>>2029255 (PB)

Guise and goils, there may not be another Q post. Do we really need one? Are you willing to pursue your independence without chasing a laser?

We are being told to look more closely at the information we already have … the stuff in the (rearview) mirror, including the deaths. Have we not ALWAYS been told that we already have more than we know?

Identify the disinformation and answer the question "Why was the disinformation necessary?" DO NOT SKIM THE SURFACE.

Go back to before the SA trip and learn "What questions were asked in re: SA prior to SA events" and WHY were the questions relevant?

(ISTR that they have a massive computer array and I suspect that it is relevant to the recent mass deletion -- without public pressure, recent litigation, congressional harrumphing or executive fiat – of NSA data.

What purpose do the square brackets [ ] serve? Was the <b>[here]</b> of especial value?

It's the only word emphasized. Dig deeper into the deaths, starting with the ones Q has previously mentioned (Think mirror.)

JFK. Seth Rich. There were others.

Q said that there was a particular prayer uttered daily in the WH. By whom? WHY?

Seven days a week I make supplication that the leaders of the world would be granted wisdom to lead us in accordance with the will of God -- it seems odd that the daily prayer in the WH would be a prayer for the dead.

Christian theology tells us that the dead are remembered by God … so no need to pester God about them. (You could build an entire theology around the thought that this "memory" might be simply a computerized record of their DNA, with "successful" variations recorded and unsuccessful variations destroyed.)

I am of the opinion that for every person who IS wise, there are many who think they are (Dunning Kruger syndrome) and that one reason Donald likes surrounding himself with military men is that these are men whose wisdom has either been tested by fire or has been judged by others who were.