>>10543
>No, they're funding Chabad because they support it, and want to advance its anti-gentile agenda. Are you postulating that Kushner took over Chabaed and made it BASED now, in the same way that Qcumbers say Trump "freed" Saudi Arabia?
You know more about this than I do. I will need to do some more research before forming a conclusion. What I do know is this:
The Pharisees killed Jesus, and Israel paid for their sins. Jerusalem was sacked. The remaining Jews were doomed to wander the earth for the next two millennia. The Romans also paid. The cowardice of Pontius Pilate in dealing with the Pharisees marks the approximate high point of the Roman Empire. After this it was invaded and its people were replaced.
All who reject Jesus, die.
John 14:6
>Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
>Trump's antisemitism executive order.
Trump's EO is in support of Israel. This is why
>Shockingly, Jews are not thankful to Trump for this extraordinary action done for them, and are still trying to impeach him.
Because they are different Jews, Jews who have given their souls to the devil, as did the Pharisees some two thousand years ago, and as with the Pharisees, they will be subject to fire and bloodshed, after which their souls will burn for an eternity in Hell.
In your first picture, you state:
>Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis
This is somewhat reasonable, apart from labeling simple facts (some Jews killed Jesus; some Jews predate upon the goyim) as antisemitism. It would be reasonable entirely if they were to qualify their statement:
>Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis in general
For this would mean that we could single out particularly evil Israeli Jews for harsher treatment, whereas the statement as written could be used to give protection from criticism to any Israeli, being evil or not.
Trump has chosen Israel as an ally, because Israel gives him cover to attack evil diaspora Jews, but Trump appears to have erred in his judgement in returning this favor using the language of Holocaustianity. Trump is a merchant, not a warrior. A warrior, or a priest who supports warriors, would write
>A Jewish Israel is my ally because the idea of Israel is congruent with ethnonationalism, which is natural, and incongruent with globalism, which is unnatural.
Instead, Trump has acted in a cowardly manner, and this manner will alienate him from his natural constituency, being straight white Christian males.
>if Obongo or any other Demokike would have done anything that even resembled either of those things (not involving jews, obviously), kosher conservatives would never shut up about it, but because it's Yael Kushner's dad and being done to protect jews and Israel, there's no problem whatsoever,
Trump is borrowing some of the victimhood status points from Israeli Jews. Again, it is a cowardly strategy, and a failure in the long term, and Trump needs to know that straight white Christian males do not support it.
