/pone/ - My Little Pony★

>>302427 (OP)

Why?

>>302429

>using your own mind for once

That's pretty ironic, coming from a glimmernigger

>>302427 (OP)

Those were both good though.

Luna Eclipsed was great. Maybe next time don't form a cult of personality around a character with ten words of dialogue.

>>302429

>>302433

>>302434

>>302437

>>302439

Oh my God I will fucking murder you, you immature little shits. Do you have any idea who you're talking to, you shitposting lunatics? Do you enjoy torture?

>>303027

>Do you have any idea who you're talking to

Gonna take a stab in the dark… uhm… Ray Romano

Negative quality review? So a crappy review. You can find tons of that all over the internet.

>>302433

What was their woona headcanon?

>>303027

You will not, dumb manlet fuck.

>>303052

People thought she was all shy and submissive like a blue Fluttershy because she says "I'm sorry sister" at the end of the series opener.

>>303041

>>302430

>Why

Every single review about MLP is full of asskissing hasdrones, even the biggest waifufagging whiners are hasdrones. I'm glad their shitty number of views represents how uninteresting and plain retarded their opinions are. I've seen 8 year olds who can speak more clearly and say something more substanceful than the entirety of MLP's fanbase.

That's why I would like not just an anti-hasbro reviewer, but an intelligent one who has something substanceful to say and express in a quick manner. Someone who's experience in writing, storyboarding, directing, soundtrack, dialogue, voice acting, characterization, plots, finer details and overall ideas and can be exactly on point with his criticism.

>>303052

My assumption was that she was a playful mischievous intellectual with confidence, but she was crazy, angry and a sad fuck.

I based this off Nightmare Moon's personality and how would Celestia's relative behave.

Nightmare Moon made some really sad faces like somebody just killed her puppy when Twilight said the EoH were working.

Well who's gonna do it?

>>303106

>That's why I would like not just an anti-hasbro reviewer,

It would be better for a critic to not have a particular bias going into it.

>but an intelligent one who has something substanceful to say and express in a quick manner.

Anyone with anything worth saying would not waste their time reveiwing a cartoon on YouTube.

>>303106

My comment was poking fun at your grammatical error. Instead of negative quality review, which implies that the quality is negative hence a shitty review, you should have wrote negative review. It was merely a shitpost friendo.

>>302427 (OP)

You're looking in the wrong place. I suggest you go to /lit/erature, but you need to micromanage the living shit out of them till they quit it with the purple prose.

I highly doubt anyone in this fandom has the mental capacity and vocabulary to make a substanceful review, not when everyone in this fandom is a social misfit who barely ties together 2 sentences.