Can someone point me a thread discussing the nomination of Haspel as top clown?I know Q alluded to Pompeo concluding his mission there to clean things up but the appointment from within of a career bureaucrat seems counter to the swamp-draining narrati

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

Anonymous 05/13/18 (Sun) 17:17:32 078b1d No.1397824

Can someone point me a thread discussing the nomination of Haspel as top clown?

I know Q alluded to Pompeo concluding his mission there to clean things up but the appointment from within of a career bureaucrat seems counter to the swamp-draining narrative.

Has she been shown to be a white hat?

Was the nomination recommended by Pompeo?

Is it in fact yet another 3D chess move to drain the swamp?

Anonymous 05/14/18 (Mon) 00:31:29 e16cd2 No.1402045

>>1397824

I haven't seen a specific mention of her by Q…so at this point, the purpose is up in the air.

Here are some arguments in favor of her being /ourgirl:

1. Q has mentioned repeatedly that not everyone is corrupt (starting Q3)

2. Feinstein and McCain opposed her nomination

3. POTUS picked her

4. Pompeo might have suggested her to POTUS, after working with her for awhile (no evidence of this at the moment)

Here are some arguments against:

1. She was endorsed by dozens of former Intel leaders, most of which were likely in power during times when corruption was rampant:

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/386803-former-intelligence-leaders-send-haspel-endorsement-letter-ahead-of

2. Q has never said "Trust" anything associated with Haspel, to my knowledge.

3. The fact that POTUS picked her might not have anything to do with him wanting her–he may have just done so to focus scrutiny on her.

4. Q mentioned that the C_A might be so bad that it might have to be absorbed into the NSA

Considering #3 against, consider this statement for Larry Schweikart regarding Mueller:

>he keeps numerous Deep Staters in the employ of the FBI where, although being systematically demoted and de-fanged, they cannot leak.

https://spectator.org/the-biggest-demonstration-in-dc-has-nothing-to-do-with-guns/

Also consider that Andrew McCabe served as interim Director of the FBI after Comey was taken out, and look what happened to him.

So the bottom line is, until Q posts something like "Trust Haskel," don't trust Haskel. For all we know, she may be /ourgirl, but the plan dictates that we not know it yet. Or maybe she's simply being put there to give /theirguys a sense that they can relax, now that one of their people is in place. We just can't tell at this point, so remain vigilant and the truth will come out in time.

Anonymous 05/14/18 (Mon) 01:25:48 078b1d No.1402449

>>1402045

Thank you, Anon. I appreciate the effort. Very little of what has transpired has been a head scratcher to me but this one is.

It reminds me of some of the earliest nominations, especially RR.

Love the Schweikart article!

Let's hope the Q "Trust Haspel" comes soon and the IC triumvirate of Rogers, Wray and Haspel can finally seal the perimeter around the Deep State.