d8⋯.png (349.64 KB, 343x484, 343:484, ClipboardImage.png)

They do naval training all the time in the straight of Juan de Fuca or Georgia, I am guessing a launch from mid straights would put it visible


001884 No.2355539

File: 337c573e4cd6003⋯.png (247.73 KB, 1296x597, 432:199, June10.png)

Possible related event 39 minutes later.

>Possible meteor streaks across Western Washington skies

>Author: KING Staff

>Published: 11:30 AM PDT June 10, 2016

>Updated: 2:38 PM PDT June 10, 2016

>SEATTLE – A meteor may have streaked across the Western Washington skies early [b]Friday[/b] morning.

>Darren Clayton was driving west on the Highway 2 trestle in Everett when the dashboard camera on his car recorded video of a bright object streaking across the sky at 4:35 a.m. He posted it on YouTube

>It’s not clear yet if the object was a meteor, space junk entering the atmosphere, or something else.

https://www.king5.com/article/features/possible-meteor-streaks-across-western-washington-skies/238957000

Video is here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcQsYwK5XVE

[b]Note the article says Friday but 6/10/16 on the video name is a Sunday. The article is posted on Sunday then "updated".[/b] 4.35am is 39 minutes after the "missile" photo. The date on the car cam must be GMT/UT time. If it is UT time then:

June 10, 11:35 UT = 04:35:00 a.m. Sunday June 10, 2018 in US/Pacific


001884 No.2355671

>>2355539

Sorry for the dumb post. I failed to realise 2016 is not 2018.


cb326d No.2356314

>>2352035

>Who launched it? Who had or gave authorization to launch it?

I don't know. Why don't you tell us? Or why doesn't the military tell us?


2b5e3c No.2356358

>>2344988

Here's how I look at it: This would either be a SAM (surface to air missle) to take down POTUS on AF1, or an ICBM launched as part of a false flag attempt.

If it was a SAM, it would have a maximum range of maybe 20 miles from the launch site. AF1 was not even close to the Puget Sound at 4:00am on the morning this image was captured.

If it was an ICBM, 1st, there is no way in hell that it could be used to take down an aircraft. There is no ICBM in existence that has that kind of guidance system… they're designed leave the atmosphere, travel around the globe, and then reenter to drop their payload on the target. They're not designed to hit a 600 MPH target streaking through the sky.


9c2589 No.2356603

>>2344988

Forgot to write, you are correct except that technically, the missile was not aimed directly at POTUS but, rather, the city (Singapore) where the clowns expected him to arrive at detonation time. Maybe splitting hairs, but we need to be clear.

I don't how far MIRVs can be spread (certainly classified), so maybe they wanted to take out other cities also like Tokyo, Manila, Jakarta, Taipei near the missile path, or maybe they planned an 8-MIRV airburst spread around Singapore to guarantee they got AF-1 regardless of its direction for approach to landing.


001884 No.2357361

File: 39694a805436276⋯.png (1.54 MB, 1346x1060, 673:530, cam-orientations.png)

File: 66617185fa38399⋯.jpg (284.99 KB, 1915x973, 1915:973, missile-stellarium-sun-low….jpg)

File: 8f4e6b0cf2e6b96⋯.jpg (24.08 KB, 634x490, 317:245, missile-right-hand-sun.jpg)

File: 94ea18af3211ecd⋯.jpg (15.78 KB, 634x490, 317:245, missile-close.jpg)

Assuming the cam is oriented as per >>2346322 and assuming pic #1 is correct the cam is oriented from N to NE 45 degrees. Using Stellarium the sun is to the lower right (not left) pic #2. If the sun is illuminating the object then its shape is pic #3 (original pic #4).


631aa8 No.2358681

Until someone raises the sub or posts radar records of the missile or sonar records of the sub getting hit and going down, all that we have is speculation and an alert that they said was supposed to be a drill. Speculation from an admiral is still speculation. If there was anything going on, way much too info is being kept in the dark.

The Washington incident is explained by the guy who took the photo as a time-lapse of a descending helicopter with a downward-locked searchlight. Why Q is saying it's a photo of a missile when no one from the area supports that idea, I don't know.


7c2cd5 No.2359344

https://evolvepolitics.com/theresa-mays-husbands-investment-firm-made-a-financial-killing-from-the-bombing-of-syria/


001884 No.2360603

File: 4ad044b94dc7c6d⋯.jpg (335.96 KB, 1600x900, 16:9, missile-stars-Muscida-Murf….jpg)

I think I found stars in the image which show the cam is facing North to NE. The object is North of the cam. If it is travelling horizontal is is travelling South from North. Canada? Over the poles? Heading to Cali?


8601a9 No.2363828

File: 70a41a25d51af05⋯.jpeg (65.89 KB, 672x613, 672:613, 70a41a25d51af05f8c5b1829c….jpeg)

File: 7b48a4b7775ba38⋯.png (845.78 KB, 1080x824, 135:103, WA miss Mixed grphic 2.png)

File: f7a792437b27318⋯.png (477.55 KB, 806x404, 403:202, f7a792437b273181ce80733a5e….png)

File: bbb721dd49bcb90⋯.jpg (39.25 KB, 1080x824, 135:103, WA miss Mixed grphic.jpg)

Reposting from these

>>2355049

>>2359197

because truth demands answers —-

though it may not be 100% discernible from what we have so far, …..

makes me think

1) direct air strike to splash AF-1 or it's Decoy AF-1 Westward (averted)

2) nearby air burst (also devastating for AF-1)

3) or an SLBM D5 heading towards Singapore while AF-1 on site,

4) or to another False Flag target.

There really aren't too many possibilities when we think about it.

Either way,…. it still accomplishes NO summit w/ NorKor, a dead POTUS, and eventual WW3.

But the type of missile would help eliminate, assuming the timeline, position of AF-1 actually true (eg, standard cruise missile operates at a very low ceiling threshold). Yet if this video captures a D5, again, …… why is the surface not smooth?


3236cd No.2367265

Was the helicopter flying stright up and down?weird looking missile shaped helicopter.>>2358681


3236cd No.2367366

>>2356358

No, but an airburst or detonation as potus is on the ground in Singapore is definitely an option.


3236cd No.2367419

Shills and bots can’t distinguish that horizontal does not mean straight up…>>2350103


3236cd No.2367460

>>2351939

Kinda like Salem Oregon and Salem Massachusetts. Do a Siri search….


a32239 No.2367758

>>2363828

>SLBM D5 declass distance 4K miles

whidbey to sing is 8K


3ba18f No.2368024

>>2346322

I dont think this missile would have exploded, it would have been deactivated I believe, there are several fail safes on ICBMs. Also the 13600mph is its max velocity, it takes a bit of time for it reach this maximum and must be calculated to get a good indication of the exposure imagery.


3ba18f No.2368293

Reposting from these

>>2355049>>2359197>>2363828

RUM-139 VL-ASROC is a surface to water missile to hit subs underwater.

UGM-133 Trident II (D5LE) has a max range of 10km which could hit NK or SK or Singapore.. these three being the likely locations for a FF attack to trigger ww3.

The Ohio class subs which launch these are stationed at bangor base. This must be the case


3ba18f No.2368351

>>2360603

Bangor is south of this location, however a sub could easily be anywhere in the sound.. likely in a remote area. The media tried to cover up by saying no launch sights at whidbey island airbase (which is north of the weather cam).

Disconnect they were not anticipating sheep to put together is the fact that nuclear subs are in the water in this region.


0105dd No.2368622

>>2346322

It's MAX 20 secs,…could also be 12+8


3ba18f No.2368674

File: da98a47c5871360⋯.jpg (96.33 KB, 815x754, 815:754, BangorCamLoc.JPG)

File: b60b00bfd468aa8⋯.jpg (116.22 KB, 872x591, 872:591, avoidcandadianairspace.JPG)

File: 9d63b1dac17d120⋯.jpg (128.11 KB, 1088x974, 544:487, hawaiitraj.JPG)

File: 30038ca57717443⋯.jpg (144.67 KB, 685x944, 685:944, launcharea.JPG)

File: bf8987bdc28a89d⋯.jpg (68.98 KB, 1040x428, 260:107, SeoulEieson.JPG)

>>2352589 >>2351939

Target not af1 - likely seoul SK to trigger ff event blamed on "treacherous" NK.

Speed calculations would take me a while.. too many things to take into consideration however the first stage after exiting water has a much larger exhaust cone which with exposure would be very visible.

Very hard to tell the trajectory from this image other then the launch sight would have been appx 30-50 miles north of this cam as it was not seen until it was in the air for several seconds.

Alot of people live on whidbey and camano island with beach front property and nice views of the ocean, the launch zone would have been in the more secluded "reserve" islands I marked on the Map.

Trajectory was likely to SK though in picture heading SW (Adjusting trajectory to avoid CA airspace and possible intel leak on who really launched the missile)

Likely intercepted by f-16 squadron at Eielson AFB.

This would be a dumb idea, because even if 18th agressor squadron didnt not disarm, Russia would also have a chance before reaching NK and heading south to seoul to look like an NK attack. Traj was likely altered to avoid RUS continent as SAM antimissiles is not RUS strength but best chance if its decending over rus land mass.

Other potential is Pearl Harbor - this would blamed on NK of course as well but an even more difficult target then Seoul despite the traj making more sense. Even singapore (which is the least likely would not have southern bound traj, only explantion is that missile launched at SW traj to avoid CA airspace.


fec071 No.2370520

>>2367758 ==>>> excellent point, anon. I forgot. In fact, I think the max range is 4k miles+ actually remains classified.

Then we are left w/ the possibility of a strike / air burst downing of Decoy AF-1,

or a False Flag somewhere within that range of the of the D5.

Otherwise, still hard to entirely rule out a cruise missile (possibly a classified surface to air missile exceeding the service ceiling of traditional cruise missiles, which is low)…..

Just wish we had cleaner, other pics of the missile seen in the vid.

>>2363828


fec071 No.2370567

>>2368674

see point below…..

can the MIRVs from a D5 reach that far???


fec071 No.2370656

File: 993698af4198f7c⋯.jpg (77.07 KB, 817x665, 43:35, Range to Pearl.JPG)

>>2344988

>>2368674

>>2370520

>>2367758

>>2363828

Did I miss the OBVIOUS again?

FF attempt #2 upon Hawaii???

Me thinks reasonable…..

Sum of All Fears.

(only about $300 of gas to drive there!!!—– bargain for sure.)


ce8e12 No.2371027

File: 4c5fdeba2896d88⋯.png (521.44 KB, 1806x1151, 1806:1151, Screen Shot 2018-07-31 at ….png)

Didn't see Michael Avenatti's June 10 tween in this bread so here it is.

from this Q repsonse: >>>2342726


71cdfc No.2371360

>>2371280

Posting this here too, it could have been a SM-6 which is top secret "Sea Dragon" which has small blast, super sonic and anti aircraft (AF1) details stolen by Chinese hackers

>>2371280


6e872e No.2371937

>>2350142

Recovered by NAVY, now evidence


a32239 No.2375358

https://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/sm-6

can one of yall take the footage of the missile launch in the video and side by side it with what unathorized launch

are there any known vulnerabilities associated with raytheon and their weapon systems?


f12bbe No.2376921

File: dcc12fb391f5206⋯.png (102.81 KB, 439x574, 439:574, 49D.png)


3ba18f No.2382234

>>2370567

>UGM-133 Trident II (D5LE) has a max range of 10km which could hit NK or SK or Singapore.

Range: With full load 4,230 nautical miles (7,840 km);

with reduced load approx. 7,500 mi (12,000 km) (exact is classified)

^^ Above from Wikipedia not sure how accurate that would be though.

SK/Singapore is def in range for bangor subs, you know former presidents use that fact when dealing with china etc. Or they prefer it be an unknown factor hence the "distance" issue.

I think this was a hack and not a rouge crew, as they would have chosen a better location then just the puget sound, I am still thinking HI though because of the trajectory of the missile on the video.


7c9279 No.2431958

File: 0761e03ce89f094⋯.jpg (432.46 KB, 802x750, 401:375, 0761e03ce89f0940322326161e….jpg)

>>2382234

>>2370567

>>2370656

So among possibilities for the FF attack from WA sub launch:

1) Hawaii

2) AF-1 via air burst (indirect)

3) Singapore (AF-1 + POTUS)

4) another domestic target

5) another ally target

6) an adversarial target

Not necessarily in order of odds.

Seem about right so far?

Just frustrating we don't have a simple push Red Pill narrative at this point for the Normies….

(pic only partially related)


b27d2d No.2440188

Another missile? What is this? One month ago. In Iceland, supposedly exploded (struck) 26 miles north of Thule USAF base.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/2018/08/04/09/52/meteor-comet-explosion-thule-air-base-force-us-greenland-nasa-nuclear

Also on Fox, who backhandedly invoked a Russian "first strike":

https://www.foxnews.com/science/2018/08/03/air-force-remains-silent-after-huge-meteor-hits-near-us-military-base.html


649bbb No.2441805

File: 7878a5b646a4c34⋯.jpg (42.94 KB, 768x544, 24:17, 2018_Hawaii_missile_alert.jpg)

>>2356358

Which takes me back to my original point: FF using missile targeted at least at SOME point at HI. Right?

Good info on SAMs and ICBMs, thanks anon.

Next time you get one of THESE take it seriously.


8601a9 No.2443371

File: 8b041ac18d71b83⋯.jpg (14.45 KB, 1096x616, 137:77, 017314f43e46a0addb761a06e8….jpg)

File: 7ffd70ef9d08803⋯.jpg (219.87 KB, 1088x726, 544:363, Trident-II-D5-Missile-Laun….jpg)

>>2431958

— Notice from this file picture of a D5 Trident….. the exhaust gases at higher altitudes burn brightly, & less steam / smoke seen …… just as in our video footage.

It also makes sense as the missile / rocket accelerates moving faster towards its terminal velocity, one would expect the exhaust contrail to appear less funneled compared to just leaving the water…..


b9f74d No.2443666

>>2382234

You think the got a wbe site on that sub so they could hack it?

Too many movies, too little real world exposure to actual "networks" and how they operate.

Maybe they hacked the Captain's Twitter account on his cell phone.

Google SIPRNet


b9f74d No.2443714

>>2431958

Your post:

4) another domestic target

5) another ally target

6) an adversarial target

Why not just say "anyone"

Oh yeah, that would look stupid, like you didn't think very much before posting


b9f74d No.2443784

>>2350142

Where did you come up with eight?

Top secret military report or Sum Dum Gai?


b9f74d No.2443867

>>2371360

And Avenatti took a picture of a top-secret Sea Dragon with his cell phone from his own Sea Dragon?

Did I get that right?

How did he get that pilot's heads-up display with "lock-on" indicator from his phone


b9f74d No.2443915

>>2375358

Yeah

I think they post all known vulnerabilities of their military products on their website.

Look in the section labelled "Sum Dum Gaiz"


b9f74d No.2443941

>>2440188

,,,,backhandedly invoked a Russian "first strike":

Did they go to DEFCON 1?


ce8e12 No.2444298

Maybe it ended up in Greenland.

This article from U.K.'s Independent describes a meteor strike saying "The explosion contained 2.1 kilotons of force and occurred just above an early-warning radar at the Thule Air Force base in June,"

It doesn't give a specific date.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/meteor-thule-air-base-air-force-asteroid-earth-hans-kristensen-nuclear-missile-russia-fireball-a8476896.html


ce8e12 No.2444365

>>2444298

Looks like the Independent screwed up. Every other source I saw said it happened July 25.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8cup / acme / arepa / bcb / cutebois / general / qanon / tacos ]