seems a bit "off".

shouldn't the exhaust be centered?

>>1721171

If you look carefully, the exhaust has a very dark side which completes the symmetry. If you have a laptop, try tilting the screen.

Never seen a 'dark exhaust' or 'shaded exhaust' before, though. Needs a reality check, anyone familiar with lighting effects of exhaust plumes in rockets?

The link below is from the folks that run the Skunk Bay Weather cameras.

>>1718290

http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/was-there-unannounced-missile-launch-on.html

>>1721798

No longer in that blog - it's been pulled?

>>1721747

That’s concerning no? Why do that?

>>1721747

Anon, you nailed it. Let me help with the rest of the pieces. Trump Tweeted today twice and the letters I and P were missing.

IP=Intelectual Property. Who is responsible for stealing IP?

CHINA.

In the past Q mentioned Rogue. I have assumed he meant agent\agency. But then I looked into the location of this missile launch and noticed Boeing was near there. Boeing and China have made some MAJOR financial moves and working on Anti Defense Missiles. Someone at Boeing go Rogue? Hacked?

This picture of a missile DEFINITELY looks to be something like anti defense missiles, but not ICBM. Then I found this… https://www.popsci(dot)com/chinas-new-ramjet-engine-triple-range-missiles#page-5

2+2 = China is working with Boeing (Rogue) and took a shot at something (Perhaps AF1?)

The only problem is we don't know if this was an attack or if it was defense. Technically speaking it could be used either way.

If defense then just anti defense missle firing at a hacked Boeing Missile from one of our subs?

If offense Boeing and China taking a shot at AF1? Or another target?

>>1723848

I was phonephagging. Thanks for the assist anon!

Wow, new star wars JEDI SWORD. It reaches ground from high altitude, imagine the tall hero. LOL

or is it a new LAARP weapon?

>>1729323

The missile was launched upwards at 4am local time. Camera was looking North/NortEast.

Sunlight from early morning at that lattitute was illuminating the contrail form the missile from the east. The West facing side of the contrail is harder to see and dark because of it, that is why it looks weird and misaligned, but in fact the missile is perfectly centered above the contrail column.

I would posit that this contrail is caused by a solid fuel rocket booster, similar to the two white large boosters used in the space shuttle.

Additionally, I have been told that standard missiles do not leave contrails like this after launch. So either it is another missile (sea dragon?, SM-6?) or it could be a rogue launch of a Trident D5 from puget sound (really scary if true because it means SLBM launch codes were spoofed and the nation/world would be in GRAVE danger).

Another comment to be made here is that it looks like the missile was angled to go towards the NorthEast direction at a very steep angle, supporting the idea that it would be targeting a spot somewhere in Canada/north america through which AF1 would be flying through that morning on the way to Singapore.

If the missile was targeting moscow or some such the angle of ascent should be much more shallow.

We need confirmation about a Trident D5 being missing from the SLBM arsenal - you can't hide this. And prosecution by any means of whoever has done this needs to happen fast and at any means to prevent further attempts.

>>1733980

Anyone check eam.watch for skykings near that time frame?

TWA flight 800 in 1996 hundreds of people say they saw a missile. It was a cover up. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/sciencetech/video-1706342/Video-Tracker-shows-aircraft-Skunk-Bay-time-rocket-launch.html

>>1736208

That area is heavily populated and a heavy traffic corridor..especially in the summer. (at least the spot you pinned). And I concur that right in that area is the most likely spot for the OHIO class sub in the photo. The OHIO class subslive right around the corner in bangor.

http://q13fox.com/2018/06/11/missile-launch-lens-flare-mysterious-object-spotted-over-whidbey-island-raises-questions/

Greg Johnson of Skunk Bay Weather was looking through the pictures snapped by a weather camera on the Kitsap Peninsula when he spotted a photo with a mysterious object. The picture - snapped at 3:56 a.m. Sunday by a high-quality, 20-second exposure camera - shows a bright orange streak in the early morning sky over Whidbey Island.

Johnson told Q13 News he was hesitant to release the photo.

Mostly, because it appears to be a missile launched from Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

So, that explains the ridiculously long exhaust, a 20-second time-lapse photograph.

For it to be a helicopter, the streak and fuselage would need to be reversed. YES?

Helicopter N952AL was traveling northerly. Skunk Bay cam 2 took the picture.

Am I off?

See article that "debunks it".

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/21461/lets-talk-about-that-mysterious-rocket-launch-over-whidbey-island-photo-from-washington

No way a helicopter can travel that far that fast, these Coast Guard helicopters are slow.

Think about altitude too, it would have to be really high for it to be that small.

Clouds would obscure.

Most of these helicopters travel at a low altitude.

From Skunk Bay blog:

https://skunkbayweather.blogspot.com/2018/06/missile-launch-on-whidbey-island.html?m=1

https://www.bitchute.com/video/oDSIuFZio3zO/

http://q13fox.com/2018/06/11/missile-launch-lens-flare-mysterious-object-spotted-over-whidbey-island-raises-questions/

if u google 'missile launch long exposure' you'll find several photos that look extremely similar. a long narrow band w uniform brightness for a tail

^Also, from looking at the photo, the missile's trajectory appears to be heading South-Southeast. I do not think *this* missile was headed towards AF1 over Alaska.

It seems more likely that it was heading towards Seattle which would have given the military just minutes to respond. Sounds like a pretty gnarly FF to me… nuke a major city on a Sunday before most of us have woken up.

The expanding v-shaped exhaust trail is missing and the path is almost too straight and too vertical in my opinion compared to actual submarine launch videos. It is possible the helicopter searchlight story holds water. I think Q was referencing something else.

>>1738575

That's the line I came up with too. I'm pretty sure it launched from Skagit Bay or Saratoga passage south of Whidbey NAS. Skagit Bay gets relatively shallower towards the NAS so I think Saratoga Passage between Oak Harbor and Coupeville is the best bet. Plenty deep there and just aways from Bangor. They're supposed to go in and out of the Sound on the surface but I know they move around the Sound submerged too. The Island is heavily forested so many wouldn't see it even if they were awake and there was a very small window of time it was visible. I don't see how it could be anything other than a missle from a submerged launch. If it looks like a missile and flies like one it probably is one. I concur it probably wasn't a Trident although that's just a guess on my part.

Look at the Sound.

It's lit up.

Sea/undersea launch.

Altitude vs size.

HUGE MISSILE

We need to go back and look at ALL previous MISSILE drops. Q left us the answer.

Cum-on DIG.

This got super real.

Avoid all "this ain't a missile talk" or such.

It's unproductive.

Such as lasers, or flashlights.

https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/d-5-pics.htm

1)If the exhaust is stretched-out due to long exposure (20sec.), so would rocket fuselage/body. Still huge rocket.

2)Our work here could save an entire city.

>>1740765

I believe it even more after looking at long shutter pics of helos with their spotlights on. You still see all the other lights on the heli, they're not blown out like some suggested. Also, we should see the surface of the lake illuminated by the spotlight. We do see a slight glow that's more consistent with a rocket higher up.

Additionally, the medivac company did not provide any specific details about the flight path. Many times aircraft don't actually fly exactly direct routes to their destination.

It would be helpful if we could get a copy of any additional photos taken from the time lapse as well as any security or webcams that may have been in the area.

We should also look into how the missile might have been stopped. There could still be pieces of it in a lake somewhere.

Mostly lurker, newishfag here.

Its a missile. Intended for AF1.

That was launched from off the coast of Washington state somewhere. Intended to be blamed on the Chinese to start WWIII. The pic Q posted from AF1 was of the missile incoming, likely just before it was taken out.

This all from "famefag" deceptionbytes on YT.

I think the timelines roughly line up?

Worth digging moar?

Shipyard and Naval Base in Bremerton put on lockdown today

http://mynorthwest.com/1019901/police-explosive-device-bremerton-shipyard/

Search "helicopter long exposure" & "Missile long exposure".

There isn't even one helicopter pic that would come close vs. many missile pics that are same.

None.

Where are the port and starboard lights?

Where are the rotors?

Tail lights?

Where is the orange and black paint?

Why does the "spot light" streak end at the tail not on the nose of the "helicopter"?

Why is the streak going from north to south, when the helicopter N952AL, was headed north bound?

None of these thing support the helicopter narrative.

Nothing.

Rampant cencorship on 4chan for this missile

Ok i need someone to tell me if I'm being retarded. In the 30s webm, some anons were claiming a star was actually the helicopter. It wasn't. It was a star. Figured this out by showing a few dimmer stars moving at the same rate.

My point now is that I just realized the stars were moving left to right across the video. The sun rises in the east. If the camera is facing north like everyone keeps saying, why are the stars moving left to right(west to east)?

Wtf would this even imply?

Think about this drop:

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: ec346b No.339775 📁

Feb 11 2018 15:37:17 (EST)

>>339583

Ask yourself, why is NK participating in the O-games this year?

Ask yourself, why is the 'sister' w/ Pence?

Ask yourself, if controlled, how might you protect yourself and look for a way out?

Ask yourself, what is a distraction?

Ask yourself, why did Korea come together as a country v N&S?

Ask yourself, what occurred in Asia (ref pics) just prior to the O-games?

Ask yourself, what does FREED mean?

Ask yourself, do we want a WAR?

Ask yourself, who is trying to start a WAR?

Ask yourself, if a missile was launched by rogue actors, what would be the purpose?

Ask yourself, what would/should immediately start a WAR?

Ask yourself, would the PUBLIC understand the following statement: "Rogue actors (Clowns/US former heads of State) initiated a missile launch in order to 'force' the US into a WAR/conflict against X?"

Be the autists we know you are.

Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.

Q

SM-6 is surface vessel launched.

No surface vessel in sight.

It also would have destroyed the helicopter that was in the vicinity as well as possibly destroying the passenger aircraft that were in close proximity.

It's big, but not as big as the missile in photo.

Although, they have launched SM-6 from land, there isn't any facility at Whidbey NAS for ANY missiles. Whidbey NAS confirmed, they didn't launch anything.

https://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/sm-6/

It does have similar charictistics though, I will admit.

I believe they are limited range too.

A SLBM targeting Seattle or surrounding area would launch straight up, as in photo.

They deploy warhead in space and free-fall to target. Angled launches are for much distant targets. Getting in close to target also increases success rate and allows a confirmation of kill. Being distant increases chance for opposing force to destroy missile.

https://youtu.be/htnUDjtemqw

There is another possibility, that it is a different type of sub than an Ohio. It would then have different capabilities.

But, Q posted an Ohio, so I'm a bit skeptical it is something other than an Ohio.

http://navynews.co/2018/06/12/what-is-the-navys-secret-sea-dragon-weapon/

Short range, small blast radius, anti-aicraft, supersonic.

Doesn't really seem to fit the profile, but could it be outfitted into a sub and "test" fired? It is a SM-6 allegedly.

>>1756239

The streak does not necessarily originate from the water. It could have been fired from the landmass in the background

What would immediately start a war?

Blow up a major city.

This isn't HRCs server. All of the information is public domain. If this "helps" team retard they can't do fuck all anyways.

Dont waste useful board space with useless commentary. We almost lost a large American city while it was sleeping and potentially have a rouge Ohio roaming with 22 more kills in the tubes.

Be helpful or fuck off.

ICBM's go straight up into the ionosphere.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercontinental_ballistic_missile

Boost phase: 3 to 5 minutes; it is shorter for a solid-fuel rocket than for a liquid-propellant rocket; depending on the trajectory chosen, typical burnout speed is 4 km/s (2.5 mi/s), up to 7.8 km/s (4.8 mi/s); altitude at the end of this phase is typically 150 to 400 km (93 to 249 mi).

Midcourse phase: approx. 25 minutes—sub-orbital spaceflight with a flightpath being a part of an ellipse with a vertical major axis; the apogee (halfway through the midcourse phase) is at an altitude of approximately 1,200 km (750 mi); the semi-major axis is between 3,186 and 6,372 km (1,980 and 3,959 mi); the projection of the flightpath on the Earth's surface is close to a great circle, slightly displaced due to earth rotation during the time of flight; the missile may release several independent warheads and penetration aids, such as metallic-coated balloons, aluminum chaff, and full-scale warhead decoys.

Reentry/terminal phase (starting at an altitude of 100 km, 62 mi): 2 minutes – impact is at a speed of up to 7 km/s (4.3 mi/s) (for early ICBMs less than 1 km/s (0.62 mi/s)); see also maneuverable reentry vehicle.

The distance from the camera footage to the missile is roughly 30 miles. The size of the missile is the size of a submarine from this distance. Therefore, the missile must've been fired from a silo at the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station or nearby. However, the Navy denies the existence of missile capabilities at the base.

NORAD would've detected the launch within seconds and activated their protocol. Trump was alerted of the launch. The missile was taken out within minutes either by THAAD batteries or by the Secret Space Program.

What was the Cabal's plan? The only conclusion would be to either hit the ocean or a mid-air detonation where the blast would reach Air Force One.

What is the truth? You decide.

Ghost Operators were given approval and have dealt with the threat

p l e i a d i a n

l

e

i

a

d

i

a

n

>>1757787

>p l e i a d i a n

Bizzare timing…….

>>1758813

"Think hack."

I think the subs launch systems were compromised while under C/A control. I think that the sub was being redeployed with a new crew and something triggered the 6/12 launch: gps/timer/remote control.

>>1759377

How do we conclude a 6/12 launch when the weather cam says 6/10? (US 10 = SING 11th)

Those with an agenda to discredit pushed 6/11 with this in mind?

>>1759377

Okay, but if it's a hack, then where does ultimate authorization to launch come from? Surely there has to be official protocols in place still to alert the crew and commanders on board?

Rogue crew?

If so, then surely they'll be known?

You'd have to have both to make it work. Surely there wouldn't be a completely automated system for launching sub nukes.

So perhaps MIL know who was on that sub?

I guess they'd know who is involved on that score, already, even if just pawns in the game.

This is important I feel.

It's why they're perhaps still looking for the sub, rather than just destroying it?

>>1759469

You're right. I'll fix that for next time.

>>1759525

I don't know if there is a purely manual element to the launch. Makes sense that there are two parts, but if the onboard part can be compromised…

>>1743838

ok then what is it?

>>1759695

People keep saying that the two-man process is impossible to get hack but that’s just not true. The turning of each key, a willful mechanical movement is eventually converted into a electronical command. Once it is electronic/digital ANY system can be hacked. Same as flooding the tubes. It isn’t purely mechanical. A button is pushed, a lever pulled, which is then converted. This is related to those crazy Naval “accidents” and aircraft “malfunctions”. The U.S. fighter jet that just happened off Japan May have been another. This is as serious as it gets. We can’t have boomers susceptible to hacking. I would be surprised is orders have been sent to physical disconnect the command systems to the missiles.

>>1759795

*wouldn’t be surprised

>>1759525

This is “Skynet” territory. Perhaps this is the biggest failsafe that QTeam had to disarm before they could drop the hammer. Why Hillary and Hussein are globetrotting and seeming to not give a hoot.

>>1759795

Agreed. And potentially difficult to detect short of ripping out the wiring of the entire sub.

Based on Q's drops, are we at a point where we can agree on the following with confidence:

The US was searching for a sub for a period of time at the end of last year. While in the Pacific, that sub launched a missile attack on HI on 1/13/18. This was expected. While in the Puget Sound, that sub launched a second missile on 6/10/18. This was unexpected.

>>1759795

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if AI is involved in the matter. But your point about possible sabotage Re: the physical makes more sense in that respect. I don't think it's anywhere near impossible to hack, but I do know that some circumvention of protocol has to take place for this to happen, at which point anything is possible.

The only question I've got left is who's AI if so?

OTOH:

>>1760195

You're saying a Search and Destroy OP is underway?

>>1760258

I think the US is in control of the physical sub.

I think the subs systems are comped.

Could Red October have another meaning, like the easing of tensions with a previous enemy state/ communist nation like East Germany? Then working together under these new condition that were previously un-thought of?

https://youtu.be/AzIlL5NFvAo

Could have two meanings

anyone saying its an slbm that was launched to hit AF1 is mental, maybe an SL-ABM like the sea dragon. But you dont try to hit a flying target with a trident 2

Trident 2's were phased out.

Ohio subs carry Trident C4 missiles, and the refueled subs carry Trident D5 missiles now.

The Sea Dragon, info is obscure, is a SM-6.

It's twang is only 180 m8les, so it would have a very difficult time hitting AF1, if not impossible.

Any planefags have the course and time of AF1 or other high value aircraft such as Japanese Prime Minister She's aircraft? Perhaps they flew over Vancouver Canada? Time and route are KEY factors.

>>1761375

Thanks im a bit out of the loop in current military SLBM /BMs

But if a nuke/Ballistic missile was launched, a city was the target

If a ABM/S2A was launched, AF1 was the target (?)

We need to find out what kind of missile

>>1756548

Correct me if im wrong

But if a SLBM was launched at Seattle we would know about it. It would be cratered right now.

Theres no stopping a missile launched sub ~30mi from its target. The response time isnt there.

>>1739662

what are you trying to show anon because i see didly squat here

>>1759908 missle bread

was going to post this video as well.

LOTS if sauce in this interview for those paying attention.

An SLBM flies at like M4 no way anything could shoot it down. Also multiple warheads once it re-enters atmosphere.

Are there still Soviet drone subs at the bottom of Pearl Harbor/Puget/SD bay?

>>1762593

IRAN'S SUBMARINE ARSENAL

These midget subs have travelled far beyond the Korean coastline, but they didn't journey underwater. As Burlingame notes, "The submarines built by North Korea have also been sold to Iran."

Stephenson wonders: "Could an Iranian midget sub penetrate an American harbor?" If so, it could present a real danger, and in addition to getting their hands on several North Korean Yugos, the Iranians have also developed a powerful midget submarine of their own.

img tag

In addition to its midget subs, Iran also has full-sized submarines, such as this 230-long, Russian-built, Kilo-class sub. Enlarge

Photo credit: © Associated Press

Military experts describe the Iranian Ghadir as silent enough to elude the most advanced U.S. sonar. As recently as June 2009, Iran commissioned three more Ghadir-class submarines, bringing the total number of these midget subs to seven. Like the North Korean Sang-O subs, the Ghadir subs are 50 percent longer than the Yugo, but still small enough to sneak into a harbor. And they're large enough to drop small teams of commandos onto enemy shores, damage warships, and lay underwater minefields. Iranian military sources have reported that, in addition to torpedoes, the Ghadir is also capable of launching missiles.

As is the case with North Korea, details surrounding Iran's midget sub-technology remains speculative. Still, Iranian officials claim that the subs are equipped with the latest military and technological hardware.

>>1762610

But dont we start the wars with Iran? not the other way around?

I dont think we should be looking at an outside party here. Just US

>>1762389

If a Ticonderoga class Cruiser or Arleigh Burke class Destroyer was off Washington coast it could destroy the SLBM on terminal phase. This would be the only way, other that a space base defense, that would kill a SLBM that I can think of that doesn't require a land based defense. I admit, it would be a hell of a task, but they have had success with the system.

I'm not a ship tracker so, I cannot verify what was on the coast, if anything, at that time. It's impossible to concretely say Seattle was the target, but it really would have increased their odds of success being so close. I think the Aegis says has a pretty remarkable record of kills vs failures and there is the land based systems in Alaska (GMD) that may have played a roll.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegis_Ballistic_Missile_Defense_System

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground-Based_Midcourse_Defense

https://news.usni.org/2015/08/04/successful-sm-6-ballistic-missile-defense-test-set-to-expand-capability-of-u-s-guided-missile-fleet

The milfags who argue the “two man” system prevents a hack are wrong. Any mechanical device operated by two or two dozen individuals are all converted into electronic signals which when combined together initiate a launch sequence. Even the flooding of launch tubes are electro-mechanically initiated. Accordingly, the systems are susceptible to hacking. Period. I wouldn’t be surprised if our ENTIRE arsenal of boomer missiles are on a temporary lockdown, i.e., pulling the fricken motherboards out of the launch systems until we can come up with a software patch to defend against hacking. This launch is probably related to those crazy ship accidents and aircraft malfunctions.

Second, who gave orders for this certain sub to be positioned where it was and armed with this particular missile? This was a well-planned and desperate op and one which we can’t afford to let occur again. This is war and I’m surprised that we aren’t seeing more military activity. What an opportunity for a real enemy to initiate a first strike if our systems can be hacked.

There is a 15 hour time difference between Washington State and Singapore. The missile photo was time-stamped 3:56 AM and AF1 landed in Singapore at 8:21 PM local time. Doing the math using a 10 - 30 minute missile flight time calculated by another milfag indicates an intercept time (missile and AF1) approximately one hour from landing. Alternatively, it could have been a SLBM targeted for Singapore itself and the resulting conflagration would have taken out AF1. The hack would’ve been blamed on the Chinese although we know that it was really Deep State controlled.

Bottom line is that this cat and mouse game will end badly if allowed to continue. Either civilly or militarily, the Deep State actors have to be taken down. We know who they are. I just trust that QTeam has it under control but Q’s message that this was “unexpected” was very unnerving. How close did (((they))) come in succeeding?q

>>1759469

It was launched 3:56 AM Sunday June 10. AF1 touched down in Singapore Sunday evening 8:21 PM local time. There is a 15 hour time difference between Seattle and Singapore. Assuming the 10 - 30 minute Missile flight time given by a milfag, the missile would have hit Singapore 7:10 - 7:30 PM or it could have been programmed to airburst in the vicinity of AF1. From the size of the missile in the photo, it appears to be a larger SLBM.

Ok, here it is, a list of capabilities, albeit public domain information. I'm sure we have better in deployment, and more than what is the in the videos, but you get the picture. We are capable of destroying SLBM/ICBM missiles one at a time.

Each video has a small to large gem of truth, and reveals what the hell we have out there. It's not perfect, but it seems to work, each and every system. Russia would overwhelm it, but we are concerned with a, one missile strike, at this time. I think we just saw it prove it's self. Now, let's put together what we do know, what Q left for us, and put together the big picture.

News, tweets, they make the MAP, yes?

https://youtu.be/bAjUM_hf8DE

https://youtu.be/m6MOaECL6FM

https://youtu.be/O41nB9qj2eg

https://youtu.be/9GEqRIqjRSk

https://youtu.be/91gxC9YNMII

https://youtu.be/WDFonobKDRQ

(Sorry, it clown news)

https://youtu.be/tyUh_xSjvXQ

https://youtu.be/3zOUDvbPI1c

https://youtu.be/x_89139WKho

https://youtu.be/7fwreL0Drio

Q,

these weapons should not exist in first place. It was and is wrong to build such weapons by a nation state( no matter what nation state), for the purpose to mantain a military balance, whis is nonsense, the military balance is a ILLUSION feeded by the military industrial complex arround the world.

The chaos resulting from selling subs and rockets from state to state only makes it more dangerous.

If the people in this world seek a save future, then it will only be possible without these weapons & and without a certain energy industry aswell.

Evil likes to enter & uses the powerful and that is what results, such weapons, wars, destruction, devision. And even the idea of civic nationalism separates you from the rest !

I wish you were a spiritual person instead of a regious one to understand.

I wish a day of reflexion to everybody.

Launching sequence is it hack-proof?

Well…

No.

We all assume it takes great steps and sequences to launch, but all systems have vulnerabilities.

You just need to understand the system and make a workaround.

Land based, aircraft and naval systems are all similar in procedure. Titan base in Az. will walk you through it if you visit. Dr. Strangelove showed the basics and so do these videos.

https://youtu.be/HWZXinRwCaE

https://youtu.be/knDIENvBTgw

https://youtu.be/YchEuqYjMi8

(4:44 sequence begins)

https://youtu.be/J7vKF0V-A9Y

https://youtu.be/IZXUC-nnDIc

Part of launching is that the fire control crew has NO idea of the intended target. This was to ensure they would not hesitate for any reason. It takes a bit of the natural human element to resist mass murder out of the equation.

Sadly, this did happen, so don't convince yourself it cannot be hacked. All systems have vulnerabilities. All decent hackers know this. It's just a matter of intel.

See below:

https://youtu.be/fsei3aqTKGo

One of the worst elements of submarine warfare is isolation. They have to rely on their systems for conformation. There isn't any chatter or comms with anyone or anything after getting the green light. They go dark immediately. This is to ensure mission success and survivability.

So, who did this and why?

Who would profit?

Who would we go to war with at that time?

Who were we de-nukeing?

This is the ultimate FF.

It's a desperate move.

They know we know, and time is up.

Gather the crumbs/drops and let's put the MAP together.

This Cold Civil/Global War just turned RED hot.

For all we know it still is an issue and I encourage you to work your hardest on this. Others can handle the politics and propaganda. If you know anyone that was is sub service, missile defense, or such, contact them and get all the Intel you can to resolve this. Retired mil. often have good insight.

Those good at gathering crumbs and mapping need to dig moar.

Remember Q:

"This is bigger than you can imagine."

Don't waste board space - make the best use of your posts.

We will bag these fuckers.

Clowns, President, Nat. Security Advisor, a billionaire and the media all participated in this event in the '70's. Was considered a "conspiracy theory" for a long time. Just posting for historical purposes. It adds to credibility, shows previous clown fuckery.

This organisation has skills and abilities that most do not have nor understand. The public bought this story in its entirety.

https://youtu.be/wBGoUYVDcSg

https://youtu.be/dVlpJJWzQK0

They did this too:

https://youtu.be/y6m7GDfCX1w

So, is it really beyond clown capabilities to grab our sub, mess with it, and leave Chinese "fingerprints"?

>>1720994

I am in WA state, about 150 miles from where this occurred, and unless it was just a coincidental phenomenon, at 3:59 am last Sunday I experienced what I can only describe as a mild soundwave/airwave type occurrence. I will explain…the following all happened pretty quickly:

I was laying on the sofa playing cards on my laptop and in my peripheral vision I noticed the water in my glass begin to wave/vibrate. I have lived for decades on major fault lines along the bases of volcanoes, so this is something I notice. I immediately glance over to the sleeping pets on the floor and am momentarily relieved that they are still sleeping, but look back to the glass. The intensity is increasing and my neurosystem just lights right the fuck up. I jump up, and plant myself solidly because only have a few seconds to assess if this is a shaker or roller and execute a plan. And why in the fuck are the animals still sleeping?! Glass rattling on glass table now, and why can't I feel anything?! I have a metal base with a glass top table, with a glass of water on top. The base is slightly uneven, so even walking by the table hard will make the base wobble a bit on the floor. The glass top never wobbles. At this moment, the base is of the table is NOT wobbling. First, the water in the glass started…then it grew to the glass itself rattling on the table top…the base of the table and the glass top were still. Confused as all hell, I grab the glass and steady it. I let go and it very mildly rattle a small bit and faded off, water still vibrating. Out loud, embarrassingly enough, I remember saying "what the fuck is happening, what the fuck is happening?" It faded out and I stood there for a moment and I realized it wasn't the earth, but it was in the air. It wasn't instantaneous in intensity, and there was no sound on my register. It was just a deep, low, almost lazy wave of undetectable (to me) sound. This is the point that I actually felt SCARED. I don't know why. It seemed ominous for some reason. I immediately wanted to go wake my husband, and so checked the time. It was 3:59 am. I didn't wake him.

After he woke I told him "I almost woke you up at 4am, I thought we were having an earthquake." I explained what happened and that I have no idea what it was, but it was not an earthquake, it was in the air, and it totally freaked me out. He later said he checked if there was any activity, and it was definitely not an earthquake.

I don't know why, but yesterday it suddenly crossed my mind – wait, what time was that possible missile sighting again? So last night I ask my husband if he remembers me telling him about me thinking we were having an earthquake and reconfirm with him what I told him. He confirms what I remember. So I showed him the article (he doesn't news) and told him I wondered if there was any validity to the missile thing because I totally think I observed a wave of some sort at basically that exact time.

So I don't honestly know what it was that I experienced or what caused it, or if it is related to this story, but when I looked at the clock it was 3:59 am and I'm about 150 miles from the island.>>1720994

>>1771737

I've been waiting for something like this. Any missile that size makes a hell of a lot of noise because the exhaust gasses are supersonic and blast continuous shock waves in their wake.

Look at the amount of water they have to dump on a missile plume during ground based launches to prevent the sonic shock waves from destroying the very vehicle creating them until they reach an altitude and speed that the shock waves dissipate behind the launch vehicle.

A couple days ago an anon was asking for more camera footage in order to triangulate the launch site/area. He had some maps ginned up and had the primary azimuth plotted from the Skunk camera position. I never saw any follow up posts. Even without triangulation we do have his azimuth (though I didn't earmark or save that, dammit).

If any anon's are in that area, why couldn't one start down that azimuth and just question people if they heard anything that night? This thing didn't launch in a vacuum and if it was "heard", even subliminally, 150 miles away then it had to definitely have been audible (if not deafening) at much closer range.

That's gonna be rough. Up here we are used to really loud planes and the Naval Air Station do Ya some really noisy aircraft. Paine Field isn't very far away and it has tons of giant passenger planes coming and going, testing, etc. It's got Tramco that does annuals on the big birds, so, we are kinda used to extremely loud aircraft. Also, it's not nearly as populated as Seattle, lots of trees. I'd be surprised if anyone was woken by it. It takes time for these rockets to get supersonic, so that would be another factor. They unfortunately picked an ideal spot to launch. Don't forget the exhaust is pointing nearly straight down too. It would have been very brief.

Look at the launch videos, it's no Titan or Space Shuttle.

>>1771737

Which area do you live in? This could be a large find as we could likely tell which direction the missile was headed.

Close enough.

I can't do a thing till next weekend, then I can ask around and look for evidence/debris etc.

I thought about getting photos of the camera and checking the lenses.

But, I cannot till next weekend.

>>1770517

Excellent summary anon. I also knew this was the ultimate FF which may very well have involved the deadliest SLBM in our arsenal. Some anons are theorizing that the target was AF1 and that it may have been a sub to air smaller missile. I don’t buy that for a number of reasons. We don’t have such a missile, it’d be near impossible to hit the fast AF1 as it was about 1 hr 30 mins from Singapore which is 8,071 miles from Seattle, the size of the missile as seen from the photo, the vibrations noted by the anon above at almost the exact time stamp on the photo. No, I believe that this was a hot nuke planned to hit Singapore or detonate somewhere between AF1 and Singapore. No one in history has ever launched a nuke with intent. I’m still trying to process all the dire implications. After I settled down a bit, I realized that the White Hats must have immediately taken steps to mechanically disarm our boomer missiles until they could design a bulletproof software patch to close any back door in our submarine systems. By now, ALL boomer captains must have been informed about the incident and have been given countermeasures. HOWEVER, the point I’d like to make is that after this near miss (Q said it was “unexpected”) it’s time for POTUS to come clean with the American People after he has declared Martial Law and has rounded up all the known Deep State culprits. ALL OF THEM. Have the Military explain to the People the truth of just what happened using demonstrative evidence photos, captured transmissions, etc. Q keeps saying that the arrests can’t be made until all the failsafes have been dealt with. Well, they certainly missed a HUGE one. What about suitcase nukes many of which went missing after the fall of the Iron Curtain? We can’t count on being lucky a second time. How we actually intercepted that missile is story we’ll never be told. Sorry for ranting but I see a clear huge risk here which hasn’t been entirely eliminated. POTUS is playing the highest stakes poker right now either waiting for a certain level of public support or waiting for members of the Deep State to flip and disclose all the remaining Nuclear fail safes.

Again, sorry for the rant.

I thank you and mostly agree with you.

My one problem is that all nation states with space programs would have seen and therefore known the origin of the launch if Singapore was intended.

It would have panicked the Russians and we all wouldn't be talking today. Plus, deniability would have flown out the window. A straight up, straight down launch would have been very hard to detect a d confirm, but the public wouldn't have a clue to its origin and would have bought the "it's the Koreans" narrative very easily. I don't know what took it out, but something did. We can all be thankful for that. I have a suspicion it was followed. Perhaps by a Crusier or Destroyer on the coast. Perhaps Canada was target, impossible to say. But this is certainly not time to play poker. Somebody needs to come clean. We know what we saw. We got the comm loud and clear. Its past time to stop this. Nukes are not toys nor are they just really big bombs. The devastation lasts lifetimes.

>>1773083

I am in Vancouver, WA. about 150-160 miles directly south through the I-5 corridor at the Columbia River.

I was just talking with my husband about it. He is former Air Force. Several years back I was living in Portland close to downtown/the river and someone detonated a small pipe bomb about 7 miles from where I was, down by the marina on the Willamette. From where I was there was a fairly loud explosion, everything rattled, and then I was hit with a massive wave of energy that was far stronger and seemed longer than the audible noise, itself. The way the water and the surrounding mountains are situated in that area acted like an amplifier for all that energy. I wondered if Sunday morning there was an explosive event and that energy made it's way down echoing through the I-5 corridor.

He he didn't think so, that what I described to him on Sunday sounded exactly what would be basically the outskirts of a sonic boom. He described it as sort of a cone shaped echo and at the ends of it you would probably not hear anything but it would basically rattle things and whatnot. In his interpretation he seems to think I "heard" something overhead but far away – I saw the shake… and not an explosive launch or anything.

He is an extremely rational and logic based person who is not into conspiracy at all, but I asked him if he believed that was a helicopter in that time lapse vid. He said no, I really don't think so. I asked him if he thought it was a missile. He said yes, that is what it appears to be to him. I asked him that if it was a missile, where would it be headed and why. He immediately pulled up maps on his phone and said "Look, there is puget sound and there is north korea." The visual was clear. I said some speculate that it was an attempt at AF1 – he did not think that was a reasonable explanation. His most likely theory was "a show of capability." He is not a fan of Trump, and said this scares him, although he did say if that is what happened he doesn't believe it would actually be carrying a nuke. He thought it would be most likely we might drop something just off of their coast or something to make the point. I think he would prefer it was a helicopter.

>>1775079

I'm not sure a "show of capability" makes sense. NK knows we have missiles capable of hitting them. However, if the 1/13 missile was meant to get the US to respond, maybe the 6/10 missile was meant to get NK to respond. Although they'd certainly need "a show of capability" before I believed they could hit the US.

>>1776293

That's his viewpoint. He and I are living in totally different reality tunnels in this regard. My theory is we have been usurped by a pack of wild Marxists and we are probably literally at war right now.

>>1759735

extraterrestrial mothership (good guys)

>>1775079

My guess is it was headed either towards SF or LA. Probably was intercepted somewhere over Oregon or NorCal. Scary shit. I think their plan was to shoot down AF1 with one missile near Alaska then destroy a city and send us into war.

US Navy Fact Files (all publicly releasable info):

Trident II (D5) Missile:

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2200&tid=1400&ct=2

———————–

Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines - SSBN:

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4100&tid=200&ct=4

===================

Tomahawk Cruise Missile:

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2200&tid=1300&ct=2

———————–

Guided Missile Submarines - SSGN:

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4100&tid=300&ct=4

==============

Standard Missile:

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2200&tid=1200&ct=2

US Navy Fact Files (all publicly releasable info):

TRIDENT D-5 photos:

https://search.navy.mil/search/images?utf8=%E2%9C%93&affiliate=navy_all&query=D5

—————————————

Tomahawk missile photos:

https://search.navy.mil/search/images?utf8=%E2%9C%93&affiliate=navy_all&query=tomahawk+missile

>>1739662

Suppose was the 5th word in the post, missing the D.

Trident II D5.

>>1721320

>>1721171

>>1723848

The dawn sun is to the left. The rocket is half lit, half in shadow. The shadow part is seen as the same color as the sky?

>>1779420

Why is the dawn sun to the left of the camera if it's facing north?

Why do the stars in the upper left of the video move left to right?

I don't believe the camera was pointing where they say it's pointing.

>>1749627

Explosive ordnance experts have determined that a suspicious package left inside the gate of the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard near a ferry terminal in Bremerton is not an explosive threat.

https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/06/14/possible-bomb-at-kitsap-naval-base-closes-ferry-terminal/

>>1783420

Damn, I've been making the assumption that the Q photo of the object was taken from AF1 - But if AF1 was approaching Singapore at the time the photo was taken, then who took that photo?

Also, and this just dawned on me, the time of day in the Q photo is much later than the weather cam photo, by hours. I can not see how those two photographic events line up. One is 4am and the other looks to be anywhere between 8 to 10am.

What the hell?

I put this in the general, and think it's related.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1006763550843367424.html

Try to match the photo with an Alaska Airline flight/vs/Time.

Vols is French for flights.

Look at the photo name.

Remember everone:

We are dealing with multiple time zones.

Singapore is across the date line

Skunk Bay, Wa. is PST

AF1 is EST

Check and double check you work.

Thanks.

>>1783097

vols is not only french for flight

>Vertical Optical Landing System

>>1742383

>>1742383

Q posted (2) missiles extinguished (Hawaii and this one). He crossed out “The Hunt for” part of “THFRO” meaning we have located, recovered, or destroyed the sub. Q posted: “Comms Dark” meaning that they couldn’t contact the sub. Most interestingly, Q posted an article about the Chinese hacking one of our submarine contractors which indicates that a back door was hacked into the launching software. When I read these posts and saw the picture, I expected all hell to break loose. Seriously, how vulnerable are we if any old operator can run our destroyers into other ships, crash our military aircraft and LAUNCH A FRICKEN SLBM !! Expected to see a lot of action on the high seas but don’t see it. An amazing situation and I hope that they catch and deal with these psychopathic traitors!

>>1787043

At the nanosecond the “shutter closed” after 19 seconds +, the camera would have captured the missile image. Prior to that the missile was obscured by burn.

>>1789886

Precisely.

>>1789085

Holy ‘ell! If that picture was taken by AF-1 that’s some darn good shooting from 8,000 miles away. But it was probably shot from an escort or scrambled fighter. It appears that the missile was either a dummie sent as a warning or that we were able to deactivate or disarm the warhead. I wonder if Edward Snowden is somehow involved with this. Whatever the case, I hope that they’ve pulled every darn motherboard from our entire missile arsenal until they get this problem squared away.

>>1789811

I seem to remember a Navy friend saying it's typical for their subs or ships to cut off all communication ("go dark") for a week or two if they fire or are fired upon?

Red/orange object:

- burned-out booster stage (heated from within)?

- laser/directed-energy kill?

- deployed decoy with red/orange paint?

- failed orbital/suborbital/hypersonic weapon?

>>1790083

Maser took it out?

>>1792441

>>1786655

1. According to Trump tweets, he left Canada approx 5pm local, June 9. (Time in Seattle = 2pm)

2. Flight time from Quebec to Seattle, approx 3.5 to 4 hrs. AF1 may have been over Seattle earlier as it was flying right over that area, not landing.

3. AF1 over Seattle WA approx 5 or 6pm local, June 9.

** This confirms the time of day in the Q photo above Seattle WA, shadows on the mountains, light coming from the west.

4. The 'missile' weather pic was shot at 3:54am, June 10.

** A full 10 or 11 hours AFTER AF1 passes the area.

So how does the object seen in the Q photo above WA fit with the object seen in the weather pic when they are separated by almost half a day?

What does one pic have to do with the other?

I dont think it's Washington. Looks more like a flight to Asia passing by Alaska. Most flights to Asia skim Alaska coast.

Cannot confirm, but there is too much water, and not enough land (green land/trees) for it to be Puget Sound. Looks like a northerly view towards Alaska from a passenger airliner. It just does jive with my personal flight time in the NW, but does look like a view on the long voyage to Asia.

I've flown around the area for decades and it just looks strange to me,ie, not Washington but likely Alaska.

It could be confirmed with weather history.

I don't recall that much cloud cover in Wash. that day, though there was scattered coverage. It's also a strange pattern of cover for this area in Wash. this time of year.

>>1794422

My diagram of the Q photo (AF1 photo?) was based on another anon who had stated that the three peaks visible were, closest to farthest, Glacier Peak, Mt Rainier and Mt St. Helens. As I am not local to the US, I took that as fact.

The high altitude Q photo once aligned on the map, with those three peaks, does line up with Whidbey Island! That can't be coincidence.

However, if someone local can confirm those peaks as being elsewhere, please let us know and I will determine the camera position again.

Interesting speech by CNO Richardson during his address at the U.S. Naval War College’s Current Strategy Forum on June 12, considering the missile takedown on June 10 which is not mentioned in the article.

The US Navy is fed up with ballistic missile defense patrols

The U.S. Navy’s top officer wants to end standing ballistic missile defense patrols and transfer the mission to shore-based assets.

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson said in no uncertain terms on June 12 that he wants the Navy off the tether of ballistic missile defense patrols, a mission that has put a growing strain on the Navy’s hard-worn surface combatants, and the duty shifted towards more shore-based infrastructure. …

The unusually direct comments from the CNO come amid growing frustration among the surface warfare community that the mission, which requires ships to stay in a steaming box doing figure-eights for weeks on end, is eating up assets and operational availability that could be better used confronting growing high-end threats from China and Russia. …

The BMD mission was also a factor in degraded readiness in the surface fleet. Amid the nuclear threat from North Korea, the BMD mission began eating more and more of the readiness generated in the Japan-based U.S. 7th Fleet, which created a pressurized situation that caused leaders in the Pacific to cut corners and sacrifice training time for their crews, an environment described in the Navy’s comprehensive review into the two collisions that claimed the lives of 17 sailors in the disastrous summer of 2017.

Richardson said that as potential enemies double down on anti-access technologies designed to keep the U.S. Navy at bay, the Navy needed to focus on missile defense for its own assets. …

The Navy has had some success with land-based BMD with its AEGIS Ashore system in Romania, which uses what looks like a cruiser superstructure with SPY arrays and missiles to create a missile defense shield. Another AEGIS Ashore is planned for Poland in 2020 and last year Japan announced plans to buy the system, which could relieve some of the pressure on 7th Fleet ships once operational.

More at:

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2018/06/16/the-us-navy-is-fed-up-with-ballistic-missile-defense-patrols/

>>1795493

Didn't POTUS fly Delta with SS according to picture posted by Q?

"Thank you USSS" was a United craft.

>>1795493

2 af1's … yes. Also stuff like blackhawks that can be loaded into a c-5 to cross the globe. There is an entire fleet of presidential aircraft. Plus god knows what that is unofficial stuff that could be flown around.

I agree, it looks like Unimak Isiland.

Good job Anon!

Well done!

Now let's make the Q MAP, ie, gather up the collective crumbs that show what happened that Q has left for us.

I think the photo over the island show the Trident on terminal phase just at destruction.

Let's roll!

>>1779542

>>1754182

I'm wrong. I live near equator. Took a while to find video of Seattle sky without cloud cover. Nm. I'm the tard.