[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 2hu / arepa / bbw / fast / leftpol / miku / tacos / vichan ][Options][ watchlist ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

First time on QResearch? 8chan? Click here, newfag.


File (hide): 3c76af4060bbe99⋯.jpg (361.52 KB, 1588x720, 397:180, c3d8f4bab9f2cdddfa40abfbe1….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2ba20aa7c761208⋯.jpg (5.73 MB, 2000x4200, 10:21, Q=Retard 2268131.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

602be1 (7) No.2279235>>2279379 >>2279576 >>2283862 >>2294856 >>2365579 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

I'm sorry, but after this I can't look at Q the same, it all just seems so stupid now (I used to be a hardcore follower). I can't imagine a high ranking military intelligence officer spending their time on 8chan, taking photos of a picture of inside airforce one off the back of his iphone, pretending it's a real reflection, etc… "disinformation," highly doubtful. More like stupid miscalculation

76704a (2) No.2279379>>2279548

>>2279235 (OP)

Where's the mug?


602be1 (7) No.2279548>>2279985

File (hide): 5a96a7b2b9596d1⋯.jpg (136.24 KB, 1600x900, 16:9, maxresdefault.jpg) (h) (u)

>>2279379

mug or mug holder? it's from this pic, not the one with Trump in it


5a8d9d (1) No.2279576

>>2279235 (OP)

Must admit I pretty much go along with what you say sadly


0a91de (1) No.2279985>>2280186

>>2279548

its moved. Remember its an airplane, and all larger things like desk, lamps, chairs etc are bolted down for turbulence. They are permanently affixed so always in the same place.

The mug holder/coaster is moved in the Q pic. One of the few things that CAN be moved. Your hair is a bird, everything is bolted down, and your argument is invalid.


602be1 (7) No.2280186>>2280621 >>2280719

File (hide): 2ba20aa7c761208⋯.jpg (5.73 MB, 2000x4200, 10:21, Q=Retard 2268131.jpg) (h) (u)

>>2279985

Look closely at the bottom pics (and especially in light of the skewing effect as illustrated above them), it's pretty obvious it's from the same picture. The bottom left and center are my own photos. The mug holder, and everything else, is in exactly the same place, nothing has been moved (not even the precise camera angle). My "argument" is not invalid, but it's up to you as to whether or not you are blinded by what you want to believe is true


41364d (3) No.2280621>>2280898

>>2280186

What's your result when you photograph a reflection of a reflection of your lamp? Your single reflection photos clearly show a reversed image. It would require a 2nd reflection to correct back to original (or flipping the photo electronically). Q's photo shows an original orientation v. the stock photo. So it was either flipped electronically or is a photo of a 2nd reflection. Right? Mirroring is a key concept in his posts.


602be1 (7) No.2280719>>2280796 >>2365628

>>2280186

PS: I don't mean to be disrespectful. If you follow Q that's perfectly fine, and even though I don't think Q is real anymore, I still think the movement is a good thing for the sake of furthering the overall greater movement. But there are certain things, like the photo above, that are quite obvious, which also go to show the brainwashing effect that a mass movement can have when even simple obvious truths are disregarded in favor of more complicated and ridiculous explanations (think the "celestial spheres" used to explain the movement of the stars in order to hold on to the belief that the earth was at the center of the universe). And I know this because of what I went through after this whole air-force-one-pic-fiasco started, what I would call "Q-disillusionment-shock-to-the-nervous-system"


831fe5 (1) No.2280796>>2289241

>>2280719

I need shawl..its shilly in here


602be1 (7) No.2280898>>2281318

File (hide): 4150714366f30e0⋯.png (1.18 MB, 591x1280, 591:1280, ed6964be1cd55445ede255e23a….png) (h) (u)

>>2280621

Here's the original q photo, which is reversed orientation compared to stock photo. When I said "some combination of angled photo of stock pic+reflection," I don't know the exact combination of photos and reflections, just the fact that the original source is the ABC stock photo


941553 (1) No.2281299

GTFO you dirty rotten faggot OP. You were never on this board before your criminal mafia boss started paying you to post.

You lie.


41364d (3) No.2281318>>2282581

>>2280898

You have a strong argument (and simpler than mine). I'm not disputing that, so please don't get my intention wrong here.

My interest is whether a photo of a second reflection of your lamp shows the same skewing as your photo of its reflected photograph. If the skewing shows up, then we have alternative explanation for it in Q's photo. All that's left is accounting for the reverse orientation of Q's photo.


d31c4e (3) No.2281385>>2283227

Actually the OP is totally correct. The photo on the back of the phone is exactly the same as the stock pic (same angle, object placement, everything).


758d0f (1) No.2281982

trump = q


644d30 (1) No.2282423

>>

remember 'i recognize that bulge'?

this is why no one should underestimate the anons.

q/mossad whatever they are.. Heh


602be1 (7) No.2282581>>2282963 >>2283687

File (hide): 825133e35fdde5e⋯.jpg (3.47 MB, 3120x4160, 3:4, P_20180725_114825.jpg) (h) (u)

>>2281318

Ok sorry i misunderstood you. Here's a reflection of a reflection of my lamp, no skewing. No matter how many reflections, there shouldn't be any skewing, unless the mirror was warped (which would cause a different type of skewing than what is seen in q's photo). It's just physics, optics. But it's not only the skewing effect, it's also the exact object placement and camera angle. The only way you would have that is if someone on air force one had a photo of the stock image to compare to, and then placed everything exactly the same, filled up the napkins (or whatever that is) to the same level, and then took multiple pics from different angles until the exact same camera angle was achieved (eg look at the corner edge of the lamp and the side of the chair in relation to the folds on the curtain behind, etc)… and then take that image and photograph a reflection of it off the back of an iphone to get the skewing effect… obviously it's a little bit far-fetched to believe that a high ranking military officer, or Trump himself, would be wasting their precious time doing something like that. Q once referenced Occam's Razor, I think common sense would call for it's application in this case


25691f (1) No.2282963

>>2282581

With you 100%. I've felt this way about the Q character since they posted that image of Robert Byrd posing in a klansman getup. That image is obviously fake and has been proven fake time and time again. Its inclusion in any real research thread detracts from the true facts that Robert Byrd actually was a hideous person and that HRC looked at him as a mentor. I do not buy into "disinformation is necessary" when we are talking about informing the general public about the very real nature of our once glorious and currently troubled republic. If you aren't part of the solution you are part of the problem. In my opinion, spreading untruths makes you a suspect of the movement, whether you started it or not. We are not here to trade one "drone master" for another, make NO MISTAKE.


76704a (2) No.2283227>>2283435

>>2281385

That picture was taken by an anon which Q replied to. Go to show that you can't take a clear picture from the back of a phone reflecting the target.


d31c4e (3) No.2283435

>>2283227

The original pic in question (and the one in the “reflection” on the phone) is from an ABC News piece from 2015:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/air-force-access-pass-secrets-iconic-presidential-aircraft/story?id=30799245

https://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FNvyCqgrzOYc%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNvyCqgrzOYc&docid=unW4_MagUoWXrM&tbnid=Em1ZubKnllpuKM%3A&vet=1&w=1600&h=900&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim


299638 (2) No.2283577>>2283680

Regardless of whether Q is real or not, the effect is real. The digs on 8chan are real. The movement is real.


d31c4e (3) No.2283680>>2285551

>>2283577

Yes I agree. And despite the issue with this picture and Q’s phone post, there’s still so much other stuff (various other “proofs”) that makes me feel he/they are somehow still legit.


41364d (3) No.2283687>>2284029

>>2282581

Thanks for that. You seem like an honest and intelligent man. You have made good points and done follow up experiments.

I am not convinced of your conclusion that Q is not authentic, but I do acknowledge you have a very good case wrt how the photo was produced. Good work.


12ecda (2) No.2283729>>2283755

File (hide): f8cb8b88e903799⋯.jpg (234.29 KB, 750x555, 50:37, Q10DAYSDARKNESS.jpg) (h) (u)

Until yesterday morning…actually just before Q returned, I came to the conclusion this pic is saying something we aren't understanding. A website showing many different meanings to the drops really opened my eyes. I'm willing to admit I'm simply not saavy enough to put a lot of this together. But when you see how many different meanings things have, it's easy to see this as something we simple misinterpret vs. it being a fraudulent photo. Even if it's fraud photo, that says something and has a meaning.

I was completely on board with this being the slip up to kill the larp.

Take a look at interpretations.


12ecda (2) No.2283755

>>2283729

Point being. This photo isn't fake. It's simply not solved correctly.


16ba91 (1) No.2283862>>2284308

File (hide): 3a572050d796657⋯.png (406.34 KB, 1242x1653, 414:551, IMG_3921.PNG) (h) (u)

>>2279235 (OP)

this douchey thread should be deleted immediately.


602be1 (7) No.2284029>>2284897

>>2283687

Thanks. ya i do agree that this is not any sort of definite proof that q is fake, but for me personally, after this I can no longer see how it could be real. I still keep an open mind, but it will take some very solid proof to convince me otherwise (in my opinion the q proofs so far are pretty weak)


1a0991 (1) No.2284308

>>2283862

That'll be $12.99. Would you like some fries with that?


b0c13c (2) No.2284897>>2285285 >>2445946

>>2284029

It's clear the original is from the ABC photo. I thought maybe its intention is to maintain the idea that Q is a larp for those being targeted and/or in denial about what's transpiring. Part of me thinks Q may be 75% disinfo, 15% semi-true, and 10% real.

Perhaps I should better state that as these threads are 75% disinfo and just a few snippets are related to legit happenings, i.e. the pedo stuff is way overblown, the satanic child eating is fake, the alien stuff as well, military tribunals ain't gonna happen, no American pol will be sent to Gitmo, the Roth's/Muh Jew is semi-true but overblown, and in the end this will mostly be about a few dozen well-known politicians getting busted for violating their security clearances along with maybe a few hundred of their lackeys.

On the other there are 41,000+ sealed indictments (the only thing that's kept me going along for the ride).


b0c13c (2) No.2285285>>2289257 >>2294444

>>2284897

Samefag here.

Believe me, I want all this to be true and for us to see a brighter future full of interstellar travel, all evil smited from this world, the likes of which we can't currently even imagine, but I try to be a realist and I'm often a pessimist.


299638 (2) No.2285551

>>2283680

Plus I feel like Q is smart enough to know how good the anons are, and that they would easily figure out that the picture was fake. I can only hope that maybe its just another mysterious crumb.


450146 (2) No.2289241>>2294417

>>2280796

yeah… time to war


450146 (2) No.2289257

>>2285285

well shut up bitching and get to work, anon!


8b6975 (1) No.2294353

Q is a larp. Move on and get back to digging.


e6a864 (2) No.2294417

>>2289241

True dat

When posters start to have this soul-searching monologue, you can be sure it is a concernfag or a emotional midget. Neither is worth any consideration

Move along there is nothing to see here


e6a864 (2) No.2294444

>>2285285

Where do you want to go first?

Or you gonna just cruise around?

You can do that or astral travel whenever you can gets your hand on some good acid.

I know guys that went to unbelievable places and did unbelievable things so I know is is possible with the right drugs


ccefe2 (1) No.2294751

Q posting again can only mean a few things.

1>scam artist saw some things might actually be happening in the world again rather than nothing so decided to try and cash in

2> Now that a few things have happened the PSYOP has to start again because it's time for NOTHING to happen again, and what do you need when nothing is gonna happen ? A stalling scam, some fruity tool talking in riddles for no reason because if any of it was legit there's be no need to talk in riddles.

your welcome


ab5894 (1) No.2294856

>>2279235 (OP)

Trump has learned to beat the media filter. He's playing a game, and winning. But the MSM are the biggest idiots of the lot and still haven't figured out they're being played. Fake news was part of DJT's campaign, and when the gutter press used that phrase it was to describe Pizzagate.


898b4e (1) No.2365579

>>2279235 (OP)

MSM shill. Get fucked.


c5e21f (1) No.2365628

>>2280719

every single point is the center of the universe

every.

single.

one.

every fuckin one

this fuckin dimension, I swear to god


0b552a (1) No.2445946

>>2284897

You're probably right, sadly.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
39 replies | 6 images | 24 UIDs | Page ???
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 2hu / arepa / bbw / fast / leftpol / miku / tacos / vichan ][ watchlist ]