>>51262
I think that is all enabled by a dying, obsolete approach to communication that is simply an extension of the prior century of television and telephone networks - one that is to be cast off, as soon as possible.
>>51370
>Also patterns of language
It goes far deeper than that. Along with the standard points of entropy that are given away with any contemporary web browser (see Panopticlick), the act of allowing JS scripts anywhere gives any such party your entire history of physical interactions with and on the website. Going further than that, they could even use click, scrolling and other behaviour to infer the psychographic or phrenological profiles of their users. This kind of mining is inherent to the web 2.0 advertisement model, and allows the full extent of surveillance and censorship that the System depends upon to maintain its presence.
As long as we continue to use location-based addressing and routing systems, including traditional DNS registries, web hosts, websites and the HTTP protocol altogether, and to a lesser extent, the physical infrastructure behind our ISPs and transnational connections, we will continue to suffer. Fortunately, alternative protocols are already starting to flood the market in an attempt to solve the former. What is necessary is that we settle on a system of user indexing (wherein indexes or catalogues of content and its metadata is not kept and moderately entirely by unaccountable administrators, but by anybody with the ability to share them), as well as a set of technologies on top of which to build the new platforms we will inevitably need to draw in the necessary popularity for these systems. Personally, I opt for NDN, IPFS and NNTP.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/primer-information-theory-and-privacy
https://panopticlick.eff.org/
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2017/11/15/no-boundaries-exfiltration-of-personal-data-by-session-replay-scripts/
https://cultstate.com/2017/10/13/The-Butterfly-War/
https://ipfs.io/
https://2hu-ch.org/b/